Anything Else?

Let's see.  I've dealt with 'the Family,' and Abortion, and to some extent at least with Vaccinations - anything else I can pontificate on??

9/11?  I'd love to go into that appalling and disgusting event.  But perhaps best to save it for the official investigation to come on it.  Inevitable.  And in-depth.

The same with the Sandy Hook Elementary School very curious caper.  And the Aurora Theater shooting (with Mind Control fingerprints all over it).  And the Boston Marathon bombing.  

And.  And……

As we clear the deck, for other action.  

More permanent action, than merely the same old, same old.  Just dressed up in different forms, is all.  Of events; and of ourselves, in the acting out of The Return.  The endless Return, of the lessons.  Until we get them.  Their download of awarenesses.  And then -

and only then -

move on.  

--

In the meantime it's business as usual.  And a major feature in that; an old favorite of mine:*

from tea party C.C.: 'Video: Angry Residents of Tiny Farm Town Take on the Obama Administration Over Controversial Plan -- and Win' - orig. posted by Admin Linda Hahn on June 20 - appeared on June 21

..

Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (June 22)

Thank you very much for all the trouble you are going to to educate the American public on these matters, Juan.  Just one thing.  You need to strike the names of Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio from your lists of potential conservative candidates for the presidency in 2016.  They are not "natural born" citizens.

A 'natural born citizen' is one born on the soil (jus soli) of two (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis).  This eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency - and that federal office ONLY - was put in the Constitution in order to make sure that any candidate for that office - who would if elected also become the Commandeer in Chief of the nation's military forces - did not have DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  Like a naturalized citizen.  And like a dual citizen.

Like Obama.  And which therefore has rendered him an illegal president, for the last two terms.  For which he needs to be removed from the office - by court order, and/or by active military and other Oathkeepers, for whom he is an illegal commander in chief - and held for trial, for that, and other crimes that he has committed in the wake of, and in attempts to hide, his illegal status.  No thanks to an asleep-at-the-switch opposition/Republican party in this whole sorry mess.

But, as your list of e-sites indicates, they are up to their eyeballs in collusion regarding all this illegal, republic-destroying and rule-of-law-destroying stuff going on these days, and will have to face the music themselves, along with a corrupt, and even treasonous, Democrat Party.

A clean sweep needs to be made of politics on the federal level AT THE LEAST in America.  And the sooner we start in on that job, the better.  Before this Marxist Usurper and his minions create an excuse for him to declare Martial Law, and thus eliminate the Constitution altogether.

-

* And no, I won't get off my hobby horse regarding it.  The hijacking of the American presidency is no laughing matter; whether it results in the hijacking of the U.S. federal constitutional republic itself as well or not.
     And I want some - more - American patriots to join me in this effort; who care for what they, and the world, have been bequeathed, in the way of a damn fine form of governance.
     Before we move on.

Next, On 'The Family' Subject

So much for my take on the 'radical feminist'/LGBT take on the family unit.  (It's perverted.  The rf/ LGBT take on it, that is.  Not the family unit.  That is natural, and logical.)*  Now: How do I feel about abortion?

1) No female should have to carry the child of her rapist to term.  That is an insult to injury. 

2) Abortion should never be considered as 'simply a form of contraception'.

     This is a human being, for heaven's sake.  A culture of Death has been allowed to grow up in our midst.  It must stop.  It is heinous; and can lead to no good end.  If it already hasn't; enough, for We the Living to engage in a self-correcting course of action, to get humanity back on track, to its highest Good.  Not its lowest, expedient one.  

3)  And anyway, it is a matter for the individual states to deal with; such issues being closer to 'the people' that way, in a federal constitutional republic (which the U.S. still is; if but barely, anymore).

     Roe v. Wade must be repealed.  It was based on the personal socio-political proclivities of the Supreme Court majority of the day; not on the law.  The Constitution nowhere gives the federal government such power, as to adjudicate in and on such matters.  The decision was based on a flimsy reed, and read, of some sort of imaginary 'right to privacy' contained in the Constitution.  Whereas the main things contained in the Constitution are limitations on the power of the federal government - limiting it to those powers duly assigned to it (i.e., 'delegated powers'); and nothing else.  

     Such powers being "few and defined," in the rather authoritative words of the Father of the Constitution, James Madison.  Did the majority of the SCOTUS in the Roe decision really think to challenge Madison in the proper, intentful reading of the Constitution??

     They must have drunk too much from the 'the Constitution is a living document' bottle; bottled by shyster lawyers, and sold even to the members of the Supreme Court of the United States.  

     My, how standards slip - in all things; even as hallowed a subject area as the law - over the years…

In any event: Even now - like so much else that the federal government has mistakenly made its business - this issue needs to be returned to the individual states.  The American form of government is not a centralized form of government, no matter how much some of the citizenry - desirous of centralized planning and control - would like it to be.

The easier to eat us up by, my dears.

And thus endeth this lesson.  On the difference between (essential) liberty and (state-mandated) equality. 

---

* We are being born through a perverse screen; which must be eliminated, for a true 'reading' of our natures to come through into our lives (as best it can; while we are still 'spiritual beings having a human experience').

     It's the same with vaccinations; which are causing such perverse conditions as SIDS (that, in conjunction with low vitamin C levels) and what is called 'the homicidal triad' - cruelty to animals; excessive bedwetting; fire-starting - which is a signature group of traits signaling a warped, homicidal bent of mind in many cases of serial killers.  At the lower end of the thus brain-damaged scale is the Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) group,+ like ADD/ADHD, and autism (excuse me; the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) group), and so on - all with a name, and so all billable for treatment.

     Do I sound sarcastic, or at the least, ironic?

     I hope so.

     Enough, here.  But another couple of 'hot' subjects to address, at some point.  Just to say here, and for now: Hang in there.  All this sort of crap - how we have been misled, by our 'authorities,' in so many areas - will get sorted out, folks.  

     And will end.

     The same as our long sojourn in (seeming) Separation - in Duality - will end.

     For some.

     As for others of Us…well, this just will not be their Turning Point turn around.

     Their choice.     

+ which used to be called Minimal Brain Damage conditions (MBD), until the PTB apparently decided to get away from the 'damage' connotation - which wording caused some parents to wonder what was causing the "damage," instead of looking at it as simply some sort of 'disorder,' of which there are a myriad and for which there are a myriad of causes, nothing really to see here , folks, just keep moving along - and keep letting us vaccinate your kids, against those terrible 'childhood diseases'  (that never got quite so terrible as when vaccines had been developed for them, and boy, then did they ever get terrible, and needing the new treatment for them…Follow the wording for measles, for example, in the Merck Index of diseases over the years; and notice the change in wording for it when the MMR vax came along).  

     Shyster lawyers are bad enough.  Now we have to deal with shyster doctors as well.

     Grrrrrr………………….

Book 'Em, Danno

I have just sent an email to the author of a book titled 'Stand for the Family,' which is primarily about one woman's battle against those forces that are trying to break down the family unit in the world - 'By Any Means Necessary,' in the words of Saul Alinsky's 'Rules For Radicals' - in order to install a world regime (yes, that New World Order) wherein the State is/takes over the role of the Family.   

It is self-explanatory.

--

June 20, 2014

Dear [       ],

My name is Duane Stanfield.  I am the paternal uncle of [a mutual family member].  I was recently visiting 'family' in Utah, and when staying at [said family member's] house for a night before returning back to my home in So. California, she, knowing my interests in things political (esp. from a conservative pov), gave me a copy of your book to browse through during the evening.  When I expressed considerable interest in it, she gave me the copy, saying that she had another one.

I have been reading it here back home; and am very impressed with the work that you have been doing, and how you articulated it in the book.  However, I was disappointed that your understanding of the homosexual (and thus anti-family) 'thing' appeared to be limited; and wanted to let you know how to approach the matter, rather from a potentially off-putting (and thus unsuccessful) way, via reference to immorality and the biblical 'take' on the matter, to a scientific take on it.

