Wednesday, 24 August 2016
The Obama administration's MIAC 'Fusion Center' Report labels -
Libertarians, Constitutionalists, Second Amendment Supporters, Ron Paul Supporters, Veterans, Militia Members, and Christians
as potential 'domestic terrorists'.)
'Any last words?'
'I wouldn't do this if I were you. And I am you. As you are me. And we are One. Facets, fractals, aspects, points of view of the One Holy Being.
'And just so, We are God. Are of God. And you are currently functioning at a rather low level of consciousness of your potential.
'We have a better world to co-create than this present vale of tears. You don't really think that this is all there is, do you?
'If so: Think again. And think of having to face the consequences of your actions. As you will. As. You. Will.
'That is all. That is enough, I would think. A word to the wise being sufficient.
'A category of person whom I don't appear to be faced with at the present moment.
'Well, do what you have to do.
What you have. To do.
'And be. Which is
'your true self.
'And so, your true mission is to leave your old identity behind. It won't help you on the next leg of your journey.
'Our journey. Together. Back to
1) from wnd.com; ‘Diagnosing Hillary: Did Top Aide Seek Treatment For Clinton?’ - Bob Unruh - August 23
(“New medical bombshell as media scorch health critics as new 'birthers’” - also ’healthers’ and the old putdown favorite, ‘conspiracy theorists’)
Why is anybody still paying any attention to anything that CNN has to say? I gave up on them completely when they were caught out faking having their war correspondent reporting from a rooftop in Tel Aviv, under SCUD missile attack, and even donning a gas mask after a warning siren sounding off-camera, when they were actually in a studio in Georgia or Florida, wherever it turned out to be. And that's not the only time that they have been caught out faking an onsite appearance, with the use of green screens. And they have the nerve to label their political enemies with demonizing name-calling??? Tell them to go take a flying leap off that rooftop - or better yet, a real one.
2a) from thecommonsenseshow.com; ‘CHEMICAL WARFARE RED ALERT: Zika Panic DEET chemical part of a brain damaging binary weapon being carpet bombed across America’s cities’ - Mike Adams, the Health Ranger/Natural News - August 23
(DEET spray as a defense against Zika mosquitoes “is one chemical component of a binary chemical weapon system currently being carpet bombed onto U.S. civilian populations…” DEET, especially in combo with carbamate and organophosphate (OP) pesticides, causes such effects as fear, weakness, confusion, memory loss, and loss of cognitive function. They are deliberately setting us up for takeover, since we won’t go quietly into their corral…)
Stan August 23, 2016 at 11:34 pm
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)
Despicable stuff. Thanks for the repost, Dave.
Love to get my hands on these s.o.b.’s…
2b) from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘Reporter Jailed for FOIA Regarding Judicial Misconduct by the Judge Being Investigated’ - Dave Hodges - August 23
(A Superior Court judge in Georgia, Brenda Weaver, jailed a reporter and his attorney for making FOIA requests to see her check statements concerning a possible corruption charge, for her being a participant in an alleged criminal activity that she ruled on. Her charge to have them jailed? Identity theft.
You can’t make this stuff up.)
Stan August 24, 2016 at 12:24 am
(Your comment is awaiting moderation.)
The judicial branch of government in this country has become hopelessly corrupt, and even, in some instances – like this one – brazenly so. It was our last hope for a redress of grievances of The People, after both the executive branch and legislative branch have let us down.
Time to take matters into our own hands.
Each person to his or own devices. I still hold for all of us being the 'offspring' of a loving Creator Source, aspects of the All That Is. But I certainly support those who feel the need to respond in a different way to the outrages going on, designed to herd us into the New World Order's concentration camps. Those cretins still playing parts in The Drama.
Me, I want The Play to be over with And we get to
the Real Thing.
At long last.
Tuesday, 23 August 2016
‘Alright, boys and girls. Settle down…
‘The lesson for today is:’ (writing the word on the blackboard) ‘Links.
‘What is the old boy up to today…’ (Titters in the ranks; as he writes underneath it the numeral 1 with a period.)
