Thursday, 18 December 2014

A Quick Report On My Whereabouts

A quick note to my hordes of auditors on this site:

Earlier this evening (Wednesday) I almost experienced a release of one of my myriad realities within the ONE of the NOW (as some channelers say), when I stepped off a curb to cross the street and a light-jumping bull of a car came charging within inches - literally - of separating me from my cape, as it were.  Basically unscathed, I picked myself up, dusted myself off, and started all over again, to try to cross that (major) street on the next light.  Where a funny thing happened to me on the other side.  Actually, two things.  The first was that I found my lucky penny for the day.  (Ever since coming back to 'my old haunts' - is the expression that springs to mind right at this particular moment, upon re-'living' my narrow escape from abrupt transition from this realm - I have found myself, during my daily 'constitutional,' coming across what I like to refer to as my lucky penny for the day.  It can be - and is, most often - a penny, or (less often) a nickel, or (even less often) a dime; but the spirit of the thing is the same, as I 'take' it: a gift from the universe.)1  I even put them on the little side table beside the door to my small apartment, and change them when the next one comes along.  Good luck gestures.  Harmless.

But what I really want to report on is the big find of the evening.  Shortly after this rather scary event (although I found myself remarkably calm about it),2 and in leaving the supermarket, where I picked up the makings for my evening meals (a big salad, with a side of either a hard-boiled egg or a slice of cheese; the makings lasting me for over a week of meals), I noticed on the sidewalk ahead of me - as is my wont; as you will have gathered by now - something that caught my eye: it looked like a small set of some - could it be? - American flags.  I stopped, curious, to pick it up (which a passing young woman helped me with, seeing me with shopping bags in both hands, and a loaded backpack weighing me down), and inspected it more closely when I got home to the better light in my room.  You will appreciate this telling more when I explain that part of my daily outing, earlier on, had been to go to the Post Office and, besides mailing something or other,  pick up some stamps.3  I wanted some holiday-type ones, which they didn't have.  I would have bought a set of ten stamps from the machine in the building, but they stopped providing those with the American flag on them - which I enjoyed putting on my envelopes (mostly to worthy political causes; or to other deserving 'charities') - making them available now, for whatever reason(s), only in the mundane Post Office 'logo'.  I had to settle for five stamps celebrating Farmers Markets; at least they were colorful.  And now here, I had been 'gifted' with a set of, not five, not ten, but twenty, stamps, all of various seasonal shots of the American flag, flapping in the breeze.


My first thought was concern for the person who had dropped them.  (That's nearly ten dollars.)  Should I have left them there, for the person possibly retracing his or her steps???  But how long would that take; and where all had they been, to wonder where all they could have dropped them; etc. etc.

I decided to thank 'my lucky stars'.  In the spirit of the close call from the speeding car.

And now I will get down to the real, nitty gritty of why I am telling this story.

Because I think we are a special crew.  Having signed on, to be here, at this particular time, to help humanity through the 'chute' that we are coming to.  The portal, into a New Era; for all humanity.  A Golden Age.  And we have work to do, in order to help that process.

And I would assume that you will have - if you haven't already - some similar, helpful things happen to you, too, along your path.  To give you some reasons to thank your

lucky stars.

In whatever form - shapes and sizes - they come in, for you.


1 I even once found a very large cache of coins, in the gutter; as if dropped from a piece of furniture being moved and not noticed by the mover(s).  I had a plastic bag with me, in my trusty backpack (I carry one in case I come across a dog walker who has been 'caught short;' as actually happened once, allowing me to come to the rescue.  There's a huge number of dogs in this general vicinity; of all shapes and sizes.  What is it; like comfort food???), and scooped them up into it, telling the Fed Ex driver, who actually first saw the cache, that I would take it to a nearby 'soup kitchen,' out of a church (it provides evening meals for a lot of electric cart-scooting old-timers, and otherwise down-and-outers.  Nice service).  Which I dutifully did.  Not sure how much was in it.  Coins of all kinds.  Too large a cache to have come from a normal-sized broken piggy bank.  Unless they have grown in size, since my day, of knowing about such things.  Having been out of touch with 'normal' life for many years, in my off-the-beaten-path spiritual community, in the north of Scotland.  Another story.  

