Wednesday, 30 March 2016

Further On Turning Points

from ‘The Undeniable Reasons Why Civil War Is Near’ - Dave Hodges - March 30
(A list of crucial issues of the - our - day)

Stan March 30, 2016 at 3:26 pm
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)

Both current major political parties need to be dissolved – taken to (a legitimate) court under RICO statutes, for being criminal enterprises because they have put forward ineligible candidates for the office of the presidency – and they know it, for having tried between them a total of 8 times, between 2003 and 2008, to get a constitutional amendment watering down the stringent ‘natural born’ citizen eligibility requirement for the office of POTUS starting through Congress – and failing each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this particular issue. And thus, the Usurper in the office at present needs either voluntarily to resign – seeing that the jig is up – or be removed – by Oathkeepers – and held for trial (in the same sort of court; call it a Common Law court; not the Maritime Law type that is falsely practiced in this day), on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason. And all his minions in the Executive branch agencies and departments rounded up and held for trial as well, for their roles in the attempt to overthrow the American Republic that has been going on. And not to overlook the Elite masterminds behind them, for their roles in this arrogant travesty. Their time now being up – because The People have woken up, are mad as hell, and are not going to take it anymore.

And of course, not to overlook the criminal, Hillary Clinton, to be arrested and held for trial on her own ‘whole host of charges,’ especially for jeopardizing the national security while SoS by dealing with classified documents on an unsecured private email system, and soliciting bribes from foreign governments for her and Bill’s Clinton Foundation personal slush fund. And the list goes on, of things to be set to rights in this country.

The Play being over. It’s time for the Real Thing. Which includes getting rid of the fiat-currency, interest-bearing money system, with its partner in crime, fractional-reserve banking, and running our world ‘economy’ in a different way – ridding ourselves of the venal moneychangers who have been running things for long enough now, and going to a system that operates, not on the motive of profit-making, but by the highest motive that there could ever be: people sharing goods and services – and giving of their best in the process – out of gratitude to their Creator for life with meaning. Out of, in a word: Love. And that opens the doors and windows of our social order to a world of Abundance.

All of which is to say: First things first. First, we recognize, and fully accept, that we are, first of all, spiritual beings having a human experience. And then everything falls into place from there. We might as well go, neither Left nor Right, but Up, anyway, because the monetary system is about to collapse, whatever we do.

Time to choose. And choose wisely. Much depends on our rising – fully – to this occasion. The occasion, of our maturity as the human race. Ready, now, for greater things.

And not a moment too soon, by the looks of things.


We are in this hot water particularly because TPTB saw that the public was sufficiently asleep that our erstwhile masters were able to slip an illegal candidate into the Oval Office, and that was the foot in the door for more - for Obama to use that breach in the wall of the Constitution to move us into a period of the undercutting of the rule of law in favor of the enthronement of the rule of men.  To say, of arbitrary law.  Aka tyranny.  And thus, why his IRS and EPA and BLM and so forth are 'pushing the envelope' so arrogantly: they have the advantage of a time wherein the law is malleable, is whatever the strongest force wishes it to be.  And if anyone stands in their way, they are subject to being taken out, in one way or another.  By bribery - as exemplified by our disgusting set of congressional representatives.  By relativist judges - as exemplified by the ones that have been appointed primarily by Clinton and Obama.  And by outright murder - as exemplified by the examples of Antonin Scalia and LaVoy Finicum, and by the deaths of a considerable number of alternative health practitioners who were blowing the whistle on the cancer fraud, helping the public to discover how to deal with it in an alternative way.  Cancer being not only a great money spinner for the medical-pharmaceutical-government complex, but a great way to take out individuals who get on the government's shortlist.  

Before we do away with the old ways of doing things altogether, we need to get back to them; to 'set things right,' and thus start out on a clean slate, reflecting truth, integrity, and honor.  Thereby to have earned our 

Next Steps.

On Turning Points

“We set out to make a movie, now we’re making history. Every major newspaper is saying don’t go see a movie they haven’t watched themselves. What’s next, are they going to tell us to start burning books in the streets? We’ve never seen anything like this. This is supposed to be a country based on freedom of expression, and our entire media that [claims to] represent speech and expression, is telling everybody to shut down free speech. Journalism is officially DEAD in America.” – Del Bigtree

This is the producer of the docu film VAXXED - which tells the true story of CDC scientist and whistleblower Dr. William Thompson who publicly admitted to fabricating scientific data at the CDC in order to hide the known links between vaccines and autism - which has been pulled from Robert De Niro’s Tribeca Film Festival, under pressure from unknown sources, but which has managed to have a one-week showing at a theater in NYC (the Angelika Film Center), starting April 1.  No, this is no April Fool’s joke; the corporate world in the U.S.A. really does have such power over We, the People.  

It’s the same with GMOs.  And with ‘climate change’ - that other major untruth biggie, that TPTB are trying to spring on us right now; all of with which to merge us into their totalitarian, ‘1984’-like New World Order. 

