Monday, 21 July 2014

Arise & Shake Off Your Various Shackles

1) from 'The Coming Christian Revolt' - J. Matt Barber - July 21 

fleurons-de-lys an hour ago

'If the ancient church, through the power of the Holy Spirit, was able to face the lions in hopeful anticipation of joining Jesus, then we, too, under the same Spirit, will face anything today’s pagan left can threaten."......WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YOU PEOPLE TALKING religious ideologues threw this Country under the bus in the last national election. YOU ALL have no one to blame but yourselves for the dismal state of affairs this Country is in. The LGBT community and potheads are laughing all the way to the bank while you all go ON AND ON about the fear of GOD. The direction this Country is going in is based on ONE FACT.........THE VOTE. The leftists finally got what they where after for decades......A MAJORITY ELECTORATE. The ancient church is just that ANCIENT and the MAJORITY ELECTORATE PREVAILS IN THIS DAY AND AGE; until that FACT is impressed into the minds of the religious ideologues, WELL GUESS WHAT............the Senate will stay a leftist entity and after that you all will have something to REALLY complain about when the SUPREME COURT SWINGS LEFT.


kibitzer3 fleurons-de-lys a few seconds ago (July 21)

Actually, fleurons-de-lys, something trumps "a majority electorate" in this country: the Constitution. And yes, there is a worry that a majority electorate will result in the Supreme Court 'swinging left'. But if conservatives and constitutionalists and honorable legalists continue to hold the SCOTUS true to the rule of law in this country, it - to say as well, the Constitution - will prevail, though moral and political relativists huff and puff and try to blow this house down.
It has been well anchored in fundamental bedrock. It just needs being well looked after, is all.


(I sensed that this wasn't sufficient enough of a response, wanted to say a little more to the general subject. Herewith:)

kibitzer3 a few seconds ago  (July 21)

No disrespect intended. But the time for man-made religions is past. And all religions are man-made. Even those of the people of what is called The Book; which many very respectable scholars have perceived to be fundamentally flawed in its claims, in both the Old and the New Testaments.
It's time for the unalloyed Truth to take over in human affairs, anyway. And raise them a level, closer to where James Madison referred to, when he said (I paraphrase) 'If men were angels, there would be no need for the likes of constitutions'. It's time to head in that direction with the equivalent of a quantum leap. A grand and glorious future awaits us. If only we acknowledge the truism, that 'we are spiritual beings having a human experience'. Without that understanding, we are about to fall flat on our faces. And not in awe of the awesome Creator of the universe.


2) from Judge Jeanine: Obama Planned Immigration Crisis 2 Years Ago'  - Tom Hinchey - July 21

July 22, 2014 at 12:14 am — 

Well spotted and told, Judge Jeanine. And thanks for the posting of this, Tom.
Keep on the firing line, Judge. You’re doing a great job.
When we look back on these days, you can both stand tall, for your efforts to alert the American public to what has been going down, on their watch.
That’s what ‘a free press’ is supposed to be all about, anyway.


3) (A reply to my follow-on post at conservative

Debbie G kibitzer3 4 hours ago (July 22)

And what is Truth, Kibitzer? There can only be one.
And by which Truth do you set your moral compass?


kibitzer3 Debbie G a few seconds ago (July 22)

The Truth that the universe has Purpose, and that purpose is Good.  More specifically: that there is Plan in and Purpose to 'the universe' - to life. The Plan is signified by the fact - for which there is overwhelming evidence in our time (which needs now to be looked at seriously, to help us take our next steps) - of the mechanism of reincarnation, whereby we souls are but playing, and exchanging, parts in a Drama - now a prince, now a pauper; now a male, now a female; now of one race or religion or nationality, now of another - in order to grow in consciousness and awareness, in this school of 'hard knocks' - this realm of (seeming) separation, of duality and polarity. Learning, first, that We Are One Another. And then 'getting,' from that place of awareness, that We Are All One. Are facets, fractals, aspects, points of view of One Holy Being; experiencing Itself through Its constituent parts - Us.
We are in/parts of a great hologram. Whereby it can be said - in an upgrade, for our crowning time IN Time, of The Golden Rule - that, As you do unto others, so do you do unto yourself - literally. For, We Are All One. And All IS One.
There is, then, in truth - in Truth - no Other. We are all in this experience - this school - together. And it's time to graduate. For the purpose of a school, obviously, is not to get stuck in its lower grades. But to graduate.
And to keep going. Ultimately back to Unity. The richer for the experience, of the equivalent of The Prodigal Son. Having used our gift of free will ultimately to enter back into the House of our loving Father/Mother Creator.