2 On the other side of the 'arena' of my experience, I found myself recalling what Abraham Lincoln said to himself when he had lost a pre-presidential-run election, and in leaving the office where the count was being reported, dejected, he slipped on something or other.  He caught himself; and in walking on, found himself thinking: 'A slip. But not a fall.'
   He was a spiritual man, too.

3 My daily 'constitutional' is often to said Post Office, basically for its good walk from my place; just over twenty minutes, at a healthy, brisk pace.  I often have the excuse to go there to put some mail in the collection slot, both 'R.T.S.' - Return To Sender - and 'virgin'.  I get a huge amount of mail, from having given donations to many 'worthy causes,' and their obviously selling their mailing lists to each other.  My small flat is piled with mail that I will never get to.  I don't want to just dump it in the Recycle bin, because I have been warned about people stealing your ID from such a source.  I'm not sure what I'm going to do with all this stuff.  There is no incineration going on in my neighborhood; it may even be illegal, these days.  I suppose they can bury it with me.  No no: cancel cancel.  Not going there.
   Just yet, anyways.      
   Work still to do.
   Which is perhaps why I was so calm about the showdown with the bull.  

..and speaking of the work that we are here to do; this,

from 'Cascading global financial collapse now a very real risk as Russia heads for default' - J.D. Hayes - Dec. 18


(Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by Natural News.)

We need things to come to a head. The derivatives market needs to be burst; the whole fiat-money system needs to be burst. It is corrupt beyond repair. To be replaced, first, by a (non-interest-bearing) currency backed by a basket of precious metals & commodities, and then, ultimately, a moneyless society, once we learn how to operate that sort of vehicle. Which will require us to recognize that we are 'spiritual beings having a human experience,' and get back in alignment with Spirit. Not with the 'spirit' of the greed of Man; which divides us. Not unites us. In common cause, on this planet sorely in the need of [the expression of] our best consciousness. Not our worst.


…and now, a good night, to all few of you.

Wednesday, 17 December 2014

Further On Ted Cruz's Ineligibility For The Top Office

(further from Tea Party C.C.: '2016: Ted Cruz Will Bank on the Base' - Dec. 15.  Two excellent source references.  Another: 2 videos on YouTube by Prof. Herb Titus.)

Reply by kathyet yesterday (Dec. 16)

Natural Born Citizen – Why it Should Matter to Both Republicans and Democrats

Jon Hubbard 20 hours ago

There has been a lot of misinformation and confusion regarding the true definition of the term natural born Citizen. Some say that being just a Citizen of the U.S. is all that is required to be considered a natural born Citizen. The Framers of the US Constitution decided, after much debate, that the President must be not just a US Citizen, but a 'natural born Citizen.' Only the President is required to be a natural born Citizen....all other offices need only be a Citizen of the United States.

Article II Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution states:
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;..."
To qualify as a 'natural born Citizen' of the United States, both parents must be US Citizens (either natural born, native born or naturalized Citizens) at the time the child is born in the USA.

The 'natural born Citizen' requirement to be president is a 'national security' requirement, because our Framers did not want the Commander-in-Chief of the military to have multiple, or dual citizenships. In other words, the President of The United States must not have allegiances to any country other than the United States of America!

During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, discussions between Founding Fathers John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington led them to choose the definition of natural born Citizen provided by Emerich de Vattel's "Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law," Book 1, Chapter 19, Section 212, (175. According to "Law of Nations," natural born Citizen is a child born in the USA of two (2) U.S. Citizen parents. Vattel's Law of Nations defines how being a Natural Born Citizen differs from a classification of citizenship given to those simply born in the United States. Natural born and simply being born in the USA does not share the same meaning! The parents can be US Citizens by birth or they can be US Citizens by Naturalization after immigrating to the USA. But to create a natural born Citizen of the USA, 'both' parents must be US Citizens at the time the child is born on USA soil.
The Framers even recognized the "Law of Nations" within the US Constitution, where in Article 1, Section 8 it states, "The Congress shall have Power To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the "Law of Nations."

