I have today (now gone yesterday) received a mailing from one of a number of Impeach Obama groups that I get such mailings from, that caused me to shake my head. Not at the fact that I don't buy into the argument of any of them, about Impeachment being the way to go with the Usurper, since Obama is not a legally sitting president, so he can't be impeached, as if he were one. Which action would tend to give him some undue coloration in the office, undue legitimacy. Impeachment would not undo all the illegal things that he has done in the office - all the legislation that he illegally signed into law, and all the illegal Executive Orders that he has issued, like a potentate - the Emperor of America - and all the illegal appointments that he has made. They all need to go with him, and his administration stricken from the record, as if it had never happened, was but a sad footnote in the life of the American Republic, before it succumbed to the Vandals - or didn't. No. My concern was about the attitude of the Project Director of this particular group, who, although obviously a person of good intentions, feels that:
"There needs to be tangible evidence that the MAJORITY of Americans want to Impeach Barack Obama and remove him from power.
"And although polls show that it is the MAJORITY of Americans who want these actions to be taken - the House Judiciary Committee needs tangible evidence that the action has been demanded by the people…"
With all due respect, Douglas, I beg to differ. The House Judiciary Committee needs no such thing. All it has to do is
do its job.
I talked about 'Profiles of Courage' now-gone yesterday in a couple of Comments to an article on the Internet. Well, here:
at codyjudy.blogspot.com: 'Breaking News: Justices of 10th Circuit Court Will Conduct A Poll on Obama's Ineligibility Case' - Feb. 9
(Mr. Cody was a candidate for the presidency when the ineligible candidate, Mr. Barack Obama, ran against him, and he has challenged Mr. Obama on those grounds in court, also as having undeniable 'standing' to bring his suit, since he was personally injured by the illegal act of the Democrat Party putting up an ineligible candidate for the job. He has presented his case to 'the courts,' with all of the appropriate arguments for his legal position, and is a step closer to being heard on the subject by the legal system in this country by this action of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. This doesn't mean that they agree with him; it only means that the process will advance to the stage that the judges on that Court will be polled as to his queries, which involved asking those (3, out of the 12) judges appointed by Obama to recuse themselves or be recused from the hearing. As, indeed, they should; since they would - will?? - be stricken from their jobs once Justice is served in this matter.)
Stan - Feb. 10
Interesting. I hadn't heard about your case before, Cody. I applaud your efforts, under the rule of law in this country - to say, the Constitution.
I am reminded of JFK's book 'Profiles of Courage'. Not only in relation to you. But in hopeful relation to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. It will be interesting to see if they are willing to hear a case of an Individual v. The Government of the United States. More power to you in your taking on of - in your willingness to take on - Goliath.
For Truth to prevail. Or not.
--
(above story posted at birtherreport.com:)
..
kibitzer3 60p · 6 minutes ago (Feb. 10)
This man is to be commended wholeheartedly for his actions. Call it 'Profiles in Courage'.Or not.
My point: The House Judiciary Committee simply needs to exercise some Profiles in Courage in this matter. And bring the governmental system in this country back into harmony with Truth and Justice.
Now, I understand that that might take a little doing; particularly by my synchronistically having listened now-gone yesterday to a radio interview, on the Internet, with a woman who outlined in great and convincing detail how the American system of governance has been hijacked - starting many years ago - and is operating, not under the Constitution, as we common garden-variety citizens think, but under a form of corporate statute. not law per se. It's all a bit complicated - and includes the larger agenda of TPTB, who mean to do us common garden-variety citizens in, in many ways, including by modern hi-tech mind-control and -enslavement techniques (including in our air, food, water, EMF fields, and vaccines) - but the bottom line is that the rot set in in this country well before Obama's advent.
And so, we are up to the point where not only he has to go.
But the whole system has to go. As it has been corrupted so.
And I'm just your man to do it.
Because this is my country. And I will not countenance such shoddy stuff going on in it.
Being here, now, for this very job. Because, you see, with its pristine help - regarding its having been raised up to champion the sovereignty of the individual - we are about to go Up.
Not under.
Deal with it, one and all.
'It': that
the Play is over.
It's time for
the Real Thing.
Because
that's where we are at.
Not a pretty note to end this 3D Drama on.
But there you go.
That's what free will will get you.
What's that, you say?:
Choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment