Tuesday, 10 January 2017

On Getting All Shook Up


A friend has sent me a clip of Meryl Streep's 'performance' at the Golden Globes Award event, as commented on, dutifully snidely, by The Guardian, the UK's leading liberal rag.  My response:

"There is something ironic here about Meryl Streep's 'performance'.  And let me say up front that I have had respect for her, as a big star who has been willing to do small films because they had heart/human interest.  One was based on a true story (as I recall) about a small boy who became brain-damaged by a vaccine shot, which rendered him with seizures, and the difficulty she as his mother had in getting her son some attention from a basically indifferent medical profession, but who finally got some help from an alternative practitioner who had worked out a diet to help such kids (a ketogenic diet).  So I can understand, and appreciate, that she may well have a very soft spot for disabled people.  Having said that, I would say to her, in this current regard:       

Meryl; with all due respect: Check your effing facts.  Trump did NOT "imitate a disabled person".  That was a total beat-up, by the in-the-bag-for-Hillary media attempting to get 'gotcha' things on Trump - anything to attempt to derail him, from challenging their big fave in Hillary.  I  saw all those video clips.  He was not imitating that reporter - who he may not even have known had anything disabled about him; his disability was/is not all that apparent, and anyway, in the segment that the media beat up, Trump wasn't even talking about that reporter.  He was talking about something else, and he uses his hands a lot in talking that way about people who are getting all shook up [as in flustered] about whatever.  I've seen clips of him doing that even well before that reporter ever came into the picture.  This is a total beat-up, and obviously pushed by the liberal Hollywood crowd; the liberals failing to correct themselves on the matter, because such crap is all that they have to try to beat Trump over the head with.  And if Meryl doesn't apologize to Trump for not checking her facts first, before making that sort of accusation on prime-time TV, in front of a huge viewing audience, she should be terribly ashamed of herself. 

I have lost my respect for her.  

There is the larger story here, too; how the 'liberals' are using every trick in the book to attempt to undo Trump's victory, because that is the far Left's nature.  Saul Alinsky - who was Hillary's mentor; and whose 'community organizer' techniques Obama cut his  'community organizer's' teeth on - said it well in his revolutionary primer, Rules For Radicals: 'Whatever It Takes.'  'By Any Means Necessary.'  Meaning, in practice: Use every trick and stratagem in the book, to accomplish your mission.  Lie, cheat, steal, kill - whatever it takes.  Because there is no right or wrong but thinking makes it so.  Whatever advances your goal is right, and whatever impedes your goal is wrong.  And these far Leftists in our day are out to attempt to take over the world, for their totalitarian New World Order; and Anything Goes.  To them.  Totally immoral as they are.

And I'll quit here, because I am getting very angry.  And you have a good point, about the value of not letting things get to you.

But sometimes.........................................."

--

These are perilous times.  The New World Order crowd wanted their victory, big time; and so, they are out for blood.  Literally.  Before everything potentially comes out about them, under a Trump administration.  Their monetary games; their predilection for not only pedophilia but for satanic rituals, including drinking the blood of their 'sacrificial' victims: the whole ball of wax.

As this Era is wrapped up.  And they are put back in their box, for a long time.  Unless they choose to come over to the Light.

Their choice.

Still.

But sometimes...if I had my way......


...rather than The Way......................

--

P.S. To clarify:  I have checked further into the 'disabled reporter' story, and it turns out that what Trump was doing that the liberals were and are still trying to 'get' him for was giving that reporter guy a hard time for changing his story about a story that he had reported on some 16 years previously; so he was calling the reporter out for doing a 'I don't remember' thing, and using his hands in a 'flustered' gesture - not mocking the guy for his later-reported disability whatsoever; as he has tweeted both at the time that the liberals were trying to give him a hard time about it, and after Streep's 'performance'. 

Just wanted to set the record straight.  Accuracy being a good thing...

---

...and further on this day...

from patriotsforamerica.ning.com/Constitutional Emergency; ’Let Me Repeat, “Obama,The Most Sinister, Evil Enemy America Has Ever Defeated…”’ - Lawrence Sellin - thehill.com - January 9 (posted by Harry Riley - January 9)

..
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 2 seconds ago (January 10)

As with the MSM and the Democrats trying to point the finger at the Russians for their supposed hacking (read more accurately: leaking) of the DNC emails and all the rest, there is this distraction game going on, about Obama's presidency.  Let us never forget the real matter here about his time in the Oval Office, and not be misdirected away from it, no matter how hard the New World Order crowd tries to work their magic act: 

Obama was, and is, a Usurper in that office, for not being a 'natural born' citizen; which, according to considerable historical evidence, the constitutional Framers understood to mean a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens..." (E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212.)  And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.  So, when this nation returns to the rule of law - its Constitution - all the legislation that the Usurper signed into law, and all the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he issued, and all the appointments that he made - including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts - go with him, into the trash bin. 

And the sooner, the better.  Before the Usurper and his deep state backers orchestrate a 'state of national emergency' giving him the excuse to declare martial law, and thus destroy the Constitution and this nation in one fell swoop; rather than by the death of a thousand cuts that he has been administering to it so far. 


from teapartyorg.ning.com: ‘The Russian Hack Narrative And The Real Reasons Behind It’ - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - January 9/10 (orig. posted at canadafreepress.com - Andrew G. Benjamin - January 9)

..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (January 10)

The Russians are being blamed because TPTB behind both the MSM and the Democrat Party machine see this as a way to take down the alternative media competition, who are proving to be a major pain in the caudal exterior to them: paint them as being agents of 'Russian influence,' and then have Obama take them down under the terms of new Patriot Act-like legislation, as engaging in 'Propaganda and Disinformation' - 'fake news,' as they are trying to label it.  When all the time it is the MSM that is behind fake news to the American public. This whole thing smacks of Soviet Union-style tactics, or East Germany Stasi tactics, and current Red China tactics, and needs to be rejected out of hand.  Or we will end up in this country with only the 'news' that the totalitarian government wants us to have access to.  

All the more reason that this is a very dangerous time, pre-inauguration.  Such totalitarian-minded people are not about to give up their long-planned-for power so easily.  Look for a major coup attempt - a false flag op - for the takedown of the American federal constitutional republic, by a declaration by the Usurper of martial law.  Or a deliberate attempt on Trump's life.  These people are growingly desperate.  And desperate people do desperate things.


--

This all does not bode well for Donald Trump.  I trust that all is the way that it needs to be.  As we make our way perilously towards

The New.

No comments: