Facts And Fictions

‘The Constitution is just a guideline.  C’mon.  We all know that.  Its interpretation is just a matter of what you can get away with.  Push too far, and you generate too big a reaction.  That’s all.  That’s why they call politics an art.  It’s the art of the possible.  You get your 5-4 decisions from The Supremes, and we get our 5-4 decisions from The Supremes, and we all move on, to the next go ’round.  

‘It’s a ride at an amusement park.  C’mon.  Enjoy the ride.  Don’t take it so seriously.  It’s not supposed to be taken so seriously.

‘Alright alright: It’s more like The Big Game.  But it’s just that.  A big game.  It’s not the end of the world.’

And on the other hand:

‘The Constitution is a contract, between, essentially, two parties: the States and the federal government, in a federal constitutional republic.  To change an essential aspect of the contract, you have to pass an amendment, agreed to by both parties to the contract.  

‘Period.’

Aa for the ‘not the end of the world’ bit:

No, it’s not the end of the world.  But it’s the end of an Age.  And one of those wrapping-up exercises goes like this:

from townhall.com:  ’Trump: Let’s Face It, Ted Cruz’s Canadian Birth is a Real Problem’ - Guy Benson - January 6

(“As we've written in the past, Ted Cruz is a natural born United States citizen, and therefore fully eligible to seek the presidency…”)

..

kibitzer Just now (January 6)

Dear Guy,

It's a shame that you didn't investigate the definition of a 'natural born' citizen at the time that it was incorporated into the law of the land - the Constitution. As a reasonably intelligent person, and professional commentator on the political scene in this country, you would have found out for yourself that an NBC is one born on the soil of citizen parents. That's plural. As in both. The point of the constitutional Framers putting that eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY - being so that the occupant would have NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. As a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to. Like Cruz. And, er, like Obama. (And Rubio too, for that matter.) Oh - and please note further: this eligibility requirement has never been changed by constitutional amendment. Got it? 

Just a couple of inconvenient truths, that we will have to face up to, sooner or later. Because, you see, the Truth WILL out. No matter how much some people try to keep stuffing it away and out of sight. Funny thing about Truth. It doesn't go away.