‘What if I were to tell you that bears in the wild do not get cancer, but bears in zoos do. What do you think would be a, if not the, causal factor.’
(Silence. Then, one child:) ‘Emotions.’
‘Good. But let’s drill down a little deeper into that link. Where would we end up…Anybody.’
(Silence. The Teacher then writes on the blackboard the words: Body chemistry.)
‘What if I were to tell you that this link was recognized hundreds and hundreds, even thousands of years ago, by the very man recognized to this day as, quote, the Father of Medicine, a Greek named Hippocrates - anybody recognize that name?’ (Some assenting murmurs from the class) ‘What is the name of the oath that doctors take to this day, to enter the ranks of their profession?’
(A couple of the children; with assenting murmurs from others:) ‘The Hippocratic Oath.’
‘Indeed. The very man. Who is quoted to have said: ‘Let your food be your medicine, and your medicine be your…’
‘Food for thought, eh? Wouldn’t you say?’
(Assenting murmurs. The Teacher wipes his hands of the chalk; but as well, as a gesture of having dealt with that matter.)
‘Another example of Links.’ (Writes the numeral 2 on the blackboard, with a distinctive, definitive hit on the period, as if really getting down to business, now.)
‘What if I were to tell you that back at the beginning of this nation there were two schools of legal thought, one based on what was called English Common Law and the other based on what was called American Common Law, or Natural Law. Question: Which school of legal thought do you think the colonists - on the verge of creating their own country, mind you - would base their law on?’
(Silence. Then, a couple of the children, taking their lead from The Teacher’s ‘hint’:) ‘American Common Law.’ (The Teacher hesitates to respond. Another child:) ’Both.’
‘(The Teacher, acknowledging that particular answer:) Very good. But which do you think would be paramount?’
(A number of the children) ‘American Common Law.’
‘Very good. And I will tell you basically why, ladies and gentlemen.’ (Some titters; but some recognition as well amongst them that he was making a point: that he was signaling that he was treating them like adults.) ‘Because English Common Law was, is, based on the concept of ‘subjects’. Subjects to and of the king. And American Common Law is based on the concept of ‘freemen’. Sovereigns in their own right. And damn - excuse me; darn proud of it, after a half-a-dozen years of a War of Independence over the very subject. What so many of the colonists yearned for, in their heart of hearts.
‘Not to say all of them did. Many colonists still had an almost built-in sense of loyalty to, even fondness for, their former country, Mother England, where most of them had originated from. But the spirit of the times - anybody know a fancy word for that?’
(Silence. Then, one child, a bit hesitantly, as if not wanting to appear to be showing off:) ‘Zeitgeist?’
‘Very good. The zeitgeist of the times in the American colonies was for Freedom. Freedom to exercise their own individual sovereignty, out from under the oppressive hand of the state. Whether that state be of royalty or religion or oligarchy or outright despot. Do you understand the word ‘despot’?’
(Some assenting murmurs; some indicating unsureness)
‘Autocratic rule. A leader declaring, ‘I am the law’. And you ‘little people,’ you ‘useless eaters,’ will peep out from between my legs like the underlings that you are.’ (Getting a bit emotional; then dialing it back)
‘Well; not to get too carried away. Let me continue my line of thought.
‘There we were, at the beginning of establishing a new nation, “conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that ‘all men are created equal’”. Anybody know who I’m quoting, there?
(Silence. A lone child - the one who had known the word ‘zeitgeist’:) ‘Abraham Lincoln?’
‘Very good. You would go to the head of the class, if you weren’t already there.’
(Titters. Overwhelmingly friendly in tone, and obvious intent; with blushing from the child in question.)
‘And that closing phrase was taken from its original source…’ (Silence) ‘Not to prolong the agony in the classroom: the Declaration of independence. Some of you may have heard of it.
‘But I digress. But not entirely.
