So, taking everything together: now we know, and in spades, what Obama meant when he said, on the campaign trail in 2008, "We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America". When I heard this reported on, over in Scotland, where I was living at the time, and had been for some time, I wondered precisely what he meant. I knew, or at least suspected, that part of the political dialogue going on back in my home country of America was over the extremes of the Bush W. administration, in taking the country down the road of war, and more war - making the world safe for the likes of Halliburton & Co. - and not being open with the American people as to all the doings of his administration; so that the issue of 'transparency' was one of Obama's best cards to play at the time. How ironic, eh, given how things have turned out…
Anyway, here we are; where things have turned out to be very transparent now indeed: how Obama meant moving the country into the socialist camp of nations, and 'redistributing the wealth' from the haves to the have-nots - his constituency. Along with the 'haves' who wanted more: more abortions for the ladies (i.e., 'women's rights/issues'), and so forth and so on - that is to say: taking the country down a dark road, leading to the tyranny of the hard Left. Where Bush Jr., in beginning to accrue more and more power to the 'unitary executive' (under the false-flag excuse of 9/11), appeared to be taking the country down the road leading to the tyranny of the fascist Right.
It's time to leave both those roads behind. And go, neither to the Left nor to the Right.
But Up.
--
2) …and, as if to emphasize my point: this today, from Tea Party C.C.: 'Obama Publicly Announces His Supreme Authoritative Dictatorship' - posted by kathyet - Mar. 5 (orig. posted at godfatherpolitics.com - by Dave Jolly - Mar. 5)
..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 minute ago (Mar. 5)
Well put, Dave.
The question was raised: Is impeachment the way to go? I say No; because that is the legal 'way' for a redress of grievance(s) against a legally sitting president. Obama is not a legally sitting president, for not being a "natural born" U.S. citizen (if a U.S. citizen at all; another discussion). A "natural born" U.S. citizen is one born on the soil of two U.S. citizen parents. (That eligibility requirement having been put in the Constitution for that office - and that particular office ONLY - so that the candidate, if elected - who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - would have no DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. Like a naturalized citizen. And like a DUAL citizen. Like Obama. Which was the whole POINT of the exercise, on the part of the constitutional Framers.) He simply needs to be removed from the office, by Oathkeepers, BACKED UP in their thus-sworn duty by We the People, Assembled. Or resign, seeing that The People aren't going to follow him into the socialist abyss that he - obviously - has planned for them; where everybody is equal, except some are more equal than others, under the rule of tyrants.
And that 'way,' all the legislation that he signed into law, and all the executive orders that he issued, and all the appointments that he made, go with him; into the trash bin. Where they belong. For having issued from a liar, and a cheat, and a thief; a fake and a fraud.
And we start living our lives under Truth. Not these degrees of corruption that we have been living under for some time. For long enough, now. Spanning - in this country - a period of time longer than just this Usurper's time in power
More on which, another time, perhaps.
-
(and slightly edited; from godfatherpolitics.com directly; where the article was posted in its entirety, thusly:)
"For the past six years I’ve been warning everyone that Barack Hussein Obama has every intention of destroying the America we knew and establishing a dictatorship. In August 2012 I wrote:
“Our Founding Fathers purposely established a three branch government so that no one person or group of people would end up with absolute power. To pass a new law, it would take both the House of Representatives and the Senate to pass the same bill and then it has to be signed into law by the President. It’s a system of CHECKS and balances.”
“However, Barack Obama has repeatedly taken it upon himself to declare law, eliminate law and change law without going through Congress as required by the U.S. Constitution. He took it upon himself to instruct the Department of Justice to stop enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act and what immigration laws he wanted ignored and which ones to obey, among others.”
“Now, Obama has once again bypassed Congress and decided to change the federal welfare laws in an obvious attempt to buy votes among America’s poor. In a move that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich refers to as illegal, Obama has taken action to completely gut the work requirement from the Welfare Reform Act that was passed in 1996 and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.”
Since writing that, Obama has CONTINUED to act without the consent of Congress. Congress froze all federal aid to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government because of their terrorist activities and inhumane treatment of the Egyptian people. Without any congressional approval or court order, Obama took it upon himself to release millions of dollars in money and weapons including a number of fighter jets to the terrorist regime. Don’t forget that Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood has called the United States an enemy like Israel that needs to be destroyed. Aiding them constitutes treason according to the US Constitution.
Obama has used a number of executive orders that would allow him to take over every form of communication, BANKING and commerce in the declaration of an alleged national emergency. Just last week internet regulations were established that would also give Obama complete control of the internet if he wanted.
Obama has repeatedly acted like he is above the law, but now he has basically said the same thing when addressing a town hall meeting at Florida International University organized by Telemundo host Jose Diaz-Balart:
"If Mr. McConnell, the leader of the Senate, and the SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, John Boehner, want to have a vote on whether what I'm doing is legal or not, they can have that vote. I will veto that vote, because I'm absolutely confident that what we're doing is the right thing to do."
Notice that Obama did not say that what he is doing is legal, but just the right thing to do according to him. He defies Congress to try and stop him from doing anything they believe is illegal. Andrew Malcolm and Michael Ramirez with Investors.com see what Obama said as the establishment of his dictatorship when they wrote:
“Rule Of Law: First, the president issues unlawful executive orders giving illegal immigrants amnesty. Then, he dares an equal branch of government to vote on his orders' legality so he can veto it. Is he establishing a monarchy?”
“While speaking at a town hall meeting Wednesday night at Florida International University, President Obama clearly indicated that he believes he is the final authority on law in this country. He will not tolerate dissent…”
“There was no vote in Congress. No consultation with the House and Senate. No law cited that gave him the authority. Just his word.”
“A month ago, we wondered if Obama was ‘so hellbent on amnesty for illegals he'll resort to nullifying and even breaking the law.’ Today, we know that he is.”
“Not even a federal judge's ruling has stopped him from making and unmaking law as he sees fit.”
I looked up the definition of ‘dictator’ and found this:
“a. ruler who is not effectively restricted by a constitution, laws, recognized opposition, etc.”
“b. an absolute, esp tyrannical, ruler”
That description clearly defines Barack Obama as a dictator, something our Founding Fathers took many steps to avoid. Obama has grown so bold that he even announces his supreme authority and defiance of Congress.
Only a dumbed and numbed public would allow this to happen, but not all of us have been dumbed down and numbed by a corrupted socialistic public education system and blind media. Like our Founding Fathers did when they were under the tyrannical rule of the British monarchy, it’s time to rebel and throw off this unconstitutional government. On July 4, 1776, they signed their names the Declaration of Independence with these opening words:
“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident:”
“That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to SECURE these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future SECURITY
[Emphasis mine.]
It’s time for a second Declaration of Independence. I just wonder if we have enough leaders that have the courage to sign such a document and overthrow our self-described dictator?"
..
Well put, Dave.
A renewed Declaration of Independence has merit. The question has also been raised: Is impeachment the way to go? I say No; because that is the legal 'way' for a redressor grievance(s) against a legally sitting president. Obama is not a legally sitting president, for not being a "natural born" U.S. citizen (if a U.S. citizen at all; another discussion). A "natural born" U.S. citizen is one born on the soil of two U.S. citizen parents. (That eligibility requirement having been put in the Constitution for that office - and that particular office ONLY - so that the candidate, if elected - who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - would have no DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. Like a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And like a DUAL citizen would be subject to. Like Obama. Which was the whole POINT of the exercise, on the part of the constitutional Framers.) He simply needs to be removed from the office, by Oathkeepers, backed up in their thus-sworn duty by We the People, Assembled. Or resign, seeing that The People aren't going to follow him into the socialist abyss that he - obviously - has planned for them; where everybody is equal, except some are more equal than others, under the rule of tyrants.
And that 'way,' all the legislation that he signed into law, and all the executive orders that he issued, and all the appointments that he made, go with him; into the trash bin. Whee they belong. For having issued from a liar, and a cheat, and a thief; a fake and a fraud.
And we start living our lives under and by Truth. Not these degrees of corruption that we have been living under for some time. For long enough, now. Spanning - in this country - a period of time longer than just this Usurper's time in power.
More on which, another time, perhaps. In the meantime: First things first.
--
But perhaps we don't have time for "another time". Maybe this is it. Where and when we can see ourselves as having been but playing parts in a Drama; and now, with that insight, that breakthrough in and of consciousness, releasing those parts. And falling back in love with one another, as facets of The One. Our Source. From which we have all come; have issued, like books; for the lesson learning. Being each other's teachers and students. And then moving on. Moving back, in a higher turn of the spiral. Individually.
As we are to do now, together. The Play, for all intents and purposes, over.
For most of us, that is. For others, they may have become too attached to their roles, to be able to make the cut this time around. This Time around.
Pray for them. For they are of us.
And in the widest sense:
They are Us.
-
P.S. Even the s.o.b. who planted a virus in my computer. Ooh, how I would love to get my hands on him.
'Unconditional love' may have to wait awhile, in that event…
--
But perhaps we don't have time for "another time". Maybe this is it. Where and when we can see ourselves as having been but playing parts in a Drama; and now, with that insight, that breakthrough in and of consciousness, releasing those parts. And falling back in love with one another, as facets of The One. Our Source. From which we have all come; have issued, like books; for the lesson learning. Being each other's teachers and students. And then moving on. Moving back, in a higher turn of the spiral. Individually.
As we are to do now, together. The Play, for all intents and purposes, over.
For most of us, that is. For others, they may have become too attached to their roles, to be able to make the cut this time around. This Time around.
Pray for them. For they are of us.
And in the widest sense:
They are Us.
-
P.S. Even the s.o.b. who planted a virus in my computer. Ooh, how I would love to get my hands on him.
'Unconditional love' may have to wait awhile, in that event…
No comments:
Post a Comment