Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Wisdom Teachings


from Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock: [#58] 'Escape the Next 25,000-year Cycle' - April 21 (on gaiamtv.com)

("Different religions and spiritual paths claim to have the only answers to ascension. Despite their best intentions, they may be compounding the problems we face rather than solving them. The truth is there are simple things that you can do, no matter who you are, to promote your progress. As we move toward the end of this cycle in the third density, we must be more focused on loving people instead of manipulating and controlling them. David Wilcock reveals how you can ensure that you are not caught in another 25,000-year cycle of life, trapped in third density reality in this presentation originally webcast April 21, 2014.")

It was all about how we need to experience life, and have desires, so that we can learn lessons from them; not live by Ten Commandments-style Thou Shalt Nots, but by the attitude that If you steal, e.g. you will be stolen from - i.e., the Wheel of Karma, grinding us out slowly into our purified forms (my words).  In order to Ascend to the next, higher level of 'density'.

There were some good basic principles mentioned, from the Law of One series.   For example:

1) the primary purpose of an entity is, in this density, to experience all things desired.
(Life is a class.  Do it, and, experience karma; for the primary message/lesson is: You are accountable for all you do.  You never get away with anything.  Life is not chaotic. The primary 'commandment' is: become loving.)

2) Analyze, accept, and understand those experiences.   (The purpose being to balance your karma, in order to progress on the spiritual path.) 

3) Distill the love and wisdom that can be found within them.  (Ditto.)

4) Exercise your imagination where the things you desire wouldn't infringe on others' free will.

This latter is when he got into the subject area that I commented on; whereby he seemed to be saying that Christians shouldn't be so judgmental of others; that people should be allowed to do what they want to do (same-sex marriage, he gave as another example from the one I cite below).  His bottom line to his lesson:

"Experience what you want." 

Well; yes, and……  


s.stanfield, posted on April 23, 2014 new


…but I'm not precisely sure why he took after Fox News about talking about the likes of 'welfare queens'. There ARE 'welfare queens'; and the 'racism' is in their doing it - living that sort of life - in order to get even with Whitey. They are buying into the Al Sharpton mantra of being a victim. There is nothing wrong with calling them, and him, on that distortion.
I guess David was just trying to make the point about how (some) Christians feel that some people need to have 'God's will' enforced on them, when what is really going on is the Law, not of a vengeful God, but of Karma. Well, yes; and, 'some people' need to get off their karma-creating kick, too, and help stop the Wheel from just going around and around and around.
We ALL have work to do, lessons to learn.  Or we wouldn't be here.


--

So, I would say that the true bottom line, to the whole shebang, is:

to become fully conscious Beings.  Or, more accurately:  

to return to full consciousness.

From experience in the - seeming - realm of separation.  From our Creator.  And from our Selves; as aspects of our Creator.

And thus the real end to the lesson.
---

Tuesday, 22 April 2014

Money Money Money - Part 2


from 2012: What's the 'real' truth?: 'Why Jesus Was REALLY Killed: Challenging the Money Changers' - orig. posted at Washingtons Blog - April 20 

..
patricia says:

