A lot of talk on the Internet today about insurrection: breaking the country down into regions, for resistance coordination; marches on Washington, unarmed and armed; lists - 'theirs' and 'ours' in retaliation; a video of a long train of abuses and usurpations - excuse me; of military vehicles, out in the desert in the middle of Arizona, going - where. And for whom, as ultimate destination...1
So, to clarify where I'm at, in all this current scene, of life in America.
No. 1. I am incensed that a Usurper has succeeded to the highest office in the land (and perhaps the most powerful position in the world). I understand that there is some question regarding the judicial ins and outs of the pertinent definition of a 'natural born citizen' - to say, the one that was the understanding and intention of the constitutional Framers in convention. The argument is made by Obama supporters that they (the Framers) were going by English common law, in which and by which 'a natural born subject' only refers to the place of birth - jus soli, the soil, not also jus sanguinis, the blood.2 But surely the whole point of the exercise was to make sure that the prospective candidate for the position of the Commander in Chief of the military forces of the Republic did not have any conflicts of interest - did not have dual loyalties or allegiances, as he would have if he were not born of two citizen parents, Surely 'you' don't take me for a fool, as to think that they would have been content simply to have meant only that he could not be a naturalized citizen??
If they were concerned enough about the issue, of the candidate's prior citizenship, why would that concern not as well have extended to his current/born citizenship??? And especially as they were familiar enough with de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations' that they could see the intrinsic value of the point, in determining the loyalties and allegiances of individuals.
No. This business in our time of fudging on this issue was a political one, not an honest legalistic one. And the Republicans did not make an issue of it, because why? Because obviously they entered into a quid pro quo deal with the Democrats on the matter. As is telegraphed by the fact that both sides of the political aisle made a total of eight attempts, between 2003 and 2008, to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on this very issue, of the high bar for the requirement for a candidate for the presidency; i.e., that he or she was not to be able to be just a citizen. And they failed even to get it out of committee each time.
I won't dwell on this discussion. The point is legitimately made.3 And in addition, there is the little matter of business regarding Obama's birth certificate. Which, to considerable expert - and commonsense - opinion is a forgery.4 So we are talking not only about a usurper. But a man subject to felony charges. If not of treason itself.
No. 2. The Patriots, bless them, want to take their country back. I want to take it forward. And not 'forward' as in the Obama campaign call this last time around (building on his/his backers' '08 call for Hope and Change), into whatever specifically he has in mind for the country. (Whatever it is, it doesn't augur well.) I mean, into a real New Era for Humanity.
Not just on a linear, materialistic timeline. The Time now calls for moving Up. Out of the dense 3D stage that we have been on, playing out our various parts, over and over again; until, apparently, we get it 'right'. And individually move on on our spiritual paths, into the higher realms of the All That Is. But now, there is something 'new under the Sun' going on. With the imminent collapse of the world's monetary system; and with the level of technology that we Humans have achieved; and with a number of wheels within wheels within wheels, including of the cosmos itself - it is clearly time for, as they say, something completely different. We are at a Turning Point. For Humanity as a whole. Not just as individuals.
And it is that new sea that I wish to help Humanity sail on.
Let me.
For it is that time.
Before we accidentally spill over into a stage of development that we really don't want to go into.
And have to start the long climb out into the Sun all over again.
--
footnotes:
1 Shades of the 2700-some MRAPs ordered recently by the Obama administration for domestic use...
2 American common law, or what was known as Natural Law, or The Law of Nations, refers to both categories. But the argument is that, although it is known that the Framers were aware of that factor, the accepted 'coin of the day' was English common law. I'm not enough of an investigator to have looked into this matter in that detail. All I know is what I continue to comment on, above.
3 And that the authorities of both political parties need to be hauled before a - legitimate - court of law on RICO statutes. For some justice to prevail; on this level. Before all changes.
For a bit more on which, keep reading. (This isn't the place to go into the 'after' in detail.)
4 Actually, both the original COLB posted, and then the LFBC itself.
As to this business, we come to the question, Why? The most logical answer is because there is something 'wrong' with his original bc - if he even ever had one. All of which is another matter, in this murky business, of a man having risen as high as this man has without clear information regarding his background.
Not a very salubrious story, for anyone involved in the matter. Including Joe and Jill Average Citizen; who seem to have been fairly content just to get on with their lives, in a form of government that required, and requires, the citizenry to be alert Pay attention. Be their own leaders.
If free will is sometimes a drag, so is self-governance. But it beats every other form, by a long shot.
No comments:
Post a Comment