On Having Had Enough

from conservativebyte.com: ‘Why Trump Warned A Third-party Scheme Would Be ‘Playing with Fire’’ - March 7

Stan Stanfield · Stanford University (March 7)

Speaking of parties: The best thing that could happen would be if the Democrat Party AND the Republican Party would be hauled before a (legitimate) court of law and charged on RICO-statute charges for being the criminal enterprises that they are, at the least for trying to run a scam on the American people for having put up ineligible candidates for the office of POTUS (neither Obama nor Cruz nor Rubio being 'natural born' citizens, for which there is ample historical evidence), found guilty as charged, and dissolved; Obama arrested and held for trial on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason; Hillary arrested and held for trial as well, on her own nest of charges (Bill as well, at a minimum for their Clinton Foundation scams); and we start over in this country, on a cleaned-out level, which includes all of the executive branch agencies & departments cleansed of their Obama revolutionaries. Oh - and every State needing to meet minimum Voter Integrity standards, including photo ID cards, cleansed voter rolls, and doing away with the hackable electronic voting machines & going back to paper ballots, with their identifiable paper trails.

And a whole host of other Augean stable clean-out measures; but you get the idea, of what REALLY needs to happen in this country, in this crucial election year, to stop the New World Order crowd in their murky tracks, which include murder and other forms of foul play. All of which stinks to high heaven; and needs to be put to rights - and, like, NOW

—

I have also just signed an online petition for The People to be able to defend themselves against those who would think to do them harm.  Including the federal government.

It really does feel as though it is coming to crunch time.


P.S. And to clarify: those "clean-out measures" that I advocate include the truths about 9/11, and the Boston Marathon 'Bombing' drill, and the Sandy Hook Hoax exercise, and...and........and...............

A total clean-out.  Before we can advance. Untruth being unable to withstand the vibratory nature of the higher realms.

---

2) from wnd.com: ‘Vote For Ted Cruz’ - Joseph Farah - March 7

(“Exclusive: Joseph Farah endorses candidate with the 'most Reaganesque vision’”)

..

kibitzer3 • a few seconds ago (March 8)

You speak of the "rule of law", Joseph? Surely you jest. "(T)he oldest and greatest Constitution in the world" would become a mere piece of paper, a dead letter, if Cruz were to continue to be a candidate, and thus attempt to make two wrongs make a right. All it would do would be to ELIMINATE the rule of law in this country, and put us further under the rule of men. Aka arbitrary law. Aka tyranny.

For a presumed lover of the Constitution, it seems rather odd that you haven't checked out the constitutional Framers' meaning and intention of the term 'natural born' citizen as an eligibility requirement for the office of POTUS - and that particular office ONLY; which is a dead giveaway as to said meaning and intent. All the historical evidence points to their understanding of the term being from the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law' (which was taught in the universities of the day, & was well known by the politicians of the day; like, say, the constitutional Framers). In his Book One, Chap. XIX, Sect. 212, he spells out the accepted definition of a 'natural born citizen': as being a person born in the country of its citizen parents, with the understanding that they were its citizens at the time of the person's birth. The whole POINT for the Framers being to make sure that the occupant of that office, who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.

There; now, that wasn't all that difficult, was it? It's just a matter of reading the historical record. So, what's your problem?? The little matter of Obama having been snuck under the wall of the Constitution into the Oval Office??? Well: Can't you think of a better way of dealing with that USURPATION OF THE OFFICE, than to compound the error????

Come ON, Joseph. You are a better man than this. Prove it to us.