On Getting Sick & Tired, And Disgusted

from Tea Party C.C.: 'Obama: Ban Parents from Having Children Counseled Not to be ‘LGBTQ+’’ - posted by Natl Dir Dee - April 9 (orig. posted at cnsnews.com - April 8)

..

Reply by Stan Stanfield just now (April 9)

I am getting so tired of our failure as a society to address this issue in a meaningful, scientific way.  The fact is that the brain is sexed by maternal hormones at an early stage of pregnancy (around 8-10 weeks, as I recall from the literature on the subject) - regardless of the genetic makeup of the fetus.  Thus, if there is an imbalance in the maternal hormones, male-oriented brains can be 'wired' into genetically female bodies and vice versa and every abnormal stage in between, like trannies - the LGBTQ+ 'syndrome' that Valerie Jarrett is talking about.

The causes of potential imbalance in these hormones are varied.  A defect in the adrenal glands of either the mother or the developing fetus or both.  Hormone-skewing chemicals in the environment, called estrogen mimics/endocrine disruptors, from such as plastics and pesticides.  Stress, of all kinds.  (More homosexuals are born in the wake of wars than the 'normal' background 'noise' can account for, e.g.)  But most alarmingly perhaps, is the effects of drugs like barbiturates on the developing fetus.  We have, in short, been playing with fire.  We need to wake up to our responsibilities in this matter, and clean up our environmental act.  One child committing suicide because their brain is telling them one thing [about themselves] and their body is telling them another - or one child undergoing a painful sex-change operation - is one child too many.

Come ON, folks.  We can do better than this.  We have brains.  We need to use them wisely.  

        

(See, e.g., the book 'BrainSex' by Anne Moir, Ph.D. & David Jessel.)

Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 4 hours ago

Is that right... and just how did these scientist manage to determine these facts... How did they probe the brains of the unborn children or conduct the research to verify these outlandish claims. This sounds like more excuses by the GBLT group... Who is Anne Moir Ph.D.? Is she gay, does she have any affiliations with the GBLT movement?

Any confusion regarding sexual orientation isn't coming from drinking water out of plastic bottles... or fetal hormonal imbalances.   It is resulting from the 'indoctrination' of our Public Institutions, Schools, Hollywood, and the MSM... more than some hormonal imbalance.  Certainly, hormones may play a roll, in spawning these unnatural acts, but that is why society and parental indoctrination is necessary to counter that imbalance and temptation.

If we provide our children with information that normalizes an abnormal condition, we should not be surprised when some of them succumb to the abnormal order and become Homosexuals.  Our roll as parents and society should reinforce the NATURAL ORDER, not a perverted or abnormal order. Parents with the aid of society, need to train up children in a world where the 'natural order' is preferred and encouraged, not the abnormal.

We don't need to promote or excuse ABNORMAL behavior... whether, that behavior is driven by hormonal, chemical, environmental or emotional disorders... it is wrong. Abnormal behavior needs to be clearly viewed as WRONG... abnormal...it must not be confused as an alternative life style or an alternative norm. 

• ▶ Reply
  

Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (April 9)

1) Look her up.  (She and Jessel also co-wrote an excellent book on 'The Criminal Mind,' [actual title: 'A Mind To Crime'] and the environmental influences on such.)  She is a geneticist, btw.

2) "Our roll [sic] as parents and society should reinforce the NATURAL ORDER, not a perverted or abnormal order. Parents with the aid of society, need to train up children in a world where the 'natural order' is preferred and encouraged, not the abnormal..."  I agree entirely.  I was just pointing out that we have an equally important role, and job, to 'clean up our act' in regards to the environment that we provide our children to grow up in.  We have been sorely lacking in that regard.  

--

...and, occasionally, relieved:

from impeachobamacampaign.com: ‘Former Obama Harvard Law Professor Says He’s Destroying The Constitution’ - L. Todd Wood - April 9 (via White House Watch/Western Journalism)

(“The issue I want to discuss is the Environmental Protection Agency and rules they have issued in an attempt to go around Congress on Obama’s climate change agenda. Laurence Tribe, formally the Left’s go-to-guy to support Obama’s illegal executive actions, thinks the White House has gone too far this time…”)

kibitzer3 · less than 1 minute ago (April 9)

Thank you, Todd, for this heads-up article. And good on Prof. Tribe for being willing to be honest, rather than merely ideological, on this matter - this terribly important matter, of Obama and his administration trying to become a law unto themselves. As though the U.S.A. were some flunky country ripe for picking by the socialists. 

I hope they get the message: Even a liberal law professor says you guys are going too far. So stop your nonsense. Or face the consequences. Americans don't roll over all that easily, when push comes to shove.

--

speaking of Americans, and push coming to shove:

from Tea Party C.C.: ‘Former DOJ Official: Non-Citizens Registered To Vote Through Motor Voter Registration Forms’ - posted by Natal Dir Dee - April 9 (orig. posted at dailycaller.com - Kerry Picket - April 8)

..

Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 2 seconds ago (April 9)

Enough of all this nonsense.  'Clean Elections Or No Elections!' should be the battle cry - and meant.

It can be made to happen by the federal government telling the states that unless they 'clean up their act' in regards both to registration rolls and voter photo ID at the polling place on the one hand, and the electronic voting machines on the other (we may have to go back to hand voting [i.e., paper ballots] if they can't be certified clean; so what?), their state's votes will not count in federal elections.  Period.  

Ah.  But that requires a change in the current federal government.  But that will be aided, somewhat ironically, by the fact that Obama is in the office of POTUS illegally - for not being a 'natural born' citizen; historically provable - and so all we need to do is get back to the Constitution, in his unceremonious removal by Oathkeepers & other Patriots; and that solves the Catch-22 problem of having to vote in order to get a government that will clean up the voting act.

It WILL require the American citizenry to get off their duffs and take their country back.  But that should be a piece of cake.  To real Americans.

Or am I mistaken about that.