‘We were talking about the law of the land. How this nation was based primarily on American Common Law, also known as Natural Law. And that was based on… ‘ (Some curious looks to one another in the class)
‘I won’t prolong the agony on that matter, either. It was based on the definitive tome of the day on such matters, a treatise - anybody know the meaning of the word ‘treatise’?’ (Silence) ‘No big matter. I was just trying to give someone the opportunity to show off.’ (Laughter) ‘ - a long-winded dissertation on a subject; and the subject here was, quote, ‘The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law’. They were codified in a work under that title by a Swiss man named Emmerich de Vattel; three copies of whose book on the subject and under that title were sent by a friend to one of this nation’s most eminent Founding Fathers, a man by the name of Benjamin Franklin.’ (Starts writing the name on the blackboard; while doing so, continues: ) ‘Anybody know what he was most famous for?’ (Silence) ‘He’s the guy who had something to do with a key on the string of a kite that he sailed into the clouds of a stormy evening, and called down fire, in the form of… ‘
(Another child; eagerly:) ‘Lightning!’
(Stumped silence) ‘Elect…elect……’
‘Elect those kids to the head of the class.’ (Titters. The Teacher turns fully back to the class) ‘Franklin was sent those copies, in their original form of having been written in French - and one copy of which he donated to the first Continental Congress, for their edification, in that same year, of 1775, which was a year before the writing of the Declaration of Independence, and eleven years before the statesmen of the day put together what we know as the Constitution, after a period of time under what is known as The Articles of Confederation. And among those statesmen of the day in the writing of the Constitution was…this very same Benjamin Franklin; whom you lot better know as the face on the hundred dollar bill. (Titters) ‘You don’t believe me? Get out your wallet and take a look.’ (Outright laughter)
‘And so this major figure among our Founding Founders was present during those proceedings; after all those intervening years, which included a bloody War of Independence, you will recall, if you were paying any attention at all to the doddering old fool in front of you,’ (Laughter) ‘And as their elder mentor, was looked up to by those present. And if there had been any question in the minds of any of those present, what certain terms meant that they were considering, in their construction of the proposed Constitution for the proposed new nation, of the federal constitutional republic of the United States of America, they could have checked it out right there with him. (Points to the word ‘Link’ on the blackboard. and then underlines it)
‘But they didn’t have to check one term out, in some question in our day. Because it had been taught in the universities of the day, besides being ‘signed off on’ by none other than the illustrious B. Franklin himself And that was the term, a ‘natural born’ citizen.’
(Writing the term on the blackboard) ‘A ‘natural born’ citizen, according to their understanding of the term, then, meant - and I quote: “Those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” Unquote. It is based on two concepts: being born of the soil - what is called, in legal parlance, jus soli; that is, the law of the soil; and jus sanguinis, that is, the law of the blood.' (Writing the terms on the blackboard) ‘That’s what makes it ‘natural’. The whole point of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers, in putting that eligibility requirement in their contract for the office of the presidency, being to make sure - at least as sure as they could, in their time - that the occupant of that office - who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces; a major factor in their considerations - had no dual or otherwise conflicting loyalties or allegiances or influences.’ (Underlines the two legal terms) ‘Had sole allegiance to the United States.’
(Looks for a moment, almost sadly, at the items he has written on the blackboard. Then thoughtfully, almost to himself:) 'And that eligibility requirement for that office still stands, to this day; absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary...' (Puts down his piece of chalk; turns to his class; says, simply:)
‘You see where I am going with this little oral dissertation of mine…
“Which would you rather live under. Tyrants. Or Truth.
(The bell rings)
‘That’s all. You’re excused. But not from learning
the lessons of history.’
N.B. This Teacher was hauled away a couple of days later - after a child in his class snitched on him - on charges of sedition.
A very strong link, that one, to certain factors, of our day. And historically.
Monday, 22 August 2016
Interesting times we live in...
For some reason, that I can't recall the initial impulse for now, while fixing my dinner this evening I got to thinking back to my time in junior high school, specifically once during my ninth grade, in my Student Council class - a class for those of us who had been elected to our student governmental positions (I was elected Class President) - when the subject came up of how some of the kids were beginning to sneak up to the head of the line waiting for the school bus. There was a point on campus where the line formed from, and it turned out that some kids had begun hanging around in the space ahead of the line, all innocently engaging in conversation, and then when the bus arrived out on the street, they would rush into the head of the line. And it had apparently been going on for some time. (I didn't know anything about this; I never caught the bus. I always stayed after school to play on the playground for the hour allotted to those of us wanting to do so.) Some of my student-government peers were quick to say that those queue-jumpers should just simply be punished for their sins; and that was the way the vote was beginning to line up for, as it were.
"Wait - you can't just do that," I recall blurting out; my sense of justice sorely offended. "It's our fault too, that we have been letting them get away with this. We need, rather, to give them a day's warning, that we are now going to stick strictly to the rule, and then hold them liable for breaking it."
I say this, in relation to an article that I have just come across among my emails, involving illegal aliens, and specifically, those who have been allowed to be in this country for many years. But I will let my response speak for itself:
from rickwells.us: ‘Immigration Expert Vaughn On Whether Trump Is Backsliding On Amnesty’ - Rick Wells - August 22/23
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
(A FOX News reporter expressing concern about the issue.)
Keep holding his feet to the fire of our ire on this matter, everybody.
I personally accept that there are two separate matters here, border & law enforcement on the one hand and what to do about long-time illegal aliens in the country on the other. The first has to be initiated: full stop. (Not just promises, as were given to Reagan, in order to get him to sign the amnesty back in the mid-’80s.) But we/the U.S. needs to take some measure of responsibility for allowing the long-time illegals in here and letting them stay here, and grow roots here. The same with children of IAs born here, who are NOT U.S. citizens. That is due to a deliberate misreading of the 14th Amendment, that needs to be corrected forthwith, as we set about setting this nation back to rights. But WE seduced them here, and under that ‘anchor baby’ pretense. So, a measure of leeway is needed to be demonstrated here.
Personally, I would have it that that would look like those IA families do indeed have to return to their (parents’ ) home countries, and then apply for immigration through the front door, so that the law will be seen to be working. But Justice sometimes needs to be tempered with mercy. And actually, I think it’s a moot matter anyway, because I see the global monetary system collapsing – as it needs to, under its enormous weight of corruption – and a New Order Of Things does indeed come into play. Just not the one that the New World Order crowd are pushing for, with its obscene measures of Force, and People Control. And with that monetary Reset, some of those families might well wish to stay in their home countries after all. So: One step at a time. One clear, serious step at a time.
I am happy to report that my words of wisdom prevailed in the first instance.
We will see about the second one.
And, of course, this is as well about the best-laid scheme of the erstwhile NWO crowd, first to help bankrupt the U.S. so that it will fall like a ripe fruit into the waiting hands of the socialists (i.e., the Coward-Piven Strategy), and secondly, to so change the demographics in the country that the same sort of crowd will get it to fall into their waiting hands. Statists, all. Both the far Left and the far Right. With the same nest of vipers at the top of the pyramid of power.
To all of whom I say:
It ain't going to happen, Gang.
There is another Plan afoot, here.
And you can get with it.
Or lose out.
Sometimes, I'm not so keen to see Justice tempered with mercy.
Sometimes, I want to see it play out to its fullest extent.
But then, that's just me.
All grown up, from my days as a ninth grade Class President.
To an Observer of the larger scene.
Waiting, like Charles Martel (whom I have been thinking about today as well, for whatever reason), to take my place at the head of the queue.
Of Justice servers.
'That thing is at it again. You know the one that keeps putting out food for us, being the nice It that It is - at least, that we keep thinking It is - and then it slaughters us! Wholesale! It's maddening! Can't you do something about it, Your Royal Highness??'
'Well, I do keep churning out you lot, to make up for such contingencies. There's not much more I can do. We're just up against a fundamental fact of life.'
'What's that, Your Royal Highness?'
'That those two-legged creatures amongst us are a fickle lot.'
Moral: Looks can be deceiving. As in, Greeks bearing gifts. And as in geeks doing the same thing, with their vaccines, and such like. Like, IntelliStreets.