There is no money. Only Federal Reserve Notes, which is debt.
Section 20 of Coinage Act of April 2, 1792 defines Money of account:
” Money of account of the United States
SECTION 20. And be it further enacted, That the money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars or units, dismes or tenths, cents or hundredths, and milles or thousandths, a disme being the tenth part of a dollar, a cent the hundredth part of a dollar, a mille the thousandth part of a dollar, and that all accounts in the public offices and all proceedings in the courts of the United States shall be kept and had in conformity to this regulation.”
[ Title 31 MONEY AND FINANCE section 5101 page 320 shortened the term "money of account" to 'money'. If money of account is a silver dollar coin and this term was shortened to money, then by that definition there is NO MONEY!! unless Federal Reserve Notes can be redeemed in money or money of account aka silver dollars or gold.
"The word "money" i substituted for "money of account" to eliminate unnecessary words. As far as can be determined, the phrase "money of account" has not been interpreted by any court or Government agency. …"]
Money of account is the DOLLAR: section 9 of the coinage act of april 2, 1792 says: 371 and four / sixteenths parts of a grain of silver.
DOLLARS or UNITS – each to be of the value of a Spanish milled dollar as the same is now current, and to contain three hundred and seventy one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or four hundred and sixteen grains of standard silver.
HALF DOLLARS – each to be of half the value of the dollar or unit, and to contain one hundred and eighty-five grains and ten sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or two hundred and eight grains of standard silver.
QUARTER DOLLAR – each to be of one fourth the value of the dollar or unit, and to contain ninety-two grains and thirteen sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or one hundred and four grains of standard silver.
DISMES – each to be of the value of one tenth of a dollar or unit, and to contain thirty-seven grains and two sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or forty-one grains and two sixteenth parts of a grain of standard silver.
HALF DISMES – each to be of the value of one twentieth of a dollar, and to contain eighteen grains and nine sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or twenty grains and four fifth parts of a grain of standard silver.
CENTS each to be of the value of the one hundredth part of a dollar, and to contain eleven penny-weights of copper.
HALF CENTS – each to be of the value of half a cent, and to contain five penny-weights and a half penny-weight of copper.
Does Jesus want us to barter? Use gold or silver pieces carried in pouches without the name of a country on them in payment of goods? Rome had a coin with Ceasar’s profile on it. Perhaps this is what he objected to?


  • 45017dc20ce2dd468632e1029df454c2.png
  • kibitzer3 says:
    Your comment is awaiting moderation. 
  • April 22, 2014 at 4:45 am 

  • Excellent post, Patricia. Back in the mid-70s, after Nixon took the last of gold backing off of the U.S. dollar (read: Federal Reserve Note) and TPTB were starting to really show their looting mentality (from the Right, at the time), I was part of a Taxpayers’ Revolt movement wherein we stamped our pay checks with a notation that we had not been paid in (legal) dollars and which gave the relevant definition source (possibly the one you’ve noted). This act of (legal) rebellion was combined with a (legal) form to our employers that kept them from withholding the federal tax part of our checks. We were ready to go to court to make our case, if it came to that (although at the time, the feds were trying to keep the whole movement quiet). I happened to move out of the country at that time, so I never heard what came of that movement. But it was a valid defense against a wayward federal government. I would recommend its use now as well. 

  • As to ‘what Jesus would do, or wanted’: the higher-conscious way of sharing goods and services with one another is through, in a word, Love; not making the means (of exchange) becoming the end, which was what happened when the system went to an interest-bearing system. And to clarify: ‘usury’ does not mean charging excessive interest. That is/was a copout. Usury IS interest-bearing. The early Christians knew the difference; and that was why it was not allowed, for a long time, as exchange between Christians. (Their ‘loving,’ community-creating and -strengthening practice was called ‘koinonia’ in Greek.) It was the Jews that engaged in it (and got a bad reputation for it; a large part of [the reason for] their vilification over the centuries). And the Templars. Who became the first non-Jewish bankers. And got hugely wealthy by it. Which ultimately brought about their downfall, via the King of France and the Pope, who mistrusted their growing power. And so goes the story of humanity.

  • Down to our own day. It has been all about Power Over. Instead of Power With.

--

Ah, how I would really like to get into this subject…

- but - anon, perhaps.

On Standoffs


from teaparty.org: 'Ron Paul: Nevada standoff symptom of increasing authoritarianism' - April 21 (Ron Paul's weekly radio message, carried & transcribed orig. on infowars.com)

..

Our government has too much power and is out of control on so many levels. I agree with Ron Paul, America's Government is acting Authoritarian.
Reply · Unlike · 15 · Follow Post · Edited · 7 hours ago




  • Mark Are Reynolds · Top Commenter
  • More like TOTALITARIAN.
    Reply · Unlike · 3 · 57 minutes ago

..


you allways say that it is welfare and that's bad well I worked all my life doing jobs that destroyed my body and now I only get social security to live on less then a minimum wage worker gets I used to get food stamps to help I barely got 100 a month but now after you people changed that I only get 20 dollors a month which is barely enough to eat one meal yet you basterds give trillions to the rich and other countrys -- what's wrong with you people you act like your for the people but your realy only for the rich people screw you all.
Reply · Like · 4 · Follow Post · 2 hours ago


  • Stan Stanfield
    · Top Commenter · Stanford University  (April 21)
  • Jerry, please be more clear about who you are attacking: Ron Paul and the conservative types who frequent these comments threads are against the big-government people you are talking about who "give trillions to the rich and other countrys (sic)". We want the government to be less powerful than what it has taken on; and that means the likes of its giving the big banks bailouts of the taxpayers' money that was supposed to find its way back to Main Street and support of the economy, but which ended up stuck in the pockets of the Wall Street crowd. And this business of sending so much of the taxpayers' money overseas to other countries is also against our political position. That's the Establishment, of both political parties. A pox on both of their corrupt houses.

---

This wasn't the time or place to go into this subject in more depth with Jerry;  but I at least wanted to help him get clear on this aspect.  His beef is not with tea party types per se.  He is angry at all that 'federal money' wasted on others; and I/we would agree with him.  The fact that the federal government has also gotten itself involved in all manner of welfare programs that are not constitutionally its business is another subject.  

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence,  promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." - the Preamble to the Constitution (my emphasis)

1) "provide for the common defence" - or as we would spell it in our Americanized English day and age, defense - is, then, one of the (if not the)  main purposes of the federal government.  

2) "promote the general welfare": That would be to help support a climate of economic opportunity, by, e.g., keeping a prudent eye on spending, that it didn't become profligate, and jeopardize 'the general welfare'.  (How we have failed with that responsibility.)  It could also legitimately mean 'promoting the general welfare' by spending tax monies on interstate highways, e.g.; that sort of economically healthy thing.  NOT to take money from some and give it to others, in what we call the 'welfare state'.  As confirmed and highlighted by the next clause in the Preamble: 

3) "...and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity".  NOT 'to impose a regime of Equality on the populace'…

And here is the crux of the modern matter.  Obama & Co. of the Left want to impose a big state - and by all the looks of it, an outright totalitarian state  - on the citizenry, in order to - 

1) make everybody 'equal,' including, ultimately, equality of income ('because people with more money than others act superior to other people, doncha know; plus it creates envy, and we need to cut people's acquisitiveness nature, desire for things, and return to a primitive state of existence, of harmony with and on the land, stop the 'consuming' mentality'); which brings up 

2) 'protect the environment' from people with 'liberty' as their guiding principle (to the point of locking off a massive amount of the land from even human ingress; because humans are a cancer on the land, doncha know); and 

3) keep them shackled by a majority vote in other ways, dear to the hearts of the Left; taking away the rights of the individual, as secured by the U.S. Constitution, and replacing it with the collective power of the state over them.  Group rights vs. individual rights.  (Which allow the Have Nots to steal from the Haves; and presumably feel it's okay, because 'they' voted for it.  Grrrrr…..)  

And the fascists on the Right are happy to let the Left create a totalitarian state, for their own purposes; and figure simply to take it over, once it has been put in place by the deliriously happy and naive tree huggers.  Sort of like how the Mensheviks were shoved aside by the Bolsheviks in the establishment of the imperious and omnipotent Soviet Union.

But I digress.

A little.  Just pointing out how both the far Left AND the far Right want the Constitution out of the way, for being the main stumbling block standing in the way of their vaunted New World Order visions. 

So, we believers in essential liberty - i.e., in humanity's free will; the spiritual 'take' on the matter, as opposed to the simply materialistic take on life  - have our work cut out for us.  

And, in the spirit of the motto, 'When the going gets tough, the tough get going' -

It's time to 'get going'.  Those of us on neither side of the dialectical process, working its way out, to

Synthesis.  

