It's Time & Past for the New

I have been making some comments recently on various blogs on the internet. One was on the phenomenon of 'chemtrails', which also expanded, in the Comments thread, to include accusations of 'satanic child abuse', and other 'conspiracy theory' subjects like 9/11. I'm beginning to lose it with people who scoff at any position that can't be backed by hard, 'scientific' evidence - evidence which by their definition is reliable, and totally ignoring anything else. My latest reply first, and then a comment:

" Posted by (me)

"terry the censor:

"Yours seems a reasonable response, and indeed, one needs to look at the facts at hand about any issue, rather than just the 'smoke'. But a couple of points.

"(1) Although FBI Agent Kenneth Lanning's site is a good, detailed one, I missed subject areas like (a) other sites that make a case for mind control techniques (including creating Multiple Personality Disorder) developed years ago, and obviously put to work since, by very powerful people; (b) the Franklin case; and (c) sources such as Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips's 'Tranceformation of America' and 'Access Denied' - detailed documentation on CIA mind control activity, for generations, reaching to the highest levels of government. There is too much evidence in that something extremely sinister and damning has been going on for years, to let the baby be thrown out with the bathwater- to deny it because perhaps some reports of ritual abuse may have been overegged.

"(2) The "solid discussion" about chemtrails that you cite dates back to 2004. Yes, it sounds reasonable; but there have been so many reports since, about aluminum, and barium, and Morgellons Disease, eg, that the evidence in over the years amounts to far more than just smoke.

"You may need detailed chapter and verse. But be aware, that if the government is involved in this activity - which it would have to be, in order for it to have been able to have been gotten away with the way it has for so long - the 'chapter and verse' available may be very hard to find. They're not going to make it easily obtainable. Any more than they're going to admit to involvement in 9/11, and so forth. When you're in power, you have a lot of power. When you're not, you have to go with what you can access. What can be accessed on chemtrails - on the internet - may have a fair amount of 'chaff', as it were. But it also has a lot of evidential believability.

"Since there are so many examples in the world today of our governments hiding things from us, and seeming to have ulterior motives regarding power over the people, I'll side with the serious questioning of the 'facts' that we are given by the Establishment. I would far rather err on that side, than on the side of mindless acceptance of what I'm fed in the MSM. 'They' have an agenda. I'm not about to buy into it, just because I can't come up with all the details to substantiate my case of cynicism.

"Where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm not going to let the smoke that the PTB are blowing in my/our eyes keep me from keeping a damn close eye on what's beneath it, being hidden from view by it. Gunderson has legitimate concerns about what's going down in our day and age. I may not agree with every piece of 'evidence' that he cites for his case. But he's on the right track. Your case seems to boil down to the position that he "is not a good source of information". But who ELSE is trying to blow the whistle on horrendous things going down in our time? It takes extreme people to carry the torch. Most people seem content to watch the telly. Not good enough. We have far more responsibility than that - if we want to continue to have government of, by, and for the people."

'Terry the censor' questioned the position of one Ted Gunderson (ex-FBI agent) on chemtrails because he feels that Ted is a 'conspiracy theorist' who believes that satanic child abuse rituals, etc. have been going on. T the c feels there is no tangible evidence for such a charge. It reminded me of the same sort of denier activity leveled at the dangers of vaccines, and those trying to draw attention to those dangers, by many people on the internet - in the pay of the pharma industry or not. (There is evidence that some people are being paid by Big Pharma for the number of comments they put on website threads.) I recently called a science blogger to account for his position on vaccines, ie, that 'anti-vaxers' not only have holes in their heads but horns on them as well. There is so much evidence in that the whole truth about vaccines, ie the full extent of their side effects, is not getting out to the public at large, except via passionate parents who have been doing their homework, that when the 'pro-vaxers' snarl 'There is no evidence...Show me the evidence' they only mean from the mainstream medical journals. Which are paid for by the pharma industry; which have been proven to engage in falsifying their studies to make them look better, for all the money they have poured into those studies, in order to recoup their costs, and hopefully make a bundle besides. This is called 'a conflict of interest'. And when somebody tries to question the safety of vaccines, they are shot down by this crowd, either by (a) saying that the journal source of the study is "not credible", or (b) claiming the person behind it is "not credible". Hey - either the study is valid or it is not. Stop with this business of attacking the messenger. I'm getting tired of this crap.