Tinsldr2 4 mins ago Kibitzer says : "you would have found out for yourself that an NBC is one born on the soil of citizen parents" Now the very first Congress , the one made up of founders and Framers passed a bill that was signed. into law by Pres Washington that made some people born outside the US 'natural born citizens" in 1790 So that kind of defeats your narrative. Citizenship at birth means NBC,  In english Common law, a natural born subject was anyone born a subject , that included people whose parents were not subjects and people born outside the kingdom Perhaps he did do his research? The constitution, identifies 2 types of citizens. NBC and naturalized. There is no 3rd type Reply kibitzer Just now It is extremely clear from the historical record that the constitutional Framers were going by E. de Vattel's definitive tome of the day, 'The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law' when they incorporated that eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office. That definition for an NBC is: one born on the soil (jus soli) of citizen parents (jus sanguinis). So that the person would have SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the new United States republic.  English Common law does not fit here. That talks about natural born SUBJECTS. Those men were no longer subjects; they were freemen - and proud of it. They were CLEARLY going by American Common law, or Natural Law, as defined by de Vattel in his treatise (and as confirmed by David Ramsay a few years later in private correspondence).  [CORRECTION: Historian & Founder Ramsay confirmed it in a public essay; in 1789.  See below.]  Any change in that constitutional requirement would have to be made by a constitutional amendment. There has been none on this issue. But a telling little fact: Both major political parties tried a total of 8 times between them, between 2003 and '08, to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on (including) this very issue - and failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue. So: THEY KNEW. And will have to have their day of reckoning - in court - on their subsequent collusion on this matter, under RICO statutes. Reply .. jdbixii 2 hours ago The reason why the concept of "native-born citizen" ("natural-born" vis-a-vis what? Caesarean section?) is important with respect to the office of the President is that of blood-relations in a foreign country and the liability or susceptibility of a President to be unduly influenced by them. This is what should concern any native-born, American citizen. If either Rubio or Cruz have relatives in Cuba whose treatment could be a factor brought to bear on the office of the president, it would automatically disqualify them from running for the presidency. That said, the eligibility qualification of native-born citizen was understood to be "a person born to two United States citizens" as we were taught it in social studies and civics classes more than half a century ago. I am not impressed with recent SCOTUS decisions.  Needless to say, there are no consistent criteria used as a basis for law. It is purely arbitrary. If a majority decided to legalize something by majority vote, there are few politicians who would suggest that anything other than human reasoning, based on position, was actually necessary. Reply kibitzer 36 mins ago You've got your terms mixed up, jdbixii. A native born citizen is one born on the soil. A natural born citizen is one born on the soil (jus soli) AND of citizen parents (jus sanguinis). The Constitution requires a person, in order to be eligible for the office of POTUS, to be a natural born citizen. Not just native born.  Let's all try to keep this issue clear. — As for the David Ramsay reference; see this, from puzo1.blogspot.com, the site of Mario Apuzzo, Esq.: Friday, April 2, 2010 Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in 1789 Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in 1789 by: Mario Apuzzo, Esq. In defining an Article II “natural born Citizen,” it is important to find any authority from the Founding period who may inform us how the Founders and Framers themselves defined the clause. Who else but a highly respected historian from the Founding period itself would be highly persuasive in telling us how the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen. ” Such an important person is David Ramsay, who in 1789 wrote, A Dissertation on the Manners of Acquiring the Character and Privileges of a Citizen (1789), a very important and influential essay on defining a “natural born Citizen.” David Ramsay (April 2, 1749 to May 8, 1815) was an American physician, patriot, and historian from South Carolina and a delegate from that state to the Continental Congress in 1782-1783 and 1785-1786. He was the Acting President of the United States in Congress Assembled. He was one of the American Revolution’s first major historians. A contemporary of Washington, Ramsay writes with the knowledge and insights one acquires only by being personally involved in the events of the Founding period. In 1785 he published History of the Revolution of South Carolina (two volumes), in 1789 History of the American Revolution (two volumes), in 1807 a Life of Washington, and in 1809 a History of South Carolina (two volumes). Ramsay “was a major intellectual figure in the early republic, known and respected in America and abroad for his medical and historical writings, especially for The History of the American Revolution (1789)…” Arthur H. Shaffer, Between Two Worlds: David Ramsay and the Politics of Slavery, J.S.Hist., Vol. L, No. 2 (May 1984). “During the progress of the Revolution, Doctor Ramsay collected materials for its history, and his great impartiality, his fine memory, and his acquaintance with many of the actors in the contest, eminently qualified him for the task….” http://www.famousamericans.net/davidramsay/. In 1965 Professor Page Smith of the University of California at Los Angeles published an extensive study of Ramsay's History of the American Revolution in which he stressed the advantage that Ramsay had because of being involved in the events of which he wrote and the wisdom he exercised in taking advantage of this opportunity. “The generosity of mind and spirit which marks his pages, his critical sense, his balanced judgment and compassion,'' Professor Smith concluded, “are gifts that were uniquely his own and that clearly entitle him to an honorable position in the front rank of American historians.” In his 1789 essay, while not using the phrase “natural born Citizen,” Ramsay described the original citizens that existed during the Founding and what it meant to acquire citizenship by birthright after the Founding. The Constitution itself shows that the Framers called the original citizens “Citizens of the United States” and those that followed them “natural born Citizens.” He said concerning the children born after the declaration of independence, “[c]itizenship is the inheritance of the children of those who have taken part in the late revolution; but this is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens….” Id. at 6. He added that “citizenship by inheritance belongs to none but the children of those Americans, who, having survived the declaration of independence, acquired that adventitious character in their own right, and transmitted it to their offspring….” Id. at 7. He continued that citizenship “as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776….” Id. at 6. Ramsay did not use the clause “natural born Citizen.” Rather, he referred to citizenship as a birthright which he said was a natural right. But there is little doubt that how he defined birthright citizenship meant the same as "natural born Citizen," "native," and "indigenous," all terms that were then used interchangeably. Here we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential Founder defined a “natural born citizen.” Noah Webster, 1828, in explaining how an American dictionary of the English language was necessary because American words took on different meanings than the same word in England, placed David Ramsay among great Founders such as “Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jay, Madison, Marshall, Ramsay, Dwight, Smith, Trumbull...” Given his position of influence and especially given that he was a highly respected historian, Ramsay would have had the contacts with other influential Founders and Framers and would have known how they too defined “natural born Citizen.” Ramsay, being of the Founding generation and being intimately involved in the events of the time would have known how the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen” and he told us that definition was one where the child was born of citizen parents. In giving us this definition, it is clear that Ramsay did not follow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of nations, and Emer de Vattel, who also defined a “natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his highly acclaimed and influential, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 French) (1759 English). We can reasonably assume that the other Founders and Framers would have defined a “natural born Citizen” the same way the [sic] Ramsay did, for being a meticulous historian he would have gotten his definition from the general consensus that existed at the time. Ramsay’s dissertation presents valuable evidence of how the Founding generation defined the original citizens and the future generation of citizens which the Framers called “natural born Citizens.” It is valuable because it is evidence of the public meaning of these terms at the time they were framed and ratified. Ramsay’s article and explication are further evidence of the influence that Vattel had on the Founders in how they defined the new national citizenship. This article by Ramsay is one of the most important pieces of evidence recently found… which provides direct evidence on how the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen” and that there is little doubt that they defined one as a child born to citizen parents. While Ramsay did not require that the child be born in the country, the Framers, with the exception of children born abroad to parents who were serving in the armies of the state or were engaged in other government service (see Vattel, Sec. 217), did as is evidenced by the Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795…” etc. — A further word as to the end of the Age, and then I will let this blog go. So: where do we go from here??  First of all, we commit to Truth in all our dealings; for that is the Ring-Pass-Not keeping us from advancing from this point to our next one, which is on a higher rung of the stairway to the heavens - leaving the realm of (seeming) separation behind, and moving a step closer to the Unity realm itself.  Still a ways to go, yet.  But we’re heading in the right direction.  So, what does that mean.  That means, e.g.:  * Obama, as a Usurper in that particular office, must go.  (And with him, all the legislation that he has signed into law, and all the E.O.’s and P.D.’s that he has issued, and all the appointments that he has made - including to the SCOTUS.  And thus, all the decisions that that Court has made that depended on his illegal appointments for their passage go with him: into the trash bin.) * The American presidential candidate process must cease; since a) there are some ineligible candidates on the list, on the Republican side (i.e., Cruz and Rubio, at this point), and, over on the Democrat side, b) Hillary Clinton needs to be arrested and held for trial, on a number of charges of her own.  Perhaps not as severe as the charges that the Usurper is to be held for.  But severe enough. (And both to include the charge of treason.) * The sitting Congress is also to go, for both major political parties having effectively, if not specifically, colluded in the illegal candidacy and occupancy of the Oval Office of the Usurper.    We will see what will take the place of them - to say, perhaps of the institution of Congress itself.  Stay at-tuned.  First things first.  As things are set to rights.    Which will include comprehensive investigations into the likes of * 9/11; the Sandy Hook exercise; the Boston Marathon Bombing drill; and back to include the likes of the assassinations of JFK, RFK, MLK, and JFK Jr.; the OKC Murrah Building bombing; etc. etc. etc.    A thorough investigation, and clearing, of at least our recent past.         * The Truth requirement will also ensnare the Federal Reserve, and various other aspects of the reigning monetary system.  So that whole system itself needs to go.  For the equivalent of a Jubilee to be declared.  And the New Era to be entered into.  Which includes such aspects as: * eliminating interest-bearing money as a medium of exchange (on our way to a moneyless system anyway; another, further part of this story); * moving to what are called ’free energy’ devices, for our energy needs (many of which are already available, with more to come); * moving away from drug-based medicine to natural-based medicine (and thus eliminating all the horrendous side effects of the first, unnatural kind of ‘medicine’); * aligning all aspects of society with the spiritual Plan of Life.  Which it is our responsibility - and joy - to uncover, now, at the end of one Age.   And the Beginning of another. One more in keeping with, and in alignment with, our true Selves.     Sparks - fractals - aspects of the One Holy Being.  The Creator of All That Is. As we join with our galactic neighbors - and our Ascended Masters - in ringing in The New.

