The Nation's Unfinished Business

from NewsWithViews.com: ‘The Antithesis of Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum’ - Kelleigh Nelson - September 20

(“Back in early 2016, Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum was torn apart by Cruz supporters. After Phyllis Schlafly’s endorsement of Donald J. Trump, a rift started in her organization and family. The coup, which emerged, was over Phyllis’s endorsement of Donald Trump, and her battle against a Constitutional Convention……….”)

email to Kelleigh Nelson:

Dear Kelleigh:

First of all: Thanks for this.  Very helpful info.  I have wondered what the ’Dominionist’ thing was all about; and also, what precisely was behind the split in Phyllis Schlafly’s organization.  I knew that it had to do with some of her ‘people’ wanting to back Cruz, and unhappy with her coming out in endorsement of Trump’s candidacy; but I didn’t know the whole extent of the matter.

As for Cruz.  This is a terribly important matter, that we conservatives must never lose sight of.  I don’t know how much you know about the definition of the term, a ‘natural born’ citizen, but I wanted to give you the benefit of my research on it.  That you knew all that I know about it.  If you already know a lot about it, please bear with me, for me to make sure that you have all of the info that I have.

A ‘natural born’ citizen, rather than just a ‘born’ citizen or a naturalized citizen, is a person “born in the country, of parents who are citizens”.  (That’s what makes it ‘natural', for heaven’s sake.)  The definition is from the definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters, Emer de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations’ (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212.  It’s on the Internet.)  This eligibility requirement for the office of the president - and that federal office ONLY; indicating the specific importance and nature of that office, among all the others  - was put in the constitutional contract particularly so that the occupant of that office, who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces, had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.  

Supporting factors.  1) Benjamin Franklin, the constitutional Framers’ elder and well-respected mentor, and who was sitting right there amongst them as a delegate himself to those proceedings, is known to have had 3 copies of the de Vattel tome in his possession (one given to the Continental Congress, for their edification on such matters), and thought highly of it (historical letter to that effect).   If any of the delegates were not precisely sure of the definition of the term, all they would have had to do was ask him.  2) John Jay, a leading statesman of the day (and who, not so incidentally, ended up being the first Chief Justice of the new U.S. Supreme Court), sent a letter to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the Convention proceedings, highly suggesting that this particular eligibility requirement be put in their contract for that particular office.  (Historical letter to that effect.)   And 3) Alexander Hamilton, in his role as a delegate to those self-same proceedings, made a proposal that, as regards this particular aspect of the eligibility requirements for that office, the president need only be, quote, “born a Citizen” - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent category of citizen, of needing to be born both jus soli (of the soil) and jus sanguine (of the blood). 

Cruz and his supporters have tried to point to the Naturalization Act of 1790 as support of his claim to qualify under that requirement.  But they fail to note that a) that Act was repealed in 1795 ON THAT VERY BASIS - that it was misleading in its use of the term (with that repeal being signed off on by no less constitutional authorities than James Madison, then a Congressman, and G. Washington, as President); and b) no Act or Declaration or other such device, other than a constitutional amendment, would be sufficient to change the meaning of the eligibility requirement itself.  

People can play a shell game all they want with the definition of the TERM.  But they need an amendment to change the REQUIREMENT.  And indeed, both major political parties of our day even KNEW of this necessity, with the evidence being that, between them, they tried a total of 8 times between 2003 and ’08 alone to get [such] an amendment going through Congress - proposals all of which had this particular matter as their common denominator - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue.  So: THEY HAVE KNOWN.

And the last attempt at obfuscation that I have read is that ’they were going by British Common Law’ when they wrote this eligibility requirement into their contract.  But which speaks of 'natural born SUBJECTS’.  Which those men certainly were not, any longer.  Having fought a long battle of Independence to be able to call themselves no longer ’subjects’ but CITIZENS.  Sovereigns in their own right.  And damn proud of it.  [They were, then, going by what is called American Common Law, or Natural Law.] 

And so, not only is Ted Cruz (and Marco Rubio.  And Rick Santorum.  And Bobby Jindal) not eligible for that office.  But the Usurper, who took to calling himself Barack Hussein Obama later in his life, needs to be arrested, and held for trial (on a whole host of charges by now, including fraud, perjury, and treason).  And, when he is found guilty of the basic charge, of ineligibility for that office: All of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P.D.’s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made - including to the SCOTUS, and interior courts (and the decisions that they figured critically in) - go with him.  Into the trash bin.  For it to be as though he were never there.  For, he was never there legally.

That is how crucial this matter is.  

To the rule of law in this country. 

And its continuance, as a federal constitutional Republic. 

Please use this info as you feel so inclined.  But please: Use it.

This nation is hanging by a thread.  It can go one way or another.  Help make sure that it goes the correct way.

Sincerely,

’Stan’ Stanfield       

P.S. A good source of additional info: puzo1dotblogspotdotcom.  

--

The likes of Antifa - communists, and other members of the NWO crowd - want to erase aspects of the history of this nation?

Watch this space.

And as for 'erasing' things...

The Congress needs to be dissolved, for having failed in its duty to oust an ineligible occupant of the Oval Office.  (Not 'impeachment'.  That is for legally sitting presidents.)  

Both of our current major political parties need to be similarly dissolved, for having engaged in the corrupt practice of colluding in this criminal enterprise; with, first, their officials brought to trail, on RICO charges, the institutions fined, and said officials imprisoned.

In a proper court of law, and under proper, that is to say, (American) Common Law.  No more Admiralty Law.  We are not 'lost at sea'.  We are found.      

And this nation begins to get back to its rightful state.

In preparation for its - and the world's - Next Steps.

Into full integrity.

A New World Order, alright.

Just not the one that TPTB have been aiming for.

In fact, the reverse image thereof.

While there's is built on Force.

The Real Deal is built on Love.

Big difference.

Reflecting the difference between their sources.