Saturday, 29 August 2015

Enough Is Enough

from ‘Obama Racial Targeting Of Police Results In Execution-Style Murder Of Texas Sheriff’s Deputy’ - August 29

Stan - August 29

I have to trust that Oathkeepers are quietly preparing to remove the Usurper from his ill-gotten office, to be held on a whole host of charges by now.  A lot of good men and women gave their lives and limbs for this country.  It is for We the Living not to break faith and trust with those honored dead and wounded.  The Tyrant, who would bring down this country (and merge it into a fascist New World Order), must go - and all his minions with him.  A complete sweep of the executive branch of government [is in order] - and the dissolving of Congress as well, for failing to rein in the rogue executive, as was their constitutional duty.  And we get back to the rule of law in this country - i.e., the Constitution.  Just as soon as we can.  After the current crisis is over.  

Friday, 28 August 2015

Th-th-that's All, Folks!

I so wish I could post a blog with that title, and mean it: that The Play is over, and it's time for The Real Thing.

(You know how the Chairman of the International Olympic Committee opens The Games by declaring:  'Let The Games Begin!'?? I would so love to be able to say:

'Let The Games End!')

In the meantime - sigh - it's more of the same old, same old......

further at conservativeamericaonline: ‘Megyn Kelly Declares War On Ted Cruz’ - August 26


Get over that Ted Cruz is ILLEGAL. He is not and he is running for President of the United States and he will either be President or VP before all is said and done. You liberals crawl back in your holes because you are not even in the running. America is tired of Communism and Tyranny.
  • kibitzer3 proudtexan62 a few seconds ago (August 28)

  • Which is precisely why this is such a major issue, proudtexan62. Obama is a Usurper, for not being a bona fide 'natural born' citizen - i.e., one born on the soil of TWO U.S. citizen parents; the requirement PRIMARILY so that the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces does not have ANY DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES - and so needs to be removed from that thus-dishonored office, and quick (by Oathkeepers, current and retired). And if you would stop blindly supporting your 'favorite son' candidate for a minute and see the truth of the matter, you would see that.
  • The original intent and meaning of the term by the constitutional Framers was based on the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations Or Principles Of Natural Law'. There is plenty of historical evidence confirming that. Do your homework. And stop insulting me by calling me a liberal. I am a Truthseeker. Are you??

Ted Cruz should not even be mentioned in the same sentence with Barack Obama. Obama is an illegal, a Muslim Radical Terrorist, A Communist, a Nazi, a Marxist and a Socialist!!! He ran for president of this country with the intent of destroying America as we know it. Ted Cr in uz is a Constitutional Scholar and A Constitutional Attorney and has been fighting Barack Obama ever since he walked into the Senate Chamber in 2013. He held dual Citizenship because of being born to an American Mother (from Delaware) in Canada while she and his father were working in Canada. Ted Cruz is much more a Patriot of the United States of America than many people who were born here with two American parents . We know ted Ted Cruz and we know he explored every single law regarding his eligibility before he ever announced he was running. He had planned to announce much sooner but Ted Cruz is a very thorough person. He is one of the most intelligent people in this country and he, like Donald Trump cannot be bought by any special interest. He is truthful, respectful, and you will never beat him in a debate. He was one of the shining stars of the Harvard Law School debate team. His professors said he was one of the most intelligent men who had ever graduated Harvard, if not the most intelligence. You will not stop Ted Cruz from running for President and this country needs him like we have never needed a man like him before. Ronald Reagan was a wonderful President but Ted Cruz will equal or better him for many reasons. You need to get over the fact that you don't know the law where this is concerned and move on. You still today have the right to vote for whoever you want and if you don't like Ted Cruz, don't vote for him. Just don't sell this country down the river with a vote for Hillary Clinton if she even makes it to the primaries or Bernie Sanders. One is worse than the other and Clinton is worse than Obama and that's saying something. Joe Biden will likely get the liberal nod to run and he is not the brightest light bulb in the box but he's head and shoulders above Clinton and Sanders.


  • kibitzer3 proudtexan62 a few seconds ago (August 28)

  • I was going to let this comment thread go when someone else's retort riled me to anger, and I didn't want to engage in that frame of mind, but you have convinced me that I can't let the matter go, for you are reacting in ERROR, and I can't let that be the last word, or people might believe your take on the matter.

  • The fact is that Cruz is ineligible for that particular office because his father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth, and the argument need go no further, into where he was born, etc. etc.: he falls at the first hurdle. PERIOD.

  • The other person tried to argue that court decisions have settled the matter: I beg to differ. It doesn't matter what subsequent court decisions say, one way or the other, on the issue - the meaning - the intent of the NBC requirement for that office - AND THAT PARTICULAR OFFICE, as I have pointed out, setting it on a special pedestal for its special reason. This is a substantive, fundamental constitutional issue, that it would take a constitutional amendment to change from its original, de Vattel clarification and intent, of defining one born on the soil of TWO (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents, so as not to have ANY DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. And NO SUCH AMENDMENT has been passed. But indeed - and as evidence that both main political parties knew and know this - both parties tried a total of 8 times between them between 2003 and '08 to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on this very issue - to water down the NBC requirement - and failed each time even to get it out of committee, such was the political sensitivity around the issue. So what did they do? They engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the American people and the rule of law in this country: the Constitution.

  • Why would the Republican Party go along with a maneuver that made it possible for Obama to slip into that office illegally?? Because they wanted to be able to do the same thing with THEIR candidates. As we have seen. Do I have any proof of this? No, just common sense - but I can hardly wait for both parties to be brought up before an honest court of law on RICO-statute charges, of colluding in the commission of a crime, and being declared the criminal enterprises that they are, and dissolved forthwith. Which knocks the 2016 elections into a cocked hat, [at least] until this matter is cleared up.

  • For, this nation WILL return to TRUTH. Or it will not be allowed to pass into its future. Whatever that better future may be. For, the future is one of Truth, and Justice.

  • No more Corruption. That is coin of the realm of another day. A day now past. Or at least, in the process of passing. Into a better one. Where we go, neither to the Left nor to the Right.

  • But Up.

2) from ‘Obama Just Had His Hand Slapped Hard By Fed Judge Who Blocks This “Inexplicable” Overreach’ - Norvell Rose - August 28
(“Calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s latest effort to extend its control over virtually all U.S. waterways “inexplicable, arbitrary and devoid of reasoned process,” a federal judge has just blocked another attempt by President Obama to bypass Congress.
The Washington Times reports that Judge Ralph Erickson has issued a temporary injunction that prevents the EPA “from claiming oversight of millions of acres of land that contain small bodies of water.”…)


A federal judge has blocked an EPA edict on water rights as being unconstitutional - for excellent, intelligent reasons - and the EPA's response is to say that the ruling will only apply to the 13 states that were a party to the lawsuit, and they will go ahead with their sweeping edicts in the other 37 states - regardless of any appeal that they make to the particular decision???!!

GET THESE A*****ES OUT OF THERE. Arrest the lot of these petty tyrants, these communist commissars - and start all the way up the ladder, to He Who Gives The Orders: the Usurper, Obama. It's obviously that time. 


