Without A Clue

I woke up today incensed over my 'altercation' yesterday with Clueless in Seattle.  I want to shake somebody like that, to wake them up first, and them ask them, like:

'You seem to be pretty happy with the power of the state under Obama.  But what happens if that worm turns?  And all that power devolves to the other side of the political divide from you; with its arbitrary power, and arbitrary law?  Did you ever think of that?  And if not, why not?

'Oh, I get it: Because you think the Left will always be able to beat the bushes for more votes than the Right - including the votes of illegal aliens, and former illegal aliens - and have your people vote themselves money out of the pockets of 'the other guy'.  How arrogant. How immoral.'

'"No it's not" you may say in reply; "he probably got his money by finagling deals with politicians anyway."

'Number one: You don't know that.  Number two: What's that to you?  Since when did two wrongs make a right??  'He' will get 'his' either by the rule of law operating as it should, or in 'his' Life Review, on the other side of this screen that we are playing our parts out on, matrix trying them out in; trying different ones on for size, so to speak. 

'I want to tell people like this: "I'm on the side of man's free will.  His freedom, to do as he will; and experience the consequences of his actions, in this classroom.  But to live in, and by, essential liberty.  What the hell do you think you're doing?  That you would think to pen him up, like cattle, to be used for their meat, and then be culled at the will of the all-powerful state.  Or be like sheep to be sheared, over and over, and then end up on the table for dinner.  To which, instead of ba-a-a-a, I say:

'"Bah."

'And to the argument that "Man must be deprived of the concept of private property because of the likes of man-made global warming": First of all, check your premises.  You may be wrong in your assumptions.  Second: You would throw the baby out with the bathwater.

'It's the same with spiritualism and materialism: You would throw the baby of 'spiritualism' out with the bathwater of mere religion.  Much of 'religion' is man-made, true.  But it is a reflection of the truth of the 'matter' nevertheless: that there is 'something more than man' in the universe.  And outside of it.

'That there is a Grand Intelligence at work.  And our job, obviously, is to seek it out.  And apply it.

'And, yes: respect it.  And show that, by our actions.'  

Anyway.  You get the point.

Grrrrrr…………….

-

What the future holds is what the future holds.  But we must approach it with integrity.  The utmost of integrity.  That's what matters.

That's what 'it' has all been for.

'It':

The lesson-learning of the whole shebang.

And from here, this watershed point: We cannot proceed on the High Road without that 'utmost of integrity' level of consciousness.

For it is a Ring-Pass-Not that we are entering into.

And once into it, there is no going back.

Why would anybody want to, anyway?:

Because of their comfort-zone mentality.

Release that - and all changes.

For the better.

Obviously.

For there is a Plan in and Purpose to Life.

And life more abundantly.

In a Creation fueled by - made up of, in its essence - Love.