I should have added, 'Thanks for asking, Debbie.'  (Maybe she will respond, and I can get the acknowledgment in.  She seems to be genuinely interested.)

Blocked From RedState - ???

I went back later today to post a further Comment on the previous RedState thread, because I was aware that I didn't spell out, in my earlier posting, precisely why Ted Cruz was ineligible for the presidential office.  This was what ensued:

from - cont'd

jptravis 9 hours ago

Why do people keep writing about Cruz's presidential chances as though he is eligible for the office? He is not. As conservatives we have to decide whether we are the political philosophy with principles or not, whether we are going to defend the constitution or not. I love Cruz, I thank God for Cruz, but the man is not eligible to be president of the United States. He is even less eligible than Obama who was also ineligible.


Bill S Mod jptravis 9 hours ago

And another Cruz birther bites the dust.
Folks, I'll say it again: Cruz birtherism is a bannable offense. Do. Not. Do. It.


  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑBE Bill S 9 hours ago

  • Shame we have such dumbasses on our side. And just to think, there is a huge compost/fertilizer shortage they could help shrink.
  • Reply

  • rb1121 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑBE 8 hours ago 

  • The birthers, the xenophobe nativists, the racists. I almost hate them as much as the liberals. Almost.

  • Reply

      • kibitzer rb1121 2 minutes ago 

      • Saul? Is that you, Alinsky?? Have you come back to haunt us, this time from the other side of the political aisle???

      • Reply

  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑBE rb1121 8 hours ago 

  • Yep, they are all despicable.
2) (I then attempted to post the following message:)

There seems to be some unclarity on this thread regarding the eligibility or not of Senator Ted Cruz to run for the office of the presidency. I will assume - except in certain cases - an element of goodwill in the matter, i.e., an honest difference of opinion. Let me clarify the matter, in two parts.

1) Regardless of where he was born (a separate issue), Ted Cruz is not a 'natural born' citizen - as opposed to being just a 'citizen' - because of one salient fact: his father was still a Cuban citizen when Ted was born; he only got naturalized later. Thus, Ted was born a dual citizen (the American citizenship through his mother), not a 'natural born' citizen. A natural born citizen is one who has no DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES; is totally clear of foreign influences on him/her.
(The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers, for putting that eligibility requirement in the Constitution for that particular office, was to make sure that the candidate, if elected, would NOT HAVE such foreign allegiances or loyalties. And the proof of this definition of an NBC, as intended by the Framers, is that the Framers SPECIFICALLY REJECTED a proposal by Alexander Hamilton, during the proceedings, that the candidate for that office merely needed to be a 'citizen'. They meant for the candidates not to have any foreign ties on them. Period.)

Thus, Ted Cruz - and Marco Rubio as well, for that matter - is not eligible for that particular office. (Or the VP office either, as subsequently established by constitutional amendment.) He can make, and is making, a good senator. And long may he serve the nation in that capacity.

This is not 'racist'. This is running the country by the rule of law. If someone wants to amend the Constitution in this regard, they are welcome to try. Until that event, dual citizens like Ted Cruz are not eligible for the office.

And the same with Obama. Who needs to be removed from the office forthwith, for being the Usurper that he is.

Which brings up part

2) Both the Republican and the Democrat Parties as legal entities are guilty of conspiring with one another to commit a constitutional crime. That is a felony (RICO statues). Their authorities need to be tried in a (morally straight) court of law for their arrogant hijacking of the American rule of law, and the parties, as legal entities, dissolved. And America returned to its proper state of being. Which is NOT under the rule of men.

Hopefully, having learned our lesson - about fudging the rule of law - from the disastrous example of Barry Soetoro, also known, later in his (checkered) life, as Barack Hussein Obama. A Red flag if there ever was one.

This posting was blocked, with the following notation:

'We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by - Conservative Blog & Conservative News Source. Find out more.'

In going to the 'Posting Rules' site of, I find the following subject - among a number of others -  as not allowed on that site:

"• Theories that Barack Obama is not eligible to the Presidency of the United States, or political movements based on that idea. Birthers must post their theories elsewhere.'

Well, can certainly decide their own rules about 'acceptable' posting.  But:


I call this rather short-sighted.  And counter-productive.

The truth will out.


For that is the nature of the universe.


P.S. I then noticed that the Moderator had left me a message, to my comment to celador2:

Bill S Mod kibitzer 2 hours ago

You obviously cannot read.
Birthers - Obama or Cruz - are not welcome here. PERIOD.


(Not allowed to be posted:)

Sorry. Didn't realize this site was allowing one side of an issue, but not the other.

Doesn't seem fair. But them's your rules.  'Bye.

Et Tu, RedState?

from 'Could Elizabeth Warren Face Ted Cruz in 2016?' - Dan McLaughlin - July 18;  posted July 21

celador2 sugarmomma 9 hours ago 

The renounce process was complete May 14, I think. He is no longer a Canadian citizen in name, which is all he ever was. Furthermore in order to show he would not he stateless if he renounced he had to provide his mother's BC which made him a US citizen under Canadian law. He seems to have complied with Canadian provisions to demonstrate he would not be stateless and therefore is a US citizen. Canada may have denied the request unless the applicant showed he'd not be stateless as a result is what I read at Salon a year or more ago. Note Salon is hostile to Cruz. The site featured a Canadian - American analysis about the renounce Canadian citizen- dual process. It was a one day story in US news a few months ago. No big deal.



kibitzer celador2 6 minutes ago  (July 21)

celador2, you seem legitimate, unlike the obot equivalents (at the least) on this thread. So let me explain the facts.
"Renounce" processes are not the matter. The circumstances of one's birth are the matter. And Ted Cruz is not a 'natural born' American citizen by birth circumstances. He is not a child born on the soil of two U.S. citizen parents.  [N.B. His father, a citizen of Cuba, was not a naturalized American citizen at the time of Ted's birth.  Thus, Ted is a dual citizen, regardless of where he was born.]
Consider. The whole POINT of the constitutional Framers putting that specific eligibility requirement in the constitutional contract for that office - and that particular office ONLY, let it be reminded (since extended logically to the office of the VP) - was to make sure (at least as sure as THEY could make it, in their time) that a candidate for that office - who would as well, if elected, become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - did not have any DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. Like a naturalized citizen. And PARTICULARLY like a dual citizen. Like Obama.
Which is why Obama is a Usurper, and needs to be treated as such. NOT excused for trashing the Constitution, as he has done - by his very presence in the Oval Office, let alone his actions subsequent to that crime - the way that the Republican Party has done, in looking the other way about his candidacy.
Two points. 1) Two wrongs don't make a right. 2) Why would the Repub Party honchos engage in this trashing of the Constitution (and thus, of the rule of law in the country)? Obvious answer: Because they did a quid pro quo deal w/their Demo Party counterparts: 'We won't say anything about your candidate if you won't say anything about any subsequent candidate of ours, on this issue.' Reason? Because both parties found it too difficult to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on the issue. (Between them they tried a total of 8 times, between 2003 and 2008, to get such an amendment going, and failed every time even to get it out of committee.)
This issue needs to be settled, and now. Before the nation descends even further into the murky dissolution of the rule of law. Which means, living rather by the rule of men. And that means war.
We may have it anyway. Because of two things. 1) Obama's illegality (and the war that the Marxists, & other statists, are waging on the nation already, thereby). And 2) The Republican Party's failure to do its job, in a two-party system, of being 'the honorable opposition' party; in such a terrible betrayal of the nation's fundamental principles, of Liberty under Justice, that has occurred on our watch.
We have a job to do. And it is NOT to compound the problem. It is to correct it.
Smear words to the contrary notwithstanding.

