Monday, 21 December 2015

On Short Fuses Getting Shorter


from wnd.com: ‘Anatomy of an American book banning’ - Michael Thompson - December 18
(David Barton’s ‘The Jefferson Lies’ - of which I happen to have a copy - had been pulled from the shelves of retailers by its publisher some years ago due to - according to Thompson - “political correctness” (the ownership of the publisher conveniently changed just weeks before the book was pulled).  Some commenters say that some of the particulars in the book are wrong.)

..
kibitzer3 • 4 days ago (i.e., December 18)

Good for WND Books for bringing this book "back into the marketplace".

I am so angered by the bookburners. Such arrogance should never have been allowed to gain a foothold in this country. Freedom of the press is sacrosanct, to any real American.

The Left has much to answers for, in the demise of the value of America to the world, as a beacon off freedom. Get OFF of it, you totalitarians. This really makes my blood boil.


6
•
Reply
       
          Chris Falter kibitzer3 • 2 hours ago  (December 21)
  • Proverbs 18:17. Go read it. Now. Then read Throckmorton's comments above.
  • •
  • Reply
                    kibitzer3 Chris Falter • a minute ago  (December 21)
    • Context, Chris, context. Jefferson was deeply concerned about the fate of his slaves [which he inherited]. Barton has BASICALLY been right in his revisionism against the liberals' slanders, in their attempts to demonize the Founding Fathers, as part of their agenda to bring down the United States, and make her but a part of a region of their masters's planned-for New World Order (being slaves themselves to that end).

    • If Barton is wrong in some specific particulars, of course, let those points come out. Truth IS the issue here.

—


After receiving email word of a response to my original posting, and replying to it (see directly above), I went back and reread the original article, and it turns out (I had forgotten this detail) that there is a ‘subplot’ here,* inasmuch as the book’s major critic is involved in the Sexual Identity issue, and has a grudge against “conservative Christians” for their stand regarding homosexuality.

As the article says: political correctness, at work and play.


As for where I stand on the Sexual Identity issue.

I have said many times, in various Comments threads on this subject over the years, that my understanding of the matter (mostly, but not exclusively, based on the book ‘BrainSex’ by Anne Moir, Ph.D. and David Jessel) is that ’sexuality’'gender identity is not just a matter of genetics; that the brain of the developing fetus is sexed at a particular, early stage of pregnancy (around the 8-10 week’s mark, as I recall), which action is affected by the levels of hormones in the mother’s system, and can result in male-patterned brains being wired into genetically female bodies and vice versa and every, yes, ‘abnormal’ spectrum-stop in between, like trannies.  The mother’s hormone levels can be affected by such factors as: abnormal adrenal glands, of either the developing fetus or the mother or both; estrogen mimics/endocrine disrupters in the environment; stress, of all kinds (it is known, e.g., that more homosexual babies are born in the wake of wars than the ’normal’ background ‘noise’ could account for); and perhaps most tellingly, alarmingly, and outrageously, by the effects of drugs like barbiturates, prescribed to pregnant females without sufficient regard for their effects on the developing fetus.  And thus, the increase in Sexual Identity issues in our time.  Which then, of course, spills over into social - political and economic - issues, and of major import.

This is similar in its way to the effects of the maternal diet in producing such fetal anomalies as spina bifida and harelip.  To say: a lot of what is going on in our day has nothing to do with genetics per se; is environmentally related and induced.   

But don’t get me started.  That is a subject all unto itself.  This, here, is mainly just to comment on the subject of ’political correctness’.  And its threat to the basic rights of the citizenry in a free country.

Such as this one is.  

Or was. 

--

* beyond just the issue of how the NWO crowd and their minions have a habit of taking over things such as tv stations or book publishers who engage in activity detrimental to their larger takeover plans.  It is part of their MO.
   A very disgusting part.  But, give them credit: they are, if nothing, well committed to their cause.  
   As we must be to ours.   Not just in reaction.  But in taking the historical process a step further.  To, now 
   its conclusion.

Sunday, 20 December 2015

On Arcane Subjects


Speech To Congress

'Members of Congress, Assembled; Members of the Supreme Court of the United States; Distinguished Guests; Members of the Public listening in. 

‘I have to say that I’m surprised to see so many of you here.  I thought you all just phoned your parts in.  Near as I could tell.  With Obama such a one-man operation, and all.

‘And speaking of the Usurper…

‘I came a little late to this party.  In 2008, I was living, quietly, in the north of Scotland, in the spiritual community that I had been a member of for many  years; having left my home country, of the United States, in early 1976, to join said community, and give some service to the planet in that way, via its educational programs, of a spiritual, and particularly Nature-oriented, nature, and via its emphasis on cultivating the Inner I, for people to develop some sort of spiritual practice for themselves, and their surroundings; and from that space, to be Love in Action.  Thus, I have been keeping an eye on the domestic matters of my beloved home country from afar; and didn’t realize that there was some question about the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama for the presidential office until some time after the election that year, when my first inklings of a problem regarding that issue made their way to my computer, via several e-newsletter sites that I subscribed to dealing with such political matters.  The problem having to do with the specific issue of the definition of a, quote, ‘natural born’ citizen.     