My understanding of that angle comes primarily (but not exclusively) from a book entitled BrainSex, by a Ph.D. in genetics, Dr. Anne Moir, and her co-author, a journalist named David Jessel.  The research that they cite points to a window of time during the fetal development (somewhere between the 8th & 10th weeks, as I recall) when the brain, regardless of the biological sex of the fetus, is being sexed by the maternal hormones - and can be thrown out of kilter for a number of reasons, resulting in male brains being 'wired' into female bodies and vice versa and every abnormal stage along the LGBT spectrum in between.

Those reasons - those 'perverted' hormonal levels - include:

* abnormalities in the adrenal glands of either the mother or the developing fetus or both;

* endocrine disrupters/estrogen mimics in the environment (from plastics and pesticides); 

* stress (it has been proven, e.g., that there are more homosexuals born in the wake of wars than the 'normal' background figure would allow for), which can be due to a number of causes - a car accident, financial worries, poor diet, illness; etc. etc.;

* but perhaps most 'worrying' of all: the effects of drugs like barbiturates on the developing fetus; not being sufficiently allowed for in Western allopathic-oriented medicine.  

All in all: We have been experiencing an epidemic of skewed sexuality in our children, caused by environmental factors - which can be straightened out.  It is an appalling state of affairs.

Some people try to argue that 'it' - skewed sexuality - is normal.  It is not.  It is intensely NOT 'normal' for a child to be so stressed out by the fact that its brain tells it that it is incarcerated in a body of the opposite sex that it seeks gender-change surgery.  Or lashes out in inchoate rage and anger at the world.  Or commits suicide.  Or buys into the argument of some in the (supposedly knowing) adult world that it is quite 'normal', when deep down inside it knows damn well that it is not.  

Not to belabor the point.  Just to point out, that this is not [simply] a matter of 'immorality' (unless the LGBT person engages in immoral/promiscuous conduct), and/or biblical injunction.  It is a matter of our society not paying attention to the canaries in the coal mine amongst us - 

and thus the [true] 'immorality' in the matter can very well be placed squarely on the shoulders of us 'straights'.

I encourage you to invest some time in researching this angle.  The situation is worse - far worse - that you have imagined.

Yours sincerely,

[signed]

--

What a mess (also as acutely observed in the May issue of Whistleblower magazine).  There is plenty of blame to go around in this whole matter.  But primarily, blame falls on the shoulders of those devious persons with a political agenda - socialists/Marxists/magalomaniacs - who would use the plight of the sexually brain-skewed as a political battering ram to pursue their ends; to create a political 'class' (along with some others, like welfareites in general and single moms in particular) to help bring about 'fundamental transformation' of society, for the purpose of using the power of the state to force people to be the way that they want them to be - or else.  

Meaning: cattle.

Which is all 'we' are to some misguided souls, stuck on their paths back Home, for wanting - having been seduced into wanting - Power Over Others.

Rather than With Us All.

  

An Important Message

DEBATE

TONIGHT

     ON

VOTER ID REQUIREMENTS

" - conservatives want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws with Voter ID requirements.  

"And that is why we should not require photo ID cards in order for a person to vote."

(Applause from a large segment of the studio audience.

The Opposition to the Resolution adjusts his mike, and begins, quietly.) 

"It is an insult to the intelligence of the American people to say to them, and to their faces - not just behind their backs - 'We are conning you into believing that it's okay to run elections where the identity of the voters is not being easily verified by the use of a photo ID.  You can talk about 'voter integrity' and 'Make Our Vote Count' all you want.  We are using a cockamamie cover story, about its disenfranchising poor people who can't afford to pay for a photo ID - even though they need one to apply for and get their welfare benefits.  And we are doing this because you are too stupid to understand the screwing we are giving you.  Now run along and enjoy your bread and circuses, because we are too busy taking over your country to spend much time with you, on what we have painted, and successfully accomplished as, a false - and even racist - issue.'"