The best of both sides of the equation:

Individualism ('spiritual beings having a human experience') in the context of a New Order of Things, which involves the whole of humanity.  In another word for it - for us:

the collective.   

Going, neither to the Left nor to the Right.

But Up.   

The days of The (teaching) Drama now over.  

For this go 'round.

This Grand Go 'Round. 

On the Wheel of Karma.

For some of us, now, to exit that (somewhat dreary) state of Illusion.

And go for the Real Thing.    

Getting closer to the Heart of the Mystery.   

Which is the point of the whole exercise.

Not to get caught up in it, and lose contact with our higher Selves in the whole process.   

Take our eye off the ball, as it were.

Rather, have a Ball.   On the other side of the Illusion.  

No longer simply looking at, and interacting with, ourselves in others. 

Like monkeys, looking at a mirror.

And trying to figure out what in hell is going on.

What it's all about.

When what it's all about is staring us right - in - the  

face. 

Sunday, 20 April 2014

Money Money Money...


from 2012:  What's the 'real' truth?: 'Why Jesus Was REALLY Killed: Challenging the Money Changers' - by WashingtonsBlog - April 20
(The real reason 'Why Jesus Was Killed')

  • bf40a210ea2f0453b1f09e2d95a9acda.png
  • tommy says:
    April 20, 2014 at 11:26 pm
     

  • why did jesus try to teach about using money when he could have just said “money is the ultimate form of slavery”

    Reply

  • kibitzer3 says:
    Your comment is awaiting moderation. 
  • April 21, 2014 at 12:54 am 

  • Excellent observations in here. 

  • As for ‘the money thing,’ tommy:

  • 1) There is extremely little evidence that 'Jesus' was a real person anyway (rather, more of an astrotheological made-up one); but in terms of the subject:

  • 2) A good guess as to why things are the way they are would be that ‘life’ – 3D illusory life, in a matrix of duality and polarity – is/has been a classroom for learning lessons in, and we have needed ‘the dark’ – opposition – in order to generate more ‘light’ (wisdom; en-light-enment). The light is sufficient now to see the purpose of the whole experience; and we can now let go of the training wheels of interest-bearing money and fractional-reserve banking, and start operating with a higher-consciousness motive than the one of profit. To say: to share goods and services with one another – and give of our best in the process – out of gratitude to our Creator for life with meaning. 

  • So, yes: ‘money’ has been a form of slavery. And it can now – with the lessons well learnt (hopefully) – be released, in that form; and we can simply, as a medium of exchange, have a system of credits and debits – with both electronic and material forms – as we start our move up in consciousness to a new, higher level. Where ultimately we won’t need ‘money’ at all. 

  • But all that is another subject. Related. But another step, towards Ascension.

--
N.B. I added quote marks around the name 'Jesus' for this posting of my Comment, because I will go into that matter in a little more detail here. 

Suffice it to say that there could well have been a historical figure somewhat like the Jesus of the New Testament, but there is considerable evidence that the Jesus of the New Testament is at least primarily, as I said, an astrotheological figure.  See, in particular, the research on this matter of D.M. Murdock, who writes under the pen name of Acharya S (I don't know what the 'S' stands for; acharya means 'teacher'), and in particular her books 'The Christ Conspiracy: The Greatest Story Ever Sold'; 'Who Was Jesus? - Fingerprints of The Christ'; 'Christ In Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection'; and 'Suns of God: Krishna, Buddha and Christ Unveiled'.  

The "somewhat" historical figure comes from the research and writings of one Ralph Ellis, and in particular his fairly recent book (2012) 'Jesus, King of Edessa'.  

All very worthwhile reading.  If you're interested in the truth of things.  As opposed to the manmade story of things.  Which I have been for many years; in particular ever since a spiritual experience I had while in university, which caused me to drop out of my formal education and go searching for The Big Answers, aka capital-t Truth, on my own.  

And here I am, close to the end of my life.  Still keeping an eye out, for said answers   Or at least, clues.

Which search has, most recently, caused me to come across a couple of very interesting books on psychics.  (Yes yes; one needs to be aware of the possible contamination of such 'messages' from astral-level entities, or the psychic's own subconscious.  Discernment is, indeed, required.  But the proof of the pudding is in the eating.)  The first one was by such a person named Mia Dolan, an Englishwoman, titled 'I Know Why We're Here: The True Story Of An Ordinary Woman With An Extraordinary Gift'.  (After reading it, all I can say is: Indeed.)  The second, which I am still in the process of reading, is entitled 'Adventures of a Psychic' about Sylvia Browne - an American - with Antoinette May.  Fascinating stuff, all.

If you're into that sort of thing.

The 'Truth' thing, that is.

Good hunting.

The Darnedest Thing


 I first heard and then saw the darnedest thing on the homeward leg of my daily constitutional today.  I was cutting through a parking lot, as per usual on my 'daily,' when I heard a squawking ruckus coming from behind one of the parked cars.  When my walk took me on by it, I saw there two adult seagulls attacking their images in the sleek bumper of a newish all-black car; first pecking at their images, in their indignation, then strutting away a short ways, then coming back for another go, with a flying attack at its enemy this time.  Then a really interesting thing happened:  They both began taking to walking around the side of the car, as if to see if they could go around these arrogant assaulters of their territory (or whatever was going on in their aviary minds) and get at them from behind, since a frontal assault was,  curiously (I'm sure, even to their mentality), doing them no good.  

It reminded me of chimpanzees that I have seen, who, when faced (literally) with a mirror, would first of all 'get' to go around the mirror, looking for the 'who' that was in it; and then, sometimes, a particular chimp in the group would get it even further, and, while looking at the image, start feeling its own face, and having a Eureka moment. 

How long will it take us to have such a moment, a little further along the evolutionary path, when realizing - really getting - that We Are One Another?  That As you do to others, so do you do to yourself - literally.  For We Are All One.  And All IS One.   

I am particularly reminded of this 'lesson' today, because of one of the letters that I mailed on the outward-bound leg of my daily.  (It usually consists of my walking to the Main Post Office; to mail letters and buy more stamps, but mostly for the exercise.)  It was a donation to an organization called the State Department Watch, with a signed survey that it intends to send to Governors, Senators and Representatives, of both parties.  The title of the survey is 'Stop U.N. Agenda 21 Emergency Survey'.  Haven't heard of Agenda 21??  You should look into it, if not.  It is a socialist attempt to 'save the environment' on the surface of it; but what it is really about is doing away with private property altogether, in the implementation of the Left's plan for global Marxism.   

What Obama & Co. are quietly implementing, step by Fabian-style step.*  

Softly softly, because an awful lot of Americans are still caught up in the dangerous ideas and attitudes of free enterprise, private property, individual liberty - all that old-time stuff.  When what the planet needs now - according to their ideology - is one big totalitarian regime, ordering the people to be 'good', according to the lights of the Left. 

And so both the Left and the Right are caught up in a pecking game at 'the enemy'.

As I said at the bottom of my copy of the Survey to the Chairman of SDW, Carl Olson:

"Thanks for standing up so well for the concept of essential liberty, Carl - for the 'law' of free will to operate on Earth.  We 'will' have One World - but under God.  Not under oppressive Overseers, of their chattel."   

I hope you understand fully that the Left - the socialist-communist nexus - thinks in terms of Force.  And so does the far Right - the fascists - in their version of a New World Order.  When that is really the old way of doing things.  With humanity thinking in terms of duality.  Of polarity.  

When what we are really heading for, now, is our Oneness, under Love.  Recognizing - at last - that which pervades the Creation; beyond the Matrix of this 3D 'reality' - this classroom - wherein we think of each other as 'other'.  As separate from ourselves.  As potential enemies.   

When what we are really doing is pecking at ourselves.    