‘So I go to some of the sites mentioned for reference, one of which is the site of attorney Mario Apuzzo, for excellent example; and there he gave, and still gives, the background regarding the definitive source of the day on such subjects, Emmerich de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations Or Principles of the Law of Nature (Applied To the Conduct and Affairs Of Nations And Sovereigns)’.  And therein is the reference to the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, which Attorney Apuzzo, and others, have said was the definition of record of the time.  

‘That seemed clear enough, as far as it went.  So I go to some of the sites in rebuttal of this point of view; and I find that in general, their argument - that the term does not mean one born on the soil of citizen parents, as de Vattel described its definition (one born 'on the soil' and 'of the blood') - boils down to the fact that English Common Law describes the birth situation regarding ‘natural born SUBJECTS’. Which we were no longer talking about in regards to the American situation.  These were no longer SUBJECTS.  They were FREEMEN.  And damn proud of it.  Sovereigns in their own right, since their victory over the Mother Country, Great Britain, in the War of Independence; and now busy in codifying what their Republic was going to look like in its specifics, finally in the creation of a Constitution for the United States of America in 1787.

‘The historical record is in fact quite clear on this matter: The constitutional Framers were going by de Vattel’s treatise ’The Law of Nations’ when they codified the eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency of the new nation - and applyiing to that particular federal office only, not so incidentally.

‘And why would that particularity be?  To cut to the chase here: It is quire clear why ‘that would be’, when you consider - as they did; and as a letter at that time from John Jay - a respected statesman of the day, who, not so incidentally, went on to be appointed as the first Chief Justice of the new United States Supreme Court, such was the respect for his political and legalistic acumen - to George Washington, in his role as Chair of the Constitutional Convention proceedings, spells out - that the person occupying that PARTICULAR office was going to be as WELL the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces.  The constitutional Framers made as sure as they could in their day at least that that office would be filled ONLY with a person with SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the United States. NO FOREIGN INFLUENCE.  No one with DUAL or otherwise CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES need apply.  As a naturalized citizen would be subject to.  And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to.

‘Like Obama.  And like Cruz.  And Rubio, and Jindal too, for that matter.  

‘And as if to emphasize the point for succeeding generations: Alexander Hamilton, as one of the delegates to those proceedings, proposed that the president need only be a, quote, “citizen” - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent ‘natural born’ citizen requirement.

‘It is not as if the de Vattel treatise on such matters was some dusty, arcane-subject book on some dusty shelf somewhere, far away from public view.  For example, it is known that Benjamin Franklin, himself one of the delegates to those self-same proceedings, was in possession of three copies of that treatise, and had given one of them to the Continental Congress years before, for their elucidation on such subjects as birthing a new nation.  And it became, not only a classic in its time, and used in universities, but as well the basis for what is called American Common Law, or Natural Law; the latter of which is even referenced in our founding documents, such was knowledge of these matters amongst the political leaders of the day..    

‘In sum.  it is extremely clear: the constitutional Framers knew PRECISELY what they were doing, when they included that specific eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office.

‘And, indeed, it is quite clear that members of both major political parties of our day KNEW as well; when, between 2003 and 2008, and between them, they made a total of eight attempts to get a constitutional amendment including THIS VERY ISSUE started through Congress, to water down the stringent ‘natural born’ citizen requirement - and failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue.

‘So: What did they do?

‘It is obvious what they did.

‘They colluded.  And they are going down for it.  Lock, stock, and barrel.  As the criminal enterprises that they are.

‘And that includes you folks.  Not just for your political party disappearing out from under you.  But for your failure to RIGHT THIS WRONG, having been done to the rule of law in this country.  This trashing of the Constitution that has taken place - on your watch.  With your constitutional duty and responsibility to reign in a rogue Executive - and an illegal one at that.  

‘And you have blown it. 

‘So, you have no one to blame but yourselves.

‘Oh, I well understand that others are involved in this crime.
    
I well understand, that Money talks seriously in this town.

‘In any event: It’s good that so many of you showed up for this talk.  This dressing-down.  Because it is to announce the presentation of your pink slips.

‘You are hereby out of a job.

‘And thus, Money will no longer talk in this town.

‘If it does, it will tell a terribly sad, and disgusting, tale.  Of the nature of Man.

‘Of, that is to say, more correctly: one part of the nature of Man.

‘The part that has not recognized - or if it has recognized it, has at least not acted on it, in large measure -  the basic fact that we are spiritual beings having a human experience.

‘And the spiritual part of ourselves is now going to come to the fore.

‘At

‘Long

‘Last.

‘For, you see: The Play is over.  The Play, of the human experience, in the lowest depths of the Creation - its training school, in its realm of separation - seeming separation - and duality, with the divinely-ordained gift of free will.  In order for aspects of the Divine to learn lessons.  As apprentices.  Apprentice gods.  On our way to graduation.  When we pass.

‘And the Ring Pass Not is the ability to abide by, and embody, such qualities as Truth.  And Love.  And Wisdom.  Not Deceit.  And Hate.  And the idea of Power Over.  Rather than Power With; and Within. 

‘Humanity has been birthing a stage of consciousness wherein a Balance was to be struck between the power of the Individual and that of the Collective.  The power of the Collective was lately embodied in the examples of communism and fascism, and has been brought to its peak of completion in the plans and works of powerful people on the planet in the form of their proposed totalitarian New World Order, designed to put all of humanity under the heel of its boot, and reduce the Individual to the status of a mere cipher.  A ‘subject’ of the almighty state, and its powerful - Power Over - oligarchic Master.  

'The power of the Individual has been embodied in the example of the nation of the United States of America, wherein, and as protected by its Constitution - its rule of law - the sanctity of the Individual was codified and celebrated.  

'A clash of civilizations has been taking place, whereby the two sides of the Whole have come clearly to the peak of their positions, requiring, now, a Synthesis of the two: a ‘state’ wherein the Individual is honored, as a ‘spiritual being having a human experience’ - being, in true essence, a soul, beyond the human roles that that soul has taken, over and over again, in the karmic School of Life - but with the awareness, the degree of consciousness, of the need to live in harmony with his or her surroundings, both as to one another, and as to Nature.   

‘Balance is the key, from here on.  And from that place of Balance, we can accomplish wonders.  Including reunion with our galactic neighbors.  And whose DNA is embedded in our very vessels.  Which are far more than the mere meat suits of, and to, our erstwhile Masters; who have lost sight of the larger picture, of this whole scenario, of creation.                

‘But that’s enough on that subject for now.  For now, on the subject before us:

‘You are hereby

‘Dismissed.

‘And may you clean up your act, and atone for your mistakes - and the particular one of not being sufficiently aware that actions - including that of inaction - have consequences - so that you can join us, as we move into

‘the New Era.

‘From The Play.  To


‘The Real Thing.


'May we close the Old paradigm, and welcome in The New, with appropriate celebrations.

'That's all.  For now.

'Oh.  Just one closing comment; as for the judicial branch of the federal government itself.  Which has not covered itself with any glory regarding this matter either.

'I don't know where it thinks to get off regarding the curious subject of 'standing,' in requiring a person, or persons, to show that they have been personally injured by an action for their case to proceed in the court system.  There can hardly be any more of an injury to a sovereign citizen than that his or her rights are being threatened by the relativizing of the law of the land - in this case, the Constitution for the United States of America - whereby the rule of law is being turned into the rule of men - into arbitrary law, to be decided by the powers that be at any given time.   But even a person who has clearly shown personal injury - for having been a candidate for the same office, up against a candidate with a big question mark hanging over his head regarding his constitutional eligibility - seems to have had difficulties in the court system, to be able to advance his case ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary, for a final adjudication on this issue, of the 'original intent' of the term in question.

'However, it is all moot now, anyway.  For we will go by the Akashic record in such matters, from here on in.

'In.  To say: into

'the New Era; for all of humanity.

'And that will be all.

'As I say: For now.

'For the definitive, and real

'NOW.'

Saturday, 19 December 2015

Further On The Likes Of A Trump/Cruz Ticket...

...And Other Tools Of Takeover

further from TPC.C.: ‘What do you think about a Trump/Cruz ticket?’ - posted by Jack Sharpe - December 13
(Oren Long, who signs himself as 'John Galt' (of 'Atlas Shrugged' fame), has moved from the Trump/Cruz ticket subject to the subject of a Convention of States (COS).  A dangerous move, which he has been inveigled into getting involved in in his home state.)  

..
Permalink Reply by Debra Beatty 4 hours ago (December 19)

It is my belief that we the citizens would loose [sic] the Constitution if we held a COS. 

  • ▶Reply
Permalink Reply by Oren Long 3 hours ago

Debra,

Please give me the reasons for your concern that we would loose [sic] the Constitution in a COS.

I am NOT looking for a fight, nor am I looking to attack you.   Instead, I am curious as to the exact nature of your concerns.   How, exactly, do you see that happening.

Please allow me the opportunity to respond.   Perhaps I can assuage your fears.

John Galt

P.S.,  it will have to wait until tomorrow.   I have an appointment.

  • ▶Reply
1038654359.jpeg

Very possible... Debra. You have good instincts.

1) Given the political climate of today and the horrible leadership in both political parties a COS would be stacked with anti-constitutionalist.

2) The Conservative movement is not organized sufficiently to significantly influence the appointment of delegates to the Convention.  The result would be a stacked convention that leans hard left.

3) The MSM would not support the efforts of the conservatives to influence the drafting of Amendments or appointments of delegates.  Although they hold no office the MSM has the power to significantly influence the members of any COS... whether we like that or not.

4) The State Legislatures have shown no real support for conservative reforms... at best they have demonstrated a mixed bag of disappointing attempts to deal with the Fed and our ongoing Constitutional crisis.  I don't see them as a strong ally for reform. They remain solidly in the camp of the Two Major Political Parties.

The public is ill informed on the process in general and would likely be easily confused over the  convention and its workings... leading to their ineffectual support for needed reform Amendments in any COS.

  • ▶ Reply
flagUS175.jpg
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago

I agree.  It is a dangerous move.  A Trojan Horse, if you will.

I don't buy it either.

Good points, Col. Nelson.

We are up against a formidable enemy.  Don't give them ANY opportunity to do any more damage to the Republic than they already have. 

They are like a burglar, trying any unlocked, or easily forced-open, doors... 

  • ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Oren Long 31 minutes ago

Colonel and Stan,

O.K., I'll give up IF you can give me an alternative (short of war) that will work.

What, exactly, with specificity, with funding, with leadership, with a plan, ready to go NOW (not later when you FINALLY get around to it), THAT WILL ACTUALLY WORK AND IS LEGAL, PEACEFUL, AND CONSTITUTIONAL!

The COS Movement has EVERYTHING I have demanded above -- EVERYTHING!   Your unspoken, untested, vague, nebulous, ghostly "plan" has NOTHING.    NONE OF YOU ARE VOLUNTEERING TO DO   S Q U A T   ! ! !

I have volunteered to be a District Captain.   I have been asked to apply to be a Delegate in Convention.   I    H A V E    P U T   I T    O N    T H E    L I N E    ! ! !    What have YOU done other than whine and moan?

LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY, DAMMIT!

I hear a thousand reasons why something cannot be done (especially from the fearful), but never ONE why it can.

And NO, I will not apologize to apologists and the fearful.

John Galt

  • ▶ Reply
1038654359.jpeg
Permalink Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 19 minutes ago

Oren...

You did not fund the COS movement did you?  Who is paying the bills for this organization?  I am not a millionaire and certainly don't have the funding to put together a National Organization too engage in a national program of peaceful, civil disobedience..  If there were one, I would be in the middle of it working without charge ... just as you are ... only for the wrong cause.

I sincerely believe that the COS IS DANGEROUS... not misdirected... dangerous to our National Interest. As stated earlier... why do you believe that the current batch of political elites should be trusted to hold a COS... it will be they who select the delegates not you and I.  Do you trust the current batch of leaders in our Political Parties... if not then why would you give them the keys to the Constitution and tell them to take it for a spin? 

I will not join in to lead or follow those promoting what I see as a dangerous movement.  It not only is dangerous it is focusing valuable resources on an issue that we don't need to engage.  It is in fact counter productive.

I do not fear anything... including the collapse of America... I put my faith in God not man.  No mater the outcome in this world, I have God's promise of a better world to come...

  • ▶Reply
flagUS175.jpg
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago

Oren:

I very much sympathize with you.  You are at least trying to do SOMETHING.   And I do give you credit for that.  But we are up against very sinister, very evil people, who have been after their main quarry - the U.S.A. - for a very long time, and know how to 'play the game' of takeover extremely well, having thought it through from all angles.  [and done it before.]

I have to go out for some errands, but will get back to you, and this subject.  But I wanted to let you know that I have read your exasperated response, and I UNDERSTAND.  Having been exasperated for YEARS myself at what has been going on to, and in, my country.  Of which I am extremely fond.

And am not about to let it go to the highest bidder.  Using huge amounts of Federal Reserve fiat notes - that didn't cost them anything, except the cost of printing them - as they are.

I'm talking about the New World Order crowd.  More on all of which, later.  

          ▶ Reply

-
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield just now (December 19)

And from the top, let me clarify where I’m coming from; and say that this whole thing has a happy ending.  Why do I say that, believe that? Because the universe has Purpose; and that Purpose is Good.

We are not at the untender mercies of a malevolent god, who gets off on our fears and terror and pain - literally, for using such emotions as food.  Besides consuming human flesh itself.  There is considerable evidence that there is such a consciousness in the Creation.  But it is subject to the laws OF the Creation.  Which Creation allows free will.  But for a purpose.  The purpose of our spiritual growth.  For having opposition, to hone our decisions against.  The two parts of a scissors; both having their role to play.  

Which brings me to the subject of America, as a nation, and as an idea.  The idea, of a nation of peoples living by the principle of self-governance.  Not to be the subjects of Royalty or Church, or Oligarchy, or Despot.  A self-governing peoples, given much leeway, to say freedom, in their actions.  In part, to learn that ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.  And so does inaction. 

Specifically as to that latter point: It has been said, and with considerable wisdom, that freedom is not free.  You have to ‘keep on it’.  Work at it.  Pay attention to it.  Or you will lose it.  Because this is a ’universe’ - a realm (more accurately: a matrix.  A holographic projection.  But to continue) - of Choice.  And we are faced with opposition in everything that we do.

The so-called Law of Cause and Effect.

To learn lessons therefrom.  To grow, in consciousness, therefrom.

Life is a school.  And the purpose is to graduate.

I’ll move on.  You may well be familiar with some - or all - of this, but let me just create a thread of thought here, to hang some awarenesses on.  Awarenesses, of such as Prof. Carroll Quigley’s magnum opus ‘Tragedy And Hope’.  Of James Perloff’s ‘The Shadows Of Power’.  Of John Coleman’s ‘The Committee of 300’.  Of the various excellent works of research of Gary Allen, and of Antony C. Sutton.  Of Ted Flynn’s ‘Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World’.  And to end this brief bibliography on a note that I wish to follow up specifically: Dr. Stanley Monteith’s ‘Brotherhood of Darkness’.  

Long story short: We are up against ‘principalities and powers…spiritual wickedness in high places’ - agents of the Dark side, who wish to rule the world - its subjects - with an iron fist.  Because people - in their estimation -  should never have been allowed to have free will, because they will inevitably make the ’wrong’ choices, and the dark ’We’ don’t want to allow that to happen.  Not in their kingdom. 

Which this one is no longer to be.  Is coming into the Light of a New Day.

And you will note that this ‘take’ on matters turns the Old Testament story of Adam and Eve on its head.  I can’t help that; I have to follow my awareness on these sorts of subjects.  Bear with me, letting me make my point.  Which I will ‘cut to the chase’ and get to now, to speed this explanation up, of where I am coming from in the matter in question.

It also involves the assassination of JFK.  He was getting too close to the truth of things, and TPTB couldn’t have all that come out in the open.  Not from such a respected - and relatively powerful - figure as the president of the U.S..  A few scholarly books here and there, ‘leaking’ on it, they could put up with.  But not from a figure of such national prominence as the president of the U.S.  Who began talking about such things as ‘secret societies’ (and “repugnance” to such an attitude, of secrecy, in a free society).  And began doing such things as pull back from the money-spinner and power-piece of the war in South Vietnam.  And break away from the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on currency printing, and the interest that they made from the scam, if the U.S. government took back its proper power, and controlled its currency by itself, not needing a big-bankers’ intermediary; as was created long ago, with the two National banks, and in our day, with the creation of the Federal Reserve.  Which has reached its use-by date.  But to continue. 

But just to mention at this point: Do I worry about all of this being surveilled by TPTB?  No.  They already know all of this.  And yes, the NSA will have it, in their collection of metadata on us peasants; and TPTB’s trolls will be monitoring it online.  But hey.  Truth is truth.  And it will out, sooner or later.  This just happens to be The Time is all.  So, as I say: To continue.  And more briefly now, in summary.

I am getting to the salient point I wish to make: that America has been set up for takeover for a long, long time, by very powerful people.  Not just Marxists; although they are involved.  But the so-called other side of the political aisle as well: the fascists, on the very far Right.  Who plan to rule the world, with the aid of their cannon fodder, the naive ‘leftists’/socialists, who believe in such tools of takeover as Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW), now transmogrified into the bugaboo of ’Climate Change,’ because the Global Warming thing was beginning to be too widely proven to be a canard.  And they NEED the CO2 ‘thing’ because that’s how they plan to control us CO2 emitters.  

We are talking here, then, not really about the Bernie Sanders’s of our time (who has made some good points).  But about the likes of the Council on Foreign Relations.  The (so-called) Bilderbergers.  The Trilateral Commission.  The PNAC ‘soldiers’ - the NeoCons.  And (at least the higher echelons of) the Freemasons.  Whose ‘god’ is not the creator of All That Is.  But is a ‘god’ called Lucifer.  The ’Light-bearer’.  Whom they believe was, is, our real creator and benefactor, in a rebellion against the Source.  When in reality, the Most High has allowed all that is TO BE.  For its educational purposes.  Its spiritual evolution purposes.

I’ll leave it there.  I’m just saying all this, to point out that we are up against very powerful people, who infest every aspect of our national life, up to very high places; and we are going to need to muster all the discernment that we can, to deal with them, and the matter at hand.  

The matter, of our potential enslavement.  And - due to our Awakening - of our release from long bondage; and the start of a New Day, for all of humanity.  
                 
And to bring that about, we need to leave the ’heavy lifting’ to the experts.  Our Oathkeepers; current and retired.  Who can legally arrest the Usurper in the Oval Office, and hold him for trial - on a whole host of charges by now.  And dissolve the sitting Congress, for having failed in its constitutional duty to rein in the rogue Executive - who has been put in there IN LARGER TRUTH in order to teach us a hard-learned lesson.

And we start anew.  Having earned

the kingdom of Heaven.

IMHO, of course.

--

To clarify: I'm not advocating succumbing to the Stockholm Syndrome.  I'm just saying, Don't hate your erstwhile captors.  They're just playing roles; in a larger role.

Some of them.  Most probably the most of them.  But some of them will have become ensnared into identifying themselves with their roles, and, like stuck to a tar baby, can't release it.  Those souls will need to be taken care of, on another 'thread'.

The rest are free.

Like us.

To go.

Higher.

In consciousness.

To, in a word:

Ascend.


Like I say:

IMHO.

--

...and the beat goes on...:


Permalink Reply by Debra Rae steinman 2 hours ago

Ted Cruz had a American citizen as a parent when he was born.  So yes according to the constitution (as defined by constitutional experts) he is indeed qualified to run.


Again, if the candidate for POTUS had to have 'two' American citizens at the time of his or her birth .. then Chester Author would not have been a one term POTUS.  He would have been impeached.


  • ▶ Reply
1139095344.jpeg
Permalink Reply by Little Bright Feather 39 minutes ago

CHESTER  A.  ARTHUR WAS ALSO BORN IN Canada in 1829 - I saw a documentary on him and saw the tiny house he was born in up there.  Has a huge sign in front of it as his birth place. He was the 21st  US President. To cover up his real birth place, they list him as born in Vermont, but that is a lie.  Par for the course  for DC. His father was born in Ireland and came to Canada to settle, and his mother was from Vermont.  Pretty much like Cruz situation.

Because the people of that day knew he was born in Canada, they distrusted him but once in office he was an amazing president and he left office being well loved and respected.

You can never trust  or believe what is WRITTEN about anyone since DC makes sure it all reads as THEY want it to. most all of our "accepted"  written  history is a lie.

  • ▶Reply
flagUS175.jpg
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (December 19)

Debra Rae: I have the feeling that even if one of the main constitutional Framers showed up on your doorstep and explained that they were going by E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations' on the NBC issue - a classic by the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787; a textbook used in the universities - you would say 'My mind's made up - don't confuse me with the facts,' because you have a dog in this fight.  Nevertheless, a few points:

1) Your sources have bought the Kool-aid that the Framers were going by English Common Law - which talks about "natural born SUBJECTS".  The Framers were certainly NOT going by English Common Law - they were going by American Common Law, which was based on Natural Law, as expounded on by Vattel.  The Framers were no longer 'subjects;' they were FREEMEN - and damn proud of it, building their own nation.  There is PLENTY of historical evidence that this was, and is, the case. 

2) It was not widely known at the time that Chester Arthur was ineligible; all that only came out largely after the fact.  This example is a red herring, used by people who are trying to lead people off the scent, of a TRUE 'natural born' citizen, as defined in the de Vattel treatise of the day.

3) You are ignoring the fact that both major political parties of our day tried a total of 8 times between them, between 2003 and 2008, to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on THIS VERY ISSUE - and failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around the issue.  So what did they do?  It's obvious what they did: they colluded.  And have been trying to keep their crime covered up ever since, by leading people away from the facts of the matter.  Which ultimately won't work, and ultimately they are going DOWN, for being the criminal enterprises that they are, because the truth WILL out.

And the Usurper is going to be removed from the office that he, and the PTB, have purloined.  But all of that is another matter.  What matters now is that we don't make the serious mistake of trying to make two wrongs make a right, and thus compound the crime against the rule of law in this country - its Constitution.  And continue erroneously to function under the rule of men.  Aka arbitrary law.  Also known as TYRANNY.

And I for one WILL NOT HAVE IT.  

Not MY country, you won't.

Another Day, Another Treasonous Act...


from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘MAJOR TREASON ALERT: CISA Is Now The Law: How Congress Quietly Passed The Second Patriot Act!’ - posted by Nat’l Dir. Dee - December 18 (orig. posted at zerohedge.com - Tyler Durden - December 18) 

..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 2 seconds ago (December 19)

And just so, the surveillance state...

It has to be crystal clear by now that a) the majority of Congress, on both sides of the aisle, are in the pockets of the corporate lobbyists; and b) the Obama administration is pushing patriots in this country just as hard as he can, to get them to overreact, and thereby give him - and his masters - the excuse that they need and want for him to declare a state of national emergency and consequent declaration of Martial Law, which would finally take down the Constitution, in one fell swoop, rather than by the death of a thousand cuts that the Usurper has been subjecting it to for his whole time in that purloined office.  Thus, we patriots are in a bind.

Our only hope is that Oathkeepers, current and retired, are sufficiently awake to the takedown of the American Republic going on - to be replaced by our erstwhile masters' New World Ordure - and are organizing behind the scenes, to take the Usurper out of that position of such power, and arrest him, on a whole host of charges by now.  At which point, we can have their backs; and join in in a clean-out of the vermin in Washington, D.C., in both executive-branch departments & agencies, and in Congress.

We can only hope that there are still such patriots amongst us.  Otherwise, the whole experiment in self-governance of the federal constitutional Republic of the United States of America has been for naught.

I certainly don't want to have to answer to responsibility for that calamity.  And you, Citizen??  Where are you in this tragedy???  Taking place before our very eyes...

Friday, 18 December 2015

On Being IN The World...


I have just received a covering letter from Mitt Romney for one Joe Heck, running against Harry Reid for the latter’s Senate seat from Nevada.  I have simply torn up previous letters from the Joe Heck camp requesting a donation, but I decided to answer this one.  Thus:

‘Dear Mitt & Joe,

‘I would like to help, but since the Republican Party has at least in effect colluded with the Democrat Party in the illegal occupation of the Oval Office by the Usurper, Obama,* I refuse to support it in any way.

‘Get conservatives to run as Independents, or Constitutionalists, or some such substitution, & I will support them wholeheartedly.  But as things stand, both the Democrat Party & the Republican Party need to be hauled into court on RICO-statute charges, of having colluded in this crime against the Constitution & the rule of law in the country, &, if found guilty, be fined, their authorities imprisoned, & be dissolved, as criminal enterprises.  & the nation get back to the rule of law.   

‘Most sincerely,’

(signed)

* for his not being an original-intent “natural bern” citizen.  See, e.g.:
   puzo1.blogspot.com; publiushuldah.wordpress.com; etc. etc. etc.

-

I have written a similar letter in donation-request reply just recently to another Republican Party candidate for federal office (Kelly Ayotte, incumbent senator from New Hampshire).   Plus some harsh letters back to the likes of the National Republican Congressional Committee, along the same line.  Plus, continued financial and moral support for a female doctor in South Dakota who campaigned in 2014 for the Republican Party nomination for a Senate seat from that state, only to run up against systemic corruption in that state, and be charged with, and found guilty of, multiple felony counts for trivial offenses, and have her license to practice medicine be taken away by a corrupt medical board.  All of which is another story.  Just to say here, that:

It really is time for the corruption in this country to END. 

I for one will have NONE of it.

And I encourage you to join me, in that call, and cleanup.

--

P.S. And along this same line, I have just read, and made comment on, an article by Judge Andrew Napolitano titled ’Secrets of the Hillary chronicles’ at constitutionalrightspac.com - December 17 (carried by Washington Times) detailing the case against her regarding her email account; to wit:


Thank you for the rundown on the issue, Judge. Most helpful.

It has all the appearances of her finally having to be held accountable for her actions. She has gotten away with so much for so long that she has obviously come to feel that she could continue on her criminal path with impunity. She needs to be shown, in no uncertain terms, that that is no longer the case. 

Book'er, Dano.

—

As for my closing pronouncement: TV-goers of the ‘70s will know whereof I speak.  Although apparently, Jack Lord/Det. Capt. Steve McGarrett’s regular episode closing comment - on Hawaii Five-O - was actually "Book ‘em, Danno," issued to his cohort, Danny ‘Danno’ Willliams.  But most of us, I think, thought the spelling was ‘Dano,’ as has been largely carried down through the time since, as an expression, vocabulary and printed, of note. 

Being a man of my times, and all...

The True End Of The Matter


I have just spoken, in my last blog, on the matter of TPTB’s desire for their totalitarian New World Order, and of one of the key pieces of the process of takeover that they have engaged in to bring it about, i.e., the placing of their stooge in the Oval Office - arguably the most powerful position in the world.  Which stooge is now delivering for them, and in spades.  With acts like ramping up the national fiscal deficit to breakdown proportions; part of the so-called Cloward-Piven Strategy, to bankrupt the nation, and thereby a) create the conditions for a statist takeover of the nation (made up of elements of both socialism and fascism), and b) help bring in a new monetary system, which will - hopefully, to them - deliver even more power to TPTB.  And another such act is his/their attempt to deprive American citizens of their weapons of self-defense, in order for TPTB via their minions to take over the country with as little resistance (to their best-laid plans) as possible.  I would like, in this blog, to address directly this issue, of Where We Are At, in the historical unfolding of things on this planet.  And point out, thereby, where TPTB have it wrong; or at least, not quite right.  Not quite there, yet.  

Our erstwhile Masters wish to have total control over the human populace.  That means a Total State.  Which is opposed directly by the American system of government; which emphasizes, and celebrates, the individual over the collective.  Wherein and whereby, e.g., government should be like a traffic cop, merely keeping order, so that The People can flow as best, and as far, as they can.  The Left wants it to be, rather, like the Stasi, keeping a close eye on the (little) people for the (big) state; treating ‘the people’ (read, rather, in the eyes of the state: its chattel) like potential terrorists, with a tendency to overthrow their (rightful) Masters.  

This latter point brings up the matter of presumption; i.e., the presumption of innocence, rather than its opposite, where ’the people’ are deemed guilty until proven innocent - the default position of a totalitarian state.  But let me continue with the main thrust of my point for today’s blog.

Which is that this has all been prologue to the culmination of the process: the arrival of, for lack of any better description:

the kingdom of heaven on Earth.

You see, the Dark forces have been used, to bring about a positive outcome.  Their totalitarian New World Order is a reflection - the mirror image; to say, the reverse image, of 

The Real Thing.* 

Where their World Order is built on Force, and compulsion, The Real Thing is built on Love, and compassion.  And so forth.

Not to belabor the point.

Just to make it.


Happy end of the year.

And the beginning of

a - the -

New Era.

And New Earth.

--

* called out of incipiency into Being.  By a law.  The Law of Attraction.
   The Creation built on - out of - laws.
   Like the Law of Karma.  Aka Balance.
   And Harmony.
   Leading to
   the Still Point.



Thursday, 17 December 2015

On Speaking Truth To Power


from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘Obama’s Humiliation Is Complete: Assad Can Stay, Kerry Concedes After Meeting With Putin’ - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - December 16 (orig. posted at zerohedge.com - Tyler Durden -  December 16)
(Dee seems to think that it's terrible that Putin is making a fool of the U.S. via Obama.  Well;
 yes, and no.)

..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 2 seconds ago (December 17)

The U.S. never had any business playing with matches in the Middle East in the first place.  Especially with its being proven that OBL had nothing to do with 9/11.  Playing with matches especially around oil and gas can get you in a whole lot of trouble - and go off in your own hand.

And whoever said 'Assad must go'???  Asinine.  Who must go are the NeoCons in the Obama administration, and influencing it.

Get over your ambitions for a New World Order, you top-of-the-pyramid lot.  Your days are numbered anyway.  See you in court.

--

If only the court of public opinion.

---

Speaking of "opinion":

from westernjournalism.com: ‘Putin Just Came Out With A Massive Announcement About Donald Trump’ - Kevin Whitson - December 17
(It read like a screed from Daily Kos.  That, or some NeoCon rag.)

..

Kevin, with all due respect, a) Putin did NOT "take control of Crimea" - the Crimeans voted (overwhelmingly) for the move that THEY took; and b) Obama had no business - well, he may have had some 'business' to attend to in attempting to overthrow Assad, but he had no RIGHT to "overcome" him. Assad was duly elected by the people of Syria as well. Obama is just being a waterboy for the New World Order gang. Get your priorities right.

And oh yes - the rightfully elected president of Ukraine was overthrown by a coup orchestrated by the CIA and Victoria Nuland's NWO masters, and the people in eastern Ukraine in particular were/are Russian-speaking and of Russian descent, and chose not to be hijacked by the CIA-inspired coup taking over the governing of their country over in the western region. And MORE POWER to them. 

And we need to toss out our own NWO minions too, for the coup that they have managed in this country, via the Usurper squatting in the Oval Office, and s******* all over the Constitution as we speak. As I say: Get your priorities right.

---

Now, and fittingly enough, an updated word more about the 'eligibility' issue.

I had been thinking that the opponents of 'my' position on the NBC definition - the definition of those scholars who have determined it to have meant and still mean one born on the soil of citizen parents (the legalistic categories of jus soli and jus sanguinis - i.e., born of the soil and of the blood) - were simply obscuring the matter for political reasons, pertaining to, on the one hand, Obama's status (the Democrat Party), and/or on the other hand, the subsequent status of Republican Party candidates, like Cruz and Rubio; all of whom did not have U.S. citizens as their birth father (and disregarding for the purposes of this exegesis the question of Cruz's having been born outside of the country, and not on parental 'state business').  And I had earlier today been confirmed in my position by checking out a couple of sites that were referenced on the Comments thread of the article at Tea Party Command Center titled 'What do you think about a Trump/Cruz ticket?' (December 13); especially the site of one Publius Huldah, which I found very informative and exhaustive on this subject.  Thinking the matter settled - at least for me - I spent the rest of the day on various other, more personal bits of business, although finding myself getting more and more angry at the hijack of my country that has taken place, by TPTB who have wished to take down the U.S. Constitution for a very long time, as a, if not the, key roadblock in the way of their putsch for total power over humanity. 

And then, in returning to my apartment from my day's various errands, I decided to check out one of the 'other' sites referenced on this issue.  And now I see that I have been wrong.  Not on my basic position.  But on the case for a different interpretation of the NBC term than the one I have settled on.

It's a bit of a long story, so I will cut to the gist of it.  At a site entitled constitution.org, the site manager has made a case for another definition of the term.  I have seen this specific case enunciated elsewhere, and have dismissed it for a basic reason - which still holds, to my mind.  But at least I can see, and to some extent appreciate, how some scholarly types have come up with a different interpretation of the meaning of the term than 'mine'.  The issue boils down to the difference between English Common Law and American Common Law. 

English Common Law - codified in Blackstone's 'Commentaries' - refers to 'natural born subjects,' and emphasizes where the person was born (and thus subject to the king of the land).  American Common Law - described in/deriving from E. de Vattel's definitive tome of the day on such subjects 'The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law' - refers to 'natural born citizens,' and gives equal weight to both jus soli and jus sanguinis. 

The manager of the referenced site says that the terms 'subjects' and 'citizens' are, for all legalistic intents and purposes, interchangeable.  I (and others) say they are not.  I say that he is not giving sufficient weight to the fact that the constitutional Framers were coming from a place of being citizens of a republic, not subjects of a king - and were damned proud of the change in status.  Of being freemen.  Not the chattel of a feudal lord, or king.  And were raising up a nation on Earth to celebrate the difference - a nation based on the self-governance, and primacy, of the individual.*

But I can see better now how this subject can be confusing in people's minds.  And instead of thinking of Americans, by and large, as a terrible lot of traitors to their inheritance, for not paying better attention to how their/our nation has been hijacked from under their distracted attention, I will cut them some slack.  And if the moderator of a debate that I am ever a part of asks me why I think the way i do about the meaning of the NBC term, instead of answering him in a snide manner (as in 'You stupid ass: the constitutional Framers didn't give their definition of that term in the Constitution because they didn't have to: They all KNEW what they meant by the term - and why the effing hell don't WE' or some such similarly lofty response), I will patiently explain the difference between English Common Law and American Common Law, on this subject, that has fairly confused better scholars than I over the years.  (I basically have common sense going for me; not pedagogy.)  

And with that proviso: I rest my case.

--

* And so, of course, needing to go, in the minds of The New World Order's PTB, to be replaced by their version of a kingdom.  And subjects.