John Jay wrote a letter to George Washington stating that the citizenship requirement for the Office of Commander-in-Chief of our armies should contain a 'strong check' against foreign influence. Jay recommended to Washington, and Washington agreed, that the Commander of our Military be open only to a 'natural born Citizen.' Thus, both Washington and Jay agreed that simply being a 'born citizen' was not sufficient to ensure against foreign influence. They wanted allegiance to be solely to the USA. The word 'natural' goes to the citizenship of the parents via of natural law as defined in Vattel's "Law of Nations."

According to an article on World Net Daily, "There have been 8 attempts by members of Congress during the years Barack Obama was developing a power base and running for President, to remove the Constitution's requirement that the president be a natural born Citizen, suggesting an organized strategy." They clearly knew the true meaning of natural born Citizen, otherwise why would they have attempted to change or eliminate this requirement if not to usurp the law?

This is not a Democrat vs Republican issue, but a constitutional issue that applies to candidates of all parties. The reason Barack Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States has nothing to do with the argument over where he was born. However, by his own admission, Obama's father was never a US Citizen, which in and of itself makes Barack Obama ineligible to be President of The United States. Likewise, Senator Ted Cruz (R) is ineligible because he was born in Canada, not in the United States, and his father was not a US Citizen at the time of Senator Cruz's birth. Neither Marco Rubio (R) or Bobby Jindal (R) are eligible to be President because one or both of their parents were not US Citizens at the time of Senator Rubio's nor Governor Jindal's births.

We must decide if The United States of America is indeed a nation of Laws, and if the US Constitution is indeed the Law of the Land. If so, there can be no argument that a 'constitutionally unqualified' person has indeed occupied the Office of The President of the United States since January 2009! The question now must be, what are we going to do about it?

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

I have to admit I do like Ted Cruz but sadly he isn't eligible to run..That is my opinion of course and I am sticking to it. The article above explains it some what.

Awake yet America???

Permalink Reply by RFB_Mod 12 hours ago

"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States."
That is all that the U.S. constitution has to say about Natural Born. Therefore the constitution actually has nothing to do with this argument. All that has been presented regarding Natural Born is immaterial if it cannot be linked directly to the U.S. constitution at the time that is was ratified. There is a reason why I emphasized that with bold italic text. No, it is not rocket science so you should be able to point out where that linkage is in the U.S. constitution.
I have provided a source for you: 

  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Ray Vernon Brown 2 hours ago

  The vote Ted Cruze put to the senators, was are you for the constitution or not? The vote was 22-74. 74 of the senators voted not to uphold the constitution. Ted Cruze and Mike Lee would make very good President and Vice- President. Unlike Bush one who had everyone reading his lips and Bush two just saying what people wanted to hear. Who knows at this point what Jeb Bush will come up with, I know the Republican establishment will try keep the Tea Party down. I also believe three Bushes in the Whitehouse would lead to a total victory for the Democrat Communist Party. Because Jeb Bush would loose and good bye to the constitution, with another eight years of a Democrat being president.      

  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (Dec. 17)

Ray, if political bed partners like you don't wake up and realize that Cruz is ineligible for that office, we can say "good bye" to the Constitution right now, regardless of who either Party puts up for the office.  You need to go back and look at earlier posts in this thread.  It's all there, including good references for you (& others, possibly) to go by, to find out the truth of the matter.  
Which is, essentially, that 'they' are already getting - and in actuality, have gotten - rid of the Constitution, by such unconstitutional acts as putting up Obama for the job, who is a Usurper, for not being a bona fide "natural born" citizen, rather, just a citizen (if, actually, even that, since we haven't seen a copy of his true original bc, only a forgery.  For which he is liable for removal from the office in & of itself, being a felony).  We are already not living under the rule of law, by that act.  Only the rule of men.  Another word for which is tyranny.  And with friends like you, who needs enemies.

Smelling the coffee will include understanding that both sides of the political aisle are being controlled at the top by the same nest of vipers, who want to establish their New World Order over the whole of humanity.  And the taking of America is a key step in accomplishing their mission.  Which is why we Patriots need to take our stand, firmly, against this juggernaught threatening the basic, spiritual principle of 'essential liberty' on Earth.  Do your homework.  And join the 'right' team.  


A Prayer for the Nation

Almighty God, You have given us this good land for our heritage. We humbly ask You that we may always prove ourselves a people mindful of Your favor and glad to do Your will. Bless our land with honorable endeavor, sound learning and pure manners. Save us from violence, discord, and confusion, from pride and arrogance, and from every evil way. Defend our liberties and fashion into one united people the multitude brought here out of many nations and tongues. Endow with the Spirit of wisdom those to whom in Your Name we entrust the authority of government, that there may be justice and peace at home, and that through obedience to Your law we may show forth Your praise among the nations on ith thankfulness, and in the day of trouble do not allow our trust in You to fail. Amen.
President Thomas Jefferson

Washington D.C. · March 4, 1801 


(late addition: reply, a/o early Dec.18, to my reply above, and my response to it:)


If a law is known to have been broken and there is no prosecution then the law becomes null and void. (nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within it's jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws) Try as you might but, you nor anyone else can undo the damage that has been inflicted on the U.S. constitution. Perhaps if we were able to put a true conservative in the White House then we might be able to restore the laws and take measures to safeguard against future attempts to usurp the laws.

What you have presented in this argument is irrelevant if you cannot tie it to the U.S. constitution at the time that it was ratified. We are a nation of laws. If a contract is tested in a court of law and there is an unrecognized clause that is not defined within the boundaries of the contract then the court will force you to prove that all parties bound by contract had full knowledge and understanding of the legal bindings of the clause. 'Been there done that' and was awarded a $75,000.00 judgement. That is where the argument over Natural Born stems from.

When people state that there is no legal definition of Natural Born then they are almost right. Neither the constitution or the laws of U.S. citizenship defines Natural Born. Can you prove that Natural Born was in fact substantiated in the U.S. constitution at the time that the constitution was ratified? I say that it was but, since you are the authority I would like to read your opinion.

The sad truth is that the argument over Ted Cruz's eligibility is a huge waist of time. The GOPE is going to attempt to pull off a coup d'├ętat and leave conservatives stranded in the wilderness. The Cromnibus bill had provisions that will allow big money to drown us out. When we learn of who the GOPE will force on us then I believe that you would have been happy to have had Ted Cruz as the presidential candidate............ and then there is always the possibility that obama will not step down. 
"If a law is known to have been broken and there is no prosecution then the law becomes null and void."

And if the law has been attempted to be prosecuted but the judicial branch has avoided going there?  We are supposed to accept that??  No way, Jose.
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."    Thomas Jefferson

P.S. As for 'substantiating' the intention of the constitutional Framers: Besides the rest of the references I and others have made herein (including you), there is the 1789 essay of David Ramsay; and the fact that there was a copy of de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations' in the very building that the Convention was being held; put there by their elder, and respected, statesman, Benjamin Franklin.  Who they would obviously look to, and rely on, for advice on such subjects.  If de Vattel's take on the definition of an NBC wasn't the one intended by the delegates in their final vote on the subject, he would have spoken up, and said so.
I rest my case.  Unless TPTB try to wriggle out of this one. In which case, I will be anything but at rest.

As for the other points you make: Indeed, there is an agenda going on here.  And that discussion is for another time and place, than here.  And one that I would dearly like to see the Tea Party C.C. get into.  And any other site for patriots.

It is time for all good men - and women - to come to the aid of their country.  Tempus fugit.    

On Being A Slave

Speaking of past presidents/our Forefathers, as I was in my last blog; a comment:

"Our 'Forefathers'
And so, what is
     your pertinent
They were men
Of their times,
          yes.  And??
   And they even
              to better
                in their
         as a marker
                of their
              to better
              them by
   when they laid
      for our times.
           "We hold
         these truths
                   to be
        that all men
         are created
              so forth.
      For what
      that's worth
               to you,
      you creature
              of your

Tuesday, 16 December 2014

On The Eve Of Christmas 2014

Who are
My heroes
To help me
         on my
  (which we
         are all
        as well)?
     there was
         for one.
     George S.
          to you
  who missed
         As I did
           too, by
        And then
            the role
Of make believe -
               to say
          the value
         of 'the big
            in order                
   to accomplish
Your ends.

     And what of
The past?
              for one.
              A man
            for all
           Like -
           like -
           we are
              as we
       And what
    A problem
It would appear
        the history
Has come down
               to us
        with respect
    persiflagious -
            not true
          to history
                  a bit
              in order
                to help
          the Roman
     So, no
         on that
Oh; and
         The Great.
              A great
               of men
              his time.
And Lao-tsu
           a clever
              he had…

         you say??
         In our day
         would say
          there was
giving the people
 a positive feel
        (except for
         the leftists,
          that is;
               want to
             for them).
           As for
           the past
           in that
             there were
                 so many.
      has a way
      of decaying

More On Ted Cruz's Ineligibility

(more on tea party C.C.: '2016 Ted Cruz' - Dec. 15)

Reply by Robert William Metcalf 7 hours ago (Dec. 16)

Stan, I'm not sure what Rocket Science is but would like to know where you found your definition of a " Natural Born Citizen " . I didn't know that our English writing for-fathers meant " jus soli " and " jus sanguinis " when they wrote " Natural Born ". Please enlighten us.

  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (Dec. 16)

An excellent site to research all this:  (The blog site of Mario Apuzzo, attorney.)  Also, the blog site of CDR C.F. Kerchner (Ret.)
Thank you for asking, and caring to look into it.
P.S. Some people on this thread seem to think that Cruz is eligible because his father was 'just EMPLOYED' in Canada.  That is not the germane point; nor is it that his mother was a U.S. citizen.  His father was a Cuban citizen at the time of his birth.  Thus he is a dual citizen.  Thus he is ineligible for that particular office.  Period.
And thus, when Obama is removed from the office, for the same reason, all the legislation that he signed into law, and all the Executive Orders that he issued, and all the appointments that he made (including to the Supreme Court), go with him.  Into the bin.  For being illegal.  That is as serious - and as effective - as this issue is.

On Honoring One's Debt

(Aka On Forgetting)

So, you are
   trillion -
In debt.
 do you figure
   that you are
      to be able
             to pay
             for it?

('I owe you only
      'But it's only
 and counting.'
  That's your
   problem.  Not
          the day
 of reckoning

By borrowing
          and yet
            on top
            of that?
         What is
     known as
      the debt.
       debt off
    with debt…
You do know
             that is,
       don't you?
      it's called
        You are,
      the same

                It is
       a shame.
                It is
      than that.
               It is
        With no
          to pay
       to sell
Your country
To others -
Assets - the 

Such matters...

     You sold
The country
    you were
  and saved
        for you -
      and yes,
   in slavery
        for you
     to forget
          in this
    And now
 the slaves.

        & Co.
      should I
  that matter
    save you
      Are you
      worth it??
     You are


   At least
  has been
  out of
    this great 




 is just high-
   with other
  people's lives
         which are
             what is
            at stake,
        your own.
          with you
            as you
        the room
       us adults
         to do;
             the mess
         have made

       and are not
            to be
           to go
    Too much
     of real worth
     is at stake

     the whole
        (the physical
               at least).
      to be subject
    your gambling
                 where far
    too much
       than to allow
       you puny
       of lesser
       to rule
       any further
       than your own

Give it
A rest
And join
The real
Of flight:

 than the vessels
  that you occupy


     I admit
     to anger.

     selling out
        a waste
        of energy.