Until we get it.

--

The bottom line:

There is nothing wrong with helping people to look at the consequences of their actions.  That is, in fact, a  very healthy exercise.  But to take away their private property rights, thus giving them no 'exercise' of free will in the matter - treating them like children; or worse: like chattel - is another thing entirely.  I won't have it.  And I hope you won't, either.

We have a better future awaiting us than being a mere colony of ants.  We have, really, come further than that; on our path back to true - enlightened - Oneness. 

It's the exact same thing with the stealthy moves to impose 'equality' in the 'redistribution of wealth' schemes being pursued by the Obama administration.  Read my lips, you of the Left: You have no claim on anybody else's income.  You are trying to make of the government a thief, a robber.  I won't have it.  

That is low-consciousness stuff.   I know that you can do better than that.  There is an additional step in the process going on.  Take it. 

Or be left behind; for some more seasoning in a 3D-realm classroom, of polarities.  While the rest of us go up a notch, towards full consciousness, of who we really are. 

Of who you really are.

---


* It is what is really going on with the current Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada.  The federal government is trying to take over more and more of the countryside, in order to lock more and more of us up in the cities, where they can keep an easier, closer eye on us, with smart meters, and such.

Saturday, 19 April 2014

A Wakeup Call


from teaparty.org: 'White House Counterterror Chief: "Confrontational" Children Could be Terrorists' - Info Wars - April 18

"White House counterterrorism and Homeland Security adviser Lisa Monaco gave a speech this week in which she urged parents to watch their children for signs of “confrontational” behavior which could be an indication of them becoming terrorists...

"Over the last decade, the federal government has broadened its definition of what constitutes potential terrorism to such a degree that the term has lost all meaning and is clearly being used as a political tool to demonize adversarial political activism.

"Indeed, only yesterday Senator Harry Reid caused outrage when he labeled supporters of Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy “domestic terrorists”.
"Although such tactics pre-date the 2009 release of the MIAC report, the Missouri Information Analysis Center document was perhaps the most shocking in that it characterized a whole swathe of conservative Americans as domestic extremists, including Ron Paul supporters, people who own gold and people who display political bumper stickers.
"A Homeland Security study leaked in 2012 upped the ante even further, demonizing Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists…"

"Suspicious of centralized federal authority" - check.

"Reverent of individual liberty" - check.

Meaning…I am, and patriots are, the enemy, to the current administration.  Because the current administration is the enemy of the federal constitutional Republic, for which it is supposed to be standing.  

Could it be any clearer, ladies and gentlemen?  

The current administration is not engaging in just 'liberal' or two-party policy-making.

By its own words, it is engaging in a revolution.

I really think that we need to wake up to that fact.

And soon.

That this is NOT just 'business as usual'.  

This is a takeover.

The answer - the meaningful answer - to which, from all true Americans, must be:

Not on my watch.

--

Now.

Are their changes afoot on Earth?

Yes.

Do we need to go forward, not (just exclusively) back?

Yes.

How do we need to go forward?

With a sense of Synthesis, of the competitive strands of human development.  For example:

with a reverence for the concept of individual liberty - as over and against the controlling power of the omnipotent state - but with a sense of 'all of us in this together;' i.e., reverence for individual liberty (i.e., the spiritual 'law' of free will) in the context of a One World society.  

A world, and society, dedicated to the Most High. 

Not to despotic, materialistic Controllers.
  

Patriots are not the only ones who need to wake up.  A lot of individuals on the Left, who have been seduced by the platitudes of their erstwhile Masters, need to wake up, too.  

So, we are engaging in a process of mutual Awakening.  To a better world (and the need for our creating that better world) than the fractionated, incomplete one that we are leaving behind.

Steering between the rocky shoals on the Left and the whirlpools on the Right.


Everybody: One -- Two -- Three -- 

WAKE UP!

to where we are at.

In our time.

On our watch.

Friday, 18 April 2014

My Kind of Nation, America Was


One of our Founding Fathers said it well:

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

That was John Adams speaking.  And in the same vein, and from another of the Adams clan, this one cousin Sam:

"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced Patriots to prevent its ruin."

Having fallen into such a time, I would like to offer a course correction for the American ship of state.  It would consist of such corrective measures as dealing with the following examples:

* the voting public.  The citizens of each state are also citizens of the United States.  I would not allow their vote to be diluted and canceled out by illegal votes.  Each state must decide its own voting procedures.  But in any federal election, it must have been conducted with a) cleaned (and verifiably updated) voter registration rolls, and with b) a photo ID card presented.1  
     If a state is going to allow absentee ballots, it must meet federal regulations concerning the acceptance of those absentee ballots; i.e., the absentee voter must have had to produce, at some point in the process, a legal photo ID card in order to qualify for said way of voting.
     If you are going to act like children, you need to be treated like children.  Which measures may also have to include a voter having a finger dipped in purple dye - as in a banana republic - to keep multiple voting from going on, and perverting the process that way.
     And speaking of other countries:

* Inasmuch as immigrants need to learn to speak and read English as one of the criterion for obtaining citizenship in America (an excellent criterion, by the way; for building a national identity), ALL VOTING MATERIALS - AT THE LEAST IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS - will be made available ONLY IN ENGLISH.2 
     This brings up the subject -

* of illegal aliens.  Briefly: We should close down the honey pot that attracts them here: jobs (heavily fining, if not jailing,  anyone offering them employment), education for their children, multiple welfare categories. 
     America, like any country, has a right to protect itself.
     What about the children of illegals born here?
     A quick answer: My sympathies are rather for those who are and have been waiting patiently their turn to come into this country as legal immigrants and, ultimately, fellow citizens; NOT with those who have snuck into the country (what kind of good, law-abiding citizens would they make, with that start???).  And especially not with those among them who want to take the United States over, and turn it into a socialist basket case, before they help break it up, and cheer the creation of a return to Aztlan in the Southwestern-state areas.  Say they, whose ancestors are more Spanish than indigenous... 
     'Give them a break'??  Give me a break.  (N.B. The economic issue is about to change anyway.  Another subject.)          

Moving on, to more general subject areas:

The Left has put in place measures to bankrupt the nation, in order to have an Opportunity to take it over and make it into a socialist state; which, by its nature, would dissolve the federal contract as it is - do away with the Constitution, with its championing of individual rights - and turn the nation into a Marxist state, of collective rights, where majority rules unchecked (except by a bunch of Overseers of the chattel).  To that end, the Left has put in place a number of measures that need to be corrected.  Among them:     

* Having a child is the most civilizing experience that a man can have.  A woman wanting to have a child on her own is being selfish.  You can do that if you want; but not on my/the taxpayers' dime.  
     Helping out families on a temporary basis is one thing.  Creating a welfare class - to be used in a form of class warfare (see the Cloward-Piven Strategy) - is another.3  No more.  And that includes

* a cleaning-up of the unemployment scene.  No more state-sanctioned idleness.  As far as any federal monies is concerned, no one goes 'on the dole' if they have turned down, say, two potential jobs.  
     There are jobs available now, even as the nation experiences a high rate of unemployment (when it's easier/more profitable to stay unemployed than get a job; with all the welfare goodies that attract some to idleness).  The federal gravy train is to operate no more.
     And that includes such modern innovations - as part of conditioning the public to expect the central government to take care of them, and thus to be beholden to it  - as food stamps.

I could go on (including an attack on the 'Right' for such immoral acts as big bank bailouts - using Main Street/taxpayers' money to cover the excessive 'mistakes' of Wall Street hotshot 'Masters of the Universe' gamblers.  Privatising the profits while socializing the losses.  Grrrrr….).  But you get the picture.  The picture, of a nation cleaned up of its erroneous ways; having been allowed to develop that way by nefarious-minded people, wanting to run a big plantation of chattel on planet Earth, and operating on an ego level.  To say, a level of arrogance and lust for Power Over.