The 'Leaky Creaky Vessel' Of The Constitution...

...Of The Good Ship U.S. of A.

Paul Ryan, Speaker of the House and for the National Republican Congressional Committee, has sent me (under his covering letter, at least) a ‘2016 Presidential Preference Ballot’ to fill out - and, of course, a request to make a financial contribution for Republican House candidates.  My response, covering both aspects of his letter:  

‘Paul: Is there some good reason that the Republicans don’t understand what ‘natural born’ means?  Or at least, meant to the generation of the constitutional Framers??  & as taught in their universities???  From E. de Vattel’s ‘The law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law’????  & why they required the office of POTUS to be filled with that particular kind of citizen - & that particular kind ONLY?????

                                    (signed)

‘see, e.g.: puzo1.blogspot.com         Take me off your mailing list.’

—

Two things that it’s a shame for.  1: It’s a shame that we don’t have a way on blog sites to show a) double underlines, and b) progressively larger-sized question marks.  And 2: It’s a shame that such as a national constitution has been allowed to be punched so full of holes that it can no longer act as a vessel for a people to sail their ship of state by.  

But then, it’s time to leave it behind, anyway; and ‘graduate’ to another, better form of travel, into the new New World.

And maybe, that’s why.  If it were still seaworthy, to some extent at least, it may be hung on to, for a while, beyond its practical use; just for the sake of a knowledgeable vessel, if for no other reason, and with some aspects of it still making it seaworthy. 

But when both major political parties in a two-party system have decided to engage in its destruction, can its total  lack of seaworthiness be far behind???

Now, you can say, and argue, that political parties were never a part of the picture in the beginning, and we should go back to such a pristine time.  But that is to fail to understand how things unfold.  They take on a bit of a life of their own along the way, and, like the Second Law of Thermodynamics - which ‘says,’ in effect, that 'You can’t unscramble eggs' -  can never be turned completely back to an earlier time.   Too much energy has been invested in the process, for it ever to be able to be un-unfolded. 

No.  We are here.  For better.  Or for worse.

And fortunately - there being a God, and all - it will be for the better.

For the lessons to have been learned (hopefully; and admittedly to varying degrees) along the way.

And for the reward to be reaped.

As we have matured, in awareness, from

The Process.

P.S. I do understand that there are some folks who are attempting to bring about a Convention of the States (a COS; or Con-Con - for Constitutional Convention - as it has been variously called), in order to try to do just this: ‘fix’ the American ship of state, by inserting a Balanced Budget amendment in it, e.g..  But, for one thing, some of the folks behind that movement cannot be trusted, are in league with the New World Order crowd.  (Including a well-known 'conservative' who is widening the hole in the hull of the ship from non-'natural born' citizens being let in to become the Commander in Chief.)  And for another:

It’s time to move on, anyway.

For the whole world.  Not just the once-free people of the former U.S.A.  Whose ship of state had already been hijacked, right from under them, even before the current piratical action.  Was transformed into the subtle, and sinister, form of a corporation.  Which has made of the former free, sovereign citizenry mere wards of the ‘state’ - the corporation.  In effect, the property of the state.  And that’s why - for example - TPTB think that they can force parents, not only to have their children vaccinated, but to have to submit to vaccination themselves.  And so forth.   

And then, when those former sovereigns wake up and realize that they are being branded, and herded into culling chutes, and try to escape from not only the specific chute but from the corral itself, they will be forcefully put down.  Relatively speaking.  Of permanently so.

Because that’s what Owners do. How they think.  When possessed by a Power-Over mentality.  (Power Over Others.  Rather than Power With.  Because We Are in actuality One.)

So, as I say:

It’s time to move on, anyway.

Out of this hellhole.  Which interest-bearing - that is to say, debt-based - money has made, led us into.

And into, rather, 

The Light

of a New Day.

Aborning.

As we speak.

In alignment with

our true

Selves

as spiritual beings having a human experience.

For now.

And moving on from there.

Into

our higher

Selves.

In the lower reaches - to begin with - of

the heavens.  Above this dimension.

A new sea to sail, indeed.  Incapable of being sailed by

such as

the leaky, creaky vessel of

the good ship U.S. of A.

Which has seen better days.  And is to be honored, for its yeoman service to humanity, in championing the individual, and the individual's journey; and for all the good men and women who gave their lives and were wounded, in many ways, in service to it.  But which now needs to be released.  To give way

to a better, more fit-for-purpose vessel

anyway.

Going

Neither Left.  Nor Right.  But

Up.


In summary.

The questions about the constitutional basis for such SCOTUS decisions as the Obergefells one, on same-sex marriage (with the presence of two illegally-appointed judges helping to put it over into the majority column, and one of whom should have been recused anyway, along with another of these overly sanctified presences) - based, reportedly, on the ‘equal protection’ clause of the 14th Amendment - are all disregarding the very real questions regarding a) the faulty ‘principle’ of ‘incorporation’ - that all of the Bill of Rights was ‘incorporated’ into the 14th Amendment’s shift of power from the States to the federal government (no such thing was either intended or really took place, except in the minds of shyster-lawyer types; ‘the Constitution is a living document’ types) - and b) the actual/legal ratification of the Amendment as well.  (Answer: It didn’t happen.  Nor did it happen with the 16th.  And quite possibly others.  Speaking of a leaky vessel.)  But it’s all moot now, anyway.  Because - with the Usurper having hijacked the presidency of the U.S., and in that purloined position having helped bring the unfolding historical Process to the global level, to say, to the level of Completion - I will be taking over now, anyway.  The long slog in - seeming - separation over; The Play to its Conclusion.  Or at least, to its concluding Act.

For most of us.  Those who can’t release their Dark-side roles, in the Hegelian-like, 'dialectical'  balancing-out act that has been taking place, getting us to Congruency, will have some more seasoning to engage in, in another 3D classroom somewhere.

Not here.  Gaia is going Up as well.  

As the most of humanity graduate, from this classroom level, on a free-will planet.  And head for the higher grades.  

A ways to go, yet.  To total

Unity.

But heading in that direction.   

No longer to get lost, or sidetracked, in the Drama along

The Way.