Like ants with their two-legged creature neighbors: Check their premises. And then act accordingly.
P.S. And speaking further of Mistaking Identities...
from wnd.com;’Kerry Goes ‘Birther,’ Thanks Kenya For Obama’ - August 22
(SoS Kerry rubbing the patriotic American citizens’ noses in the deep stuff)
The "PLAYING AMERICANS FOR FOOLS" continues'
Its not where he was born. Its not a stupid birth certificate. Those two things are what you are to focus on.
Don't focus on [those issues; focus on] the condition of the mother and father!
Natural Born Citizens and for the integrity of the Commander in Chief...are those born to citizen mothers and fathers. Its a National Security issue. How many Americans have been murdered on U.S. soil since the White House was twice usurped by Congress and SCOTUS?
- Actually, SCOTUS has never ruled on the NBC issue, because it has never been allowed to reach the highest judicial office in the land for adjudication. It has been sidelined along the way on procedural grounds - the plaintiffs lacking proper 'standing,' i.e., failing to show personal injury. Oh, once it was thrown out of court, by a lower-court ruling that Obama was a, quote, "citizen," and therefore eligible for the highest office in the land. Excuse me??
The day that a court in this country shows its ignorance of the law, by, in this case, trying to equate a mere "citizen" with the same legal (eligibility-requirement) standing as a "natural born" citizen, is the day that we are being ruled by tyrants. And need to act accordingly.
- NUTN2SAY kibitzer3 • 25 minutes ago
- BS! Morrison R. Waite!
- kibitzer3 NUTN2SAY • a few seconds ago
- I am talking about a modern-day ruling that would have to rule on the original definition of the term as understood by the constitutional Framers (for which there is considerable historical evidence) and as taking into consideration the Naturalization Act of 1795, which repealed the Naturalization Act of 1790 ON THIS VERY ISSUE; the former Act, for mendacious reason, being cited by the Cruz camp for his illegitimate attempt at candidacy for the office as well.
Our day's SCOTUS needs to rule on the evidence of plain English with at least a modicum of comprehension: that a 'natural born' citizen is a person born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof; and that that eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.
(See E. de Vattel: 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles Of Natural Law,' Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212. Also see: puzo1dotblogspotdotcom)
Our modern-day SCOTUS is hoping, and even attempting, to ignore having to rule on this issue (for whatever self-perceived reason(s)), They need to have their feet held to the fire on the matter - this terribly important constitutional matter. Else we are very clearly then no longer functioning under the rule of law in this country.
And as I say above: therefore need to act accordingly.
Sunday, 21 August 2016
from wnd.com: ‘Calling The Shots: State Forces Parents To Sign Vaccine Docs’ - Bob Unruh - August 21
(“A fight has erupted over a decision by bureaucrats in Colorado to go, according to critics, well beyond what the law allows and threaten parents of homeschoolers seeking exemptions from state vaccinations requirements for their children…”)
In California, no vaccine, no public school. Period.
- California has so many rules and regulations that they don't even really qualify to be under the Constitution of United States any more. How have they let that happen?
- The state is flooded with illegal aliens, and 'legals' who helped them get here, who vote the way their masters want them to, who are out to turn the state, and the country, into a statist hellhole, as a region of their New World Order.
Gov. Jerry Brown was even caught telling an audience in the L.A. area, at which it was known there were many illegals in attendance, that, quote, "You are welcome in this state." Jerry Brown is Jesuit trained. That is part of the Cabal behind the NWO.
It will be exceedingly hard ever to get this state turned around; especially since this state a) doesn't require a photo ID to vote, and b) doesn't clean its voter reg rolls, because people sign up on it, quote, "on penalty of perjury" - but if no one ever checks to see if they are legitimate, that is a toothless tiger.
I grew up in this state, and have returned here recently after living out of the country for many years. It is sad to see what has happened to it. This state. And the nation.
There are a considerable number of natural treatments for the childhood diseases that don't have the damnable side effects to them that the vaccines have, including autism and other 'Learning Disability' conditions (in conjunction with the effects of pesticides as well, true).
