Caveat Emptor

And the disconnect continues, between what the public is told is going on in the world, and what is really going on.

Item. In the last couple of days, thousands of birds and fish have ben reported as mysteriously dying, all over the world. The internet has reports relating the phenomenon to the temporally simultaneous mysterious murder of a Pentagon adviser on poison gas releases in aerosol form. The public is told in the MSM that the cases were probably caused by weather factors, or loud noises, or let's-make-another-one-up-for-the-simpletons.

Item. This one a little closer to home, ie, regarding humans, only in a similarly fictionalized setting: the story-line of a major TV soap over the New Year in the UK had one of the leads having a baby that became a 'cot death' statistic. It caused quite a stir, with many viewers complaining in particular about how it was dealt with (the character substituted her dead baby for the live one of another mother, thus 'labeling' her as somewhat psychotic, and thus the story, in those viewers' view, being unfair to real cot death mothers). The social stir caused by this fictional event even triggered an op-ed piece in the country's main liberal newspaper, the Guardian, today (the 6th). Titled 'A pain that never fades', it was written by no less than the canon chancellor of St Paul's Cathedral. In commenting on his own family's experience with such a tragedy (his own mother), he remarked: "Yet it is also part of the terrible agony of cot death - or sudden infant death syndrome - that it comes entirely without explanation..." That is what we have been led to believe, Canon Fraser. A little investigation for oneself - rather than simply taking the word of the medical profession for these sorts of things ('No one knows the cause...') - will result in the knowledge that there are at least a couple of traceable causes. One is to the gases given off by cot mattresses that have been affected by such as urine (thus the value of the advice not to put one's baby to sleep on its tummy; without explanation for the reason). But perhaps the biggest cause is vaccines. Directly, in terms of the brain damage they can cause, or indirectly, in putting stress on the baby's system, and thus using up its vitamin C reserves - which may be depleted, or at least low. (Eg, due to nutritional deficiency; which was the main cause of SIDS amongst Australian aboriginal babies analyzed by Dr. Archie Kalokerinos; the subject reported on in his book 'Every Second Child'.) And thus the 'sudden death' is akin to the sudden death caused by scurvy. (Whereby, eg, previously healthy sailors on British ships would just of a moment drop dead; until a true medic researched the matter, and came up with the solution of such as limes for their extended period of times at sea. Ah. 'Limeys' - the nickname they got from the practice.)

What am I getting at here. I'm getting at the collusion of the western medical profession in the coverup regarding this matter, of cot deaths. (To the point even of letting innocent carers go to prison, in order to perpetuate the scam.) Their motive may be - have been - honourable: not to spook the public from letting their children be vaccinated. But if one of the side effects of vaccinations is cot deaths, Doctor...and if there are other serious side effects to the practice...which are also being covered up...do you think, Doctor, that this practice just might need to have another look taken at it? In order legitimately to weigh its benefits versus its risks??

No, appears to be the answer. Too much is at stake, here. Too many reputations, and second homes, and such.

Am I being too cynical? To continue:

Item. Specifically to the subject of western medical doctors, I'll insert a recent posting I made, on the comments thread to an article titled 'How Doctors Are Made' - about the controversy regarding foreign medical-school students getting positions in American hospitals - which I couldn't resist commenting on. On the site 'Before It's News', I remarked:

"Posted by Anonymous on 6 January 2011 00:09

"If these foreign-school students were REALLY smart, they would look into CAM [Complementary and Alternative Medicine]- including bio-energetic medicine - and get trained up for the future of medicine. Which I assure you is not more of the same, that has created a chronically sick society, dependent for life on drug therapy, because the allopathic school of medicine is in the business of pushing petrochemical-based pharmaceuticals. Health maintenance, not health preservation. The incentives are all wrong. These young people just starting out on their idealistic path (many of them; some of course are just in it for the money) should look to emulating the likes of Drs. Jonathan V. Wright, and Alan Spreen, and William C. Douglas, and Russell L. Blaylock, and on and on and on.

"Check out the Health Sciences Institute, and you'll see what I mean. There's your future. If only because we can't afford the allopathic future any longer; whereby the outcome is a variation on something that Lao-tsu observed 2500 years ago: in this case, that 'the more doctors and hospitals, the more illness and disease'. Think about it.

