On Actions Having Consequences

(Email to Devvy Kidd, political commentator par excellence)

Subject:

NWV Column of July 19

July 19 2015

Dear Devvy:

Thank you for this column, and helping to publicize the issue being, at its root, regarding Obama’s dual citizenship. And please understand fully that the issue REALLY is not ‘the birth certificate’ itself. That is a secondary issue. Nor is it WHERE he was born. The PRIMARY issue is that Obama has sworn that he is the son [of] a non-U.S. citizen father - and that ALONE cooks his goose.

It is not rocket science; as apologists on both sides of the political aisle would pretend, and try to obfuscate into being. Consider, America: the whole POINT of the ‘exercise’ on the part of the constitutional Framers in putting that particular eligibility requirement in their contract for that particular office, and that particular office ONLY, was to make sure that the person ending up occupying the presidential office - who would then as WELL become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces - had 

NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. 

As a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And as a born DUAL citizen would CERTAINLY be subject to. 

Like Obama. 

A) To pretend otherwise is to take the U.S. out from functioning under the rule of law and institutionalizing it under the rule of men. Another word for which is tyranny. Requiring an appropriate response from the American people.

B) To aid in the process of educating the American public to this ‘take’ on the issue, of the constitutional Framers’s CLEAR INTENT in putting that requirement in their contract for that office, there are four main historical factors to consider:

1. The 7/25/1787 letter by John Jay (a leading statesman of the day; who not so incidentally became the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, such was the widespread respect for his acumen) to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the Constitutional Convention proceedings, pointing out this very aspect of the matter: that the person who would become as well the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces should have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES, and thus needed to be “a natural born" citizen. 

2. The (providential??) proposal by Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the proceedings, that the person filling the presidential office need only be a, quote, “citizen” - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent ‘natural born’ citizen category. 

3. They were CLEARLY going by the definition of the term of E. de Vattel, in his definitive tome ’The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law,’ wherein the term is defined as one born on the soil (jus soli) of citizen parents (jus sanguinis). That’s PLURAL. As in BOTH. As in NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. 

4. And if any of the delegates were not sure of what they were being asked to vote on, all they would have had to do was ask their learned and respected elder mentor, Benjamin Franklin, sitting right there amongst them as a delegate to said proceedings, who was known to have three copies of said learned tome. (And as I understand, there was also a copy of it in the library of the very building where they were meeting.)

Shall we call a spade a spade? The reason that the Republican Party has not made an issue of Obama’s ineligibility for the office is because they wanted to drive their own coach and horses through the Constitution through the same forced doorway; the smoke-filled backroom conversation obviously going something like: ‘We won’t say anything about your candidate on this issue if you won’t say anything about any of our candidates that we might put up in the future. And with our control of the mainstream media between us, and the judiciary, we will be able to stiff the stupid public on the matter.’ And the dastardly deed was done. 

The reason? Because both political parties had tried a total of 8 times between them between 2003 and 2008 to get a Constitutional amendment going through Congress loosening the nbc requirement - and failed even to get it out of committee each time, such was the sensitivity around the issue. So, it’s obvious what they did:

They colluded.

Which will all come out, in a court of law, when both parties are hauled up (in a LEGITIMATE court of law) on RICO statutes for engaging in criminal and collusory practices, and will be dissolved for being the criminal enterprises that they are. Which will be part of the cleaning out of the nest of vipers who have taken over the government of this nation.

Once The People come to their senses, as to what, precisely, has been going on, and just how how artful and awful it has been. For long enough.

Which is where commentators like you come in. 

Please keep up the good work, Devvy. On this issue, along with the others that you are involved in. But especially this one.

The very fate of the American federal constitutional Republic is at stake on this one.

Sincerely yours,

‘Stan’ Stanfield

—

That should be clear enough for even members of Congress to understand.

--

2) from Tea Party C.C. - July 19:

Tom Gallagher replied to Kat's discussion "Homeland Security Working Overtime to Add ‘New Americans’ by 2016 Election" on Tea Party Command Center:

------------

This is identical to efforts initiated in 2011 designed to increase the voter registries of the 2012 Presidential election. This runs contrary to the stated purpose for the Department of Homeland Security. One can only hope that Jeh Johnson is required to explain these actions to Judge Andrew Hanen along with his explanation for continuing to issue visas to some 3,000 illegal immigrants after the judge issued an injunction to cease implementation of the Presidents evecutive order.

When government is exempt from the rule of law there is no rule of law.

—

Indeed, Tom.  Indeed.

I’m not sure that things can get worse than they already are…

…and all because the American people were asleep at the switch, from a federal constitutional republic, to a tyranny.  Which happened the moment they bought the pig in a poke:

Obama.

For want of a nail…

This thing could have been nailed down right there, and kept from hatching.

I can only conclude that there is a good reason for things having gone the way they have gone.

I certainly hope so.

I certainly hope so.