On The Law

from freedomoutpost.com; ‘SCOTUS Ignores Words Of Second Amendment - Allows Open Carry Ban To Stand’ - Tim Brown - November 30

(“On Monday, the US Supreme Court refused to deal with a real Constitutional issue, the right to keep and bear arms.

“The State of Florida has unlawfully written a "law" that bans people from keeping and bearing arms in public by open carry and one man, who merely exercised that God-given right is facing the heavy hand of government bureaucrats and pretended legislation against those rights…”)

..

kibitzer3 • 25 minutes ago (November 30; edited into December 1)

Thank you for the article and commentary, Tim. Important stuff.

We are going to have to face this issue, of court rulings on case law rather than on original intent, sooner or later. Best that it be sooner. Or it may become too late.

Not so incidentally, and on this same issue of constitutionality: In the best of all possible worlds, the Obama appointees to all levels of the judiciary should be stricken from their positions, and all opinions of theirs that were crucial to various cases likewise stricken, rendered null and void, because Obama was constitutionally ineligible for the position of POTUS in the first place; not being a "natural born" citizen. The definition of the term, as understood by the constitutional Framers (for which there is much historical evidence), is a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens" thereof. (That's what makes it "natural," for heaven's sake. NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. To have SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.)  And that eligibility requirement for that particular office - and that particular federal office ONLY; indicating its special nature in their eyes - STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.

Or a time when the nation had ceased to follow its rule of law.

—

This particular court issue, in the context as well of the State of California banning various kinds of ‘arms.' as we here face a takeover by NWO forces, is a very telling sign of the times.

Never to forget that the whole point of the 2nd Amendment was to enshrine in the new federal government contract the right of the people to protect themselves against their own government, OR forces from beyond our borders.

Speaking of timely warnings…

…and then there are the Bundys.  Out here in the West of the nation.  Their case overlooked by much of the MSM.

I see that they have been given something called ‘pre-trial release,’ to spend the holidays with their families.  It should be permanent.  Their trials have been about politics.  The federal government has been trying to take over as much land in the West that it can get its hands on.  It is using the UN’s Agendas 21 and 2030 as cover, to lock it up, under their control, and move all ranchers and farmers off of it, in order to control the food supply, for us cattle to them to not have independence from them, be as dependent on the federal government as they can manage to make us.  Plus, the former federal senator from Nevada, Harry Reid, and his son, had plans for that land, to arrange financially for the Red Chinese to take part of it over; ostensibly as a solar farm, but really as cover for them to move closer to our military bases, waiting for Der Tag.  And also there is some evidence that there is uranium in that land, and that is another cash cow to replace the food cattle that the Bundys were running their spread for.  The BLM had already run most of the ranchers off that area.  The Bundys proved to be another, a tad more American, thing entirely.  (See his Opening Statement to the Jury by the Bundy eldest son.)  As I say: politics.  

And as I also said: ‘In the best of all possible worlds,’ the federal government will fold its hand in this case; and other cases around the country that have been really about ‘politics’ will have their victims released as well.  I know of at least two such: those of a young guy named Francis S. Cox, in prison in Illinois, and a woman named Annette Bosworth, under charges in South Dakota.  They are both, for different reasons, in effect political prisoners.  

Those days now needing to be over.

As we get to the real matter of things.  That being

the end of the Drama.  And the beginning of

the Real Thing.  

Under the rule of Law.

To say:

Under God.

--

...and while I am on the subject:

message (December 1) to Steve Beckow of The Golden Age of Gaia on the issue of BHO’s birth certificate (article ‘Was President Obama’s Birth Certificate a Fake?  Yes.  But…’ November 30; the article, quoting various discarnate sources (including “the Divine Mother”), saying that “The Illuminati created the birth certificate in order to be able to expose it and represent President Obama as trying to appear as if he were born in the U.S. when he was not…” but going on to say that he was, indeed, born in Hawaii, and so - presumably - was a legitimate candidate and occupant):

Steve, 

I have been following your site for some years, and so I feel that I 'know' your heart, and that it is a good one.  But you need to understand something, that goes to the issue of deceit.  I will keep this message as short as I can. 

The issue about WHERE Obama was born is not THE issue.  That was, and still is, a red herring.  He has sworn that his birth father was Barack Obama Sr.  That made him ineligible for the office of POTUS right there.  There is all manner of historical evidence, much of which I can provide you with if you wish, to confirm that the definition of a 'natural born' citizen that the constitutional Framers understood the term to mean was/is a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens" thereof.  (That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake.  NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  To have SOLE ALLEGIANCE to, in this case, the U.S.)  And that eligibility requirement for that particular office - and that particular federal office ONLY; indicating its special nature in their eyes (having mostly to do with that occupant’s becoming as well, then, the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces) - STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.  

The definition is from the definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters, Emer de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations' (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212; it's on the Internet).  I am saying that you have been hoodwinked on this matter.  That you need to 'check your premises'.  TRUE Higher Beings would not use chicanery to accomplish their purposes.   

Obama, while in that terribly important and powerful position, among other seditious actions brought the Red Chinese and the Russians over to observe this nation's 'power grid down' exercises, thus giving them inside info as to how to bring this nation to its knees.  The U.S.A. has been set up for a takeover by the New World Order gang - i.e., Luciferians - who wish to fasten a totalitarian police state on the entire world.  You are on the wrong side in this battle.  Listen to your heart on the matter; not to corruptible others.  And good luck.  

Most sincerely,

Duane ’Stan' Stanfield