"I feel so strongly about this because I was almost one of them; on the western school of medicine path because I didn't know then how the world worked. A startling eye-opener, when it happens. Get a more wholistic training, kids. You - and we - will be glad you did."

And further on this subject, in particular of my anger towards the healing professions in the western world, and their gross dereliction of duty to their patients - in defiance of the moral instincts of the founding fathers of their professions - here's a copy of a letter I just wrote this evening to the Scottish paper I keep tabs on, regarding a letter to the editor printed therein today (the 6th, now the 7th):

"Dear Editor,

"Oh oh - here we go again. I refer to Struan Stevenson MEP's letter warning us that the industry vampire has risen once more in yet another attempt to fluoridate the Scottish water supply ("BDA's fluoridisation call must be resisted", Letters, January 6). Sooner or later enough of the Scottish public is going to become aware that this fluoridation business is just that - a business - and is going to bin it permanently, where it belongs.

"There is a growing body of evidence that fluoride does far more harm than good. One need only do a modicum of research to find the many websites and studies that blow the whistle on this scam. One of the most useful papers is '50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation' by Dr. Paul Connett (fluoridealert.org). And most recently, a study published by the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health linked fluoride in water, at even lower levels than what the Environmental Protection Agency in that country considers safe, to lower IQ in children.

"The kind of fluoride that they add to water supplies is a toxic substance, from the scrubbing systems of the artificial fertilizer and aluminium industries, which accumulates in our bones and tissues throughout our lives. While all poisons have 'safe' levels, common sense dictates that it is impossible to monitor fluoride intake in individuals when it is in almost everything we eat and drink; plus the amount of water and food people ingest varies widely.

"A 2008 report prepared for the U.S. Congress by the Congressional Research Service concluded that the allowable amounts of fluoride should be lowered in order to prevent children from developing severe enamel fluorosis and reduce the lifetime accumulation of fluoride in bone which "is likely to put individuals at greater risk of bone fracture and possibly skeletal fluorosis". This finding has been ignored in that country, just as similar warnings are ignored in the UK, because of one reason: politics.

"As even the Centers for Disease Control in the U.S. has now acknowledged, any benefits potentially accruing from fluoride are topical. Let those who want it for their children buy fluoridated toothpaste - and caution them not to swallow it. This is poison, as even the toothpaste tubes sold in the U.S. have to identify.

"We should be using the Precautionary Principle in this, as in similar issues. Which says: If in doubt, leave it out. And especially don't force people to swallow it who don't want to. That's mass medication. It should by rights be outlawed - not pushed. But if the industries behind the stuff had to treat it before it went into the environment, as a toxic waste byproduct, that would cost them money. So with fluoridation, not only do they avoid that cost, they make money on the deal. Sweet. For them.

"Too bad about the side effects. But that's corporatism for you. Caveat emptor.


"Yours sincerely,"

(etc.)


What am I getting at in this blog. For one thing, I'm getting at the spirit behind its title: that we simply cannot trust the Powers That Be running the show in our day and age. They are just too corrupt, to be listened to. They are perverting the freedom they have been given, to be a force for good, or evil, as they choose. They have - by and large - chosen poorly. Have chosen to look after themselves first, and the devil take the hindmost. Have chosen, in a phrase, to follow the evolutionary path of Service to Self.

They will get their just rewards for their choices. It's called, in a word, karma.

But what of us? What of the Citizenry at large??

And this is what I am really getting at, here. To say:

Citizen, I beseech you. I urge you. I accuse you:

You are taking too long to get it.

Whose fault is that?

Well; to some extent, it's the fault of our not having a true 'free press'.

But that's not good enough of an answer.

When things start becoming as obvious as they are, in our day and age - that there is a huge disconnect between what is really going on in the world, and what is being reported on in our mainstream media -

the answer lies within.

The fault is yours.

And mine. For not doing enough, to try to break through the barrier, between fiction and reality. Within the matrix.

So I will own my role, as part of the problem.

Will you?

And will you join me in setting it right?

'It': the history of humanity on this lovely planet. Urging us to do better.

For its sake.

And ours.

And that of our Creator. Who gave us the opportunity, to get it right.

Or not.

The choice is ours.

You.

Me.

Us.

Together.

As One.

Including those who have been playing their 'spoiler' part.

To, I must say, perfection.

Because they have gotten even me angry at them.

And I okayed this scenario.

So there am I, as well.

Dammit all to hell...