3) And then this, to finish this day's postings; from Judicial Watch's Weekly Update (Aug. 28): 
Judicial Watch Seeks Accountability for DNC's Hire of Illegal Alien
'The brazen lawlessness by this administration and its allies on illegal immigration knows no bounds.  I was shocked to read that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired an illegal alien to help with its campaigns.  The media played it as a "Dreamer" moment.  
'Your Judicial Watch is having none of that lawless approach to the rule of law on immigration. 
'We have just filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission requesting that it investigate the DNC for having "knowingly hired" an illegal alien, Cindy Nava, to help craft the committee's 2016 political message and communications.  Judicial Watch filed its complaint on August 25, 2015. 
'A June 8, 2015, story in The Washington Post reported that the DNC hired Nava with full knowledge of what DNC chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) termed Nava's "undocumented status."  The news report details that "Despite not yet attaining legal status, Nava is working for the Democratic National Committee as one of a crop of fellows from around the country helping the party organize ahead of a presidential election that President Obama predicted would feature immigration as a major issue."  The Spanish language newspaper El Nuevo Herald reports that Nava would help coordinate DNC outreach to "women, youth, and Hispanics."
'Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from participating "directly or indirectly in the decision-making process" of federal, state, or local election-related activities.
'The Judicial Watch FEC complaint charges:
 'The Democratic National Committee knowingly hired a Foreign National to assist, directly or indirectly, in setting the Committee's Public Policy Agenda for its Candidates, the National Committee, and its Associated Organizations.
 'The United States has prohibited non-citizen participation in election related activities for over fifty years. The United States Supreme Court has held that such prohibitions are legally permissible under the U.S. Constitution... In 2002, Congress expanded the prohibitions on foreign nationals... to include "anything of value" that "directly or indirectly" contributes to a political campaign... The Commission has stated "foreign nationals [cannot] direct, control, or otherwise participate directly or indirectly in the decision-making process of [a] PAC.
 'On its face, the DNC's decision to hire Ms. Nava is in direct violation of this provision. The FEC should investigate this matter further to determine the full extent of Ms. Nava's responsibilities, her relationship to the policy making team, and her effect on the 2016 DNC election strategy.
'The Democratic National Committee is Willfully and Knowingly violating Federal Law and Contradicting Federal Policy by Permitting a Foreign National to Contribute to the Conventions Campaigns, Election Strategy, and Fundraising Efforts     
 'The United States Congress created a federal offense to knowingly hire an illegal alien. It is against Federal law "to hire, or to recruit..., for employment in the United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien... There are two elements to this crime: (1) knowledge of the alien's status, and (2) an employment offer...
 'Thus, the DNC is violating federal law by hiring Cindy Nava. Her fellowship constitutes expenditures under the FEC regulation, and therefore these illegal expenditures are within the scope of FEC regulations... They have actively employed Ms. Nava knowing that she lacked proper authorization to work in the United States.
 'Our request for a "full, formal investigation" concludes, "These actions are particularly egregious because the DNC flagrantly promotes their illegal activities, lawlessness, and disrespect for the rule of law."
'Is it any wonder this nation has a border and illegal alien crisis?
'Not only do we have a major political party knowingly employing an illegal alien, but also openly boasting about it to the nation's press. The DNC should be held accountable by the FEC for hiring an illegal alien in violation of both federal immigration and election laws.  Frankly, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security should also take appropriate law enforcement action.'
And will they?  
As they say: Don't hold your breath.
And as I say:

Thursday, 27 August 2015

It's High Time...

...For Truth And Justice To Prevail

And what more needs, really, to be said.

Getting Bluer In The Face...

...As The Nation Gets Redder In Debt To Untruth

from -  August 27; conservativeamericaonline: ‘Megyn Kelly Declares War On Ted Cruz’ - Chris Cartouche - August 26 (orig. posted on - Ian Hanchett  - August 25) 

anglelou 2 hours ago (August 27)

Of all people, Megyn should have learned by now you cannot out debate Cruz or out fox him. Cruz is brilliant and is a champion debater from Harvard. Plus he is a Constitutional scholar!


  • kibitzer3
    anglelou a few seconds ago (August 27)

  • He is just under the sway of his liberal Harvard Law School professors who have somehow brainwashed him into thinking that he is a 'natural born' citizen under the intent and meaning of the term used by the constitutional Framers; which is very easily determined from the historical record, as one born on the soil (jus soli) of two (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis). He would do the nation - the American federal constitutional Republic - a bigger favor by acknowledging the truth on that matter than if he ran for the office illegally, and thereby tried to make two wrongs make a right.

  • That's not how it works, Ted. Get right with Truth. And we begin to heal as a nation.

          Charlibart kibitzer3 an hour ago

        Why do you keep telling this bald faced lie? What goes with the jus soli and jus sanguinis  crap. Is that supposed to make you appear intelligent and sway the hoi poloi? If a mexican woman can drop a baby (i.e.: Anchor) surely the child of a woman who is an American Citizen is definitely a citizen by birth right. End of story.

  • kibitzer3
    Charlibart a few seconds ago (August 27)

  • Is there some reason that you can't read plain English?? We're not talking about a plain "citizen" needed for one to be in the Oval Office. We're talking about a particular KIND of citizen. A citizen who has NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES, for having been born of TWO U.S. citizen parents. Not a naturalized citizen. Not a DUAL citizen. A NATURAL BORN citizen.

  • Go to puzo1dotblogspotdotcom, and get to the REAL end of the story.


That is exactly what I was posting for the last 3 months. No one seem to pay attention. I even emailed Ted Cruz himself to stop campaigning and pretending to be eligible. One of his fundraisers called me asking for donations. When I mentioned TED CRUZ is NOT eligible, she said "so what, Obama did it". That means Ted Cruz campaign knows he is NOT eligible. To that I said "Two wrongs does not make it right".
This is also true for Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindall.
    • Avatar

      Precisely, alicia. Well done. Stick to your guns on this issue. It won't go away. Because TRUTH won't go away.

    ...And on the subject of many - too many - American pastors misleading their flocks into submission to tyrants by quoting to them Romans 13:

    a) Go further, Pastor, and consider v. 7: to render honor to whom honor is due;

    b) Consider another quote: "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." 
         That's Thomas Jefferson for you, Pastor.  You've heard of him, perhaps?  One of the Founding Fathers of this nation??  Or possibly of John Knox before him, on the same subject???..........................

    Wednesday, 26 August 2015

    On Shyster Legal Tricks

    Speaking of shyster legal tricks, as I did in my last blog; consider:

    from ‘Does Ted Cruz Have The Qualifications For President?’ - August 26 (orig. posted at - Steve Deace  -  August 26)

    Phrank Stein (August 26)

    Luci Tomlin Cruz needs to meet the Constitutional requirement to be President. Not some court re-interpretation done by people with an agenda. The Founders made it quite clear as did the writer and Judges involved with the 14th when it became law.
    Just because some word has some different meaning today doesn't change that the Constitution means what the words meant when it was written, not today's bastardized definitions.
    Unlike · Reply · like.png2 · 1 hr

    Luci Tomlin do you honestly think the pos in the WH had any experience except for covering his tracks?
    Like · Reply · 43 mins

    Phrank Stein Thank you, for clearly expressing the fact that Senator Cruz does not meet the "Natual Born" requirement. If it were not for this problem, he would have 100% of my support, but I am not wasting my time on a candidate that no more meets the Constitutional requirement than the slime currently residing at 16 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC.
    Unlike · Reply · like.png1 · 38 mins

    Phrank Stein The constitutional requirement is "natural born citizen." Since there is no definition of that term in the Constitutional, there cannot be a "re-interpretation," only an "interprertation."

    Nowhere will you find a legal or conventional distinction in meaning between "natural citizen," "born citizen," or "natural born citizen." All mean "citizen by birth."

    Acciording to U.S. law (8 U.S. Code, Section 1401), passed in 1952, Cruz is a cirtizen by birth. Hence, he also is a "natural citizen, " a born citizen," and a "natural born citizen."
    Like · Reply · 35 mins

    Ed Rosenblum: Ed, you're wrong, The term means constitutionally what it meant to the constitutional Framers when they put it in their contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY, which is the clue to their intent. They didn't want anybody in that PARTICULAR office, who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces (HINT HINT), to have ANY DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. As a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to. They were CLEARLY going by the definition of the term as espoused in the definitive tome on such subjects of the day, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations Or Principles Of Natural Law,' as there is other historical evidence to attest to, too lengthy to go into here.

    Just because the Republican Party failed to make a case for it with the Usurper Obama - for their own purposes; as the current batch of Republican Party presidential candidates amply attests to - doesn't mean that there ISN'T such a case to be made - and that we are not deep into a constitutional crisis in this country. And before lt's over, both the Democrat Party AND the Republican Party are going to be hauled before a court of law on RICO-statute charges, of colluding in a criminal enterprise; in this case, to defraud the American people, for trashing the rule of law in this country: the Constitution. Shyster lawyers to the contrary notwithstanding.


    One of these days - and I hope well before long - we in this country are going to 'get' - and will HAVE to get - that we cannot move into the New Age - i.e., the kingdom of Heaven on Earth - with any degree of falsity still hanging in our auras.  

    Nothing but Truth can stand in that Light, of that New Day.  It's a matter of resonance.

    Got it, yet???  If so:

    Pass it on.

    That we are under

    New Management

    and the old ways - of lies and deceit and general corruption - just won't cut it anymore.

    No more Matrix; for lesson learning.

    Now, the Real Thing.

    For, we should have gotten our lessons by now.

    Shyster legal tricks to the contrary notwithstanding.

    Tuesday, 25 August 2015

    Food For Thought

    1) from ‘BOOM! This New Trump Video Takes Just 15 Seconds To Roast A Rival With Ultimate Irony’ - Norvell Rose - August  25
    (Showing/quoting Barbara Bush on son Jeb: No I wouldn’t want to seem him run.  There’s plenty of other families out there…)


    Thom H. Pean Sr I like Trump, always have because he is entertaining. Now he is in the politcal realm and makes some good points and some that might be considered dubious, and that is ok, but we have Sen Cruz that has expressed answers to the same problems, but with class and respect toward others. Sen Cruz is brilliant intellectually and would be an exceptional President so don't rule him out and Please keep an open mind.
    Like · Reply · like.png22 · 5 hrs

    Max Jones: I don't think we have either the time or the majority inclination to pass a constitutional amendment to make Cruz eligible for the job, Max, for not being a "natural born" citizen - i.e., one born on the soil (jus soli) of two (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents (jus sanguinis). That's PLURAL. As in BOTH. Put in the constitutional contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY, mind - so that the person in that office, who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, would have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. As a naturalized citizen would be subject to. And as a DUAL citizen would MOST CERTAINLY be subject to. Like, er, Obama.

    Which lack of attention to detail on the part of the American public is what has gotten us in the trouble that we are in under the Usurper (and Marxist). So: first things first. And if the American public can't figure out what that 'first' is, then that's the end of the game. And the other team wins. 

    Who's the other team? Why, the New World Order, of course. And if you don't know what that is, go back to your telly and couch. You are beyond hope. With the country.


    N.B.: I keep reading about subsequent Supreme Court decisions.  I don't care about 'subsequent Supreme Court decisions' from the original pristine condition.  If a mutation occurs in DNA from the original pristine condition, it gets handed down only as that - a mutation.  Or 'precedent,' in legal terms.  If the mutation is too great, the whole edifice built on it will ultimately topple and fall.  Nothing trumps going back to original intent, except a bona fide amendment.  Shyster legal tricks - like con-job 'principles' of a 'living document'  - to the contrary notwithstanding.


    2) And on this date; this, too; on the occasion of a relative of mine providing me with some info regarding the Mormon Church’s gathering of certain info about/from its membership: 

    ‘Hi (Relative)