And that's all
I'm going
To say
To it
For now.
I'll get
A round
    the next
There is
To say
To it

(It's the same
 with letting
 the former
 of a lobby
 to a
 the head
I speak of
 the FCC.
And the same
       so forth.
        I say:
      are you
  to get some
   Out of
   your head
   and into
   your heart
           is not
   You also
    have to
    the Right
    to fly
    the skies
    that we
    take off

* from the very
         when you
    gambled that
          your Way
         was better
           than that
               of your

Monday, 15 December 2014

More On This Moment In History

from 'Are We Moving Toward a National Police Force?' - Dec. 15 - orig. posted at - by Brent, aka The Common Constitutionalist 


The Sandy Hook Elementary School hoax was a set-up to expedite/continue the taking away of the public's weapons of self-defense ("Never let a good crisis go to waste"). He is letting millions - millions - of illegal aliens into the country, including Islamic terrorists (and released 36,000 convicted criminal illegal aliens into our towns & cities, to foment more 'crisis'). He is facilitating the bringing of Ebola into the country, instead of keeping it isolated in its home base in Africa, for treatment there (where it was spawned by a U.S. bioweapons lab). He is, as this article notes, making local police forces financially and loyally beholden to the federal government. We are being surveilled by police-state tactics worse than the USSR or East Germany ever dreamed of. The indices go on, and on: this is takeover mentality at work.
And our basic mentality in response??:
Which celebrity is doing what to whom…who won the game……what's for dinner…...
It's pathetic.
Come ON, America. I KNOW you can do better than this. In defending the principle of 'essential liberty' that our Founding Fathers bequeathed to us.
A federal constitutional Republic. If we could keep it.
The jury is still out on that one.
But barely.


2) from tea party C.C.: '2016: Ted Cruz Will Bank on the Base' - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - Dec. 15 
(Another given assumption that Ted Cruz is a candidate for the pres'l office in 2016)

Permalink Reply by Lewana Hinton 2 hours ago

It seems like that issue is no longer relevant. Obama's father was documented to be born outside of the U.S. He has now set the precedence. Since obama has gotten away with it, then Cruz father not being born in the U.S. wouldn't matter either. If they rule Cruz isnt eligible, then obama will not have any standing as President, and all decisions, rules, laws, etc that he implimented are all illegal and must be thrown out. Personally I think they should be any way, because they are all stupid & ridiculous.

  • Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (Dec. 15)

Dear Ted (& Various & Sundry Tea Partiers here on this thread, & in general),
You are a good man, and make a good senator.  But regardless of what your law professors may have tried to make you think, and what the Republican Party Establishment honchos have tried to make the Party's grassroots supporters think: You are not an eligible candidate for the office of the presidency of the United States.
This is not rocket science.  The whole POINT of the exercise, on the part of the constitutional Framers, in putting the "natural born citizen" requirement in the Constitution for that office - and that particular federal office ONLY, may all who read this please note carefully - was to make sure - as least as far as THEY could, in their time - that the person who became elected to that office - who would then perforce become as well the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - would have no DUAL LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  Like a naturalized citizen.  And like a dual citizen.  Like, for example: Obama.
You, Senator Cruz, were not born a "natural born" citizen, meaning one born on the soil (jus soli) of two U.S. citizen parents (jus sanguinis).  You are simply not eligible for the top spot.  (Or the VP position either, for that matter; occasioned by a constitutional amendment to that - logical - effect.)
Two wrongs do not make a right.
The only people who think otherwise on this issue, among those who have studied it, are those who do not believe that there is any such thing as absolute truth; who believe that everything is relative in life.  Republicans must not believe that.  Or we are doomed as a republic, and no longer living under the rule of law.  Living under then, simply, the rule of men.  Another word for which is tyranny.  
I won't have it.  And neither will a lot of other patriots, who are trying - desperately - to get this country back on track again, to its founding roots.  With Republican Party scoffers on this issue, who needs enemies.
The Republican leadership obviously did a quid pro quo deal on this matter with their Democrat Party counterparts: 'We won't say anything about your candidate on this issue if you won't say anything about any of our candidates on this, er, little detail, in the future.'  They could have gone the legal route, and moved to pass a constitutional amendment easing up on the "natural born" issue, making just a "citizen" eligible.  And actually, both parties tried - a total of 8 times between 2003 and '08 - to get just such an amendment going through Congress.  And failed each time even to get it out of committee (such was the sensitivity of the issue).  So, what to do.  Got it:
Cheat.  'And since, between us, we control the judicial branch of government…'  Mission accomplished, with the Usurper in the White House as we speak.  Which is a stench to high heaven, and enough to make our Founding Fathers groan and turn over in their graves.  All of their sacrifices.  In the end, for nothing.  
If you doubt this take on the matter, do your homework.  You will find that John Jay - who became the nation's first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, such was his stature as a statesman of that day - wrote a letter to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the C'l Convention, on this very issue, and making this very point, about the desirability of not wanting someone with the taint of possible dual loyalties to be C in C of the nation's military.  You will also find that Alexander Hamilton made a proposal to the Convention to have such a candidate need be only a "citizen" - and his proposal was TURNED DOWN.  It's on the record of those proceedings.  The c'l Framers were also familiar with E. de Vattel's work 'The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law' on this subject.  But enough on the history of the matter.  A really good, particularly salient point here is what a service you could render to the nation - to the Republic - in 'coming out' on this matter, and thus bringing pressure to bear on having Obama (simply) removed from the office, for the crime - at the very least - of impersonating an officer (Title 18, U.S. Code (Sect. 912]), before he can do any more damage to the country than he has already done.  
I look forward to your performing of this inestimable service to the nation, Sen. Cruz.  And besides The People of the American Republic, heaven will bless you, if you do.  
For standing for Truth.  Absolute, unsullied, Truth.  For, contrary to the opinion of atheists, it exists.  And is for us to stand for.
And definitely not to stand for lies.  


