Stasi In The White House

1) from opednews.com: 'Stasi InThe White House' - by Paul Craig Roberts - June 21

Stan Stanfield 1 fan, 9 comments  Permalink

What hypocrisy... ...on the part of The Great Pretender. Thanks, Dr Roberts, for - once again - telling it like it is.   And particular kudos for emphasizing the Stasi connection.  What more COULD The Great Pretender do that would earn him that analogy???  Let's see...IRS hassling of his political enemies: check; ...... Submitted on Friday, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:29:57 PM --- 2) from infowars.com: 'Bureaucrat: Water Complaints Could be "Act of Terrorism" - Paul Joseph Watson - June 21 (posted at reality zone.com - G. Edward Griffin - June 15-21) (Tennessee official threatens Homeland Security investigation of "unfounded claims" and complaints about our drinking water_) kibitzer3 • a few seconds ago  [June 21] And since the federal government does not recognize the toxicity of fluoride, objecting to its presence in one's drinking water supply could be made to BE an "unfounded complaint". And just so has the cloud of tyranny come this far over us. What more do we need to discover about our erstwhile masters that is such a telling clue and indictment that we are in the end-game of this process??? --- 3) from reality zone.com, part of G. Edward Griffin's weekly e-newsletter 'Unfiltered News' - publ on June 21: "How To Train Fleas" is an interview with educator, John Taylor Gatto. [See how it is possible for schools to break the spirit of independence and convert children into passive creatures who blindly follow orders and measure their own worth by how much they support the group to which they have been assigned.] TragedyAndHope posted 2013 Jun 20 --- 4) same source as immediately above: You have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide – right? [When it comes to amassing personal data on all citizens into a central data base with access by thousands of government employees and contractors (plus a fair number of criminal hackers from the outside), you know instinctively that this is a stupid statement. Here is a short video that explains it all.] Corbett Report 2013 Jun 19 --- 5) same source as just above: G. Edward Griffin explains the difference between individualism and collectivism and how collectivist ideas have been accepted worldwide. [Many topics are covered including why collectivism leads to tyranny, why the predator class is attracted to government employment, how war and fear are used to push people into giving up their freedom, and why modern banking is the engine of political corruption.] Tragedy and Hope Magazine Posted 2013 Jun 12  --- Ah.  And here we have come to the crux of the matter:  'individualism vs. collectivism'.  GEG has been lecturing on this for years; but let me summarize the situation as it is today.   Some people think that very wealthy people wouldn't have anything to do with socialism.  But they forget that the essence of socialism is people control.1  And those very powerful people, of the 'elite' faction behind the scenes just love people control.  And if the average erstwhile 'people controller' thinks they, the socialists, are in charge, well, let them.  It was ever thus, with 'useful idiots'.  (Question: Did you know that J.P. Morgan is one of the three key players making a huge bundle of money on the Obama government's EBT/food stamp card industry - and the more persons enrolled in the program, the more money the EBT industry makes, meaning the (crony-capitalism) corporations behind it???) So, both the socialists and fascists are out for people control, each camp thinking it will rule the roost, in the end.  Not to go here into the fact that at the top of the current pyramid of power there is the same nest of vipers; just to get to this crux matter, that both camps want an enslaved people.  A people obedient to their wishes; their running of things.  A people trained to be obedient followers, by a) years of the control of the education process, and b) keeping them beholden to TPTB for their 'income', whether through formal jobs (subject to loss at any time, so support the current mob, or face the possible consequences, of an economic collapse) or outright dependency on the government dole (whereby he who pays the piper…).   That sort of education has been constructed to get a docile citizenry, that will obey the dictates of their keepers, to stop being individuals, and start thinking collectively.  The fascists just want that sort of power, so that they can continue to make lots of money off the sheeple.  The socialists have an 'ethical' 'cover' for their people-control desires: concern for the global commons. To say: People can't be allowed to be individuals anymore, because individuals muck up the environment.  Can't have that.  And while we're at controlling them, let's get them all fixed up with 1) additives in their drinking water supplies that keep them pacified and obedient (think fluoride and lithium), and 2) the 'proper' vaccines, that have a) subjected them to fertility-controlling measures (both camps want to cull the herd; again, for control purposes, with the Left adding the rationale of their hearts bleeding for the environment, and thus the justifying of all means to the end;2 and b) weakened their immune systems so that they will be more subject to control; not hale and hearty - and therefore independent - citizens.   Control.  The magic word, for those who - currently - want to run the world. I say 'currently'.  Because the time's they are a'changing, and those who would covet such power over autonomous soul incarnates are about to be moved out of their eco-politico-social-controlling positions.   And made to get to the back of the bus.  To wait their turn.  For, first, a Truth & Reconciliation process.  And then a mutual moving up, in consciousness, to the next level.   Awaiting us. As we speak. For those who can manage the reach.            --- footnotes: 1) A number of the conservative-oriented mailings that I have been receiving recently, asking me to sign Opinion Surveys and Petitions and such - to get me as well to donate to their particular worthy cause - have been citing a comment that a liberal congressman made on talk radio in 2010 about ObamaCare.  Here is what John Dingell (D-MI) said in answer to a question by the talk show radio host as to why it would take until 2014 to fully phase in the program: "It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people." Thus, candidly, its primary purpose.      2) because - in their atheistic lexicon - there is no right or wrong, but thinking makes it so: to say, there are no absolutes.  Only relatives.  Relative to what we say is right, and what is wrong.  And don't you forget it.  For your very life is in our hands.  We can squash you just - like - that.  Or praise you, to the top of the anthill.       It's all in our power.      In our best of all possible worlds…