This is a sequel to yesterday's blog on 'This Isn't The U.S. I Used To Know'; and in particular regarding its commentary on free speech, and the major attack on it going on in our day. And why I opened it by saying that "It all began with the words 'kike' and 'nigger'."
To clarify from the start: I have nothing against Jews per se. I grew up with many Jewish friends. And so forth; you know the drill. But I have a bone to pick with a lot of them.
'Them' who: The ones that think that they are better than the rest of us. Are The Chosen Ones. And feel that they have been singled out for discrimination based on just that fact. When what they have been singled out for, in many, many cases, is their arrogance. And the crimes they have committed in the pursuit of their attempts to gain the high ground in the world; to push themselves and their socio-political beliefs on to the rest of us, and to occupy - command - the High Places.
And for which they have been kicked out of nation after nation over the centuries. From their perspective: For reasons of such discrimination; and for not being Christians. From the perspective of others: Yes, for not being Christians - to say, for denying His special divinity (and for secretly doing - it was wideiy rumored - horrible things, e.g., to Christian children, and to denigrate the Cross); but also, for their being such arrogant, money-grubbing toads. And I reserve the right to say such things, in a - still - free country.
Now. Let's get down to some brass tacks.
A former editor at the New York Times - a Jew - who moved 'up' from that desk into writing columns, warned many years ago in more than one of them1 that there were 'people' who wanted to undermine free speech in America. He said - very forthrightly, I thought admiringly of him - that 'they' didn't believe in 'free speech'; that it could be hurtful, and 'they' were going to do all 'they' could to get at least the 'hateful' part of it banned. He didn't say who 'they' were. But I inferred an answer from his context; and decided to keep my eyes open on the matter.
Time passes; and, in retirement, I moved to Australia for most of the nineties. Where - being a long-time firm believer in human freedom, to say, the principle of free will2 - I got involved with something called the Free Speech Committee, in Sydney. I forget what the triggering issue of the day was; suffice it to say that there was some sort of threat to the principle going on, and, in my retirement relatively free time, I wanted to lend a hand to that ongoing battle.3 Which interest ended up with my joining the steering committee of the FSC, for fairly weekly meetings, as I recall.
It was an eye-opening experience; which gave me a first-hand experience of 'how these things work'. To say: I began suspecting that all was not as it appeared to be on the surface of the FSC. That we were being controlled. Co-opted, I think is the word.
It basically involved a Jewish lawyer who came on to the Committee during my time there; and who obviously had prior friends on the Committee. Long story short: It became obvious to me that he, and some - most? - of the others on the steering committee weren't just accepting of the argument that it was right and proper for the government to outlaw speech that could lead to 'violence' - and clearly delineated as, and limited as, such in the wording of the proposed legislation being considered at the time. But wanted even - mostly? - to outlaw speech that was merely, quote, 'offensive'.
I could hardly believe my ears. And these were fighters on the front lines for the principle of free speech! Seemingly…For other, life reasons, I left the steering committee soon after I became aware of this movement on it. And didn't think 'they' would ever get away with it, in the populace at large, when push came to shove regarding actual legislation on the subject.
But now, here we are.
That was in Australia.
And it is also here in the U.S.
The very home of free speech. Constitutionally guaranteed free speech. Under major attack, now; from the forces of political correctness, Black Power groups, and LGBT groups, and…who knew, all. But, on that note, to be reminded: Who was behind the development of, and for a long time the running of, the NAACP?
Jews.
And now, here comes the kicker:
I believe that - or at the least, wouldn't be surprised if - this is all part of The Plan.
Specifically, that such Jews - such souls - have incarnated to play just such a role. Just such a difficult role. A non-empathetic role.
The role of objectors to 'the status quo'. The role of the 'superior'. Of troublemakers.
To get the mass of humanity to react to them, and their top-down, state-controlling ways:
In order to resist such ways.
To resist, at the end of the day, totalitarianism. As portrayed by these Jews.4
And, they have been picked to play these particular roles -
because they - many of them - are, in fact, superior souls.
Capable of taking on such roles, and enduring 'the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune' - the sneers and derision and outright enmity of others -
in order to drive the lessons home. The lessons that say:
Don't go that way.
That way there be dragons.
And if you don't believe me:
See what I am doing? Am capable of doing?? If you give your power away, like you are doing???...
Far fetched???
Check it out.
Scratch under the surface of one of these prickly Jews.
And find the real entity underneath the surface.
And don't presuppose that it's a Draconian.
You might be surprised.
And, it might even be a 'stellar' soul in disguise as a Draconian.
How can one tell which is which?
Simple.
By their aura. Which is also to say:
By the quality of their essential message.
If it's geared to Power Over, it's of the Dark. Of the capturing Drama.
If it's geared to Power With - and Power Within - it's of the Light. Of the releasing Reality.
Come. Join the releasing into the Light.
And...
You may just be surprised who you find there.
Having played such a good part.
So to speak.
---
footnotes:
1 His column was carried regularly in The International Tribune, which I was a devoted reader of, for some time. This was in the eighties and very early nineties. This is how I date a lot of what I have seen printed 'in the papers' over the years. If I read it inThe Trib: It was then.
2 I'm not precisely sure where my inordinate passion for the principle comes from. It could be from my growing up in the Mormon Church, which has a strong belief, based on writings of its founder, Joseph Smith, in what he called 'free moral agency'; which I thought made not only good sense, but sterling sense. But at the end of the day, I think that it just comes from my being who I am.
(P.S. For the record: I am no longer a 'Mormon'. I read my way out of what its adherents call the Church - i.e., the true, holy-scripture-completed Christian Church - some time ago. But some of its principles still stand for me - like, say, the Church looking after its own, and being personally self-reliant; not having 'the state' take care of you. It might just do that, in ways that you don't particularly care for - and none 'higher' than this one.)
3 The 'politically correct' forces had become quite a challenge by then, in Australia - I discovered - as well as back in the UK, where I had been living for many years. And I presumed, although I didn't know from firsthand knowledge - or even secondhand, by then - that it was going on in the U.S. as well; based on what the former NY Times editor had written about some years previously to that time, and just on how these things go. Presumably with a life of their own'; but there is always someone stoking such things. Especially if they have a dog in the fight…
4 Who, in the state of Israel, for example, have been involved in dastardly activities, celebrating the perverted principle that the ends justify the means. Just involving its relations with the U.S., there have been the likes of
the Lavon Affair, in 1954, a false flag op involving the planting of bombs in Egyptian, American and British-owned civilian targets to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian Communists, and others (with the aim of inducing the British government to retain its occupying troops in Egypt's Suez Canal zone);
the deliberate attempted sinking of the intelligence-gathering ship the U.S.S. Liberty in1967, which killed 34 Americans, and which outrageous action was not ever properly addressed, because of the power of the Jewish 'amen corner' (in Pat Buchanan's colorful phrase) in American politics (he also called the U.S. Congress "a Parliament of Whores" for that reason; and who can blame him);
the suicide attack on the U.S. Marine Barracks in Beirut in 1983, which killed 241 U.S. soldiers, and which the Israelis knew about in advance, and were guilty as an accessory by an act of omission; and
the 9/11 "another Pearl Harbor" attack on the Twin Towers, which Israel was involved in, to varying degrees (in acts of both omission and commission), in order to draw the U.S. into war in the Middle East, so that Israel could extend hegemony over the area. (With the U.S. NeoCons aiding and abetting the caper, not only for such hegemonic ambitions of their other country, but for the oil involved in the deal for the U.S. as well; besides the basic fruits of war, the contracts to supply goods and services and so on.)
The list goes on, of pernicious activity by the state of Israel; by perpetrators who know, and practice - to a fault - only the philosophy of Power Over.
And P.S. This is to not go deeply into the question of who is actually a Jew; with many so-called Jews today merely descended from Khazars, converted en masse to Judaism by their king centuries ago. There is no good evidence that the Khazars ever had anything to do with The Promised Land. They may have been part of the Lost TenTribes of Israel, having migrated to and settled in their kingdom in Eastern Europe from their roots in their Assyrian captivity in the eighth century B.C.; but there is, as I say, no hard evidence, to my knowledge, for that possibility. (Arthur Koestler would not agree.) They certainly were a quarrelsome lot; and, judging by the biblical/Old Testament account of the history of these people, could well have been such descendants. In any event, the modern state of Israel is ruled by European Jews (including Khazarians), aka Ashkenazic Jews (as opposed to Sephardic Jews, those descended mostly from Spain, North Africa and the Middle East, and with some variations in culture and practices), and they seem to have no scruples about imposing their collective, tribal will on others. Not the kind of people you would want lording it over you. Or could trust.
They would betray you in an instant, if it served their purposes to. And I for one American am still waiting for the government of the current state of israel to officially apologize to the American people for what they have done to Americans in the past (as summarized here). And then we can talk about the future.
But only then.
No comments:
Post a Comment