3) from 'IMF now ready to slam the door on the U.S. and the dollar' - Brandon Smith - Dec. 16  

"As I write this, the news is saturated with stories of a hostage situation possibly involving Islamic militants in Sydney, Australia. Like many, I am concerned about the shockwave such an event will create through our sociopolitical structures. However, while most of the world will be distracted by the outcome of this crisis (for good or bad) for at least the next two weeks, I find I must concern myself with a far more important and dangerous situation.
Up to 40 people may be held by supposed extremists in Sydney, but the entire world is currently being held hostage economically by international banks. This is the crisis no one in the mainstream is talking about, so alternative analysts must.
As I predicted last month in “We have just witnessed the last gasp of the global economy,” severe volatility is now returning to global markets after the pre-game 10 percent drop in equities in October hinted at what was to come.
We expected such destabilization after the wrap-up of the Fed taper, and the markets have not disappointed so far. My position has always been that the taper of QE3 made very little sense in terms of maintaining the illusion of economic health — unless, of course, the Federal Reserve was implementing the taper in preparation for a renewed financial catastrophe. That is to say, the central bankers have established the lie of American fiscal recovery and then separated themselves from blame for the implosion they know is coming. If the markets were to collapse while stimulus is officially active, the tragedy would be forever a millstone on the necks of the banksters. And we can’t have that now, can we?
This is not to say that individual central banks and even currencies are not expendable in the grand scheme of things. In fact, the long-term goal of globalists has been to consolidate all currency systems and central banks under the outward control of the International Monetary Fund and the Bank Of International Settlements, as I outlined in “The economic endgame explained.”
That particular article was only a summary of a dangerous trend I have been warning about for years, namely the strategy by international financiers to create a dollar-collapse scenario that will be blamed on prepositioned scapegoats. I have no idea what form these scapegoats will take: There are simply too many possible triggers for fiscal calamity. What I do know, though, is the goal of the endgame: to remove the dollar’s world reserve status and to pressure the American people into conforming or even begging for centralized administration of our economy by the IMF.
The delusion perpetuated in the mainstream is that the IMF is a U.S.-dominated institution. I have outlined on many occasions why this is false. The IMF like all central banks is dominated by the international corporate banking cartel. Central banks are merely front organizations for globalists, and I am often reminded of the following quote from elitist insider Carroll Quigley when I hear people suggest that central banks are somehow independent from one another or that the Federal Reserve is itself the singular “source” of the world’s economic ills:
It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.
The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.
No one can now argue against this reality after we have witnessed hard evidence of Goldman Sachs dictating Federal Reserve policy, as outlined here.
And, most recently, we now know that international bankers control political legislation as well, as Congress passed with little resistance a bill that negates the Frank-Dodd restrictions on derivatives and places the U.S. taxpayers and account holders on the hook for more than $303 trillion in toxic debt instruments. The bill is, for all intents and purposes, a “bail-in” measure in disguise. And it was pushed through with the direct influence of JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.
The Federal Reserve, the U.S. government and the dollar are as expendable to the elites as any other economic or political appendage. And it can be replaced at will with yet another illusory structure if this furthers their goal of total centralization. This has been done for centuries, and I fail to see why anyone would assume that globalists would change their tactics now to preserve the dollar system. They call it the “New World Order,” but it is really the same old-world monetary order out of chaos that has always been exploited. Enter the IMF’s old/new world vision.
