from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘The Americans, by Generals Paul E. Valley and Charles Jones’ - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - May 31 (orig. posted at theamericanreport.org - May 30)
(A comprehensive look at what needs to take place in the American federal constitutional Republic in order for it to remain one.)
..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (May 31)
A good beginning. But the real need is for the nation to return to the Constitution immediately as regards the proper eligibility of candidates for the presidential office. Currently, the Republican Party is running four candidates for that office who are not constitutionally eligible for it: Cruz, Jindal, Rubio, and Santorum, none of whom is a "natural born" citizen, which is one born on the soil (jus soli) of TWO (U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis). There is plenty of evidence that this was the intention of the constitutional Framers in putting that requirement in their contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY; the occupant of which is as well the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, who the Framers didn't want having any DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. And we've seen the wisdom of their 'ways' and the error of our ways in allowing the illegal occupation of that office by Obama; a man with a number of conflicting 'loyalties or allegiances'.
I am saying that we patriots cannot look to the Republican Party for a proper redress of our grievances; its leadership is in bed with the nation's enemies, who are trying to make of it merely a part of a region of their totalitarian New World Order. It's time, that is to say, for a fundamental change, not just one 'around the edges'. Those edges are now a precarious cliff.
-
(addition to this Comments thread on June 1:)
..
Permalink Reply by June Gagnon 17 hours ago (May 31)
Just a suggestion, but it would be beneficial to the USA, if Generals Vallely and Jones would campaign for the Presidency and Vice Presidency in 2016- - who could argue with a ticket like that, other than democrats?
- ▶Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 7 seconds ago (June 1)
One word of caution, June. Putting ex-generals in charge of the country could end up having the nation taken into military adventurism abroad. Some military people these days are in bed with TPTB who want the U.S. to invade Syria - or at least, help overthrow the duly elected government there - as part of an agenda for hegemony in the Middle East, on the side of Israel, which has a number of needs to apologize to the American people for past nefarious deeds, such as the attempted sinking of the USS Liberty, and, if truth be told, the true story behind 9/11. So, caution is needed in these troubling days.
But your point is taken: that we need new, clearer leadership in this country, than either of the two main political parties are providing us. But it needs to be the right kind of leadership.
Me, I would go for spiritual leadership. Not military per se. Another story.
—
2) from TeaPartyC.C.: ‘Obama To Circumvent Congress With ‘More Than A Dozen’ New Gun Controls’ - posted by kathyet - May 31 (orig. posted at breitbart.com (by AWR Hawkins) via conservativebyte.com - May 31)
(“Liberals try to say these laws would have stopped Sandy Hook. But they confidently forget that he stole the guns that he used. The way to have stopped Sandy Hook would have been to have teachers who conceal carry. Criminals don’t go after hard targets…”)
..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (May 31)
We patriots should stop buying into the gun-grabbing scenario about 'Sandy Hook'. There is plenty of evidence that that was a set-up for just that purpose: a school that had been closed for some years, with many rooms still full of boxes used for storage, and the parking lot not up to current legal requirements on such things as marked disabled parking spots; a trial-run Exercise there the previous day (proven by FEMA documentation, and a stray 'Assembly' sign that got left behind); the governor even making a public statement that he had been told that something of that nature would occur in his state; the strange reactions of some of the characters in the incident; the house mortgage payoffs to the families involved; etc. etc. etc. This was the equivalent of a false flag op. We should stop buying into these narratives. It was, in fact, the same with the crisis-actor Boston Marathon 'drill' - even announced as such by police bullhorn at the site, and in the local paper.
The (New World Order) statists that we are up against are clever. But sometimes, just a bit too clever. Look out on the Internet for the whole story on these sorts of scenarios, designed in part to try to take away our weapons of self-defense. Against personal criminals. And against a rogue government. About the latter of which, we were well warned, by our Founding Fathers.
-
(at conservativebyte.com:)
..
Rocky Vnvmc · Top Commenter · United States Army
The Federal Government is forbidden, under the 2nd Amendment, from having any purview of Americans weapons ownership. Do these idiots not understand that what they are proposing definitely 'Infringes' upon the 'Rights of the People to keep and bear Arms' ?
"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American . . . . The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." --- Tench Coxe The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788
"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." --- Tench Coxe (1755–1824), writing as "A Pennsylvanian," in "Remarks On The First Part Of The Amendments To The Federal Constitution," in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789, p. 2 col. 1
Reply · Like · 15 · Follow Post · 11 hours ago
3) from wnd.com: ‘Rove’s Lies On FNC Must Be Corrected’ - Larry Klayman - May 29 ..
Larry, you may think highly of Roger Ailes, but what makes you think that he hasn't been bought, and won over, by what he may have decided is the winning team on the matter of America's future. Or whatever the former federal constitutional Republic of the United States of America is to be called.
Perhaps simply part of the North American Union, and left at that???, swinging in the wind of the 'new breeze' of the New World Order.
..
I gave up on O'Reilly about 2 years ago and rarely, rarely watch him. He became a joke of himself by wanting to be "fair and balanced" yet has RHINO fools like Rove on spouting disguised liberal crapola. This just shows the main stream Rep Party is still too far left and doesn't want to change... More reason to vote third party to get true consevative views, unless Cruz or Walker win the nomination... they are true "renegade Republicans" not like that joke McCain was. 3 Reply kibitzer3 ilikai • a few seconds ago (May 31)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment