On Presidential Candidates

from freedomoutpost.com: ‘Weeding Out the Socialists: Our Presidential Candidates for 2016’ - Tony Elliott - July 11

(A rundown of all the candidates, from both main political parties - as they exist today…)

..

Stan Stanfield · Stanford University (July 12)

Cruz "stands for Conservative values and the constitution as the basis for law". Then why is he running for the office? He must know that he is ineligible for it, for not being a 'natural born' citizen, i.e., one born on the soil (jus soli) of TWO (in this case) U.S. citizen parents (jus sanguinis). Just as Obama was, and is, ineligible, and is therefore a Usurper, and therefore needs to be removed (not impeached; that is for legally sitting presidents). 

Can we assume that the Republican Party made nothing of the Obama ineligibility because they wanted to do the same thing? That is, go around the Constitution - and thus the rule of law - on the issue. Having discovered, with their Democrat Party counterparts, the difficulty of getting a constitutional amendment on the issue, from trying a total of 8 times between them, from 2003 [to] '08, to get just such an amendment going through Congress, and failing even to get it out of committee each time, such was the sensitivity around the nbc issue. So what did they do? Obviously, they colluded with each other, in a smoke-filled backroom in Washington, to stiff the Constitution - and the American people - on the matter; gambling on their control of both the MSM and the judiciary between them to carry off the caper. All of which will come out when they are hauled into (a fair) court on RICO-statute charges. And found to be the criminal enterprises that they are. 

Which is why I personally don't think there is going to be an election in 2016 anyway. If there is, it will be without either the Dems or the Repubs. Because the Truth will out. Sooner or later.

And much better, the sooner.

---

...and further Notes From A Speck Of Stellar Dust:

from conservativeamericanonline.blogspot.com: ‘Video: Trump Revives Birther Debate’ - Chris Carmouche - July 11 (carried under GrasstopsUSA.com - July 12)
(And yet again, everybody keeps their eye on the idea that BHO MIGHT have been born in Kenya…)

..

kibitzer3 • a few seconds ago (July 12)

When o when are the American people, and her political leaders, going to wake up to the fact that it doesn't really matter WHERE BHO was born. That is a secondary issue - which his minions & masters are happy to keep the attention on, like a magician. ('Look at this hand. No, THIS hand; over here.') What we DO know for certain is that he claims to be a dual citizen - and that cooks his goose right there.

This is not rocket science: What could the eligibility requirement of one needing to be a "natural born" citizen to qualify for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY - MEAN but that the candidate needs to have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES? As a naturalized citizen would be subject to.  And as a DUAL citizen would CERTAINlY be subject to,

The INTENT of the constitutional Framers was/is clarified even further by the historical fact that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, proposed that the president need only be a "citizen" - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more strict 'natural born citizen' requirement. The PURPOSE was/is clarified by the letter from John Jay - a leading statesman of the time; who, not so incidentally, ended up becoming the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court - to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the C.C. proceedings, wherein Jay humbly pointed out the importance of the presidential office requiring that only a "natural born citizen" - i.e. one born on the soil (jus soli) of TWO (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis) - should occupy it, because that person also becomes the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces.

And we in our day and troubled age can certainly see the wisdom of the constitutional Framers in doing all that THEY in THEIR time could do to keep what has happened under the Usurper from happening. That is, the attempted destruction of the United States of America.

The rest is up to us.

---

I am really getting sick and tired of the Kabuki theatre game that we are playing; on this issue, and many others.  But particularly this one.

We really should know better, than what we are demonstrating at this point.  Come ON, people: You are a sovereign people, self-governing, and responsible for yourselves and the nation: what are you DOING letting it be turned over like this to those who mean it, and you, inescapable harm?????????

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..............................................