Well, it's actually for a lot more than that sort of thing. It's for the likes of Truth and Justice to prevail, beyond this vale of tears that we currently inhabit. And sometimes, of good times too. As when eating chocolate, and all that that trope stands for. But mostly, is what gives life meaning, beyond just in and for itself only. Wherein sometimes, the likes of Truth and Justice do not prevail. And things get out of hand.
Take atrocious spelling, for example.1 Now, I fully understand that spelling changes over time, via usage; and often, that usage making sense, making the word clearer. But that is no excuse for being sloppy in current usage. Not to have been taught how to spell properly is a failure of the educational system, not some sort of feather in its cap, for using that time in elementary school for other, more 'important' purposes, than learning how to spell 'properly' because there is no 'properly', because there are no absolutes, all is relative...and we come now to the crux of the matter.
Not just that the educational system has been taken over by relativists, for whom there is no right or wrong but thinking makes it so; and so one person's 'virtue' could be another person's 'vice'.2 But because this educational 'policy', of inculcating atrocious spelling - as part of the relativists' program for the nation3 - means that our children's brains have not been trained to specifics. For picking up on detail.
'Oh well - it's close enough.' And just so does the specific meaning of words in the Constitution - based on what has become known as the 'concept' (and therefore, just one among others) of 'original intent' - yield, in the minds of many citizens, to a relativist interpretation of those words.
As, say, the meaning of the term 'natural born citizen'.
Having thus been morphed into becoming, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama: 'Oh well. Close enough.'
Well, I'm here to tell you: No; it's not.
Because there are, after all, such absolute things as Truth, and Justice.
And they will prevail.
Here. As in Heaven.
Especially now. When we are about to experience a coming closer together of the two realms.
As in our going up in consciousness to the next level above this one.
Or not.
Your individual choice.
To make.
And I mean, 'to make'.
For you will have to make it.
The slower, less-conscious souls amongst us no longer to be permitted to hold everybody back, in this prison of Illusion that we have been incarcerated in long enough.
To learn lessons.
And then move on.
Up.
Towards our ultimate destiny.
As fractals, 'points of view' of the Whole becoming One with the Whole once again.
After our sojourn in matter.
To find out what that was like.
Now we know.
And it ain't so pretty. To be cut off from our Source so.
Well. Live. And learn.
As long as we do learn, from our experiences.
So that the Prodigal Son can return to the Home of his parents with something to show for his journey in the wilderness of his making.
---
footnotes:
1 When I returned to the States about a year ago and, in my full retired status, had even more time to 'surf the net' - in my case, that expression meaning, mostly, keeping up with a plethora of e-newsletters - I couldn't believe just how appalling the level of correct spelling and grammar was amongst the American populace. The level, that is to say actually, of literacy. To say, actually, of illiteracy.
'Stop fighting fare. All is fare in war.' 'It is time they are held for all there crime's on the world.' 'The results where just the same.' 'Those imbasils.' 'While the lazyness playes out.' 'We all know why there doing this so thay can join the military than use them to keep us in line.' 'He would have send gunships right away.' 'She is smart, articulate an a patriot.' 'Your wrong [unless this is a variation on the expression 'My bad'].' '...waste are time on his book?' 'Sorry but I'm lost of words.' [And so am I...] 'They are moving to fast for us.../It is past time too organize...' '..to bring to past what we are here to do.' '...the right to own and bare arms.' [What?! Are we under Sharia law already???...] '...they will soon loose it.' ' 'He is a charlitan criminal.' '...you use to be...' 'I agree civil was is enviable.' [Well, a little debate about that one...] '...stand by are beliefs.' 'You wan't this to stop...You don't wan't your...' '...our ancestores were...' 'Where all Americans.' '...to seprate us...' '...a lot of our fourfathers...'
A lot of our forefathers are turning in their graves right now, groaning, at what has become of the nation they fought and died for, and envisioned, as what has been called 'a shining city on a hill'.
Not shinning to grate rite now.
2 And so, e.g., American 'patriots' are, to erstwhile subverters of the established order of things wanting to make the nation over into their preferred form of governance - a top-down, people-control form, where the state is the sovereign, not the individual - potential 'terrorists'. To be dealt with accordingly. According, that is to say, to the way that these ES's have established for them to be dealt with, step by stealthy step. First establishing 'enemy combatants', and then such as a person, including U.S. citizens, giving 'substantial aid to terrorists', and then, 'suddenly,' patriots have become the equivalent of terrorists, who can now by legal definition be dealt with outwith the protections of the U.S. Constitution. Voila: Overthrow in small Fabian-like, incremental steps. One step at a time. Sweet.
3 And just how did the federal government get so involved in the nation's educational systems anyway?? Where's the constitutional prerogative in that??? The federal government, in the terms of the Constitution, is a government of limited and delegated powers - "few and defined," in the words of the so-called Father of the Constitution, James Madison. I do not see this takeover of the nation's educational systems - which are part of the prerogative of the States, in our federal form of government - among the central government's enumerated powers.
But not to get bogged down in this debate right here and now. I've got other fish to fry in this blog, than getting involved in the Federalist vs. AntiFederalist debate of the founding years. Let alone the clash between those in our time who want to overthrow the Constitution and its republican form of government and replace it with a direct-democracy system, ideal for statist demagogues to ply their trade in.
No comments:
Post a Comment