[N.B. 1) The word is 'honorable,' ladles and gentlemen of the Republican Party.
     Not 'dishonorable'.
     ('Dear Republican Party: You were not a party to the constitutional contract.  Where do you think you get your power to amend it?,  let alone unilaterally??
     'I'm waiting.
     'An American Citizen.')
     2) To clarify my comment about "smear words": Some patrollers of these RedState threads were using words like 'racist' against those who questioned Cruz's NBC status.  Unforgivable.  And straight out of Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' bible.
     Whether socialist radical.  Or fascist.]


rcsjr2 3 hours ago

The thought of Ted is intriguing, way too early to speculate but, the notion of restoring constitutional integrity in the executive branch is a breath of very fresh air. The nation, still suffering economic malaise, over-regulation, domestic and foreign ineptitude, would not stand the strain of another progressive experiment if God forbid Elizabeth Warren were to rise to the top.


kibitzer rcsjr2 a few seconds ago  (July 21)

"Restoring constitutional integrity in the executive branch" would mean ousting Obama as the Usurper he is - and NOT compounding the error by putting up a non-'natural born' citizen for the office.
Read my comment below. And help restore that integrity that you invoke.


P.S. Some channeled advice for today:

     "You are the ones who are aware and must exercise your power by calling on the Angels for assistance and directing them to the areas where they are needed…"
     'Dear Angels:
     'You are needed in America, for its citizenry to restore it to its core roots, and thus correct error.  Before we can even think of transcending that   blueprint, and building a firmer edifice on it.  Firm enough from which to reach to the heavens.'

     ("The bottom line is how much do you love?"  
      I love my country.  And I want it back…)

     ("Become the enlightened being that can rise above any situation and see a more loving perspective."
      Damn.  Tough call…
      But then, nobody promised us a rose garden.
      At least, not on this current level…)

Sunday, 20 July 2014

It's Celebration Time...

…Or Is It???

Sunday night.  July 20th.  There's a party going on next door.  Still on planet Earth.  A birthday.


…So what do I do tonight.  Eat in, as per usual.  Or eat out, as per occasionally.

'Go out for dinner.  Celebrate.'

Celebrate what.  My  country selling out its soul?  Or having its soul sold out from under it.  Same thing.  

'Go on.  Celebrate.  Experience a change of pace.'

Okay.  Whatever you say…not that I expect much good to come from it.  Anyway: McDonald's - here I come.  Ready or not.  That's a joke.  Ha.  Ha.

'McDonald's.  That's as good as you can muster?'

Yes.  You were expecting me to spend some unnecessary money on myself??  

'I should have known better.'

Indeed.  Especially if you're my Higher Self.  Or whatever…...Okay.  Here we go, here we go, here we go.

Another joke.

Hey.  I'm a joke.

'Don't say that.  Don't ever think that.'

Why not.  'Here to change the world.'  It is to laugh.  Me?  A failure in everything I've ever touched, ever tried my hand at?  What about that time……Oh, forget it.  It's too painful to recall.

'You want to know what I think?'

Why.  Should I??

'I think you're going through a Cleansing.'

A cleansing.  That's rich.  And will take some time, boy, if it's true.  

'Well.  Just consider it.'

Okay.  I just did.

'I mean, really.'


'Because.  It happens.  When souls are ready to progress.  Like those on planet Earth, right now.  Facing their Ascension.'

There you go again.

'Well.  Just consider it.'

You just said that.  And I just did.

'Just don't lose sight of the fact.'


'That the universe has Purpose.  And that purpose is Good.'

Okay.  Got that one.  At least…


P.S. Washing some cherries for my nightly bowl of ice cream just now, and pulling the stems off of them, I was reminded of - more actually, flashed on - a memory from my childhood.  Second half of my first grade (I spent the first half in another city); our teacher told us about 'the father of our country, George Washington,' and how 'he could not tell a lie;' landing it with having us color in a print outline drawing of some cherries, with their stems on, in memory of the dear cherry tree that little George chopped down with his trusty hatchet.
     Never did find out why he had done that.  But, salient point taken.  And for a lifetime, it would appear.
     Wonder what they teach kids these days about George Washington.
     Probably that he was a slaveowner, and wore a wig.
     Ha.  Ha.

On Calling A Spade A Spade

And another letter in my pile of worthy-cause mail; this one from Sheriff Joe, down in Arizona.  On the front lines, as it were.

"Dear Stan [my nickname; which I often go by]:

"What is happening to our country?

"It seems like every day you read the newspaper or turn on the news, there is something tragically going wrong.

"We now have U.S. Border :Patrol agents moving illegal immigrants from one city to another in our United States.  In Arizona alone, we have 1,000 illegal immigrants PER DAY being dropped off at bus stations in Phoenix and Tucson.  [What???!!!] 

"These illegal immigrants are coming over by the thousands because of the failed leadership and policies of Obama and his Administration.  The claim is that these 'children' are coming here because of political unrest in their home countries such as Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.  But exactly HOW are they getting here?  I can't imagine all these 'children' are traveling alone thousands of miles north surviving rough terrain and the dangerous heat of the Mexican desert to arrive at our older.  So, who's really behind all this?1

"And now we've learned many of these 'children' are members of the most dangerous gangs in South America.  Worse yet, these illegal immigrants are bringing contagious diseases into our country, further threatening our American citizens.

"And what is Obama doing about it?  He's holding events at the White House 'honoring young adults who came to this country illegally' that won't be deported.  This President is sending the wrong message at the wrong tile.  It's unbelievable!"

Yes - and no.

The first thing we have to do is recognize that there is a war going on in our midst.  This is not about 'politics as usual,' between political parties in a basically two-party system.  This is war being waged, by a body of socio-econo-political ideologues who want the whole enchilada - a war waged on the federal constitutional republic of America by those of its citizenry (and their non-citizen cohorts in crime) who want to turn it into a socialist dictatorship, with the power of the vote to back them up, by hook or by crook.  

Thus, the repeated attempts by the Obama administration's (so-called) Justice Department to get the states to stop requiring commonsense voter ID.  Thus the attempts by the Obama administration in particular, and the far Left in general, to flood the voting system with illegal voters (of all stripes; dead people resurrected for the occasion and multiple-personality voters, and so on).  Thus, the attempts by the Obama administration in particular and the far Left in general to bankrupt the nation with welfare 'entitlements' in order to install their socialist 'paradise' on the ruins of the old order of things.2  

And thus, the stockpiling of millions - millions - of rounds of (particularly lethal) ammunition by the Department of Homeland Security, and other departments of the executive branch of government.3  And thus, the preparation of MRAPs to patrol the streets of America against patriots, the new 'terrorists'.  And thus, the drones; not only to keep track of these potential 'terrorists' to the overthrow gang.  But to shoot them if necessary.  And thus, the -

but you get the idea.  You're not dumb.

Are you?

Deaf, dumb, and blind, to what's going on??  Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil???…

And it is evil.  For thinking to take away from Man his free moral agency; and make of him merely a serf to the state…

Next, is the question, of what we do about it.  'We' being, in this instance, believers in America and its form of government -

the last, best hope of the world.  Against a long dark night of tyranny. 

So; what to do?:

The answers lie within. 

Join me, as I ask: Help me fulfill my purposes in being here at this time.

And I decidedly do not ask that of any human governmental agency.

One thing we can do.

"Will you stand with me today and support my campaign [[or re-election]?"

Yes, Sheriff Joe.  I'm right with you.  Until this whole matter is cleared up.  And we move on.

And Up.

P.S. Many of those on the far Left think that they are at war with the far Right, meaning the fascists, of the corporate-banking-government complex.  I've got news for them, apparently:
    They are being used by those very people.  As cannon fodder.
    The same way that David Rockefeller tried to buy himself a revolution some years ago.
     Plus ça change…
     Incidentally, speaking of David Rockefeller: I personally think that he has thought of himself as a prophetic King David - of the world - as mentioned somewhere in the Old Testament.  Little does, or did, he know, apparently, that the Bible is a flawed source of information.
     Something that we all need to come to terms with, as we enter into the realm of Limitless Truth.
     Limitless Love as well, yes.  But in all things, we need to practice discernment.
     That is part of our 'home' work; as we now make our way more directly back to our Source.
     The likes of the socialists having thrown the baby out with the bathwater, as they thought, and sought, to eliminate God from the equation, of our essentially crystalline natures.
     Discernment, folks.  That's the real name of the game.  Practice discernment.  And you will find your way back



1 The question itself is valid.  But just to point out, that at the time of this writing, Sheriff Joe was obviously not aware of the particular train line that the bulk of these youngsters are hopping illegally on, traversing Mexico in one fell swoop
     The state of Mexico is allowing this to happen.  The state of Mexico needs to take responsibility for this insolent act.  These young people should be sent back to Mexico, and let the state of Mexico deal with them, as the transit state.  And if the Illegals are caught on our side of the border again, they need to be sent back to their country of origin, and dropped off at bus stations in their largest cities.  And if they are caught on our side of the border a third time, they need to be put in internment camps, for a long, long time, as their applications for refugee status are reviewed.
     Illegal entry for three times not putting them at the head of the queue.  But at the bottom.