We have a different way to go into our future here.  Consisting of stepping onto the first rung of the ladder out of the 3D Matrix that we have been embedded in - have embedded ourselves in - for so  long.  And we do that by honoring the individual - with one's free will as a facet, fractal, point of view, experiencer of our mutual Source.  The All That Is.  Our Prime Creator.  

Decidedly not as sheep to be sheared, cattle to be culled, by oppressive Overseers. 


Lift up your eyes; contemplate the hills of human progress.  From whence cometh your help.  Deliverance is definitely at hand; as we move in collective consciousness from duality to Oneness.                     


And I'll let the last word in this blog go to that most eminent and quotable of statesmen, Thomas Jefferson; who said, in this case:

"Whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthorized, void, and of no force."

Barry: You're called.

It's time for Change, all right.

Just not the one that you are trying to implement. 


---

footnotes:


1 When I went to vote recently, upon my return to the States from many years living abroad, all they asked me to do was sign against my name on their rolls.  Wait a minute, I asked; why aren't you asking me for my photo ID?  It has my signature against my picture, and address.  (California issues such, or a driver's license; both of which require one to have produced their birth certificate to procure.  Although this state is now going to allow illegal aliens to acquire a driver's license.  Go figure.  Anyway, the point is that we have such ID ready to hand.  You have to show your photo ID to do all sorts of things in this state.  Including receiving welfare goodies.)  The answer to my query?  'They check your signature against your previous signature.'  1) Really?  Somehow, I seriously doubt that.  And anyway:   2) Why not just ask for a person's (photo) ID, which has all of that info right on it?  Reply:  'This is the way that we do it.'  Ri-i-i-i-ght...  
     The bottom line: those lefties who say that having to produce a photo ID to vote is a block to 'poor people' (see above) are talking arrant nonsense.  Hear me, Barry??
     (I understand that the Usurper is perfectly happy with the voting arrangements the way they are, except for those states that require an ID to vote; saying recently that that is "a block to voting".
     Well; he would say that, wouldn't he.
     What I would say to him:
     'Well; yes it is.
     'To the wrong kind.
     'To say: to the illegal kind.
     'The ones you are trying to get to help skew the vote.  To stay in power.  To accomplish your mission.  Of "fundamentally transforming the United States of America".  Into something that I for one don't want to see it be transformed into.
     'And that's the real 'block' going on here.  Between patriots, who believe in essential liberty.  And socialists, who believe in an all-powerful government, running people's lives to within an inch of their lives.'
     'So, back off, Barry.  Or there will be hell to pay.
      'Oh - and get out of the White House anyway.  You are a Usurper there.  We're going back to the Constitution - to the rule of law.  Whether you like it or not.
     'I understand from your actions that you don't; that you wish to be a law unto yourself.
     'I have just one thing to say to you about that trait of yours, Barry.  And that is:
     'Not in my country, you don't.  Go play your games elsewhere, if you want to continue down that road.
     'Say, in Kenya??' )



2  When I went to vote, and asked several questions about the procedures of the person in charge, she couldn't answer me when I pointed out that, in this country, in order to become a citizen, you have to learn to read and speak English, so why were all the materials in various languages?  Actually, I knew the answer, but wanted to check it out on the coal face.  (It's a federal requirement.  Got that? The same political body that requires prospective citizens to be able to speak and write English, is sending them a mixed signal.  
     The mind boggles.  At the least.  At the most, it gets very, very confused; which state of mind translates into the emotional body as anger.
     At the least, for this good citizen, of the late, great America.  Being taken over by moral pygmies.   
 

3 And is an especially despicable 'social change' tactic when many taxpaying families can't afford to have their own children - and are doing the honorable and responsible thing by not doing so; instead of breaking up and the mother applying for the basket of welfare goodies that are enticing Americans to break down the family unit, in order for the 'social change agents' to have their way in this country.  Disgusting, disgusting stuff.