1) from Tea Party C.C.: ''D.C. Whispers: Harry Reid Hangs Up On Valerie Jarrett' - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - Oct 1 (orig. posted at ulstermanbooks.com - Oct. 1)
("A reported early morning call from Valerie Jarrett is said to have set off Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid who in turn sent staff scrambling to cover his own bases with Senate allies in what some feel is a brewing war between an outgoing White House, and a longtime Senator increasingly desperate to hold onto power.
"The phone conversation between the senior senator and de facto president was apparently brief, with Jarrett sharing her displeasure over Reid’s personal involvement in a number of senate campaigns that she felt has led to Republican momentum in those races. Mr. Reid was equally not pleased to be the focus of blame, his voice carrying well beyond the confines of his office via a half open door…")
..
Reply by Keith Bond 1 hour ago
..
Reply by Keith Bond 1 hour ago
A house divided cannot stand. It's good to see these people fighting within their own party. It will also be good to see that house fall this coming fall once the elections have finally been contested. It is this kind of thing that will bring control of the House and Senate back to the Republican party and hopefully to true conservatives. Let them "bite and devour" each other right into oblivion.
- ▶ Reply
..
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 minute ago (Oct. 1)
The Republicans blew it when they failed to learn from the 2012 elections at the very least that they couldn't out-dirty-trick the Democrats in the election scamming 'game,' and should have joined in on the True the Vote campaign, including of biased electronic voting machines. Early voting has already started in some places; that's where a lot of the scamming takes place - illegal names on the reg rolls, duplicate voting, etc. I for one have no faith in the voting scene in America, refuse to take part in a charade. As I say: You blew it, Republicans. You had your chance. Now live with the results of your failure to act correctly, and take the high road out of this mess that Americans have allowed themselves to get into on this extremely important matter in a democracy.
--
2) from 2012: What's the 'real' truth?: 'Is "1st US Ebola patient" a hoax? by Jon Rappoport October 1' (orig, posted at nomorefakenews.com)
kibitzer3 says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Travel bans, take the (toxic-laced) vaccine or be incarcerated, gun confiscation (and UK PM Cameron declaring anybody who questions 9/11 or 7/7 is an anti-violent extremist-cum-terrorist, subject to incarceration as well) – I get it. This is what TPTB have quietly been putting in place. It’s known in revolutionary parlance as: Der Tag.
The Day.
Their Day has arrived.
May it be a short one, for them.
--
3) from wnd.com: 'Republicans Don't Deserve To Win Election' - Joseph Farah - Oct. 1
--
3) from wnd.com: 'Republicans Don't Deserve To Win Election' - Joseph Farah - Oct. 1
(…but hold your nose, and vote for them anyway, is his recommendation; the old 'lesser of two evils' argument…)
..
A few do like the guy who read nursery rhymes to his kids, while trying to filibuster obamacare...Cruz /West 2016. Otherwise you make an excellent point..he should of been impeached before Ebola and ISIS got here, but now he needs to be tried for treason along with all his evil partners..especially if he knew about ISIS and pulled our troops out anyways.
3
•
Reply
- kibitzer3 deeme • a few seconds ago (Oct. 1)
-
Just to catch anybody on a conservative site in a terrible error: Cruz is not eligible for the presidential office, for not being a 'natural born' citizen, which means one born on the soil of two U.S. (in this case) citizen parents. It couldn't be otherwise: the whole POINT of this constitutional requirement for that office is so that the person occupying the office, who as well becomes the Commander-in-Chief of the nation's military forces, does not have DUAL LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES ("foreign influences" was a term used at the time of the creation of the Constitution). Like a naturalized citizen. And like a DUAL CITIZEN. Like Obama. Who is a dual-citizen BRITISH SUBJECT, for heaven's sake - the very kind of 'citizen' that the constitutional Framers were PARTICULARLY concerned about; having just fought a hard-won war with Britain, and not wanting them to sneak back into power by the side door.
Some Americans seem to think that this trashing of the Constitution is a fait accompli, and we just need to keep moving along, nothing to see here, folks. News flash: 1) Two wrongs don't make a right. 2) We either correct this error (& on the part of the Republican Party as well, for having allowed it to stand). Or we fall under the rule of men, as opposed to the rule of law. Which means we allow ourselves to be ruled by tyrants.
Thank you, no thanks. And more fool you, if you allow it to take place.
No comments:
Post a Comment