There is vitamin A for measles; large doses of vitamin C for even polio; colloidal silver for the DPT triad; the list goes on. And that way, the child has the benefit of having contracted the childhood disease - giving him or her lifelong immunity; that the female can then pass on to her babies, to protect them in their infancy until their own immune systems can kick in to help out - and getting over it relatively easily. Plus, all the childhood disease mortality rates go down when there is cleaner water and better sanitation and nutrition.
We need to stop listening to the medical-pharmaceutical-government complex - whose motives are suspect; including money, and people control - and pay attention to what naturopaths and holistic M.D.'s have to say about this subject. Our good health depends on it. As individuals. And as a nation.
It's time to call a halt to all the corruption going on. And out the perps.
In doing so, you can holler ‘witchhunt’ all you want. If we had gotten to the root of the communist ‘scare’ in the ‘50s, we could well have saved ourselves a lot of this subsequent bother.
It's time to call a halt to all the corruption going on. And out the perps.
In doing so, you can holler ‘witchhunt’ all you want. If we had gotten to the root of the communist ‘scare’ in the ‘50s, we could well have saved ourselves a lot of this subsequent bother.
Meaning? Meaning that we could have uncovered the ancient bloodlines that are behind this ‘world takeover’ plot that has been going on, for long enough, now. Not just the Jews behind it (with their Chosen People mentality) - and more specifically, what are called the ‘Rothschild Zionists,’ aka the Khazarian Mafia. But other bloodlines as well (some researchers into the subject trace back to the Iranians/Persians); who believe themselves the rightful masters of this planet, and who want to turn us into the mere cattle that they think of us as. For whom, thus, democracy is a no-no. What they want is a theocracy, with them on the papal-like throne.
I’ve got news for them. God is in charge of this planet. And universe. Not them, and their ancestral ilk; from wherever in the universe, or intradimensions, they hail from. And God will call the shots, from now on. (As it were.)
So butt out, boyos. You’ve had your day in the sun. Now it’s the ‘A’ team’s turn to rule. By God’s law. Not Man’s.
The Muslims have had the right idea. Just the wrong god. but then, it has all been part of
‘I would like to speak to a Mr, Duane Stanfield?’
‘Hello, Mr. Stanfield. This is (garbled), I’m calling from Trump Headquarters. You recently filled out an online survey of ours, and you gave some rather, shall we say, independent answers, and since we are interested in extending our appeal to political Independents, we would like to ask you a few questions on your replies, if you don’t mind.’
‘Sure. Always happy to support a worthy cause.’
‘Well, thank you for that, Mr. Stanfield. So - shall we just get into it, then?’
‘Sure. Fire away. So to speak.’
‘ - What? Pardon??’
‘Sorry. Little joke, there.’
‘…Sure. Well. First off, at the very beginning of our survey, where we asked for you to indicate your main areas of concern - and thank you for the ones that you did indicate - you also indicated, quote, ‘Other’. Would you like to elaborate on that ’Other’ reply to your main areas of concern?’
‘Sure. Mainly, I was thinking of the need for The Donald to follow up on his already-expressed concern, or at least question, about the Usurper’s ineligibility for that office.’
‘ - Wha- . You’re talking about Obama? President Obama??’
‘Indeed. Although better identified as the Usurper.’
‘ - Yes. Well…you mean about his ‘birth certificate’?’
‘Not totally. And not mainly.’
‘It’s not really about the birth certificate per se. It’s about his claimed parentage. He has claimed his father to have been a Kenyan national, with no indication of American naturalization whatsoever. Correct?’
‘So he falls at the first hurdle. Not the second, or third.’
’ - Um…’
‘Let me ask you: If you wanted to find out what the constitutional Framers meant by the term, a ’natural born’ citizen, when they put it in their contract for that particular office, what would you do.’
‘…Mr. Stanfield, we really - ‘
‘You would go to the historical record and check it out. Correct?’
‘…Well, it would be a little more complicated than that. Wouldn’t it?’
