Th-th-that's All, Folks!

I so wish I could post a blog with that title, and mean it: that The Play is over, and it's time for The Real Thing.

(You know how the Chairman of the International Olympic Committee opens The Games by declaring:  'Let The Games Begin!'?? I would so love to be able to say:

'Let The Games End!')

In the meantime - sigh - it's more of the same old, same old......

further at conservativeamericaonline: ‘Megyn Kelly Declares War On Ted Cruz’ - August 26

..

proudtexan62 kibitzer3 • 12 hours ago (August 28)

Get over that Ted Cruz is ILLEGAL. He is not and he is running for President of the United States and he will either be President or VP before all is said and done. You liberals crawl back in your holes because you are not even in the running. America is tired of Communism and Tyranny.

•

Reply

• kibitzer3 proudtexan62 • a few seconds ago (August 28)
• 
  Which is precisely why this is such a major issue, proudtexan62. Obama is a Usurper, for not being a bona fide 'natural born' citizen - i.e., one born on the soil of TWO U.S. citizen parents; the requirement PRIMARILY so that the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces does not have ANY DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES - and so needs to be removed from that thus-dishonored office, and quick (by Oathkeepers, current and retired). And if you would stop blindly supporting your 'favorite son' candidate for a minute and see the truth of the matter, you would see that.

• The original intent and meaning of the term by the constitutional Framers was based on the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations Or Principles Of Natural Law'. There is plenty of historical evidence confirming that. Do your homework. And stop insulting me by calling me a liberal. I am a Truthseeker. Are you??

         Reply

proudtexan62 kibitzer3 • 5 hours ago

Ted Cruz should not even be mentioned in the same sentence with Barack Obama. Obama is an illegal, a Muslim Radical Terrorist, A Communist, a Nazi, a Marxist and a Socialist!!! He ran for president of this country with the intent of destroying America as we know it. Ted Cr in uz is a Constitutional Scholar and A Constitutional Attorney and has been fighting Barack Obama ever since he walked into the Senate Chamber in 2013. He held dual Citizenship because of being born to an American Mother (from Delaware) in Canada while she and his father were working in Canada. Ted Cruz is much more a Patriot of the United States of America than many people who were born here with two American parents . We know ted Ted Cruz and we know he explored every single law regarding his eligibility before he ever announced he was running. He had planned to announce much sooner but Ted Cruz is a very thorough person. He is one of the most intelligent people in this country and he, like Donald Trump cannot be bought by any special interest. He is truthful, respectful, and you will never beat him in a debate. He was one of the shining stars of the Harvard Law School debate team. His professors said he was one of the most intelligent men who had ever graduated Harvard, if not the most intelligence. You will not stop Ted Cruz from running for President and this country needs him like we have never needed a man like him before. Ronald Reagan was a wonderful President but Ted Cruz will equal or better him for many reasons. You need to get over the fact that you don't know the law where this is concerned and move on. You still today have the right to vote for whoever you want and if you don't like Ted Cruz, don't vote for him. Just don't sell this country down the river with a vote for Hillary Clinton if she even makes it to the primaries or Bernie Sanders. One is worse than the other and Clinton is worse than Obama and that's saying something. Joe Biden will likely get the liberal nod to run and he is not the brightest light bulb in the box but he's head and shoulders above Clinton and Sanders.

Reply

• kibitzer3 proudtexan62 • a few seconds ago (August 28)
• 
  I was going to let this comment thread go when someone else's retort riled me to anger, and I didn't want to engage in that frame of mind, but you have convinced me that I can't let the matter go, for you are reacting in ERROR, and I can't let that be the last word, or people might believe your take on the matter.
• 
  The fact is that Cruz is ineligible for that particular office because his father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth, and the argument need go no further, into where he was born, etc. etc.: he falls at the first hurdle. PERIOD.
• 
  The other person tried to argue that court decisions have settled the matter: I beg to differ. It doesn't matter what subsequent court decisions say, one way or the other, on the issue - the meaning - the intent of the NBC requirement for that office - AND THAT PARTICULAR OFFICE, as I have pointed out, setting it on a special pedestal for its special reason. This is a substantive, fundamental constitutional issue, that it would take a constitutional amendment to change from its original, de Vattel clarification and intent, of defining one born on the soil of TWO (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents, so as not to have ANY DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. And NO SUCH AMENDMENT has been passed. But indeed - and as evidence that both main political parties knew and know this - both parties tried a total of 8 times between them between 2003 and '08 to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on this very issue - to water down the NBC requirement - and failed each time even to get it out of committee, such was the political sensitivity around the issue. So what did they do? They engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the American people and the rule of law in this country: the Constitution.
• 
  Why would the Republican Party go along with a maneuver that made it possible for Obama to slip into that office illegally?? Because they wanted to be able to do the same thing with THEIR candidates. As we have seen. Do I have any proof of this? No, just common sense - but I can hardly wait for both parties to be brought up before an honest court of law on RICO-statute charges, of colluding in the commission of a crime, and being declared the criminal enterprises that they are, and dissolved forthwith. Which knocks the 2016 elections into a cocked hat, [at least] until this matter is cleared up.
• 
  For, this nation WILL return to TRUTH. Or it will not be allowed to pass into its future. Whatever that better future may be. For, the future is one of Truth, and Justice.
• 
  No more Corruption. That is coin of the realm of another day. A day now past. Or at least, in the process of passing. Into a better one. Where we go, neither to the Left nor to the Right.
• 
  
• But Up.