Some background.  First, the ‘climate change’ canard.  For which I can do no better than to refer the reader to The New American issue of Jan. 4th this year, and in particular its article entitled ‘The Global Warming Carbon Regime’.  The subhead tells it like it is:

“Many Westerners [esp, our targeted youth] are on board with carbon taxes and a carbon regime because they believe they are helping save the planet.  But that is not the purpose of the CO2 controls.”  Which is to control us serfs, in their feudalistic New World Order.  Its conclusion:

“A 400-page report that [Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany; “one of the major tax-supported think tanks providing the World Bank with pseudo-scientific studies to justify confiscating the wealth of the planet in the name of saving nature”] co-authored entitled World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability sheds important light on where these elitists intend to direct their decarbonization effort.  Published in 2011, as a ‘Flagship Report’ of the German Advisory Council on Global Change (WGBU), of which Schellnhuber is the chair, the report refers to itself as a ‘master plan’ for ‘The Great Transformation’.

“According to World in Transition, ‘If the radical change into a low carbon society is to succeed,’ the world ‘must leave the epoch of nation states behind’ and move toward more and more  ‘global governance.’  The new world state envisioned, according to the WGBU, will be a more ‘proactive state’ and a more ‘enabling state,’ unencumbered by old-fashioned notions of constitutional limitations and natural law.

“Politically, says the WGBU, this transformation ‘requires a historically unprecedented transcending of established sovereignty concepts.’

“Or, as Christiana Figueres, the UN’s climate czarina, puts it, ‘a complete transformation of the economic structure of the world.’  And, Figueres emphasizes, it is ‘centralized transformation,’  leaving no doubt that the central planners intend to be in charge of directing every minutia in the move to the  ‘Great Transformation.’”

I am reminded of the ‘best-laid schemes of mice and men,’ which gang aft agley…

But not far off, at that.  Consider how the agenda of TPTB is to “speed the transition to the new ‘decarbonized’ future”.  Actually: that’s true.  Just not in the way that our erstwhile Controllers plan things to be.  To say: We are moving from a carbon-based state of being to a crystalline-based state.  On our way up to a higher level of being, closer to our ultimate state, of beings purely of Light.     

But in the meantime, there is such as this scheme to use the meme of  ‘climate change’ to put us firmly under the thumb of TPTB.  And in the same sort of way - that is, of false scientific premises put forward in order to put us under their control - there is the nasty business of vaccinations, and our erstwhile Controllers’ attempt to sell us on their ‘safety’.   And so, to that particular subject, to wrap this blog up.               

From the Natural News web site:

“Natural News has since uncovered an exclusive BOMBSHELL story on how the Nazi-linked Sloan Foundation, founded by a Nazi collaborator who helped the Third Reich conquer much of Europe, pays cash “bribes” to the producers of films shown at Sundance and Tribeca, exerting influence to shape film scripts in the direction of supporting eugenics, genetic engineering and the domination of science over humankind.

“It is widely believed that Sloan Foundation “science advisors” pressured Robert De Niro to pull the VAXXED film from Tribeca, claiming the film would cause people to question the safety of vaccines. Click here for our Sloan Foundation infographic that reveals its links to the Third Reich, eugenics and depopulation agendas…”

from ‘BREAKING: Robert De Niro was clearly threatened by the vaccine establishment to censor the VAXXED documentary from Tribeca… new details emerge’ - Mike Adams - March 27
Calvinius 17 hours ago (March 29)

Meanwhile back in the real world, it's a proven fact that vaccines do not cause autism. It is a biological impossibility for vaccines to cause autism.



  • kibitzer3
    Calvinius a minute ago (March 30)
    Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by Natural News.

    Curious, then, that the Vaccine Court has acknowledged that vaccines cause ADEM (acute disseminated encephalomyelitis). Another word for autism spectrum disorder. But hey - it's a biological impossibility. Right?


The trolls are out in force on this ‘anti-vax’ issue.  Not just because vaccines are part of a huge monetary empire - the medical-pharmaceutical-government complex.  But because vaccines are a major vector for controlling us serfs.  Not only by keeping us weak and ill (vaccines depress our immune systems, besides having a plethora of side effects in themselves).  But by their intentionally-engineered ingredients, of the likes of anti-fertility agents, and even killing agents (known as bacteriophages). 

We are, in short, ‘troublesome beasties’ to these, our erstwhile masters, as long as we have any degree of a sense of freedom from their plans for us.  

Whereas, in truth, 

We Are All One.   

But you wouldn’t know that, sometimes, would you.  The way some of us act, in this realm of duality and seeming separation.  With free will to give us some ‘leg room’.  To act our our various parts, in The Play.  Which is the thing in which to catch our consciences.


We are about to find that Oneness truism out.

So, don’t let the bastards get you down.

Their days are numbered.

And they will come around, in their own time.  In the meantime:

it’s harvest time for the rest of us. 

So, I repeat: don’t let ‘them’ get you down.  

'They' are in acual fact 'us'.

Love them.  And leave them.  If you have to.

To answer a higher calling, than their ‘call’ for a docile herd of cattle, to do their bidding.  Or else.

Those days are over.

At this Turning Point.  This point of a 

Great Transformation, indeed.

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

You Couldn't MakeThis Stuff Up...

...Unless You Were Someone like Shakespeare

So, let me get this straight.  Rafael ’Ted’ Cruz was born in Canada.  So he is a naturalized citizen of the U.S. at best.*  And born of a Cuban citizen father.  So he is a dual citizen at best as well.  But wait a minute - his American citizen mother had, before his birth, taken Canadian citizenship, and couldn’t have been a dual American citizen as well, because Canada at the time didn’t recognize dual citizenship.  So she would have to have relinquished her American citizenship, in order to become a  Canadian citizen.  So, at the very, very least, our Ted was a dual citizen of both Canada and Cuba; but, since Canada didn’t allow dual citizenship at the time of Ted’s birth, he was born a Canadian citizen at actual best.  But, he gave up his Canadian citizenship when he started his run for the American presidency, and ’discovered’ (this self-described ‘constitutional expert’) that he had such documentation.  So: what country is he actually a citizen of?  Or countries??  

There is the possibility that he is a citizen of Cuba, from his father’s citizenship.  But that depends on what Cuba’s regulations were at the time of his birth regarding children of Cuban citizens being born in another country.  But then, there is also the little matter of Canada not having allowed dual citizenship at the time that little Ted was born in that country…

In any event: the bottom line of this little exercise is that he is not eligible for the office of the presidency of the United States IN any event.  So: 

Would the real ‘Ted’ Cruz please stand up?  And admit that it has all been a bit of play-acting?? 

And we can thereby draw a close to this Play that we have been engaged in.  For, as the Bard observed:

"All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players; they have their exits and their entrances…"

As for the other aspect of this subject: 

from  ‘Did Glenn Beck Go Too Far?’ - shawn - March 27, posted here March 29
(Beck going too far in lambastingTrump and praising Cruz)


Good commentary, shawn. Thanks.

Cruz "was anointed for this time"?? Like that other ineligible candidate for that office, the you-should-excuse-the-expression incumbent, Obama???

Maybe. In the sense of teaching us that two wrongs don't make a right. And better no wrong in the first place.

So.  Have we now learned our lessons?

Sufficient to progress from here??



* He and his candidacy crew - and TPTB behind the whole shebang; trying to play Bre’r Rabbit with Cruz (’Oh no - don’t throw Cruz into our briar patch - anybody but him.  OR Trump.  Please don’t give us either of them.  But of the two, at least make it Cruz.  Sigh.’  Snicker snicker…) - are trying to play hide the pea in a shell game regarding the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen by getting the public to look at his ‘constitutional expert’s’ explanation that a citizen born out of the country can still be a natural born citizen, by dint of the Naturalization Act of 1790.  Failing to point out that that Act was repealed, by the Naturalization Act of 1795, and on this very point - that the earlier Act’s reference to a NBC led to a misunderstanding of the term, thus corrected, with both Madison and Washington in concurrence.  The Congress in the 1790 Act was in no way amending the original, constitutional Framers’s definition of the term (taken from E. de Vattel’s definitive tome of the day on this whole sort of subject matter, ‘The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law’) - and, in point of fact, could not.  It would take a constitutional amendment itself to do that sort of alteration, to such fundamental a part of the contract as the eligibility requirements for the presidency of the U.S.  Congress alone not having that authority.
   But what’s a little matter like the rule of law, eh. to a regime, and period of time, when we are essentially under the rule of men.  Aka arbitrary law.
   Aka tyranny.  Where the current Executive is exercising all manner of dictatorial powers, and has been for his whole term in that purloined office.  The situation well set up for him by his immediate predecessor in the office.  Another story.  Also to come out; when the Truth outs regarding this whole sorry mess.  Which it will.
   Which - it - will.  And especially since
   it’s time.

Monday, 28 March 2016

Wakeup Call

from ‘What Obama Just Admitted About Illegals Should Make EVERYONE Want To SHUT DOWN The Border!!’ - March 28 
(The  Border agency reports that there have been more than 120 homicides committed by illegal aliens who were allowed to stay in this country.  Obama & Co. are rubbing our noses in it.  Time to respond.  In an intelligent way…)

If Obama admits this is he not in violation of his oath of office and therefor impeachable???

         kibitzer3 Jim Bahen 16 minutes ago (March 28)
  • Correction. He is not a legally sitting president, so impeachment is not the way to go to get him out of that purloined office. He is simply a Usurper, and therefore subject merely to being arrested - by Oath Keepers - and held for trial on a whole host of charges by now (including fraud, perjury, and treason).

  • He is not a legally sitting president because he is not a 'natural born' citizen, which the constitutional Framers understood to mean a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens". That is verbatim from the definitive tome of the day on such subjects, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212. Look it up. The term itself may have gone through some permutations since that time, but the eligibility requirement ITSELF still stands, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. And in point of fact, both major political parties of our day tried a total of 8 times between them, between 2003 and 2008, to get just such an amendment going through Congress - that is, including this particular issue as their common denominator - and failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this particular issue. So: THEY KNEW. And KNOW, what the truth is regarding this subject. And that means that they have colluded in trying to keep the fact of the matter quiet from the American people. Who should have known better than to trust our political parties to tell us the truth about the matter. Which includes the fact that we have been deliberately kept in the dark so that, between them, they can slip the country into their masters' New World Order, as merely a part of a region thereof. Call it the North American Union, or by whatever name, it is what it is: perfidy. And needs to be rejected. And fast.

  • Do your homework. Two good sources: puzo1dotblogspotdotcom and the blog site of CDR C.F. Kerchner (Ret.). And then get ready to take matters into your, and our, own hands. Because we cannot trust our political leadership to do the job for us. We will have to do the job required - to take our country back - ourselves.

