Going For All The Marbles, Now

from newsmax.com: ’Trump Dissolves Troubled Voter Fraud Commission’ - Todd Beamon - January 3

(The article quickly shifted gears into the question of his bc.)

wambam • 20 hours ago (January 3)

Donnie picked a day with a lot of other noise going on to admit defeat on this HUGE INVESTIGATION. Reminds one of his UNBELIEVABLE Birther report that he will release....any day now.

11

•

Reply

• 
  ernaldo wambam • 8 hours ago (January 4)
• 
  4 Simple Questions .....
• 
  1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes’. So how can the
• Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term
• wasn't even used at that time ?
• 
  2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's
• birth as August 4, 1961 and Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father.
• No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that
• his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in
• "Kenya, East Africa".
• 
  This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that
• Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's
• birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father
• have been born in a country that did not yet Exist ?
• 
  Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British
• East Africa Protectorate".
• 
  3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed
• place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
• 
  This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were
• called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity
• Home", respectively.
• 
  The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological
• Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this
• particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961
• if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
  Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
• 
  4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how
• proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so
• I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says
• his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should
• have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936 - if my math
• holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!) Now we need a
• non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the
• author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and
• 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest
• stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old.
• Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter
• the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes ?
  
  
• 16 
• •
• Reply
• 
  
            kibitzer ernaldo • a few seconds ago (January 4)
• 
  The bc, in any event, is irrelevant, except as it puts BHO on official record as naming BO Sr. as his biological father. He's toast right there. This bc business has all been a red herring from the git-go, designed to draw attention away from the magician's other hand. The salient fact of the matter is that BHO was, and is, from that evidence, not a 'natural born' citizen, as constitutionally required for that particular office (and that particular federal office ONLY, indicating its special nature in the eyes of the constitutional Framers).
• 
  The definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters was/is E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations,' wherein the definition of a 'natural born' citizen is a person, quote, "born in the country, of parents who are citizens". (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212. Look it up. It's right here, on the Internet.) The whole POINT of the exercise having been to make sure that the occupant of that particular office - who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces (the particular concern of the Framers, as the historical record attests to) - had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. (And as indicated by the inconvenient fact that both current major political parties tried a total of 8 times between them, between 2003 and '08 alone, to get such an amendment starting through Congress - proposals all of which had this particular issue as their common denominator - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this eligibility issue. So, what did they do? It's obvious what they did: they colluded, in an attempt to do an end around on the matter of the Constitution and the American public. Bad move. They will go down for it, under RICO statutes.)
• 
  Thus, the Usurper, BHO, needs to be arrested - on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason - and, when found guilty (in a REAL court of law; that is, an American Common Law court, not one of these Admiralty courts that have infested this country for long enough, now), all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that the issued, and all of the appointments that he made - including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts; and thus all of the decisions that they figured crucially in as well - go with him. Into the trash bin. For it to be as though he had never been in that position For, he was never there legally.
• 
  And we - hopefully - learn a terribly important lesson, by having to set things to rights in this regard: that is, the terrible consequences of trying to live outwith the rule of law. When Justice catches up with the best-laid plans of mice and men. Man, when he acts like vermin.

As for the subject of the article itself:

kibitzer • a few seconds ago (January 4)

Trump should not do this. It gives his political opponents a huge leg-up, and fuels them to keep attacking him. The Left/NWO crowd have been engaging in voter & electoral fraud to a huge extent (far more than the Repubs), thus rendering our elections a scam, a sham, a fake, a fraud, a delusion, an illusion - worse than any tinpot banana republic, for its effects, on this country, and the world.

He needs to understand that this matter is for all the marbles. Prosecute the states, for contravening federal laws. Or lose the Union. It's that serious.