In articles over the past year, I have warned that the plan to dethrone the dollar and replace it with the special drawing rights basket currency system would be accelerated after it became clear that the U.S. Congress would refuse to pass the IMF reforms of 2010 proclaiming “inclusiveness” for developing economies, including the BRICS nations. The latest spending bill removed any mention of IMF reforms. The IMF, under Christine Lagarde, has insisted that if the U.S. did not approve its part of the reforms, the IMF would be forced to pursue a “Plan B” scenario. The details on this “plan B” have not been forthcoming, until now.
The Financial Times reported on the IMF shift away from the U.S. by asserting the authority to remove the veto power America has always enjoyed over the institution. This action is a stark reminder to mainstream talking heads and to those who believe the U.S. is the core economic danger to the world that the IMF is not an extension of American policy. If anything, the IMF and the U.S. are extensions of international banking policy, just as the BRICS are nothing more than puppets for the same self-serving financial oligarchy clamoring for the same IMF-controlled paradigm, as Vladimir Putin openly admitted:
In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this…
The IMF decision to eliminate U.S. veto power and, thus, influence over IMF decisions may come as early as the first quarter of next year. This is the great “economic reset” that Largarde has been promoting ad nauseam in multiple interviews and speeches over the past six months. All of these measures are culminating in what I believe will be a more official announcement of a dump of the U.S. dollar as world reserve currency.
Along with the imminent loss of veto power, I have also written on the concerns of the coming SDR conference in 2015. This conference is held only once every five years. My suspicion has been that the IMF plans to announce the inclusion of the Chinese yuan in the SDR basket and that this will coincide with a steady dollar dump around the globe. Multiple major economies have already dropped the dollar in bilateral trade with China, and engineered tensions between the U.S. and the East have exacerbated the issue.
The timing of the SDR conference has now been announced, and the meeting looks to be set for October of 2015. Interestingly, this linked article notes that China has a “real shot” at SDR inclusion and official “reserve status” next year, but warns that the U.S. “may use its veto power” to stop China’s membership. I have to laugh at the absurdity of it all, because there are many people in the world of economic study who still believe the developments of globalization and fiscal distress are all “random.” I suppose that if it is all random, then it is a rather convenient coincidence that the U.S. just happens to be on the verge of losing veto power in the IMF just before they are about to bring the BRICS into the SDR fold and supplant the dollar.
This is it, folks; this is the endgame right in front of our faces. The year of 2014 is the new 2007, with all the negative potential but 100 times more explosive going into 2015. Our nation has wallowed in slowly degrading financial conditions for years, hidden by fake economic statistics and manipulated stock prices. All of it has been a prelude to a much more frenetic and shocking event. I believe that we will see continued market chaos from now on, with a steep declining trend intermixed with brief but inadequate “dead cat” stock bounces. I expect a hailstorm of geopolitical crises over the next year to provide cover for the shift away from the dollar.
Ultimately, the death of the dollar will be hailed in the mainstream as a “good and necessary thing.” They will call it “karma.” They will call it “progress.” They will even call it “decentralization” and a success for the free market. But it will not feel like a positive development for the American public, who will suffer greatly as the dollar crumbles. Only those educated in the underpinnings of shadow banking will understand the whole thing is a charade designed to hide the complete centralization of sovereign economic governance into the hands of the globalists, using the IMF and BIS as “fiscal heroes,” saving the world from a state of economic destruction the elites themselves secretly created."
–Brandon Smith