  • But then, we were warned, by our Founding Fathers, that this sort of thing might happen. Guess what. It has. And it is up to us to SET THINGS TO RIGHTS. For, the federal constitutional Republic of the United States is worth fighting for. And the world actually needs us to do that job, whether its peoples recognize that fact yet or not. Because this is a battle between the Dark and the Light.

  • Choose your side in this battle well, friend. Your immortal soul depends on your response to this challenge. This - is - it.

  • Oh - and P.S. This means, of course, that neither is Cruz eligible for the office. (Nor Rubio either, for that matter.) So we have a major cleaning job to engage in, now, of both sides of the (so-called) political aisle. But then if we but knew it, we would undoubtedly find that this is what we were born for. That it is no accident that we particular souls under these human body suits are incarnated at this particular time. So - time to rise to the occasion. The occasion, of why WE are here now.

  • It's time, that is to say, to wake up. And on many levels.

Personally - of course - I prefer nonviolent tactics.  Civil disobedience; nonviolence Ghandian-style.  Some possible features: 

Citizens arrests, the perps to be held for trial in Common Law courts, or whatever legitimate courts are called (i.e., pre-Maritime Law courts).  What perps?   All members of Congress for whom there is solid suspicion of having engaged in bribery taking.  Like Paul Ryan; reportedly paid a hefty sum for his work in steering TPA through, and thus keeping alive the TPP, for his masters.  All such suspects to have their files sealed., for investigation of wrongdoing.  Also sealing the files of all the executive-branch agencies, as, e.g., the FDA, for the same purpose (as in their communications with the corporations that they are supposed to be regulating).   And I mention Citizens arrests, because the Oath Keepers can't do everything, be everywhere.   This would be part of patriots having their backs.  As we take our country back.  

And so forth, in that vein.  In

A Call To Action.

Sunday, 27 March 2016

A Sample Speech To The Nation On This Day

On this day of celebration of the return of Life to the world - and possibly, now, Life more abundantly; a speech:

My fellow Americans:

“No person except a natural born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President…”  I quote from Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the law of the land.  And never amended since - except as to add, by the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution, the office of Vice President as well to the requirement; logically enough, given the order of succession to the presidential office.

And what is the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, at least at the time that it was codified in the constitutional contract between the States and the new federal government as an eligibility requirement for the “Office of President” - and that particular federal office ONLY; which will prove to be a tipoff as to its definition?  Well, that is easy enough to ascertain - and why it was such common knowledge at the time that the constitutional Framers didn’t have to include a definition of the term in their contract: we simply go to the historical record, to find what was taught at the time about such matters.  And there it is, as taught in the universities of the day: the definition is contained in the definitive tome of the day on such matters - and which Benjamin Franklin, the Framers’ elder and respected mentor, and who was sitting right there amongst them as a delegate himself to the Constitutional Convention proceedings, was known to have three copies of, in case there was any question in their minds as to what they were being asked to consider in this matter: E. de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law’.  From Book One, Chapter XIX, Sect. 212 - quote:

“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” 

The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers - and as emphasized historically by the letter dated July 25,1787 of John Jay, a well respected statesman of the day - and who subsequently became the first Chief Justice of the new Supreme Court of the United States, not so incidentally - to George Washington in his role as Chair of the Convention proceedings - being to make sure - at least as sure as they could in their time - that the occupant of that office, who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces, had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the United States.  For needing to have been, quote, “born in the country, of parents who are citizens,” unquote.  

And that eligibility requirement, as I say, never having had a constitutional amendment altering it - which is the only way that the eligibility requirement itself could ever be altered over time in the constitutional contract - 

still - stands.  As a major national security concern of our Founding Fathers. 

We come, now, to our day, of proof of the wisdom of their concern.  When a usurpation has taken place.  Of the highest office in the land.  By devious and pernicious people.  To achieve their end.  Which is the overthrow of the federal constitutional republic of the United States of America, and its subsumement into being a mere part of a region of their totalitarian New World Order.  Or their One World Government, as their plan is also designated.  By them, as well as by their detractors.

The latter among which I number myself.  And will go so far as to say: Chief among which I number myself.  

There will be a New World Order.  Also known as a One World Government.  But it will NOT be of the Dark side.

It will be of the Light.  The guiding Light of our common Creator.  To Whom we owe our fealty.

No - one - else.

No - Other.

To that end, I  make the following declaration.

Ted Cruz to stand down, or be stood down, as a candidate for the office of the presidency.

The Usurper himself to stand down, or be stood down, and arrested - by Oath Keepers, current and retired - and held for trial, on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason.

The other political party’s candidate, Hillary Clinton, to be arrested for and on her own ‘whole host of charges,’ including, but far from being limited to, her criminal negligence in handling classified government business over an unsecured email system, and for soliciting bribes from foreign governments for her and Bill's Clinton Foundation front for their personal slush fund.

And speaking of the political parties:

Both the Democrat Party AND the Republican Party’s officials to be arrested and held for trial, on RICO-statute charges, of being criminal enterprises, for a number of reasons; this conspiracy to hijack the presidency, and the nation, chief among them, but not the sole charge.  Among them, being a conspiracy to hijack the voting system in the country.  Each to, and by, its own devious devices.  

And as for, in all these individual instances, being ‘held for trial’: that will be in a legitimate court of law.  Not the bought system of jurisprudence that has ’grown up’ - and I use that term loosely - in this country.  And Maritime Law itself to be replaced by a proper, Natural-oriented system of Law.  More specifically on which, another time.  For now, further on the shopping list of immediate To-do’s; and starting with another aspect of the political parties:

The sitting Congress to be dissolved, for having failed to do its constitutional duty to rein in a rogue Executive.  New elections tentatively scheduled to be held within a time certain.  But events will unfold as they will, in that area of our social order.

The Usurper’s whole nest of vipers in the Executive branch of agencies and departments to be cleaned out.  And as for other aspects of the Usurper’s reign: 

All the legislation that he signed into law, and all the Executive Orders and Presidential Directives that he issued, and all the appointments that he made - including to the Supreme Court of the United States - to be rendered null and void.  And of course, the same with all the majority decisions in which his judicial appointees had a hand.

 It needs to be as if the Usurper had never been there.  Since he never was legally.

Only under the rule of men.  Also known as arbitrary law.

Also known as tyranny.

If you are going to go for a tyrant, you have gone too far, and I will take over now.  And I will see that this nation returns to the rule of law.

Only, this time, under the rule of law

of our Creator.

Stay tuned - and within yourself; to say, to your higher Self - for further developments.

That will be all for now.

As we, together,

set things to rights.

In this country.

And for the world as a whole.  Becoming



Saturday, 26 March 2016

Some Facts Of Life

I agree with the sentiment as expressed by Thomas Jefferson that, not only in regards to the judicial branch of our federal government but the legislative and executive branches as well, to, quote, "Bind them down from mischief with the chains of the Constitution."  These Beltway Bozos need to learn some limitations.  And having said that, I also agree with the sentiment as expressed by that other of our illustrious Founding Fathers, James Madison, that, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary" - i.e., we wouldn't need the likes of constitutions.

However, at 'the end of the day' - so to speak - we are angels.  If but apprentice angels, in this realm of choice, duality, seeming separation from our basic natures. With some, however, being in the nature of fallen angels.  Who have, however, given the rest of us the benefit of the equivalent of the other blade of a pair of consciousness-raising scissors to help us cut our way through the Illusion, and get back to the state of our true being.  When we arrive at where we started, and know the place as if for the first time, to paraphrase the poet T.S. Eliot.*

So.  A work in progress is humankind.  And now - we're here.

Let's make the most of it.

'It': the experience.

The learning experience.


the Arrival.


it's graduation time.

Time, to celebrate.  And then

move on.

Ever, on.

Onward.  And upward.

Phototropic beings that we are.


*To be precise:

"We shall not cease from exploring, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time."  Four Quartets, Sect. V.
   And to be even more precise - to give the poet his full due:

We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.
Through the unknown, remembered gate
When the last of earth left to discover
Is that which was the beginning;
At the source of the longest river
The voice of the hidden waterfall
And the children in the apple­tree
Not known, because not looked for
But heard, half­heard, in the stillness
Between two waves of the sea.
Quick now, here, now, always-
A condition of complete simplicity
(Costing not less than everything)
And all shall be well and
All manner of thing shall be well
When the tongues of flame are in­folded
Into the crowned knot of fire
And the fire and the rose are one.


The fire and the rose.  A rather fitting metaphor, that, methinks. And as my having referred to roses and thorns just previously.  And at this particular time.  In the green month, and the golden month, of this year.
   This particular year.

Friday, 25 March 2016

For The Record

E. de Vattel's definition of a 'natural born' citizen - 'from The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212 (and as taught in the universities of the day):

"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country." (Emphasis mine)


from ‘Why The Elite’s Psyops Against Trump Will Not Work’ - Dave Hodges - March 25

Stan March 25, 2016 at 8:30 pm
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)

The REAL issue is that Cruz is not eligible for the office, and once that gets established in the minds of The People, the next step will be to have the Usurper in the Oval Office at this time be arrested, by Oath Keepers, and held for trial (on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason) before he can do any more damage to the federal constitutional republic of the U.S.A. than he has already done. The definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, which the historical record clearly shows that the constitutional Framers were going by, is in E. de Vattel’s definitive tome of their day on such matters, ‘The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law’, Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212:

“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers…” This is an eligibility requirement for the office of POTUS to this day, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. And ever since the 12th Amendment, the NBC requirement also – logically – applies to the office of the VP as well.

All patriots: Check this definition out, and print it out for your use, and spread it around the country/on Comments threads as far and as wide as you can. We will take back our country yet, from those who are attempting to “transform” it into being a mere part of a region of TPTB’s totalitarian New World Order. And tell anybody who will listen: ‘Not MY country, you won’t.’


I have just come across some references as to why Glenn Beck and so many Mormons have backed Ted Cruz for the presidency.  Glenn, and others, have apparently helped persuade Utahns that Ted is the 'White Horse' of a Joseph Smith prophecy; that in the last days,

"You will see the Constitution of the United States almost destroyed.  It will hang like a thread as fine as a silk fiber."

They're backing the wrong horse.

They need to back the 'horse' that tells them the Truth of things.  With especial regard to the Constitution.

Just saying.


P.S. Just watched a report of Info War's David Knight from Utah on the Republican caucuses there earlier this week, wherein he detailed all the corruption that went on in that election, run by an outfit called Smartmatics, out of Venezuela.  No security at the voting places, supposed 'online' votes coming in by the boxful at the end to be included in the count, no exit polling - the works.

Sleaze.  Pure sleaze.  Third world country stuff.  

I am angry at this takedown of MY country.  And especially such hijinks going on as well in oh-so moral Utah.

Just saying.

And The War Goes On...

from ‘Has Glenn Beck Lost His Mind?’ - Steve (Ning Creator) - March 24 
(Beck attacked Trump’s wife for being in a nude mag photo shoot back in 2000, whitewash picked up now by a Cruz support ad, which triggered Trump to warn Cruz…etc. etc.)

Reply by Charles Ramsay 14 hours ago

TEA Party and Beck are both backing Cruz. They both pose as Texans and bring out the dirt of Texas poiitics,

  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Steve - Ning Creator 14 hours ago (March 24)

Charles, is the #1 site 'by far' for the T. Party, largest direct mail program, email program, biggest traffic our reach is in the tens of millions and we HAVE NOT endorsed anyone yet,not till after the primary will we throw our weight behind the candidate if Cruz or Trump. 

We have endorsed No One. 

  • Reply 
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (March 25)

Before you get to endorsement, you should ask yourselves, What is the difference between a born citizen and a natural born citizen?  If you don't know the answer - which it would appear is the case - you should.  Much hinges on this 'little' matter.

A 'natural born' citizen is a person born in the country (or its legal equivalent) of citizen parents.  (That's what makes it 'natural'.)  A 'born citizen' can have been born outside of the country, and could have parents of different nationalities, as long as one of them is of the country in question.  

It is a critical difference.  The constitutional Framers put that more stringent category of citizen as an eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency - and that particular office ONLY - so that the occupant of that office, who would as well become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.  And we have seen the wisdom of their attempt, in the form of the Usurper in that position as we speak - that We the People have allowed to get away with his usurpation, because of our lack of understanding of the Constitution in this regard.

The definition of a NBC is from the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212.  And there has been no constitutional amendment to the contrary of that requirement.  (Several have been tried; another story.)  As for those who attempt to argue that there are only 2 kinds of citizens, naturalized or natural born: Not so.  As clearly attested to by the fact that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention proceedings, made a proposal that the president need only be a  'born citizen' - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent category, of a 'natural born' citizen.

So, to back Cruz for the office would be to attempt to make two wrongs make a right.  Which would knock us irreparably into the free-for-all arena of functioning, not under the rule of law - to say, of the Constitution - but under the rule of men.  Aka arbitrary law.  Aka tyranny.  

Come ON, Tea Party crowd. You can do better than this.  You MUST do better than this.  For the sake of the nation.  To say, of the federal constitutional republic of the U.S.A.  Not for it to become a mere part of a region of TPTB's totalitarian New World Order.  The choice is, really, yours.  Is up to you.  Is how you respond to this challenge.  So far, you are failing to rise to the occasion.  Sad to say.  But there's hope yet.

But tempus fugit. 


And in the meantime, the Usurper and his minions draw the noose tighter around the necks of 'potential domestic terrorists' - aka patriots - in many ways...

While waiting to pick up my pizza earlier this evening (Thursday), I was getting around to reading further in an article in the Jan. 4 issue of The New American on the Paris UN Climate Summit, subtitled: 'Shackling the Planet to 'Save' It'.  Just so.  The 'Right' to be predictably labeled 'hatist' (and a new such smear term that I have just come across, a 'threat to world peace'). It is all part of The Plan, by TPTB, to herd all of humanity into their gulag, and replace 'liberty' with (state-imposed) 'equality,' with some being more equal than others, is all.  And the rest of us being subjected to potential transhumanist 'upgrading' - wedding humans with robotic material.  That's what our erstwhile Masters think of us.  Cattle.  To be corralled.  And 'treated'.  And culled, at will. 

But I prefer to think of the lighter side of things, these days.  At least as much as I can.  I prefer to think that all of this will be changed. 

Because our Creator is, ultimately, in charge of our Source's creation.

Free will notwithstanding.  

In this realm of choice.  And seeming separation.  

When, in actuality, 

All Is One.  

And it is our job to get back to that state of Being.   

And no one promised us a rose garden in the process.

Except one with a lot of thorns, to go with a lot of beautiful blossoms as well. 

Seems you can't have the one without the other.


I wait.  

Bide my time.

And trust in

The Process.

And the highest to be served.

Because, after all is said and done:

The universe has Purpose; and that purpose is Good.

Wednesday, 23 March 2016

Party Games

Speaking Of Games…

l, The Republicans

Let’s take, oh, say, baseball.  Runner on first base, itching to steal second.   The pitcher goes into his motion to pitch, pauses, keeping an eye on the runner; then makes a move to pitch the ball to the batter at the plate.  The runner dashes for second base - bur the pitcher turns around and throws him out at second.  The first base umpire calls a balk.  But the home base umpire overrules him, saying, ‘It was only a little balk.’  The first base umpire objects to the ruling.  But the home base umpire says, ‘I’m the chief umpire here, and what I say, goes.  That’s the ruling.  Play ball.’  And the game continues.  (Or not.)  