--

2) from westernjournalism.com: ‘Obama Just Had His Hand Slapped Hard By Fed Judge Who Blocks This “Inexplicable” Overreach’ - Norvell Rose - August 28

(“Calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s latest effort to extend its control over virtually all U.S. waterways “inexplicable, arbitrary and devoid of reasoned process,” a federal judge has just blocked another attempt by President Obama to bypass Congress.
The Washington Times reports that Judge Ralph Erickson has issued a temporary injunction that prevents the EPA “from claiming oversight of millions of acres of land that contain small bodies of water.”…)

..

Stan Stanfield · Stanford University (August 28)

A federal judge has blocked an EPA edict on water rights as being unconstitutional - for excellent, intelligent reasons - and the EPA's response is to say that the ruling will only apply to the 13 states that were a party to the lawsuit, and they will go ahead with their sweeping edicts in the other 37 states - regardless of any appeal that they make to the particular decision???!!

GET THESE A*****ES OUT OF THERE. Arrest the lot of these petty tyrants, these communist commissars - and start all the way up the ladder, to He Who Gives The Orders: the Usurper, Obama. It's obviously that time. 

Grrrrrrrrr..................................

--
3) And then this, to finish this day's postings; from Judicial Watch's Weekly Update (Aug. 28): 

Judicial Watch Seeks Accountability for DNC's Hire of Illegal Alien 'The brazen lawlessness by this administration and its allies on illegal immigration knows no bounds.  I was shocked to read that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired an illegal alien to help with its campaigns.  The media played it as a "Dreamer" moment.   'Your Judicial Watch is having none of that lawless approach to the rule of law on immigration.  'We have just filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission requesting that it investigate the DNC for having "knowingly hired" an illegal alien, Cindy Nava, to help craft the committee's 2016 political message and communications.  Judicial Watch filed its complaint on August 25, 2015.  'A June 8, 2015, story in The Washington Post reported that the DNC hired Nava with full knowledge of what DNC chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) termed Nava's "undocumented status."  The news report details that "Despite not yet attaining legal status, Nava is working for the Democratic National Committee as one of a crop of fellows from around the country helping the party organize ahead of a presidential election that President Obama predicted would feature immigration as a major issue."  The Spanish language newspaper El Nuevo Herald reports that Nava would help coordinate DNC outreach to "women, youth, and Hispanics." 'Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from participating "directly or indirectly in the decision-making process" of federal, state, or local election-related activities. 'The Judicial Watch FEC complaint charges:  'The Democratic National Committee knowingly hired a Foreign National to assist, directly or indirectly, in setting the Committee's Public Policy Agenda for its Candidates, the National Committee, and its Associated Organizations.  'The United States has prohibited non-citizen participation in election related activities for over fifty years. The United States Supreme Court has held that such prohibitions are legally permissible under the U.S. Constitution... In 2002, Congress expanded the prohibitions on foreign nationals... to include "anything of value" that "directly or indirectly" contributes to a political campaign... The Commission has stated "foreign nationals [cannot] direct, control, or otherwise participate directly or indirectly in the decision-making process of [a] PAC.  'On its face, the DNC's decision to hire Ms. Nava is in direct violation of this provision. The FEC should investigate this matter further to determine the full extent of Ms. Nava's responsibilities, her relationship to the policy making team, and her effect on the 2016 DNC election strategy. 'The Democratic National Committee is Willfully and Knowingly violating Federal Law and Contradicting Federal Policy by Permitting a Foreign National to Contribute to the Conventions Campaigns, Election Strategy, and Fundraising Efforts       'The United States Congress created a federal offense to knowingly hire an illegal alien. It is against Federal law "to hire, or to recruit..., for employment in the United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien... There are two elements to this crime: (1) knowledge of the alien's status, and (2) an employment offer...  'Thus, the DNC is violating federal law by hiring Cindy Nava. Her fellowship constitutes expenditures under the FEC regulation, and therefore these illegal expenditures are within the scope of FEC regulations... They have actively employed Ms. Nava knowing that she lacked proper authorization to work in the United States.  'Our request for a "full, formal investigation" concludes, "These actions are particularly egregious because the DNC flagrantly promotes their illegal activities, lawlessness, and disrespect for the rule of law." 'Is it any wonder this nation has a border and illegal alien crisis? 'Not only do we have a major political party knowingly employing an illegal alien, but also openly boasting about it to the nation's press. The DNC should be held accountable by the FEC for hiring an illegal alien in violation of both federal immigration and election laws.  Frankly, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security should also take appropriate law enforcement action.' And will they?   As they say: Don't hold your breath. And as I say: Grrrrrrrrrrr......................................