2 the so-called Cloward-Piven Strategy.  If you don't know what that is, you should, if you care for your country at all.  Look it up.

3 Including the U.S. Postal Service.  Now what in heaven's name does the U.S.P.S. need such firepower for???
     Except that it is a branch of the federal government going rogue on the nation; and the employees thereof - hopefully, by the thinking of the nation's hijackers - will be coming out on the side of their employer, i.e., the party that they are beholden to for their sustenance.

     Bought off, as it is.

Saturday, 19 July 2014

Moving On

Got an urgent, Next Day Priority Express request for follow-on financial support for his run for Congress from Dr. Charles 'Trey' Thomas, in Louisiana.  His covering letter, in part, reads:

"Above everything else, today's Democrat Party is dedicated to one thing -- growing the entitlement culture.  They want to trap large segments of the population into thinking they're dependent on the government for their very survival…

"…and as a black conservative Republican running for office, I'm finding out that they aren't shy about attacking anyone who dares stand up to them…"

Go for it, Dr. Thomas.  I've got your back.


     Moving On

You are not 'entitled'
As a matter of right
To the earnings
Of any other person.
      And just as soon
      as you 'get' that
And are off and running
On a different track
From the one
You are on
At the moment
In graduated Time,
I'll be moving on.
I've got other
Fish to fry
So to speak
From the ones
That they have
Down in Louisiana way.

       from your
Elder Brother

Friday, 18 July 2014

In The Meantime...

… The Play Goes On 'Must See TV: C-SPAN Host Educated: SCOTUS Confirms Obama Not Natural Born Citizen' - July 18 - posted on CDR Kerchner (Ret.)'s Blog
(A summary of court cases dealing with the NBC subject)

kibitzer3· less than 1 minute ago  (July 18)

Since Obama is not a natural born citizen, Impeachment is not the way to go to unseat the Usurper. That is only for legally sitting presidents. He must simply be removed - by Oathkeepers, active and retired (including Constitutional Sheriffs), and with a multitude of Patriots having their backs - or resign voluntarily, and be held for trial. And that way, all the legislation that he signed into law, and all the Executive Orders and Presidential Directives that he issued, and all the appointments that he made, go with him, into the trash bin. And that includes all the members of his administration; and also the sitting Congress, dissolved by The People for having failed to do its duty, and uphold the Constitution in this regard, of usurpation of & by the Executive. 

And we start anew, as if this nightmare never took place. Having learned our lesson, as a self-governing citizenry - sovereigns in our own right. Not beholden to king, cleric, despot, or oligarchy. And therefore, having major responsibility, to go with our [constitutional] rights.


P.S. from 'Must See TV: C-SPAN Host' etc. - cont'd

·sicraignbc  7 hours ago (July 18)

... The 25th Amendment provides for the REMOVAL of a POTUS by the Operation of Law.


" ...SECTION 1.
In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President...."

Here there are THREE circumstances provided for; "REMOVAL, death or resignation, that's three separate circumstances.


" ...SECTION 4.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President..."

Ineligibility in the 1st instant is a condition that would make a person " unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office " and any Declaratory Judgement on the correct definition of a U.S. natural born Citizen would serve as a Transmittal to " the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President .."


kibitzer3 3 minutes ago (July 18)

But what do you do when the Vice President is complicit in the crime that put an ineligible candidate in the Pres'l office? And when the Congress failed to act on it, thus causing them to be an accessory at the least after the fact??

You go back to the original spirit of the Framers, as espoused in the Constitution: Let The People decide "what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected" (Art. II, Sect. 1, para 6) . That is, someone to temporarily hold the space, until new elections can be held - including for the culpable sitting Congress.

Personally, if you were to ask me, I would say that this setting-to-rights of this terrible crime committed against the United States of America and its constitutional-republic citizenry signals the End of History - a turning to strict morality in all our dealings; in which case, the Play is ended, and we move up onto a higher level of consciousness, the better, more aware, for the experience in 3D life. But then, that's another subject in itself. But them's my thoughts on the subject.

As for the criminal sitting Congress, needing now to be dissolved (also since they have failed in their constitutional responsibility to hold oversight of the Executive): Everyone makes their own bed, and then lies in it. And some lie more than others. :-)

Evony Master· 8 hours ago

Whether he is or is not an NBC, he has been seated and more importantly ACCEPTED by majority of the American people as being legitimate. The only way to remove him is to impeach. Until his public support is completely undermined, any attempt to remove him by virtue of his intelligibility [sic!] will surely fail.


kibitzer3  less than 1 minute ago  (now July 19)

Nonsense. It is simply a matter of being clear with the American people.

Stop making excuses for illegality.


Wrong is wrong.  We are not living in a socialist paradise yet, where questions of right and wrong are determined by whether or not the thing serves to support the ruling order or not.

Get thee behind me, Satan, and all your minions.


Am I someone special in this regard?

If you mean, do I feel willing and ready to take on this responsibility, the answer is Yes.

No one - no one - plays so fast and loose with my country.


The immediately preceding being a point which I have now used in another reply to a response to my original comment at the above site:

bob68  9 hours ago

I fail to see why a House that will never recognize that Obama is not the legal president would be constrained in impeaching him. Is someone in Congress going to say, "Wait, we can't impeach this guy because he is not legally the president". I don't think so, and neither will any court. The reason he isn't impeached is because Congress, both parties, are complicit in the biggest fraud in history. The Republican House doesn't need any more excuses not to impeach, they just implemented the "we are going to sue" excuse which can last all the way until January, 2017. Congress protects Obama to protect themselves and they have since he was sworn in back in 2009. Congress won't do their job because they aren't going to risk giving themselves prison sentences.

I agree with Commander Charles Kerchner, Impeach Obama and everything else will take care of itself. Please read this by CDR Kerchner:

Which is why the complicit Congress will never impeach Obama.


kibitzer3  2 minutes ago  (July 19)

Point taken, bob68, about impeachment proceedings a) at least getting the ball rolling, and b) helpful in order to get facts out into the public arena. But I feel that their Alinskyite crowd of obots will jump all over it before it gets any traction, and ridicule and demean it out of the ball park.

That's why I advocate a lightning strike, of Oathkeepers, with a multitude of Patriots having their back, and a direct trip to jail for the Usurper - and house arrest for Nancy Pelosi and any other Democrat Party officials directly involved in the cover-up of his non-eligibility, back in '08 and again in '12.

It's time to get serious about this appalling and atrocious matter.

I don't know about you. But no one plays so fast and loose with MY country.


(July 19)

As for that subject; and as to the theme I mentioned above, of 'the End of History: I can perhaps best use America as an example, of what I should perhaps have called 'the End of History as we have known it'.

America has been a crowning point of socio-econo-political history, Americans having learned - or at least, experienced - what can happen when you don't live by the rule of your law, and thus begin to play with fire.  That's one part of the Completion process.  Another has to do more specifically with free will, and the founding of the American nation on this blessed continent.

Some people say that the Native Americans were terribly done by by the Europeans, and the New World thing should never have happened, and so forth and so on.  My response: "If God ordained it, it can't have been wrong."

Why do I say, 'God ordained it'?

Because America - a nation dedicated, not to subjects, but to the individual, and his/her free will exercising - was meant to be  To ultimately as well learn from the wisdom of the Native Americans, about learning to live in harmony with Nature, as with a live Being, which has much to teach us; and entwining - in a process of Synthesis - the two threads into one.  For a New Dispensation.

Which we are now to enter into.

You see, the socialists have the right idea, about cooperation, and all our needs being met, and all that.  They just don't have the right means to that end.  They're trying to do it without 'God,' as it were.

Big mistake.

But, it has all been part of the process.  Of putting the pieces together.

The pieces, of the lessons of the 3D school that we have been living in; and thinking that it was all that there is.

And now, it's graduation time from the lower grades of that school.  And time to harvest the fruits of our discoveries. And our accomplishments.

As part of the general Ascension process that we are involved in; ultimately taking us beyond the highest reaches of the School.

But first: it's Celebration time.

For making it this far.  Without undue mishap.

We've failed on that score before, you know.

And if you don't:

You are about to.  As it all comes back to us, now.  In the Wrapping Up of our time ensconced - incarcerated? - in 3D.

In the 3D realm of our making.  To experience Duality.  And then - ultimately - to move on.

Into Unity.

In the Return of the Prodigal Son.

As it were.

So: America will change, yes.

But on God's terms.

Not Man's.