Let me go on record right here and now, with my position on these sorts of matters.

* Money has been talking too loud. Too many people have been seduced by money - by the making of money, in the current system. Other people have been seduced by power. It's time for a change.

* Vaccines are causing a wide range of autoimmune and neurological disorders in their side effects, amounting, in some instances, to epidemical proportions. They need to be investigated thoroughly, for the true determination of their risks vs. benefits. Unfortunately, Big Pharma has gotten into bed with the government, and so the government oversight bodies are not doing their job properly, Their intended job, that is. That nexus must stop. It will stop.+ And speaking of the medical profession in its aspect of being part of the medical-pharmaceutical-government complex:

* The allopathic medical profession needs to be stopped from running the medical show, and a wider range of medical training and expertise be allowed to come into power. There's a whole world of medical treatments beyond its purview that are overdue.
Speaking of cancer alone: there's Laetrile, and the trophoblastic thesis of cancer; there's the microbe called cryptocides by Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler (& others); there's 'cancer as a fungus' by oncologist Dr.Simoncini; there's the antineoplaston treatment by Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski; there's the awareness of the role of cachexia pioneered by the likes of Dr. Allan Spreen; the list goes on, of meaningful alternatives to the establishment's cancer-treating triad of cut-burn-poison. Which makes a lot of money for its practitioners. But no more. Because the profit is coming out of the treatment of cancer. It is coming out of it because we are going to get rid of the money system as it is. Which needs to get out of the way of progress, especially on the energy front. Which brings up

* The introduction of what are called free energy devices, ready to take over from the era of oil as an energy source in human civilization. We are on the verge of a major transformation of our civilization, because it's time to.

We can no longer afford to continue on the path we have been on, where human ingenuity and endeavour has been 'incentivized' by (interest-bearing) money in a time of scarcity. That scenario changes with the introduction of free energy - and the simultaneous understanding of the truth in the comment that we are 'spiritual beings have a human experience'; and thus the possibility, now, to change the age-old motivator of 'money' for the higher road: of giving of our best to one another, in goods and services and our human ingenuity, out of gratitude to our Creator for life with meaning. The proof of that fact of 'life' all around us now, in our modern era of such as Near Death Experiences, and incontrovertible reports of Past Life Experiences (thus evidencing that there is Plan in and Purpose to the universe: that we are growing through our experiences).

Our communications technology, in harmony with our general scientific technology, allowing us now to create One World, dedicated in Service to our Source - our Source, with which, and in which, We are One.

One Consciousness; experiencing itself in incarnation, for further development.

My belief system, that answers many of the questions of life: If one believes that beneath the duality of phenomenal life (experiencing ourselves as separate beings), we are all One, then we are all God. And even within the duality of phenomenal life, we are, at the very least, all the 'children' - the divine sparks - of The Most High. So - what's the problem?

The problem, on this lovely planet, is money; and how the thirst for its accumulation has separated us from each other. And now, how its release will unite us, in common cause:

our further exploration into God; into our Godness.


We have work to do. Major work. Let's be about it. Stat. Before the collapse of the old gets too in the way of the establishment of the new, and that new era is difficult to see, in the ruins.


P.S. There may seem to be a disconnect in all this. Which goes something like this: 'If people are so evil, why would you even think that there is 'a God' - that there is good behind this vale of tears? Why not just accept things the way things are, and stop trying to 'fix' things that can't be fixed?' The argument falls, because of the very fact that there is a point to the exercise.
Which is for us to discover what happens when we lose sight of the point. That, as said in the Christian tradition: 'Without a vision, the people perish.' That - to continue in the same tradition - Man cannot live by bread alone. And once he discovers that, by personal experience, he can return home, the wiser for the experience.

And the Father rejoices in that return, of the Prodigal Son.

Us. Here. Now. Returning. Home. The wiser - hopefully - for the experience.

Hopefully: Or we'll just have to go through it all again. And again. And again. Until we get it right.

I don't know abut you, but I want to get it right, here.

Now.


+ It also needs to stop because vaccines are a favourite tool of the PTB for people control. They have already been used to vector into the child-bearing-age female cohort of developing countries an anti-fertility agent; they have also been used to make us sicker with chronic illnesses and diseases from their ingredients, which then the pharma industry has come up with drugs to treat. And everybody's happy! - except the people.