(The Opposition, ignoring a somewhat forlorn gesture from the Moderator, walks over to the Proponent of the Resolution, and stands in her face; says, quietly, looking her square in the eye:)

"Thought you could get away it, didn't you.  You wretched excuse for a human incarnation of a spiritual being.  - "

(Moderator, as the studio audience sits in a stunned silence:) "Sir - "

(The Opposition to the Resolution continues, in the same fashion:)  "How dare you use your free will in such an arrogant, cavalier fashion - a gift.  You are beneath contempt.  You - "

(Moderator, as the Proponent of the Resolution registers a stunned and stricken look, and a gasp rises from a large segment of the studio audience:)  "We'll be right back, ladies and gentlemen, after these important messages from our sponsors."

--

The most important message, actually?:

The importance of thwarting the agenda of those lusting after Power.  

Power Over.  Not With.

Power Over.  Over Others.  Thought of as Others.  Not as One.  As Us, together.

Sparks of the One Source of All.

Including the free will to deny the One; and opt for, agitate for, the Many.

Which is what we are experiencing now, here, in our 3D Illusion, the apparent reality of the Reality which is holding all of this.

In Love.

And forgiveness.

Forever.

Unless rejected.

Freely.

Ah.

What Love.

To go with such Light.

As we are about to experience.

As through a glass, darkly.

But only just.

Enough.

To get the gist, of the process.

And of what we have lost.

In our exploration into Separation.

Into Duality.

Seemingly...


Will the adventure 

make up for it all?  

The Return, 

on the investment, 

of energy??

May be.

Until then:

Our job -  

our 'Home' work assignment - 

is to

Awaken

out of the state of slumber

that we have been in

Long enough

Now.

Land Marking Decisions

from thinkprogress.org: 'In Landmark Decision, U.S. Patent Office Cancels Trademark For Redskins Football Team' - Travis Waldron - June 18

..

Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University (June 18)

The title name Washington Redskins is used neither in an offensive nor a derogatory manner - nor a 'racist' manner for that matter. This ruling is inept for any sensible person. It is the sort of politicized, PC thing that gives the law a bad name. And shame on you, Amanda. Get a life.

P.S. I have Native American blood in me too, Amanda (& others on this thread). Stop giving us a bad name, with your oh-so-precious hurt feelings - as long as you can make a buck from it. (Pun intended.)

Reply

Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University

In the latter reference, I was referring to the phenomenon of people like Jesse Jackson Jr. and Al Sharpton trying to con money out of Whitey as bleeding-heart 'reparations' for past sins against the blacks; trying to 'capitalize' on the same thing that the Jews used against the German government - read people - to make a dishonest bundle. It is an abhorrent [not to say immoral] practice, not to be encouraged. Innocent people should not be penalized for the sins of their fathers. Take responsibility for yourself [i.e., your own actions] in life is a good motto. Stop with the attempted laying of guilt trips on others. In sum: Grow up, and move on.

--

I should perhaps put a Disclaimer note in here: I am still smarting from - feeling abused; a peripheral victim of - the PC crowd (really, just left-wing people who want the state to have a lot of power over people, to make them behave the way they want them to behave; not as free-willed human beings, which the American psyche and form of government has traditionally championed) having forced the Stanford University authorities to change the name of the school's sports teams, which resulted in their being renamed from the Stanford Indians to the Stanford Cardinals.  

And I suppose the Cleveland Indians and the Atlanta Braves are next for the whitewash job, as it were…A pox on you hypocrites.  You know why you're doing this; and seducing innocent others into your Grand Scheme.   It's all about People Control.  An authoritarian streak, in the psyches of some humans, who don't want people to be free, and hate that trait in America and Americans.

To such authoritarian-minded people, I say: Go live in either a fascist country or a socialist country, whichever statist bent you prefer.  But get the hell out of MY country - and especially, running it.

Grrrrrrrrrrrr…………………..

P.S. As for how much 'Indian blood' I have, to 'qualify' for a comment on the matter: My mom once told me, when we were having a genealogy topic in school, that her grandmother looked like a full-blooded Indian.  (Hired help on the farms in the mid- and northwest states, presumably.)  On her part, my (round-faced) mother always had her (coal black) hair very long (sit-onable), and braided around in a loop at the top of her head. 

     And was a staunch, free-willed individual, who made her own way in life, would never be caught accepting handouts from anybody.  No oh-poor-me, dependent-mentality there.  Pride all the way through to her bones.

     Part of me is just waiting to see if the bleeding-heart contingent take me to task for my comments on that thread.  I can hardly wait to say to them, in response: 'Well, boo-effing-hoo.'

     It may be apparent by now that I do not suffer fools - and the fooled - gladly.

--
P.P.S. Interestingly enough, no sooner did I go back to my emails from this blog entry when I came across an email to me, from a site called 'Right & Free,' that was headed: 'Vote: Should conservative surrender our college campuses?' with the following message:

Dear Friend, It's no secret that the same college campus liberals who helped reelect Barack Obama also attempt to indoctrinate our students in radical leftist politics.  Our college campuses areteeming with leftist abuses and bias. What's not so clear is whether grassroots conservatives are prepared to confront these radicals and take back our nation's universities. Please vote in our "Should conservatives fight back on our college campuses?" national poll right away. Just click here to cast your vote. My name is Morton Blackwell.  I am the President of the Leadership Institute, the nation's foremost conservative grassroots training organization.  And in order to respond I have to know if grassroots conservatives like you believe you and I should continue to stand up to these left-wing extremists. These radicals are entrenched at America's universities.  They have tenure.  They have scores of allies in the media and at academic institutions all over the world. Standing up to these determined ideologues is tough. However, these "professors" radicalize their impressionable students at an alarming rate.  They hate America and try to turn out yet another generation of American graduates who don't understand why our country is so unique and our freedom so precious. Please vote in my poll now. For over a generation I've been training young conservatives how to organize conservative students, start conservative newspapers, bring conservative-thinking speakers to campus, and stand up to the politically-correct bullies that dominate our universities. But it's tough work.  And I'm not sure ordinary grassroots conservatives are up for this fight. That's why I started this national poll.  In order to proceed I have to know where good people like you stand. Should conservatives continue to fight? Across America, the liberals use our universities as training camps for the next generation of leftist agitators. Left-wing speakers spew hateful rhetoric about America and conservative leaders. Students spend time under liberal indoctrination – like University of Minnesota's Un-Fair Campaign that stated any success a white person has comes from "white privilege" and inherent racism – instead of learning the useful skills that allow them to be productive and prosperous members of our society. Should you and I stand by and allow this dangerous agenda to continue?  Or should we fight back and provide conservative student's with the training they need to stand up to the liberal indoctrination and bullying? Please cast your vote by clicking here. Should you and I stand up to the liberals on their on their own turf, or retreat and simply hope for the best? I know where I stand.  I've trained young conservatives in how to win for over a generation. But I want your input, too. Please vote in my "Should conservatives fight back on our college campuses?" national poll today. Cordially, Morton C. Blackwell President Leadership Institute

The Leadership Institute is a non-partisan educational organization approved by the Internal Revenue Service as a public foundation operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. The Leadership Institute does not endorse, support, or oppose candidates or proposed legislation. The Institute has an open admissions policy; all programs are open to the public. Contributions to the Leadership Institute by individuals, corporations, and foundations are tax deductible.

--

It's self-explanatory.  And a good indication as to how we have gotten so far off track from our nation's founding values.

It's freedom or slavery - standing tall or on your knees; essential liberty or 'equality'.   Take your pick.

--
P.P.P.S. And then there's also this today, on the Personal Liberty Digest site:

Student Discovers School Filtering Out Conservative Web Results, Leaving Liberal Sites Untouched

June 18, 2014 by Sam Rolley

After a Connecticut high school student was given an assignment to discuss the merits of gun control, he learned that it was going to be difficult to get both sides of the argument while on campus. That’s because his school restricted access to conservative information outlets, according to student Andrew Lampart.