Or how about basketball.  A player shoots a free throw, and misses.  But the referee rules that he made it; saying, ‘Close enough.’  

Republicans: Your player, Ted Cruz, doesn’t even come close.

2. The Democrats

‘Boss, we’ve got a problem.’


‘They just won’t bite.  Illegal aliens up the gazoo, amnesty E.O.’s, sanctuary cities, no border to speak of, laughable screening of ‘refugees’ from, er, ‘freedom fighter’ territories, running them in here under cover of darkness but still obvious enough to be reported on, bringing the UN into our cities, - you name it.  The idiots won’t bite.  Must’ve gone a little too strong with the stuff in their drinking water supplies.’

‘Or the EMFs into their neighborhoods.  Can we cut that shit back a bit??  Until - you know…’

‘Could.  I’ll talk to the crew.’

‘Do that.  And don’t bother me until you have something solid to report, that I can take to the bank.  As it were.  Now, I’ve got to go practice my free throws.’

‘Why.  All you have to do - ‘

‘Yes yes.  But every once in awhile, we come up with an honest man, who can’t be bought.  And you know how messy that can get.’


‘Gotta do this right.  They need to make the first move.  Well; the second.  So that we can make the third.’

‘Gotcha, boss.‘

‘And what have I told you about calling me that.’


‘That’s better.’

The other just wasn’t close enough, you see.  Sometimes, ‘close enough’ isn’t good enough.

It all depends on who’s calling the shots.

As it were.

Now, about that other little such matter, regarding the security-breach criminality of Hillary…… I wait for the political scene in this country to catch up with reality.  So that we can get on with things.

With the little matter of a Golden Age.  Just waiting.

For The People to do more than just call 'em as they see 'em.

But as they really are.

For example: Do you know - really know - that you are a "threat to world peace" if you are opposed to insufficiently vetted 'refugees' being embedded in our cities and towns; and that you can be 'detained' and held indefinitely, without trial, under powers granted to, and unilaterally assumed by, your current Dear Leader if you become too much of a troublemaker in this regard - i.e., a "Far Right Extremist"?  Who says so?  The UN, and BO's administration say so, via the (so-called) PATRIOT Act, the NDAA, E.O. 13603,* and the 'Strong Cities Network' Trojan Horses in America.  You must know your place in the coming New World Order.  And that is on your knees in front of your Massa.  'Yessa - nosa - two bags full, Massa - coming right up!'

(Do I qualify yet, you denizens of the dark??  Seeing as how the only honorable place to be in such a  kingdom is in its prison.  In a prison within its prison.

A government that can define a 'natural born' citizen any way it wants can most certainly define a 'domestic extremist-cum-terrorist' any way that it wants.  Especially if it listens to the Southern Poverty Law Center. As this one does.  But don't let me keep you from your ball game...)


* by which Obama gave himself absolute power and control over all means of communication for any reason, including in an 'emergency' - at his call.  This includes TV, radio, cable, Internet, and all cell phone communications.  Plus the drones that he has ordered over the skies of our once proud nation, now at the mercy of a would-be dictator.  And actually, not even would-be any more.
   Ah - but this is all 'business as usual,' doncha know  Nothing to see here, folks.  Move right along.
   Now, about that bridge in the Arizona desert that I have to sell you...

Keeping An Oar In

further on ‘The Path to the Presidency’ - March 20
(first, some background on the Comments thread, before my definitive wrap-up on the issue:)


The actual wording of the definition is in E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' Book One, Ch XIX, Sect. 212, as a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens..." And yes, it does go on: "those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers..." The mother and the father were considered as one, and the father was the one. It's called the doctrine of coverture. That part of things was changed in the 1930s, with the mother becoming a citizen in her own right; but the eligibility requirement itself still stands. The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers, in putting that special eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office, being to make sure that the occupant of that office, who would as well become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.

Our experience with the Usurper in the Oval Office as we speak should be evidence enough of the wisdom of our Founding Fathers, in doing THEIR best to keep such an atrocity from happening. The rest was up to us descendants. Our bad.



       NativeCalifornian kibitzer3 3 days ago  (March 20)
  • Cruz is eligible... it has been challenged... Trump has blustered that he would sue... he hasn't sued... supposedly it isn;t for lack of money or lawyers on retainer... so where is the follow through... maybe this is an example of the "follow through" of Trump on his promises... like his promises to his ex-wives... or the workers and suppliers and creditors he reneged on his promises to when he filed BANKRUPTCY FOUR (4) TIMES, or those 5,000 or so Trump University enrollees... this is exactly what concerns me about Trump... I don't want another chameleon politician... I want a TRUE and steadfast conservative who loves America and its Constitution and founding principles.

  • Anyway here is expert (not self-proclaimed and self-elected and self-exalted armchair constitutional expert) opinion...

  • Here is the eligibility issue in a nutshell…

  • To all those here and elsewhere that like to play on this tripe... put up the class action lawsuit or stop pushing the lie and propaganda.