‘You’re thinking that things might have changed since then, as regards either the definition or conditions. But just stop and think for a moment. The definition - whatever it would turn out to be - would still hold, as an eligibility requirement for that office - that particular office, I would point out, as to its reason for being in there - absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. Correct?’
‘…Mr. Stanfield, it’s not my job to go into these sorts of things with you. All I’m here for is to - ‘
‘But could you just tell me if you think my logic is correct or not.’
‘Look - Actually, Mr. Stanfield, I think that bringing that question up now is rather late in the day; isn’t it? It’s water under the bridge. ‘
‘But with eddies still swirling around, from its passage.’
‘Say, Ted Cruz.’
‘Not a ‘natural born’ citizen either Maybe not even a U.S. citizen, as far as that goes. But I am pointing out that the violence done to our Constitution by the undisputed candidacy, and election, of the Usurper in the Oval Office as we speak - ‘
‘Look, Mr Stanfield, I”m not going to get into this matter with you. - For heaven’s sakes, man, can you imagine the turmoil that that would cause, if - ‘
‘If we got back to the truth of the matter? And other matters?’
‘ - I mean, just look at all the rioting that’s already going on, with that…potential element.’
‘Two things in response. Number one: You are insulting black Americans, by implying that they can’t understand plain facts when they are plainly presented to them. And number two: All that business is being orchestrated by the payment of money to troublemakers. Cut off the flow of money to the leaders of the rioting and it will stop.’
‘…And how would you propose doing that.’
‘Trace it back to its source. Undoubtedly George Soros, at the very least. And publicize that fact. Oxygen is a great anti-toxin.’
‘…Anyway - ‘
‘And another, and major, factor here is that the Usurper must not be allowed to stay in that office to the end of his purloined stay in the office, because he may well be presented with a ‘state of national emergency’ by his handlers, and thereby be given the excuse he needs to declare martial law, and that would be the end of not only the rule of law in this country - its Constitution - but the nation altogether. The federal constitutional republic thereof. And we would be deep into the dark night being set up for it - and the entire world - by the New World Order crowd.’
‘…Mr. Stanfield, we really need to move on, here.’
‘I agree totally.’
‘…I mean, with this question-and-answer session. Do you mind if we get back to that?’
‘Your call. Literally.’
‘…Yes. Well. Yes. My next question: When we asked the question about who is the nation’s greatest enemy right now, you did not check ISIS. Would you care to elaborate on that answer? Briefly??’
‘Yeah. Would you blame Charlie McCarthy for what comes out of his mouth??’
‘Or would you check to see who is behind the dummy sitting on a knee.’
‘…You are saying,,,’
‘I’m saying that we need to look at who is behind ISIS. And that involves us - the U.S.; or rather, nefarious aspects of ‘us’ - and Saudi Arabia, and Mossad, and - ‘
‘Look - Mr. Stanfield - let’s move on. Shall we? I’m almost done here.’
‘And I think you may have just touched on your, attitude, on this next question, according to your, er, attitude, when you did not support that we - the United States - continue to support Israel, our only ally in the Middle East.’
‘Not until they apologize,’
‘Not until they apologize to us - the U.S. - for the likes of the Lavon Affair, and the strafing and attempted sinking of the USS Liberty, and their acts of omission regarding the suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks in Lebanon, and their acts of both omission and commission in regards to 9/11.’
‘…I think we need to wrap this conversation up here, Mr. Stanfield. Thanks - ‘
‘Just trying to be of help. To establishing the truth of things.’
‘ - Look. Mr. Stanfield. I will be honest with you Because we are involved now in a reach-out to the Independent area of the voting public, we were going to offer you a job in the lead-up to the elections. But - ‘
‘Oh; thanks for the potential offer, but I couldn’t do that anyway. I only deal with truth. However…’
‘ - What? Yes??’
‘Tell The Donald that I would be happy to offer him a job in my government, if he would straighten up just a little more.’
‘…Goodbye, Mr. Stanfield. Thank you for your time.’
‘It is, indeed, time; isn’t it.’
(a pause; then: a click)
with a nod of acknowledgment to Rob Long