Freedom Watch 1/21
Arpaio/Klayman file amicus brief in Texas case on Obama executive orders on amnesty for illegal aliens
(Brownsville, TX., January 21, 2015). Today, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, through his counsel Larry Klayman, filed an amicus brief or "friend of the court" brief in the case now underway in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, arguing that an earlier ruling in his case styled 1:14-cv-01966 before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia should not be used as precedent, as the lower court Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, issued a grossly flawed decision denying a motion for preliminary injunction. That decision, dated December 23, 2015, is now on expedited appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The Obama Justice Department is relying on Judge Howell's decision in seeking to have a Texas court deny a similar motion for preliminary injunction filed by Texas and 23 other states. Howell's flawed decision ignores the harm to Arpaio's Sheriff's office – which is virtually identical to the harm caused to the 24 other states – that is being and will be caused further by the full implementation of President Obama's executive orders effectively granting
amnesty to about 5 million illegal aliens. The executive orders, absent preliminary injunctions, are currently scheduled to go into full effect on February 19, 2015. Howell's grossly erroneous decision also abdicates judicial authority to adjudicate constitutional disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government in this context, as she simply calls the dispute a political one.
amnesty to about 5 million illegal aliens. The executive orders, absent preliminary injunctions, are currently scheduled to go into full effect on February 19, 2015. Howell's grossly erroneous decision also abdicates judicial authority to adjudicate constitutional disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government in this context, as she simply calls the dispute a political one.
Klayman and Arpaio issued this short statement in filing their amicus brief:
"Judge Howell's decision must not be allowed to influence the Texas court. Notwithstanding our expedited appeal to the D.C. Circuit, we will do everything to turn back Obama's illegal and unconstitutional amnesty, including going all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. The American people deserve not to be railroaded by a president who knows no constitutional bounds and who does not adhere to the rule of law, particularly when it causes harm to ordinary Arizonans and other Americans by opening the door to illegal alien criminals not being deported under the current law. It instead increases the cost to legitimate law enforcement that is now forced to pay for it."
To view the amicus brief, go to www.freedomwatchusa.org and for more information contact Freedom Watch at (424) 274-2579 or daj1421822@gmail.com"
--
So an Obama-appointed judge calls this dispute simply "a political one," and dismisses it on that basis. No constitutional question about it, in her mind. No 'rule of law' issue. Apparently, Obama can do whatever he wishes to do, from his arrogant I-am-the-law seat in the Oval Office.
The judge is an ass. More. Is a part of a major problem in America.
The problem of a takeover of the country, by - in this case - the Left.
If the day comes - as it obviously has - that a citizen can't say with a fair sense of a fair outcome, "I'll see you in court," then the day has come for refusal to abide by the rulings of such an outlaw bunch of vipers.
I would say of 'sons of bitches,' but unfortunately that would exclude some of the mob.
--
Read my lips, lady:
from teaparty.org: 'Ted Cruz to Tea Party: I'm 'Very, Very Seriously' Considering a Bid' - Jan. 21 - orig. posted at newsmax.com - Jan. 19
..
Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University (Jan. 22)
What is wrong with some conservatives? Why do they think that merely being a "citizen" of the U.S. makes one a "natural born" citizen?
A "natural born" citizen is a higher hurdle to clear than being simply a "citizen". The constitutional Framers put that eligibility requirement in the constitutional contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY (the c'l contract since amended logically to include the office of the VP) - to make sure that a candidate, if elected - who would then as well become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - would not have any DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. Like a naturalized citizen. And like a DUAL CITIZEN. DUH.
As like the current Usurper. Who not only needs to be removed from that office for that reason ALONE, but is a PERFECT EXAMPLE of the wisdom of the Framers in putting that requirement in there. His allegiances are all over the place, except for the federal constitutional republic of America.
The smoking gun on this intention of the c'l Framers is that Alexander Hamilton proposed at the C'l Convention that the eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency only require the person to be a "citizen" - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more strict version (recommended by John Jay). As someone on this thread on the other side of the argument has erroneously said in that case, but as I say in point of fact:
"End of story."
--
TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT.
Get on the right side of this extremely important constitutional issue. Or get out of the way. The People - supported by Oathkeepers to the Constitution - WILL be heard in this matter.
Stand up for Truth. Or be rendered obsolete, to the grave issues at hand.
--
more from had-enough fire in the belly:
from TeaParty C.C.: 'Judge Napolitano -- Obama's Bergdahl Deal, Treason, High Crimes And Misdemeanors' - posted by Natl Dir Dee - Jan. 21 - orig. posted at gopthedailydose.com - Jan 20
..
Reply by Gregory Paul Revere Brown 12 hours ago (Jan 21)
If the Justice Dept cannot uphold the law, then the American People need to take the law into their own hands and arrest all of those under Obama!
▶ Reply
Permalink Reply by Joseph Hull 12 hours ago
I'm with you Gregory!!
What is it gonna take?
▶ Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield just now (Jan. 22)
What do you mean, "under" Gregory? Obama is a Usurper in and of that office, for not being a "natural born" citizen - for being rather a dual citizen - and then, in covering up for his ineligibility, has committed a number of crimes, including authorizing the posting on the official White House web site of a forged document - a felony in its own right.
All it takes is for the American People to wake up to the fact that the Republican Party has failed to carry out its duty, in being the official 'opposition party' in our 2-party system, and take the matter into our own hands: for Oathkeepers including Constitutional Sheriffs & Peace Officers simply to arrest the Usurper, to be held for trial in a legitimate court of law. Not one of these stinklng dogs that are in place these days, under Maritime/Admiralty Law. A real, Common Law court. And let's take our country back from the would-be hijackers.
No comments:
Post a Comment