  • 1
  • Reply

           kibitzer3 NativeCalifornian 3 days ago (March 20)

         I have checked out your sources. And they are almost laughable in terms of hard facts. Talk
         about shyster-lawyer gobbledygook. Here is a REAL site for solid info on this subject:

         Also the blog site of CDR C.F. Kerchner (Ret.) And I could go on. But don't let me spoil your


           Dan kibitzer3 2 days ago 
  • kibitzer3, YOU are wrong!!! This issue has been decided in several courts over the years and because TED CRUZ's mother is a US citizen Ted CRUZ is also a natural born citizen even though born abroad. Barry Goldwater ran for president in 1964 and he was born in Arizona before it was a state. George Romney ran for president in 1968 and hew was born in Mexico. John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone. All of these presidential candidates were determined to be natural born citizens even though they were born abroad. Furthermore, In just the past few days US District Judge Jill Parrish ruled that TED CRUZ is a natural born citizen and eligible to be president. 
  • Ted Cruz is the only constitutional conservative left in the race. He memorized the Constitution when he was a teenager. He fought and won before the US Supreme court more times than any other lawyer in Texas history. He fought against establishment senators to stop the raising of the debt ceiling, against Obamacare and fought for and won our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms (Heller Case). While he's been fighting for limited government and our constitution, Trump has been donating thousands to Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Clinton herself. He has been a liberal and supported liberals his whole life up until he decided to run for president. All i ask is for my fellow conservatives to judge both of these men by the same criteria. I will support the nominee regardless but for our country's sake i pray that it is TED CRUZ!!

  • 1
  • Reply

  •           kibitzer3 Dan 2 days ago (March 21)

    • Dan, with all due respect to the virtues of your candidate, and the perceived drawbacks of the other in question, that is not the issue. The issue is the legality - the eligibility requirement - of the matter. I can't speak to what has happened in the other instances to which you refer (I have been living out of the country for many years). But I know one thing: Two wrongs don't make a right. The NBC requirement was put in the Constitution to avoid THE VERY THING that has been evidenced by the Usurper in the Oval Office as we speak; to keep someone out of that particular federal office - the highest office in the land; and being the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces to boot - who was not born with SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S., by virtue of having been born in the country (or its legal equivalent) to parents who were its citizens at the time of the person's birth. That was the understanding of the term when it was put in the constitutional contract for that particular office (for which there is considerable historical evidence), and it has not been changed since by the only way that it can legitimately be changed: by a constitutional amendment.

    • I don't know what kind of universe that you naysayers to The Truth of things think that you are living in. But I live in, and support with every fiber of my being, a universe that is made of such qualities as Truth and Justice, to its very core. And Truth and Justice WILL out, regardless of what compromises are made along the way, by our human failures to act accordingly. Yes, to err is human. But not to correct our errors is folly. It is to slow our progress down, as spiritual beings having a human experience, to a positive end. As I say: What folly that would be. That would be to cut off our noses to spite our own faces.

    • Thank you, no thank you. And no thank you to those who would try to act that way to MY country. To whom I say: Get thee behind me. I will brook no such nonsense. Go live in your own universe. Of such qualities as corruption and sleaze. Leave this one alone. Or pay the consequences.

    • Reply

Dan kibitzer3 a day ago (March 22)

I can see that you are a very deep and thoughtful person and a deep believer in Truth and Justice. All the more reason you should get behind a candidate like TED CRUZ! Let's not make this issue more complicated than it should be. The Constitution states that the president must be at least 35, a resident of US for at least the past 14 years and a natural born citizen. However, it does not define what a natural born citizen is. Three years after the Constitution was written the Naturalization Act of 1790 did define it. It states that children of citizens of the US even if born abroad are natural born citizens unless the person's father has never been a resident of the US. Cruz's mother was born in the US and is a citizen. His father was born in Cuba but came and resided in the US before Ted was born in Canada. I hope this puts this matter to rest but if not please state your case and I will gladly study the issue some more.

  • kibitzer3 Dan 4 minutes ago (March 23)

  • I appreciate your open-mindedness to look at ALL of the facts of the matter, Dan (and others in the same camp). Here's my response:

  • The Cruz camp & acolytes put up the matter of the Naturalization Act of 1790. They fail to let the public know that that Act was repealed, by the Naturalization Act of 1795, ON THIS VERY POINT: that they realized that the reference to a 'natural born' citizen in the earlier Act was misleading. (It was only used there in the sense that in some specific instances, the child could be, quote, "considered as" a nbc; not that it actually WAS a nbc.) The 1795 such Act struck out the reference to a 'natural born' citizen, and made it read just a 'citizen'. And both Madison and Washington acquiesced in that correction. It was never intended to be a repeal of the 'natural born' eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency. That still stood; and still stands, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. The reference: E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212. Look it up.
  • This is ALL dealt with in fine (and to say, excellent) detail at Attorney Mario Apuzzo's blog site, puzo1dotblogspotdotcom. Please check out his take on the whole matter, which includes subsequent Supreme Court decisions. And I am open to any further statement you would like to make on the matter, subsequent to your checking out these references. Because I get that you are an honorable man.

  • P.S. Also, just being a 'born citizen' does not work either, in this situation, as clearly attested to by the fact that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention proceedings, made a proposal at the Convention that the president need only be, quote, "born a citizen" - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent 'natural born' category of citizen. I append this point because some Cruz apologists try to claim that there are only two kinds of citizens, naturalized or natural born. Not so.