    ‘…In looking the [Emergency Preparedness] Questionnaire over, I have to agree with the fellow in the video: Your Church is asking you members for more info than they legitimately need to know, both as to “Hunting equipment’ and as to how much food you have stored.  This is all part of the Jade Helm 15 Exercise going on, where the fed govt. is compiling as much data on us as they can, to ‘Master the Human Domain’.  (Do some research on the JH15 thing, if you’re not up to speed on it.  A good source is an iv w/a woman by the Caravan to Midnight guy, I forget his name.  Also Dave Hodges of The Common Sense Show.)  TPTB have a huge computer now - a quantum computer, that can crunch enormous amounts of data.  It’s also why ’they’ are asking children in schools to give ‘them’ as much info on their parents as they can.  We are up against very serious, very determined people - agents of the Dark side.*  They mean business, and need to be blocked from their evil intentions as much as we can.  (They mean to turn the U.S. over to the Chinese and apparently also the Russians - and put as many of us Americans into their FEMA camps as they can, and replace us also with lower-wage serfs from Mexico etc.)

    ‘If I were you, I would tell my Home Teaching people not to fill in those [particular] questions, instead [to] put in ‘Declined To State’.  Or, if they are really aware and incensed about what is going on, to fill in: None Of Your Business (NOYB).  Or NOYDB.

    ‘You may think that you can trust your Church authorities.  But many Christian churches have been compromised.  They may have been made an offer that they couldn’t refuse.  As I say: These people that we are against in this matter MEAN BUSINESS.  Stay clear of them as much as you can.

    ‘Enough for now.  Just this word of warning.’


    '* Socialists following Obama, but also fascists following the banksters, et al.  Who are the REAL leaders of the totalitarian New World Order planned for humanity.  Many of the socialists buying into this scheme - for ‘good,’ environmentally-aware purposes [read: reasons] - may well not understand that they are being used, like shock troops, by the real perps.  It’s much like the Menshiviks who were eliminated by the Bolsheviks once they helped pave the way for the 1917 Russian Revolution.’


    No. 1: The Caravan to Midnight guy’s name is John B. Wells.

    No. 2:  TCSS is a lot about fear porn.  Important info; but lacking on any positive attitude to deal with it all.  (Very Christian oriented; which tends to keep some - a lot?? - of them from doing anything about things ‘on the ground,' as it were.)  Though, true; it is all a possibility…

    What would I do, if the Chinese came flooding across Obama’s non-border and from having been pre-positioned amongst us, with weapons stashed here from their poorly inspected container cargo in ports such as mine here in Long Beach?  I would say to them:

    ‘Chinese soldiers of your Motherland: I remind you - I command you to -

    Remember The Flying Tigers.’

    And they will not forget, when their country was saved by this country.  And then I would say, more gently:

    ’Now, let us work together, to build a better world.’ 

    They were in debt to us.  And now we are in (literal) debt to them.  And so, we are even.  As long as it is recognized.

    Would they even know of The Flying Tigers?  Maybe they themselves know nothing, from their indoctrination in their schools about us Americans. But their parents knew.  And their grandparents.  And I don’t care how much their leaders have tried to brainwash them in their schools that the Americans hate them (to program them to kill us with impunity): they would not dishonor - disgrace - themselves, and their ancestors, if thus reminded.   

    As for Putin: He seems an honorable man.  I have seen a video of him putting it to some local oligarchs.  As Thatcher said of Gorby: We can do business with him.  And as RR subsequently did. 

    Anyway.  As things come down to the wire:

    Food for thought.

    Just not for exposing.  To whatever authorities.

    You never know.  These dark days.

    Sunday, 23 August 2015

    The Proper Use Of Power

    No more games.  It’s time to grow up.  Time for the real thing.       

    For example: the medical mafia.  In short: You don’t go to the manufacturer of a laxative product to find out how to keep from having to use the product they make their money from.  And substitute ‘allopathic medicine’ for laxative manufacturer in that equation.  Or, more accurately, the medical-pharmaceutical-government complex.     

    Time to pull the plug on that approach to ‘medicine’.   