Lampart told reporters that he started doing research for a gun-related assignment in his Nonnewaug High School “Law and You” class only to find that the National Rifle Association,The Blaze, the Connecticut GOP website, the website for a Sarah Palin PAC, Town Hall ,RedState and other conservative portals of information were blocked by his school’s SonicWALL firewall.

“I used my study hall to research gun control facts and statistics. That is when I noticed that most of the pro-second amendment websites were blocked, while the sites that were in favor of gun control generally were not,” Lampart told Campus Reform. 

That’s right, Moms Demand Action, Planned Parenthood, Hillary Clinton’s website, the Center for American Progress website, the Connecticut Democratic Party’s website and other left-leaning information outlets were left unblocked.

“They’re trying to, in my opinion, shelter us from what’s actually going on around the country and around the world by blocking these web sites. It should be the other way around. The web sites should be unblocked so that students can get different viewpoints from different sides of each argument,” Lampart told FoxCT.

Lampart said that he notified his school district’s superintendent of the problem but nothing was done. On Monday, he took his concerns to the local school board.

Meanwhile, Campus Reform offers some insight about who might be behind the inappropriate censorship:

In an email to Campus Reform, Paul Ciotti, Director of Network Operations and Technology for Connecticut Region 14 schools said “[i]t is not uncommon for websites to be improperly categorized, resulting in a blocked website that should be accessible or unblocked website that should be blocked.”

“However, SonicWall’s Content Filtering Service allows administrators as well as end users the ability to request that a website be re-categorized to a more suitable group,” Ciotti said.

It’s unclear whether Lampart’s high school plans to address the problem.

Of course, this leaves us with one burning question: How many other schools throughout the Nation have a similarly indoctrinating web-filtering strategy?

--

I have just one thing to say, to all this shit.

And just said it.

Of The Passing Parade

A MEA CULPA MOMENT

       I

I can't really

Get into too high a dudgeon

With the likes of an Alinsky

If, in a past incarnation

I was a Lenin,

                   and he

Has just built on

What I advocated

At the time;

           that is,

That the end

Justifies the means.

Or so it seems

In the pageantry

Of the passing parade.

        II

I am very fortunate

               in that

Little known to me at the time

I was preparing

For my future,

              in that

I was working 

Within a system

That gave me recompense then

Even though I don't believe

In socialism

Or anything

That smacks of it,

Like 'social security,' 

                   run by

Too powerful of a state.

The state reflects the will of its leader.

Set the kingdom well

And you will be right.

--

P.S. A hopeful note in a daily pile of my mostly bad-news mail:

An outfit called the Center For Individual Freedom has sent me a petition to send to the governor of my state - headed 'Make My Vote Count' -  calling on him or her (him, in my instance; a liberal, but hope springs eternal) to support meaningful, common-sense Voter Identification procedures in the state - meaning, in this instance, requiring a photo ID in order to cast one's ballot.  

(As Jeff Mazzella, President of CFIF, says in his covering letter:  "Today you and I have to show a Photo ID to get on an airplane or train; open a bank account, withdraw money from it, or cash a check; to pick up concert tickets; and even go into a federal building."  He could also have said - specifically to counter the Left's attempted argument that such a requirement is to discriminate against 'the poor' - that a photo ID is also needed to apply for welfare benefits.)

As I said in my supportive response to his mailing: "Excellent initiative - thanks, Jeff.  (I wasn't going to vote - be part of a fraudulent operation, a charade - for this very reason.  Given hope [like this initiative], I will now reconsider.)"

But it is still an uphill battle, with the Obama administration's Department of Justice - under its disgraced AG, Eric Holder -  fighting such state initiatives all the way:

 "Yet the 'powers that be' in Washington, D.C., are already using the left-wing bias media to spin the story [i.e., that "a recent poll indicates 83 recent of Americans support Photo ID requirements for voting" (emphases his)] by labeling us conservatives 'bigots' and 'racists.'"  Oh, how that Alinskyite-type crap makes my blood boil - to demonize your opponent with smear words, rather than engage in meaningful debate with them.*

Ah - but perhaps I should look at this sort of thing in the spirit of my 'mea culpa' moments, above.

How can I do that??  I know.  With a two-pronged fork:

1) Look at it all as 'God moving in mysterious ways' by separating the sheep from the goats; the latter of whom, with their lack of sufficient consciousness to advance, will be left behind at Ascension Day; and 

2) Sending a letter, headed 

     'Dear Barry and Eric,

     'Thank you, for playing the Devil's Advocate.  (And so well!)  

     'You can soon return to your proper level of consciousness.

     'That is, if you haven't gotten ensnared in your roles…...'

---

* "Chairman of the Democratic National Committee and Liberal Representative Debbie Wasserman-Schultz says conservatives 'want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws' with Voter ID requirements."  Oh, really, Debbie???…I have but one word to say in response:          

     Bollocks.  

     Actually, I have two.  But I'll keep this clean.  

A Prisoner Of Love

…AKA A STICKLER FOR DETAIL

I have enjoyed, in my retirement days in the sun in my old hometown in Southern California, some bursts of nostalgia, in the form of ''oldies but goodies' on CDs.  I have collected quite a rack of them (actually, a small box full), online from an outfit called Publishers Clearing House.  I forget how I came across them; most probably from their advertising on some site I was visiting, of a way to make a small fortune in their Lotto-like periodic draws.   (They had hit on this way to flog more than magazines, have a whole range of household items for sale, with the 'draw' of the thrill of a possible big score on their very large Giveaways.)  The odds are something like one in a billion; but I was interested enough1 to peruse their offerings; and hence my collection of various said items, including a number of CDs from The Good Old Days.   

Among them was, is,  a 3CD Set of 'The World's Greatest Crooners'; and thereby hangs my tale.

These crooners of days gone by were Frank Sinatra, Nat 'King' Cole, and Perry Como; and I have enjoyed their numbers on this set very much.  Except for one seemingly small, niggling detail; and every time I hear it, in replays of that collection while preparing, and eating, my evening meal.  On 'Prisoner of Love,' Perry makes a mistake of emphasis on one line.  The lines in question are:

'She can have another, but I can't have another, because I'm not free…'  

Logically (and as sung correctly on another collection of O's but G's I ordered from the PCH - called 'Moonlight In Vermont: The Great Pop Standards' - by Gordon MacRae), the emphasis in the line 'but I can't have another' should be on the 'I'.   But Perry sings it - and twice, no less - with the emphasis on the 'can't'.    

A small thing, you are no doubt saying.  Nothing to get so worked up about, as to have it bother you, each time you hear it.  

Well, maybe not you.  But it bothers me.  (With the emphasis on the 'me'.)

Because it is wrong.  

And now we come to the gist of my little essay on such seemingly little things.

The Framers of the American Constitution - gathered in the sweltering heat of the summer of 1787 in Philadelphia -  in deciding on the 'little details' of the birth of a new nation, conceived in the basic spirit of what Benjamin Franklin called 'essential liberty,'2 inserted, in coming up with the eligibility requirements for a candidate for the presidential office, the following words:

"No person except a natural born Citizen…"

What did they mean by that expression?

It was obvious to them - and should be to us, taken in the context.  The context, including a proposal at the Convention by Alexander Hamilton to have the 'citizen' requirement read, simply, 'citizen' - which option was specifically turned down by the Framers, in favor of the more stringent requirement proposed by John Jay (in a letter to the Chair of the Proceedings, one G. Washington) for that office, in the context of that person as well becoming the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces: for that person to have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  It was this concern that prompted the delegates to choose the more stringent requirement for the office.  Which required - and does to this day - the candidate to be born on the soil (jus soli is the judicial term) of two (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis).  Thus, no naturalized citizen can hold the presidential office.

Nor dual citizen.

Like Obama.3

And now we come right down to it:

A Prisoner of Love - in this case, of both Truth and of his country - requires the true American to uphold the Constitution.

Or there is no rule of law in the country.

There is just hell to pay.  

And we will, as a nation, divided against itself.

Oh, how we will.

And, judging by all the signs of preparation that the - illegal - Obama administration is and has been making:

very soon now.

Unless we choose to take on a transformative moment.  A real "transformation".  That is to say, to go neither to the Left nor to the Right.

But Up.

(The 'Right' has sown the seeds for this face-off, in its dialectical excesses.  Mostly by the Zionist NeoCons, in their Machiavellian-machination attempts to fasten American hegemony on the world; and thus to take it over, in their Grand Strategy for Power Over Others, and planetary control.  Which the Marxian-Muslim putsch for power under Obama is a reaction to, as part of the historical dialectic going on.  And thus, by its Completion character, bringing the entire process to a head, and close; for Next Steps, on another, higher level.

Another detail, to look at, in these pages, at some point.)

---

footnotes:

1 because of hoping for ways to be able to provide more monies to my political choices - in this election year in particular - to help the nation engage in a 'midcourse correction,' and stop going down the road towards civil war that we are on; caused by the hardcore Marxists amongst us having commandeerd the high ground in America via the - illegal - Obama administration, and a compliant Congress, clearly not up to the job at hand.

     Another story.  

2 The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."  (emphasis mine)

3 Now, for all the public knows - because the birth certificate copy that he provided to the public (on the official White House website) has proven to be a forgery (and a not very good one at that, adding insult to injury) - he could, in fact, very well be a 'natural born' citizen; since we don't know, really, who either of his parents were.  But because of all the lying and deceit and chicanery that has been going on regarding his birth records, he has disqualified himself anyway.  

     Incidentally, to note that some online Obots have tried to argue that the NBC term only rules out naturalized citizens.  This perspective on the matter not only falls on its face value - a dual citizen is equally, if not more so, subject to the pressures of DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES as a naturalize citizen - but is based on the idea that the constitutional Framers were going by English common law (which, in fact, only talks about natural born subjects; which these free and independent, newly-enfranchised Americans certainly no longer considered themselves to be).  The salient legalistic document that they were going by - and which they were known to be familiar with - is Emer de Vattel's The Law of Nations Or The Principles of Natural Law'.

---

P.S. And, before I call it a night this day; this late entry, to my Congressman (occasioned by an appalling summary of the Illegal Alien issue by Devvy Kidd - down in Texas, and so on the front lines of the war going on,between the Obama administration and the American citizenry - at News With Views):

U.S. Congressman Alan Lowenthal - CA's 47th District

(June 17)

Dear Rep. Lowenthal,

Pres. Obama's ill-chosen announcement that children of illegal aliens will be allowed to stay here has set off a firestorm of both illegal-alien border-flooding response and American citizen outrage at the collapse of our borders.  I join the latter camp.

Vote NO on any plan to fund accommodation for illegal aliens (which if enacted would just further incite them to come here, in further droves);

Vote YES for illegal aliens to be deported - and for that word to be published widely in Mexico and Central America.

Congress did NOT pass the so-called DREAM Act - do your job and rein in this lawless, unilateral Executive.

What a monstrous farce Congress is becoming.  It is easy not to have any faith in or respect for you, the way things are going.  In this area, and others (like the NSA illegal spying on Americans wholesale).

DO YOUR JOB.

Increasingly disrespectfully,

'Stan' Stanfield

--

A shame that we don't have a real two-party system in this country.  The Chamber of Commerce gang and the banksters - who run the food stamp program, and make a bundle on it, and on the more they sign up for it - are happy with the illegal aliens being here; the bottom line is all that matters to them.  So they are a part of the problem, too, besides 'the left'/liberals.

Out with the lot of them.  A clean sweep.  And elect people on their merits.  Not on their party affiliations.  Meaningless, those, almost, anymore.

Totalitarians are in both parties.  Just a slight difference between socialists and fascists.  They are both arrogant people controllers.

And have to go.  For free sovereigns to take back their country, from the vandals, from within and without her gates.