The nature, character, history, birth, upbringing, and presidential eligibility of Barack Obama are beside the point of the speech. It could be given (with only slight adjustments) by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (General Martin Dempsey). It was written, it is true, with Obama’s style and character in mind (the Lincoln quote for example), but my goal was to write a speech announcing a great victory of freedom for the world, including a brief and reassuring historic overview, as given by the spokesman who would be the most reassuring symbol of continuity amid upheaval for most of the world (our American partisan insanity, and birther madness notwithstanding). My goal was to create hope and generate vibrational momentum towards the realization of the global transformation.
But we will all be better off if a speech like this one is given by the President of the United States – think of him what you will.
If General Dempsey gives such a speech, announcing an interim government, the world would view it as the first coup in American history (well, at least the first visible one, as the years 1865, 1963, and 2000 come to mind as the occasions of non-military coups), and the myth of American democracy would be shattered. If Dempsey gives it, the majority of Americans who voted for Obama (present disenchantment notwithstanding) will likely conclude that the rightfully elected president has been deposed by the military in what will look at first like a Tea Party-inspired coup. If, however, Obama gives it, and announces that the election process has been corrupted for decades (including his own election in 2008), and that paper ballot elections will be held shortly, then a peaceful transition becomes more possible – especially if the announcement is accompanied by the reassuring and happy news of debt forgiveness, release of global funds, and development of free-energy technologies.
However, such a speech can only take place either before November 7th because of military intervention to suspend elections, or in the wake of an Obama victory, even if tainted.
It goes utterly against the grain for me as an American to wish to halt a presidential election, but if the elections proceed as scheduled, that course is rife with peril. For they are tainted, and will be fraudulent, and whatever the outcome, upheaval will ensue. And there are grave risks here, the worst case scenario being one in which Romney is (fraudulently) pronounced the winner, in which case any such speech by Obama will be viewed as de facto announcement of a dictatorship by the losing candidate. As Romney is the candidate of the Bush cabal, the banksters would then have millions of rightfully outraged American voters on their side as they attempt to foment civil war. This is the scenario that must be avoided at all costs.
It may be that my estimate of Barack Obama is in error, and that he is merely the cabalist tool now condemned by former supporters. My intuition tells me otherwise, but I am merely one person, and do not have all the facts.
In any case, his power at this time is so much more limited than we can imagine. He cannot effect this transformation on his own. He can only be (if indeed he is) a figure of integrity and humility in the wake of the Shift, not the principal actor who accomplishes it. It is up to the Pentagon patriots, the oathkeepers in the agencies, the law enforcement officers, the US Marshalls, and the calm and centered, patient militia (let us hope that they are so!) to make this change possible.
And, of course, it is up to all of us to calmly share what we know, and to be of service to our communities where we can.
Michael
- Thank you once again Michael for sharing your enLIGHTful thoughts. My focus will remain with the vision you so graciously presented and one which I too have intuitively held for some time now. We all are more powerful than we give ourselves credit for and what we THINK and how we FEEL can change every thing for the good of all.
Warm Blessings of Light and Love,
Cindy