from teapartyeconomist.com: 'Marco Rubio's Immigration Scam: 'You Dumb Gringos' - Gary North - June 20
Sutekh · 1 day ago [ = June 21]
Well, after Obama, we'll have another 4 years of a foreigner in the White House -- if Rubio runs and gets elected. At least one of Obama's parents was a citizen when he was born (although, constitutionally speaking, that wasn't enough.). Neither of Rubio's was.
kibitzer3 37p · 1 minute ago [ = early June 23]
Then stop talking about "if Rubio runs and gets elected". Nobody on a conservative blog thread should be making it look as though there is any chance whatsoever of an ineligible candidate running for the presidency (or VP). We MUST stay in solidarity on this - and I mean SOLID. I mentioned on another thread about the ineligibility of either Rubio or Cruz on this issue, and I got a response by someone who said something like 'well at least they're better than the current guy'. I can only presume that that person was a troll - and he could have been either an Obot or a plant from the Republican Establishment, who obviously did a quid pro quo with the honchos of the Democrat Party to allow their own ineligible/non-NBC candidates to go for the office, with that explicit requirement thus weakened beyond repair. Which has been the whole point of the exercise.
Don't fall for these shenanigans, people. Both parties are trying to do an end-around on the Constitution. To undercut the rule of law in this country is to invite disaster, from either the far Left or the far Right. Stick to your guns - figuratively, as well as literally. Tyrants are afoot these dark days. Don't give them what they want: power unchecked by the Constitution.
--
righteous777 - 15 hours ago
I really had high hopes for Rubio, but when I see how far he's pushing this legislation to undermine our laws, our culture, language & most of all being able to "steal" the rest of anything in Social Services from our own citizens. Is there ANY of the supposed candidates FOR American citizens? I now have my eye on Ted Cruz, but as with Rubio, will he become as the same? Rand Paul is a likely candidate, but I don't think he would be elected UNLESS we REAL Conservitaves really push back. I'm extremely disappointed in Rubio & his visit with the Bilderburgs. They are the ones that have way too much power & money. Truly, one God in His great mercy, can save what we have & whatever we would have in the future. This is NOT a religious issue tho, it's a survival issue for all Americans!
kibitzer3 42p · 2 minutes ago [ = early June 23]
If you truly believe all this, then stop with even slightly pushing Ted Cruz. He's no more of an NBC than Rubio is.
PLEASE, Conservatives: Get your heads around this issue. To be an NBC, one has to have had two U.S. citizen parents - that's PLURAL. The whole POINT of putting that requirement into the Constitution for that particular office - who is also the Commander in Chief of the military forces of the Republic - was to make sure that the candidate did not have dual loyalties or allegiances. Obama was ineligible from the git-go. That the Republican Party chose not to make an issue of it speaks volumes. Both political parties are corrupt to their cores. Vote for the best constitutional candidate regardless of party affiliation - and work for fundamental change in the country, back to its basics.
---
…and I am just sick and tired of this whole thing, and am going to bed now.
Hopefully I'll feel better in the morning…
I think some citizens - beyond just the ideologues who are doing all this footsy-playing on purpose - think that those of us who are sticking strictly to the Constitutional definition of an NBC are being 'petty', or 'pettifogging'. If so, what a commentary it is on how dumbed down the average American has become, about the importance of these sorts of things - about the details of things; fidelity to principles.
Maybe we 'deserve what we get' (as another poster here remarked).
But personally, I'm not there yet. I'll still fight the good fight.
Only right now, I'm tired of it. And getting angry about it all. And that's not a good space to be in, or come from. So I wish you 'all' (whoever ever comes across this Note to America, and whenever; or just having floated it out into the ethers) a
Goodnight.
---
P.S. Next day (actually, still today, June 23), response by righteous777 and my reply:
righteous777 - 55 minutes ago
Who do you have your eye on for a constitutional candidate, other than RON Paul? How about Rand Paul? There seems to be quite a few candidates toying with the idea of the POTUS, but I don't think any of them can beat Hillary! Thanx for your feedback. We are in deep do-do with so many issues that it seems almost like a done deal & why bother or feed money to them to just rat us out anyhow?!
Reply
kibitzer3 41p · 11 minutes ago
I agree, righteous777, that it is such a bummer to realize that you can't trust your own political party to uphold your values. But, it was ever thus, in life; sort of the name of the game. And when the going gets tough...
Who do I have my eye on "for a constitutional candidate"?? I would put the pertinent question rather in the form of 'What do I have my eye on in this matter'. Because I see a major socio-political process having come to a head. Not just for Americans. But for the whole of humanity. And those of us who stand for principles (and most certainly NOT the perverted, relativist 'principle' that the end justifies the means) can help lead that whole of humanity to the equivalent - and more; ah, far more, now - of the ancient Promised Land.
As long as we hold firm to principle.
No comments:
Post a Comment