    Plus, both major political parties need to come up in court - at the very least, the court of public opinion - on charges of failing to exercise their responsibility in all the gender bending that has been going on, for example, and for long enough now, in the polluting of our environment in many ways, from their scientific advisors failing to advise them properly.  And if you try to argue that that is the fault of the scientific advisors, and not of those who hired them, I am sure that we would all be interested in finding out just how involved the political parties have been in putting scientific advisors in positions of power who support the piper’s agenda as part of the deal.  As in how the pharmaceutical industry has their employees come into the likes of the FDA and the CDC and the NIH, and then, job done, revolve back into their positions - or upgraded, for services rendered - in the very industries that they are supposed to have been regulating.  And so forth, in all the scamming that has been going on in this regard.

    As the truth outs, in so many areas, now.  Under the pressure of our human ascension, to a higher level of consciousness than we have been existing on, for long enough, now.  And before we do ourselves in most terribly, because of such a low level of consciousness, and sense of integrity, as we have been engaged in.  For thinking, widely - especially in the circles of our (erstwhile) Controllers - that there is nothing more than Man, and so we can do whatever we want to do, without having to experience the consequences of our actions.

    The thinking of children.

    Kids’ stuff.

    But now, comes 

    our wakeup call.

    And just in time, it would appear.

    Certainly I, for one, am sick and tired of all the corruption, and low level of thinking, that is going on in this benighted day - and getting worse, as the 'day' wears on.


    from ‘“Saving America?” No, Donald Trump is a Clinton Operative’ - Melissa Dykes - August 21
    (pics of The Donald with The Clintons; quotes from him about his position on various issues; etc.  Belief that he is a stalking horse for TPTB.)

    Idahocntryboy! 14 hours ago (August 23)

    Cruz for President!

    • Я0llyJ0g3r
      Idahocntryboy! 2 hours ago 

    • He is a zionist sellout.
    • Reply

      • kibitzer3
        Я0llyJ0g3r a few seconds ago (August 23)

      • Worse. He's ineligible, for not being a "natural born"citizen, and it would be an attempt to make two wrongs make a right. Meaning: the country going deeper into corruption, and the rule of men. A/k/a arbitrary law. Which is the hallmark of tyranny.

      • We're in enough trouble as it is. Don't wish more on us.

    from Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth: ‘Who Knew Trump Was a Constitutional Scholar’ - posted on August 23 - orig. posted at - ’The Common Constitutionalist’/Brent - August 22
    (The 14th Amendment does NOT confer U.S. citizenship on 'anchor babies'.  Trump sort of gets it.)
    kibitzer3 says:

    Good on Brent for being willing to look into an issue further and admit that he was wrong.

    Now if we had some more honest bloggers, on the issue of the Usurper’s ineligibility, for not being what the constitutional Famers clearly meant when they required the candidate for the office of POTUS to be a “natural born” citizen……


    As to The Donald:

    He talks a good talk about the illegal aliens.  Remains to be seen what he would actually do.

    What would I do?

    1) You do not reward lawbreakers.  Back to their home countries.  And fine and possibly imprison the employers who hired them knowingly, and thus enticed them here with the promise of a job, no questions asked; over legitimate immigrants.

    2) As for their children born here:
       They knew what they were getting into when they chose to incarnate into those situations.
    And on that level, they, too, knew that you do not reward lawbreakers.  So, they go with their parents.

    3) It's all moot now, anyway.  For,

    4) Time's up.


    Final word on this subject for tonight:

    from ‘Cruz rallies Iowa evangelicals’ - Elliot Smilowitz - The Hill - August 24

    kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (August 24)

    I wish Sen. Cruz would hurry up and do the right thing, by clarifying that he is not eligible for the top job, for not being a "natural born"citizen - that is, one born on the soil of two (in this case, U.S.) citizen parents; the clear historical intent of the constitutional Framers, with much evidence to that fact - and pointing out that neither is Obama, so that we can get back to the rule of law in this country. Before we descend so far into corruption that it will be impossible to get out of that dark hole, and we degrade into tyranny - inevitable when you open to the rule of men - and subsequent civil war.

    We don't need that experience, to learn our lessons. Come on, Ted. Do the right thing. And save the nation that worse outcome, than facing up to the Truth.