To Everything There Is A Season

To everything there is a season
A rhyme and a reason
             and everything else
              is an illusion
                              is
A sound and a fury,
                    signifying
Nothing so much as a mess.

--

from obama release your records.blogspot.com: 'Team Arpaio: Certified Document Fraud Examiner Confirms Obama BC Entirely Fabricated' - June 2

(reminder: I am kibitzer3.  And kibitzer2, sometimes, depending on the site.  And Stan.)

Robewrt18

· 2 hours ago

All his ID's are fake which makes him a fake and he can not side step that.

Crystallite

· 4 hours ago

The 2008 certification may be legal, but it doesn't prove where he was born. Those certifications were given out to the foreign-born children of Hawaiian residents.

Crystallite

· 4 hours ago

They (by "they" I mean most in Congress) now agree that Ted Cruz (whom I love) is NBC because his mom was a US citizen even though he was born in Canada. Think about it. I'm sure many of them know the jig is up and it will come out that Barry was not born in the US and therefore claiming Cruz is eligible to run for POTUS absolves Barry - and complicit Congresspeople - from any liability in this farce.

kibitzer3

· 5 minutes ago

You're making an interesting point here, Crystallite. Two wrongs trying to make a right, by people who are, indeed, complicit in this crime. And deserving of judicial censure just as much as the Usurper himself; who couldn't have made it to his lofty pinnacle of power without their connivance in the crime. Aka accessories before, to, and after the fact... 

Most probably, their next line of defense will be to argue that 'the people spoke - and twice, and the U.S. is a government of The People; so...' To which bit of attempt at legal legerdemain the best answer would be simply to point out that this is a constitutional republic; being governed by the rule of law, said rule of law being said constitution. And putting them behind bars as well, where they too belong. 

Actually, I look at this matter to be the catalyst for a major change in life on planet Earth, and the next, best move being a Truth & Reconciliation process; as all manner of hidden truths are revealed, as the Dark gives way fully now to the Light. But that's another story. Or rather, stage of The Story...

---

I could perhaps have added some words as to why he is a Usurper, and not just an accessory to forged ID documents.  But that might have distracted from the essential point I was making.  However, I can go into it a bit more here.  To say:

It is being argued by some in the BHO camp that the term 'natural born Citizen' to the constitutional Framers who put it in that document-read-contract only meant to bar a naturalized citizen from the office of the president (and that federal office only).  These people, and the American people in general, need to be told:

Stop insulting my, and our, intelligence - 'our' being all those who believe in the American constitutional republic as it was founded, and has been legally amended.  Think: What would be the point of confining the concern simply to naturalized citizens?  The concern was - and still legally is - in not having someone with potential or demonstrated dual loyalties or outright allegiances in the office the holder of which is also the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces.  How much more would a citizen. in their thinking, be barred from eligibility for that office - and that particular office only, among all the federal offices, let us not ever forget; for this particular loyalty/allegiance reason - if he, or she, were born of a non-U.S. citizen father; a person then who most clearly would have dual loyalties, as a dual citizen??  Even if renounced, in order to become a naturalized citizen???...1

I could say more.2

But I'll rest my case.

In the interests of brevity.  And clear rationality.

To a rational people.

To any rational people...

Except just to say/and then let it go/for now:

If his birth father was indeed Barack Obama Sr. (about which there is some question; which muddies this mendacious matter even further than it already is): did Obama ever legally renounce his British citizenship?  Or could he not do that, because to do so would be to draw unwelcome attention to the matter.

This matter, in its essence, of the Emperor's New Clothes.

Which I will forthrightly, and unequivocally, name; to wit:

This emperor - this would-be emperor - has on no clothes.

And the American people, by and large, know it.

And this little-boy equivalent is here to call him, and them, on it.

Be warned.

Be very warned.

That God will not be mocked.

And God

is

You.

So stop mocking yourself; you

hologrammatic part of the Whole.

Which needs healing

badly

now.

In our time.

And You hold the key.

---

footnotes:

1 And in Obama's case, not even be a 'mere' U.S. citizen, because his mother was not of age to confer even basic citizenship to him through her.
     The whole 'birther', and 'where was he born' thing, being a red herring.
     And 'red' is the apposite word.  Google 'Tom Fife', and his experience in Moscow in 1994.
     And wake up.  Citizen.

2 Especially as to how this issue goes to the subject of intent; and more precisely, in this context, of original intent: the very issue that the Left has tried to wean the law away from, in championing the notion of the Constitution as 'a living document'.  Meaning, in reality, a wet noodle; to be manipulated every which way you wish to see it go.  The answer to such leftist, rule-of-law-destroying people is to stay clearly with 'intent'; with the purpose of the whole exercise: which was to eliminate any possible foreign influence at that critical level of the government.
     And especially not of Britain; with which the Founders and constitutional Framers had just been involved in fighting a war of independence.  They certainly did not want any British influence at the head of the new nation, and fledgling republic.  So having a specifically British subject pass under the radar screen now is rubbing salt in an old wound; is adding insult to injury.
     Grrrrrrrrrrrr................

---

P.S. A late addition to the fray:

from obama ballot challenge.com: 'Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo Disproves Congressional Research Service Papers on Presidential Eligibility/Natural Born Citizenship' - George M. - June 2

Excellent going to post this, George. Well done. People need to have the facts at hand. And the main fact to understand in this matter is the reason why the Framers put that requirement in there for that particular office, and that particular office only: so that any candidate for the office – WHO ALSO BECOMES THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE NATION’S MILITARY FORCES – would not have dual loyalties or allegiances. Like, say, someone with a father who was a citizen of another country, and who thereby conferred his foreign citizenship on his offspring. Which state of legal schizophrenia a TRUE ‘natural born citizen’ does not have, for having had TWO U.S. CITIZEN PARENTS. And thus no competing loyalties or allegiances: THE CARDINAL ELEMENT – and sin, as it were – in the matter.

It all seems so straight-forward. Unless one has an agenda, to make it differently.

Kudos to Mario Apuzzo for helping us keep our eye on the ball on this terribly important matter. For those who have eyes to see.

Stan, 7 hours ago   [actually, 1am on Monday June 3]

REPLY

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

--

I can only hope that the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers' Association membership will do something about this matter, now that they have had a detailed report by Mike Zullo - the lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse - into it.  And the Congressman who was present.  Who together may well be able to redeem the good name of the U.S. Congress yet.

We'll see.  

All, of us...