A New World Order...

...Just Not THEIR New World Order

I hope I'm being clear about what I have been talking about in my last couple of blogs.   There is to be a New World Order, alright.  The Dark side - having brought The Process to a global head - has its version.  Which invokes its reverse image; its opposite.  In The Light.  And which involves new forms, new 'vessels' as well.*

For the New Earth, and its New Heaven:

     We Need
A new vessel
          in which
   and by which
            to sail
A new sea
            to
A New Earth;
      for what
     it's worth
     to us
          galaxy
      explorers
              now
            in
    the new

            NOW.

       All
Aboard

              for
       the ride
Of your new life.

                Those
 who can take it,
 that is.

-

* It's time
To trade in
This leaky creaky one
Of the United States
Of America
        anyway
With all of its
Now built-in
Contradictions
To the original
Plan
And the very
                 rule
Of law.
It is beyond
Repair.
Let it go.
           A better
Version
Of social order
Awaits us
Anyway.

Completion - Mach II

First of all, a commentary on my day’s reading, out in the waning sun, at my nearby park, in a rising chilly breeze.  But then, it is winter.   And the winter of the discontent of many of us.

In the December 7th edition of The New American there is an excellent article (well; one amongst a number), in their ‘Correction, Please!’ section, titled ‘Is Global Warming the Greatest Threat to National Security?' itemizing the arguments of a number of the woe-sayers on the subject, and then giving the facts - at least, a good argument from the other side of the issue.

And I have read a considerable amount of other material on the subject as well, to know that AGW - Anthropogenic Global Warming; or its latest incarnation (because the ‘Warming’ canard is proving to be just that, and actually, the exact opposite of that argument), 'Climate Change'- is a hoax, designed and perpetrated by the NWO crowd (the international banksters & industrialists, the Committee of 300, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the ‘Rothschild Zionists’ aka the Khazarian Mafia, the patsy socialists, etc. etc.) in an attempt to drive humanity - cattle, to them - into their global corral, for total control over them (us), and culling, at their will and choosing.  Don’t fall for it.

It’s the same with the PC/feminist crap about mothers trying to get their male children to play with dolls and their female children to study physics and electronics - because all this sort of thing is only a cultural artifice, you see.  That mentality is also a load of just that: crap.  Don’t fall for that, either.  There are fundamental differences between the wiring of male-patterned brains and female-patterned brains. Those differences are so strong - as we have seen, to our cultural confusion and disruption - that they can even make a genetic, and genetically-equipped, male think that he is a female (and vice versa, and every stop along the abnormal spectrum in between, like trannies).2  

Don’t fall for any of this deliberately programmed artifice that TPTB are inflicting on us, in order to further their cultural and social breakdown of the established order of things, and create a new kind of humanity, subservient to their needs and ends; ultimately to be replaced by creatures almost totally of their own -in a perversion of their 'legitimate' /natural creator instincts - called transhumanist; aka robots.   That’s how bent their minds have become, by the working of the Dark forces behind even them.  

Call them satanic; call them archonic; call them by a number of names.  They are all the same: rebels to the Great Creator. The All That Is, in reality.  Behind even this construct, this matrix, this hologram that we currently live and move and have our being in; in order to learn lessons.

And graduate.  

I am here in part (as are others) to try to help bring them back into the fold.  But ultimately, it is their choice.

And woe to those who try to keep you from yours.

--

footnotes:

1 'Climate Change' is relative to our Sun's activity; has been for eons.  And, our Sun is affected by further galactic activity.  Not necessary to go into all that here, to make this current point.

2 There is abundant evidence of and for this take on the matter.  A good source: the book BrainSex by Anne Moir, Ph.D. and David Jessel.  

   Briefly: Even beyond the genetic patterning, the fetal brain is sexed by the mother’s hormones at an early stage of its development (the 8-10-week period, as I recall).  The causes of potential abnormalities: faulty adrenals glands, of either the developing fetus or the mother or both; estrogen mimics/endocrine disrupters in the environment, from plastics, pesticides, foodstuffs, and The Pill's excretion; stress (of all kinds. There is evidence, e.g., of more homosexual children born in the wake of wars than the ‘normal’ background ‘noise’ could account for); and perhaps most alarmingly of all: the effects of drugs like barbiturates, prescribed to pregnant females without sufficient regard for their effects on the developing fetus.  A sad, sad - and even deliberate - story.  All another story, only briefly to be touched on here.

—-

Secondly.  In my last blog I talked about the “intricate beauty” of the human body, and the value of appreciating it; as a learning tool if nothing else.  But, and to clarify what I was getting at: The Process doesn’t end there.  That versing can be continued thusly: 

(Call it: El Camino Real)

                 But not to

Become attached to,

                  as we 

            make way 

          for the new..

And that goes

For America, too.

     For you see,  

The U.S. of A.

Was a vessel

           too;

           to help

           get us 

    here.

             It’s Time

   to board

A different one -

            a more

  inclusive one -

On our mutual

           journey

     Home.

                 And,

You have every

                right

     and reason

Off past experience 

         to question

Everything

  

  and in excruciating

              detail

               too.

                     Do so.

       It’s part of

          The 

       Process:

              to know

              fully

     what you are

     engaged in 

        at every step

        along

               The Way.

On Actions Having Consequences

I get mail…

               I

    On The Fact of 

Obama’s Coronation

The California Republican Party has asked me to join them as part of their Membership Apeai for 2016.  My reply:

‘Dear Jim (Briulte, Chairman),

“The moment - the very instant - that the Republican Party does its job, as the opposition party of record, & declares Obama to be an illegal occupant of the Oval Office - for not being a ‘natural born’ citizen* - I will consider your request.  Oh - and that means, of course, that neither Cruz nor Rubio are eligible for that office, either.  Inconvenient truth that, isn’t it.

                                                                      (signed)

         

* see puzo1.blogspot.com for the historical background to this issue - & never subsequently changed by constitutional amendment.

                II

On The Consequences

               of

  Obama’s Coronation

1.  The U.S. Justice Foundation, in one of its many mailings to its followers, has just pointed out the ramifications of the UN’s Small Arms Treaty that the Obama administration is quietly positioning to get ratified by the U.S. Senate; pointing out that “…all Treaties…shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby…”  What the USJF’s Executive Director didn’t point out in his letter was that the Obama administration, in connivance with the present sitting Senate, has turned the Constitution on its head with respect to the ratifying of treaties.  The Constitution requires that treaties must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate present.  What your current batch of senatorial representatives has done, quietly and sinuously, like a snake in the grass,  has been to amend that requirement to ‘read’ that it takes two-thirds of the Senate to overturn a presidential veto of a treaty/‘agreement,’  which could have passed the Senate by a simple majority vote.  

     Sweet.  And deadly.

     And on this same note, of its particular consequence:

2.  The only ‘legitimate’ reason that weapons of self-defense in the hands of the citizenry could be a problem for the Obama administration - other than via the concocted business of needing to tighten down on their availability because of all of the manufactured mass shootings that have been going on in the country (some not even true events; another story) - is if said federal government was plotting to overthrow the Constitution, and “fundamentally transform” the nation into, not just a socialist dictatorship, but a mere part of the New World Order, by hijack.

     Manufacture a ‘state of national emergency’ (action), declare Martial Law (reaction), and hey presto! - overthrow (solution).  

     These people behind all this business have not just been beady-eyed little termites.  They have been busy little beavers; setting things up beautifully.  For their best-laid plans…

3.  Another example of the Consequences of having elected - and his political opponents subsequently acquiescing in the act of subversion - a person to the highest office in the land who thinks of himself as a law unto himself (well, of course he does; he got away with his initial lawbreaking act) is how he has both weakened and demoralized the nation’s military forces, as its Commander in Chief.  Weakened manpower-wise, and demoralized political-correctness-wise, with 

   a) the move to put females into frontline combat positions (not only weakening the physical-strength requirements in the course of the PC action, but jeopardizing the unit morale, in introducing jealousies and sexual competition into the ranks); 

   b) the move to put LGBT personnel in positions of authority over ’straights,’ and revenge being played out often;  

   c) the move to fill the ranks with illegal aliens; not just resulting in their having thereby an inside track for citizenship and thus effective amnesty, but compromising the military, if push comes to shove regarding the presence of so many illegal aliens in the country; and 

   d) the moves not only to ban Bibles from the enlisted personnel, but to keep chaplains from being able to minister to their flock according to legitimate needs and wishes.  

Another example, and then I’ll leave a possible whole handful of such examples in order to move on to my conclusion; of this litany of grievances, and this statement emphasizing the adverse Outcomes of grievous Actions:

4. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Obergefell case - the same-sex marriage case - which relied for its ’victory’ on the votes, not only of two (illegal) appointees by the Usurper in Chief, but the votes of two SCOTUS judges who by rights should have either recused themselves from the vote, for having demonstrated prior bias in the most flagrant way possible - by having presided over same-sex marriages themselves - or been recused, by a morally upright Chief Justice.  This smacks of defiling the “good behavior” requirement of the Constitution by such judges.  

     But then, so does a lot of the decision-making that has been handed down by Obama appointees to the various benches of the judicial branch.  

     And this all is even disregarding the serious question about the actual ratification of the 14th Amendment, on which this decision was based.*  

But it is all moot now, anyway.  

Because with the Usurper and his minions and his masters having ‘raised the ante’ to the global level, of control, and governance, I and the flock that I am a part of will take over now, and bring The Process to its conclusion.  Replacing the Dark side - the reverse side - of The Process.

Having played its part.

The long slog in - seeming - separation having come to its state of stasis, from preliminary states of unfolding; theses and antitheses, resulting, in their interactions with each other, not in the final Synthesis along the historical Way, but in another level of unfolding to take place, as another thesis, generating a reactive response to its constituent elements.

All stages done now, with the raising of the Outcome to the global level.  Under the control of the Dark.  Having invoked its opposite ’spin,’ as it were; physical-law speaking.  To say: the Light.  To take over, now.  And from here on.

For most of humanity.  Those who can’t release their Dark-side roles, in this balancing act, this Drama  that has been taking place, will have some more ’seasoning’ to go through in a 3D classroom.  Elsewhere.  With Gais moving up also.  

With us.  Or without us.    

Those God aspects who are moving on and up:

Pray for these, your lost sibling sheep, stuck in various thickets of their making..  They are only momentarily lost - in Time - for having over-identified with their (oh-so seductive) roles.  If they can’t release their roles:

their choice.

Me?  I feel as though I’m in for the duration.  Some of us are.  Pray for us, too.  As we keep trying to separate more of Us from their thickets in Time.  And get them to start responding to the intuitive calls - the ’still small voice within’ - from their Higher Selves to get with

the agenda.

And speaking of this latter business - of the ’still small voice within’ - I feel dawn to end this Conclusion blog on a more positive note.  Thus:

I am not privy

               to

              a lot

  of information.

        I am privy

        only to

My intuition.

And my intuition

             tells me

             that

     it’s Time

                     to do

      such things

                     as to

           appreciate

           your body.

      Wherever

  it came from

         it’s a thing

         of intricate

      beauty.

        And it’s going

        to get

                   even

     better.

-

And having said that:

I now command you Dark-side minions to CEASE AND DESIST.  

For, we are

HERE. 

And I pronounce The Process

COMPLETE.  

And thus, I DO NOT CONSENT to any more Dark-side stuff.

It is FINISHED.  And done with.

With appreciation for its role in our unfoldment, towards

our True Selves.

Having now broken out of the chrysalis of

               Time   

to move on, into 

the eternal NOW.

And the start of its many levels, of consciousness.  As we engage in further rounds of Self-realization, and reclaim thereby our higher-frequency Light Body.

With which we can commune with our Creator more directly, than through these poor imitations of

the real thing.       

—

* On the ‘equal protection of the laws’ section of said Amendment.  A basis dubious at best, on which to overthrow centuries of precedent regarding the institution of marriage, including its religious underpinnings. 

   To have opened the door to marriage between anybody, or thing -  a man with a sheep, or a woman with a dog, for example; since the criterion now is no distinction to be allowed in law about marriage with ‘who (or what) you love’ -  is to court total decadence.

     But then, that is where we are at.  And is the point of my conclusion.  Coming up.
                       

On The Truth Of An Ounce Of Prevention

from wnd.com: ’New Year Brings More Crimes By Obama, NSA’ - Larry Klayman - January 1

(‘Exclusive: Larry Klayman spotlights latest revelation of administration surveillance’)

..

kibitzer3 • a few seconds ago (January 1)

All of this executive-branch nonsense could have been prevented if the American public had not been asleep at the switch of their federal constitutional republic to a dictatorship when the illegal candidate, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, made his challenge for the presidency, and the public trusted the opposition party of record, the Republicans, or, in the last event, the media, to say something if the Democrat Party candidate was not eligible for that particular office. Big mistake. The fix was in from the very highest levels of power. The American public - in and of a country where self-governance reigns as the form of government - had, and has, nobody to blame, truth be told, but themselves.

Freedom is not free, and, once lost, is almost impossible to regain.

It can be done. But it needs a really awake, and alert, and committed, citizenry to do it. It remains to be seen if this generation of Americans - NOW - is up to the job. So far, things don't look very good for freedom; not just in America, but - to the degree that things have now been taken - on Earth.

And where are YOU, Citizen, in all this?? And what do you think the New Year demands of YOU???

To Sir, With Recognition

(Lecturer:) People are basically selfish.  That’s why they have to be forced to pay more in taxes on a progressive scale…What is it now, Johnny, my little class nemesis.  (Chuckles emanating from the other students)

(Johnny:) Excuse me, sir, but I have heard that Americans are the most charity-giving people on the planet.  Per capita, they - 

(Lecturer:) If you stole other people’s money, you would be more inclined to give it away, too. 

(Johnny:) How so ’stole,’ sir?

(Lecturer:) By raping other countries of their wealth, in the form of their resources.  By living on a higher standard of living than anybody else.  We owe them.  We should have no higher standard of living than anybody else.  That would be more fair and equitable; wouldn’t you agree, if you had an open mind?  Don’’t you agree, class?  (A unanimous ‘Yes sir’ in response)  Did you hear that, John?  

(Johnny:) …i hear that.  Sir…   

(Lecturer:) But what.  I heard a ‘but’ in your voice.  But what. 

(Johnny:) It’s just that…

(Lecturer:) That you’re so much smarter than all the other students?  Your peers?  You are better educated?  Where were you educated anyway, if you don’t mind my asking.

(Johnny:) I was home-schooled.  Sir. 

(Lecturer:) Aha.  Well, that answers that, then.  We really should have closed that door a long time ago.  

(Johnny:) Excuse me, sir.  Who’s ‘we’?

(Lecturer; snarling his reply, all ‘gloves’ - pretenses - off:) Your masters.  

    (A short stunned silence in the room; then, slipping back into his moderate persona:) 

     Now, where were we.

We were getting to the core of the matter.

Sir.

—

Reading the Young America’s Foundation latest donation-request letter this early evening, I was myself stunned into a short silence when reading the following:

“…polls of U.S. students prove that our children and grandchildren aren’t being taught real and unbiased American history.

“** Only one in three fourth-graders can identify the purpose of the Declaration of Independence.

“** Less than half know why George Washington was an important American leader.

“** And most fourth-graders have no idea that the Pilgrims fled England so they could be free to practice their religion…”

The bit about the pilgrims was bad enough - airbrushing inconvenient info out of our history books and education; just like, and no better than, the old Soviet Union, airbrushing the images of ‘fallen’ leaders out of pictures.  But I was particularly struck - saddened, and angered - at the bit about George Washington.

My mind went back to my experience in the second half of my first grade in school, when we colored in some sprigs of cherries, and a hatchet, to ‘land’ and help remind ourselves of the story we had just been told about George Washington as a little boy.

And if you don’t know what i’m talking about, you just made my, and the YAF’s, point.

Anyway.  Back to the full-court press going on, with our erstwhile masters pulling out all the stops now, in trying to keep us from being successful in our anticipated reaction to their machinations, in such actions as 

(1) trying to block their flooding of the country with jihadists and other Muslims - to stir up animosities and turmoil, and try to balkanize the U.S., in order to weaken it, so that it will, like a ripe fruit, fall into the hands of the New World crowd - and 

(2) starting to heat up our securing of weapons of self-defense (as Obama and his merry band of nation hijackers try to block American patriots any way they can from such purchases, via such clever techniques as (a) buying up available ammo, and (b) pricing it out of availability via taxation, plus (c) keeping such weaponry out of the hands of veterans); and 

(3) rebelling against such people-control agents as Smart Meters on the one hand (both for their surveillance nature and their EMF/radiation toxicity), and vaccines on the other (with their intentional toxic ingredients).

DO NOT BUY INTO THEIR CRAP.

And on that note:

I wish you and yours the best New Year that we can muster, against these miserable creatures trying to lock humanity up in their prison planet.  

May we rise to this august occasion.  So that we can see the wondrous view on the other side of this particular mountainous range of challenges.

So be it.

---

A footnote to the national world we have been living in:

from wnd.com: ‘The Crummy Deal ‘Progressives’ Sell’ - Joseph Farah - December 31

(‘Exclusive: Joseph Farah hears Obama explain realities of 'new economy' under his watch’)

..

kibitzer3 • 4 minutes ago (December 31/January 1 on the mark)

Good point, Joseph.

I am reminded of the confession of one of the younger Rockefellers on video once when he admitted that 'they' were behind the feminist movement. Why? They wanted the extra taxation money to flow into D.C., so they could have more dosh for their corporate-welfare shenanigans. Sweet.

And now we suffer the results of their selfish actions.

--

And another:

from Co-Creating Ou Future on Planet Earth: ‘Guess Which State Is Planning Gun Confiscation Starting January 1, 2016?’ - December 31 (orig, posted at news.clashdaily.com - Wes Walker - December 30)

kibitzer3 says:

January 1, 2016 at 12:25 am

Ah. The authorities in California can now confiscate your weapons of self-defense if a “potential for violence” exists. This, at the same time as the Obama DoJ has a body now that is going to go after ‘potential domestic terrorists’. Which list includes – in their minds, and intention – ‘anti-government extremists’.

Just so, the noose tightens…