As a follow-on to yesterday's stated disappointment in Joseph Farah, I want to refer to the fact that I have received an urgent request from the United States Justice Foundation - which bills itself as "the 'legal arm' of America's conservative movement" - to engage in a worthwhile project, but which may be too little, too late. It has to do with a) a petition to the House Judiciary Committee, expressing deep concerns about Obama's intentions and asking for "immediate televised public hearings" regarding such, and b) their failure in the past to act sufficiently, as such a leading conservative body, to head off this potential looming disaster.
First, the petition:
HOUSE JUDICIARY PETITION TO INVESTIGATE
Sponsored By The United States Justice Foundation (USJF)
In the matter of: Actions being taken by the Obama Administration which could be a prelude to a declaration of Martial Law.
To: The Honorable Chairman of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, United States Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA).
(8 Whereases)1
Therefore, I respectfully urge the House Judiciary Committee to launch immediate televised public hearings into whether the Obama Administration is planning to declare Martial Law, in order to cancel the November Presidential election, to stay in power indefinitely, and to establish dictatorial rule in the United States of America.
Sincerely, (signed & dated)
Secondly, my additional note, in my response, to Michael Connelly, Exec Director of the USJF:
'Dear Michael,
'I have stopped supporting the USJF in principle because you have failed to force the issue of Obama occupying that office illegally, simply for not having been born of 2 citizen parents regardless of other issues surrounding his birth certificate - and so he simply needs to be arrested.* But at least this petition is worth supporting.'
(signed)
--
I have written back to Michael - in return envelopes noting "for the Personal Attn. of Michael Connelly, Exec Dir.' - a number of times on this issue; though I have no idea or indication if he ever received them, from the processing center of his organization. 'This issue': the issue of Obama's ineligibility for the office. To give credit where credit is due: The USJF has consistently supported the idea that impeachment is not the way to go with the Usurper, because that is the way to deal with legally sitting occupants of the office who have caused a call for such a response. But they have never told their mailing list of conscientious American patriots that Obama fell at the very first hurdle, and we don't have to try to prove that he was born in Kenya, as the USJF supposes. To say: It doesn't matter where he was born. He did not have two U.S. citizen parents. (At least according to his claim about his birth; for which there is even question about that.) That puts him out of the running right there. And in not letting their 'constituency' know that simple fact, they have provided the Usurper unfortunate cover all these years - acted precisely as if a co-opted opposition. For, if even such a staunchly conservative outfit as the USJF (like Joseph Farah, and the WND crowd; and others on the Right) doesn't alert the public to that simple fact, how can they be expected to 'get' the matter in its simplicity - and thus to have made such a fuss over it to have had something done about it before this???2
The USJF says that it has taken this matter, of Obama's 'suspected' ineligibility, all the way to the Supreme Court. But on what basis? This should have been a simple open-and-shut case - a slam dunk, if this nation had evan a halfway decent judicial system. I 'get' that most attempts to bring this case to the SCOTUS have been tossed, for lack of proper 'standing' of the plaintiff - to say, the person or group needing to evidence personal injury. But at least two cases attempting to get a SCOTUS ruling on the matter have definitely fallen within that requirement, for the plaintiffs of record having been candidates for the office of the presidency. Why haven't those cases made it to the SCOTUS by now??? And the public thus alerted to the facts of the matter.
I am sorely disappointed in the judicial branch of this country. It goes without saying that I am terribly disappointed in the legislative branch - Congress should have grown a pair well before now, when things are getting extremely dangerous. (Bought off, gang? Made an offer that you couldn't refuse?? What's your effing excuse, as a real 'Do Nothing' Congress???) But if The People can't trust their judicial branch of government, then they are already well on their way into the dark night of tyranny.
And I will NOT countenance such a state of affairs in MY country.
So, put me unequivocally on your red list, boyos, if you don't already have me there. For, I WILL see that you sons of bitches go DOWN.
As the rest of us go up.
Into
The New.
Pending.
As we speak.
As does
the other way.
Your choice.
Choose wisely.
You don't get a second choice.
This time around, at least.
The next time??
Ah. You really don't want to think about that. You will be so appalled, that you might make your decision on a weak, compromised basis. Not on the basis of really choosing
the Right way.
--
footnotes:
1) having to do with various aspects of the Usurper's occupancy of the office, particularly to do with his issuance to his DOH, and other executive-branch departments and agencies, of billions of rounds of hollow point ammo - which is only intended for killing, and terribly so; not target practice - and military equipment, including MRAPs.
The man is clearly gearing up for a takeover attempt.
The man should have been run out of that office long ago. By a properly alert citizenry. Who apparently still have to learn that freedom is not free.
2) THE HISTORICAL RECORD IS UNDENIABLY AND OVERWHELMINGLY ON YOUR SIDE, PEOPLE. That the case is this simple: to read the following with even a modicum of comprehension:
"The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens..."
- and NOT to be put off by those New World Order apologists who have attempted to make the case that the constitutional Framers were going by English Common Law. Not. Because that talks about 'natural born SUBJECTS'. And those men were no longer subjects. They were sovereigns in their own right -- and damn proud of it, after a long and bloody War of Independence for the right to be able to call themselves that.
And what this country has been all about, for heaven's sake...No. They were CLEARLY going by American Common Law, aka Natural Law. Patterned after the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law' (see quote above). Which even distinguished legal types could have found out for themselves. if they had bothered to check the historical record on this matter. Or wanted to. Rather than wanting to impose their own reading - 'interpretation' - on the matter. These characters, who, in their august finery and flowery oratory, want the law to mean what they say it means. Nothing more. And nothing less......
Grrrrrrrr............................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment