Saturday, 13 February 2016

On The Meaning Of Things

A late entry for today:

from ’Nation In Crisis - No Leadership And Now Scalia Dead’ - R.L. Grimes

kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (February 13)

All the more reason now that we must not, cannot wait for a hypothetical election in November, with the Usurper poised to declare martial law at his whim, or orchestrated Event; that Oath keepers, both current and retired, must rise to this crucial occasion and arrest said Usurper, with true patriots having their backs, and as One, leaving behind for now our divisiveness over the questions, as serious as they are, regarding the eligibilities of either Cruz or Rubio for the office of the POTUS, in light of the more pressing need to take care of First things First.

But not to forget: Two wrongs don't make a right, Conservative supporters of either Cruz or Rubio. If you insist on continuing with your erroneous take on the natural born citizen matter - i.e., conveniently overlooking the fact that citizenship follows that of the father - you will be consigning the Constitution to being nothing but a dead letter, with no meaning but what current-time judges give it. That would be a signal for disaster; for the unmistakable rise of the rule of men in the country. A/k/a arbitrary law. A/k/a tyranny. Present example being a perfect example.


As for the question of the original-intent meaning of the term, 'natural born citizen':

Further inquiry on my part has led me to find out that de Vattel, of 'The Law of Nations' fame, indeed did define the term as those "born in the country of parents who are citizens"  - 

BUT - 

later on in his definitive treatise on the subject, ALSO included in its definition those born of citizens even if born in a foreign country.  'Natural,' then, even though seemingly logically relating to both 'of the parents' - jus sanguinis - and 'of the soil' -  jus soli - technically speaking relates simply to the citizenry of the parents.*  However, the essence of the matter remains the same, for Obama, Cruz, and Rubio; to wit: they are not 'natural born' citizens of the U.S., because their FATHERS were not citizens of the U.S.  Citizenship is a matter legalistically speaking of patriarchal lineage/'patrilineal descent'.  Was then, and still is, even with the rise of feminism.

The bottom line, then, is still the same, for these examples: None of these men were born of a U.S. citizen father.  And even the most legalistically adventurous soul is going to have to own up to that.  Sooner or later.    

And far better sooner.  For the particular reason indicated above; along with a number of others.  Which have resulted in a major Crisis time for the American Republic, with a person at the helm with 'divided loyalties and allegiances and influences' - precisely what the constitutional Framers were trying to avoid, with that particular eligibility requirement put in their constitutional contract for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY.  As I have pointed out, enough times to even make me sick of the subject.

And of its consequences.  Which we are experiencing.  And in spades.  

As I have also said.  To say: pointed out.  For even the most dense American to get

the point.

And thus, have no excuses.

In the Harvest.  Coming up.

As we speak.

In which we need to say Yes to a new reality, and a New Life.  And leave the old, tattered way of doing things behind.

Been there.  Done that.  Time for  the total


In the Light.  And Love.  Of our Creator.

Hallowed be Thy name.

No other.


* And through the doctrine of coverture: At common law, husband and wife were considered One, with the husband's citizenship being the One.

History 101

Gong along with the theme that I closed my last blog with, I received a mailing today from the Young America's Foundation - a supporter particularly of the Ronald Reagan presidency - which said, in part, that:

"...studies have shown that only one in four American young people recognize President George Washington's portrait on the dollar bill.

"Surprised?  You shouldn't be.

"Every President's Day [coming up on Monday], patriotic Americans remember George Washington and celebrate his courageous leadership in uniting a free nation.

"But instead of teaching students to revere George Washington and other Founding Fathers, leftist school officials have been stripping their names out of textbooks and from elementary and high schools across our nation for the past decade.


"Because leftist lawmakers and school administrators think that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other Founding Fathers are a disgrace to our nation.

"They attack these courageous Founders as 'racist' and 'sexist' and call them 'slave holders.'..."

Other than being men of their times, AND much more - what does any of that have to do with their having created a free country?

' Yeah - free to have slaves.'

'And free to give you freedom from governmental oppression, and the highest standard of living that the world has ever known.'

'Yeah - and the greatest trashing of the environment that the world has ever known, too.'

'If you hate it so much, why don't you leave?'

'And why don't you get out of the way of change, old white man, part of the problem.'

'Right.  Change into an economic basketcase, like all the other Third World nations, that have to be bailed out by this country's citizens' tax dollars.'

'Right.  You and your ill-gotten gains, on the backs of people of color.  It's time for something new, old man.'

'New!  Government oppression of its people is as old as the hills.'

' Only oppression of you lot, who deserve it, turn about being fair play, and all.'

'I notice that you are white.'

'And I'm ashamed of it, for what we have done to the world.'

'Done!  We have done magnificent things 'to' the world.  In art, literature, music, physics ...'

'And oppression.'

And so the argument rages...

I'll cut to the chase here.

Number one.  The Founding Fathers of this nation were, indeed, men of their time.  And, far beyond their time, in their vision, of and for a New World, free from the old controls, of church or monarch or state.  Free to be men, and women, standing in their own sovereignty - as children of a higher God than that of either Monarch or State OR Church.  Free to worship as they pleased.  And free to to explore the likes of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".  

Without my going into the excesses of liberty - of which there have been many in this country - I'll cut to the bottom line.  Which is that our youth have been and are being manipulated, in their youthful idealism, by experts in the trade of propaganda, and illusion.  The real PTB behind the scenes of all this revolutionary spirit going on don't give a hoot about 'people of color,' or 'the environment'.  That's all for propagandic, end-justifies-the-means purposes.  What they want is their New World Order of power.  Naked, ruthless power.   Power Over others.  As opposed to Power With.  

Welcome to the real world, sonny goy.

On Rising To The Occasion - However That Might Be

1) from ’The Department Of Justice Prepares To Step Up War On Domestic Extremists’ - Derrick Broze - February 12
(“Senior officials with the U.S. Department of Justice recently announced possible legal changes which could allow the government greater room to combat so-called “anti-government extremists”…”) 

kibitzer3 - (February 13)

Excellent article, Derrick.  Thanks.

The tipping point, from ’terrorists’ to ‘domestic terrorists’ to ’domestic extremists’ has to be whenTPTB labeled the Founding Fathers ‘extremists’.  Their agenda is there, for all to see who have eyes TO see.

2) more from patriotsforamerica.ning: ‘What Constitutes Someone Being Called A Natural Born Citizen…..’ - posted by Harry Riley - February 12

Reply by Aaron M. Lauer 34 minutes ago (February 13)

For all intents and purposes, the overwhelming majority of citizenry that comprise this once great republic have "stood for it" and much worse since the traitorous piece of shit Obama began his crime spree 8 years ago. Complacency and self-imposed ignorance have replaced righteousness and logic and the courage to stand up for either.

This is not a revelation the patriots who frequent this site; I'm hep. None of us want to stand for this bullshit. That's how most of us came to this site... To march on Washington with Harry. I was completely on board... but as we all had surmised, it would only be the first volley. It was a courageous endeavor. But it FAILED.

That was over two years ago. Time for a somewhat more serious approach. The legal and peaceful strategy had to be tried if not for any other reason than showing just cause to embrace more abrasive stratagem.

Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of both patriots and tyrants."

We know damn well he wasn't speaking metaphorically.

I confess I don't have a plan or even the facilities to devise one.

What I do have is nothing more than what the fed up, pissed off men who gave us this great republic by making a stand against tyranny and fighting for the idea of liberty and justice for his fellow mankind.

Which sadly most of them would never have the chance to enjoy.

t's time to start putting in work. They're only men; just like us. Only they don't have God on their side. They're trying to take away what God gave us by destroying what protects our ability to defend against them.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
 ~Edmund Burke

  • Reply
  • Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (February 13)
  • I'm totally sympathetic, Aaron.  This is not an easy time.  Personally, I have had 
  • to trust that men of honor, Oath keepers all, are organizing behind the scenes to 
  • take down the tyrant and Usurper, Obama, or whatever his real, legal name is
  • (since we don't know, never having seen a legitimate copy of his bc).  Or the
  • grand experiment in self-governance has all been for nought; having failed to
  • capture the loyalty of its citizenry.  
  • I prefer to think otherwise.  And am ready to respond, in support, at the
  • appropriate time, and place, for where I live.

  • That's the best that I personally can do.  That.  And hold the vision.
  • As for the latter: A wise comment has been made regarding such a thing.
  •  Quote:
  • 'Without a vision, the people perish.'

  •  Indeed.  And how we have found that out.  And in spades.

Friday, 12 February 2016

A Whole Lotta Obfuscation & Outright Duplicity Goin' On

1) from patriotsforamerica.ning: ‘What Constitutes Someone Being Called A Natural Born Citizen….’ - posted by Harry Riley - February 12
(A video of a Litigation Attorney - apparently Publius Huldah - going through those details in a 12-minute speech.  She got it mostly right.  But…)

Reply by Stan Stanfield 3 seconds ago (February 12)

I liked, and appreciated, her clarity of speech.  I have one quibble.  She says that the de Vsttel treatise on 'The Law of Nations' only talks about the parents needing to be citizens for the child to be a nbc.  But other sources/researchers, e.g. Attorney Mario Appuzo, make the case that the person, to be a nbc, needs ALSO to have been born on the soil (jus soli, law of the soil).  See this quote, from Apuzzo's article under the heading 'Natural Born Citizen - A Place To Ask Questions And Get the Right Answers', dated February 5, 2016:

"Having examined who the original citizens were, now let us examine who the natural born citizens were.  Our U.S. Supreme Court has long confirmed that the birth circumstances that make one a natural born citizen are birth in the United States to U.S. citizen parents (meaning U.S. citizen father and mother).  Under the common law the nomenclature with which the Framers were familiar when they drafted and adopted the Constitution, all children born in a country to parents who were its citizens were “natives, or natural-born citizens,” and all the rest of the people were “aliens or foreigners,” who could be naturalized by some law.  See Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, or Principles of the Laws of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, bk. 1, c. 19, sec. 212 Citizens and natives (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758) ("The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens")..."  Thus, he is quoting from the English translation of de Vattel.  So, according to this, we are talking about both jus sanguinis - law of the blood - AND jus soli.

Either way, they all - Obama, Cruz, and Rubio - need to be brought to justice on this issue.  Or we are without a law of the land - the Constitution.  And are under the sway of the rule of men.  A/k/a arbitrary law.  A/k/a tyranny.

And I for one will not stand for it.


Permalink Reply by Bruce K. Brown 3 hours ago

They have claimed that people who filed suit did not have "standing".

Trump has just clamed that if it comes to it - he could file suit against Cruz for eligibility and he would have "standing" --

I understand that the reason Trump would have "standing" is because he is actually in the race and it would directly affect him. - If I am wrong, please enlighten me.

  • Reply 
  • Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (February 12) 
  • You are absolutely right.  He would have a personal injury if he were forced to have an  ineligible candidate run against him, and thus skew the voting result.

  • This whole dastardly business may come down to just that decision by Trump.  Andmay it happen.  Or there will be hell to pay.  We have operated under despotic rule long enough - perfectly demonstrating the wisdom of the constitutional Framers in this regard.  

2) from ‘Cruz: His Momma Is Natural Born.  Thus, So Is He.’ - Lloyd Marcus - February 12
(More crap, and outrageously so at that.  I’m getting sick and tired of all of this deliberate shit.  Wake up, America!  You are being had!!)
  • kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (February 12)

  • First of all, your source is duplicitously quoting from a Naturalization Act (1790) that was repealed (1795) for this very reason: to take out the reference to a 'natural born citizen,' because it was misleading, according to the definition that prevailed at the time of the Constitution's creation; which requires a person to be born on the soil of citizen parents thereof to quality for the definition. (That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake.) Second, citizenship legalistically follows that of the FATHER - which I am sure your source knows as well, but is choosing to obfuscate on.

  • I'm disappointed, Lloyd. I usually like your postings. But you have allowed yourself to be snookered on this one. Cruz, and Rubio, are no more eligible for that office than Obama is. Which makes him a Usurper. Which makes him needing to be removed from the office simply as the illegal occupant of it that he is - no impeachment process necessary, for his being there illegally.

  • And that way, all the legislation that he has signed into law, and all the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he has issued, and all the appointments that he has made, go with him, into the trash bin. And we need to be about that nation-saving work quickly. Before he and his minions - and masters - orchestrate a Crisis 'national emergency' that gives him the Opportunity to declare martial law, and thus destroy the Constitution in one fell swoop, rather than by the death of a thousand cuts that he is subjecting it to now.

On Refusing To Be Manipulated

Greg Brannon is a conservative candidate for the U.S. Senate from North Carolina - and announced ‘constitutional conservative’ at that (whose website proudly says: ‘Stand With A Constitutional Conservative Fighter’).  I have donated to his campaign in the past, until I have bailed out on the Republican Party itself for failing to uphold the law of the land.  I still take various candidates’ email mailings - from both sides of the supposed political spectrum - to keep tabs on what is going on.  His Finance Chairman has queried me via email to see if I am still ‘on the team’, not having heard from me “in a while”.  As I unsubscribed from his/their email list, I gave him the reason why I was doing so; thusly:
“The Republican Party has proven to be involved in the trashing of the Constitution by running ineligible candidates for the presidency - for not being 'natural born' citizens; just like Obama - and I cannot support a criminal enterprise.

“A 'natural born' citizen - according to the definition of the term of the Constitutional day (for which there is ample historical evidence, for anyone to see who wishes to see) - is one born on the soil of citizen parents thereof.  That's what makes it 'natural'.  DUH.  

“The Republican Party, therefore, needs to go down, just as the Democrat Party does.  And we start over, with a clean slate in this country.  In which case, I would be happy to support Brannon.  But not before.  He is part of a corrupt enterprise.  I won't have anything to do with it.  It's against my religion.  So to speak.”

And this, interestingly enough, goes along with a comment I just moments before emailed to a friend in the UK.  I forwarded to him this week’s e-mail from the Judicial Watch team, which features a report on the noose slowly tightening around Hillary’s neck, involving her unsecured email server.  Thus:

"News From Across The Pond

"Who said there was no such thing as karma??  Hillary was involved deeply in the drip drip drip of info about Watergate that finally undid Nixon - and she did it in a corrupt/unlawful manner.

"Hoist by her own petard, or something similar, for a lezzie???

"As for the primary battles going on over here, on both sides of the aisle:

"1) There is no such thing really as "sides of the aisle"/two parties (except for Bernie, who is, indeed, a self-proclaimed socialist, and is, most probably, not beholden to TPTB for his political life - except as a helpful tool); and 

"2) I'm not all that sure that there is going to be an election this November anyway.  The way things are going, and all.

"And seeming to be picking up a little speed, now."

And, to top it off, the message today from Colleen of Galactic Heart, the email site of the Galactic Federation’s rep on Earth (one of them, at least), Sheldan Nidle, ends with the admonition:

“Keep shining your Light bright.  We are on the precipice for the dominoes to fall.”*

I would like to think so, Colleen.  I would very dearly like to think so.  It really is that time.  At least, for something to happen, along those lines.  

So to speak.


* With the specific message for their Live Webinar for February:

“We are on the brink of receiving prosperity funds as we unite in a great shift of our current debt slavery system.
   “In this live Webinar, Sheldan, guided by the Galactic Federation, will explain what is to happen to us, during and after funds are delivered, to prepare us for the coming changes.”

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

On Refusing To Hold My Nose...

...And Other Signs Of The Times

An outfit called Concerned Veterans for America has just asked me, via snail mail, to sign a letter to 'President' Obama "requesting" him to support something called the VA Accountability Act of 2015 (and the previously-passed Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014), reprimanding the VA for its disgraceful treatment of Veterans and attempting to redress the grievance.  This, on the same day that my emails have a couple of reports of how Obama is slashing the budget for the VA, AND adding even more than that figure (in the millions) to a payout for Syrian 'refugees'.   My response to Jae Pak, COO of the CVA:

'Dear Jae,

'I'm sorry, but I can't bring myself to signing a letter to 'President' Obama, even in support of such a worthy cause.  He is not my, or our, president.   He is a Usurper - for not being a 'natural born' citizen* - & should be removed from that thus-dishonored office, by Oath keepers, & held for trial on a whole host of charges by now, including treason.  Not beseeched, or "requested" to do anything.

* see, e.g.:

'P.S. I am sending you a little something - regardless - for your worthy cause, and for the well-rendered litho.
     'A fitting tribute, to real Americans.'


What was the litho?

A commissioned rendering of the iconic photo of 'Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima'.

And I wonder how many of our youth even know about that......

...and in the same vein:

from Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth: ‘BIG United Nations Secret They Don’t Want Out, But Has Just Been Leaked!’ - February 10
(The site’s owner Jean Haines posting a video of Lisa Haven who has done research on the extensive no. of Muslin countries which are the most highly represented in the UN’s Peacekeeping forces.  The posters to this item didn’t get why Lisa was making a big deal of that fact, and why she ended her video presentation by noting that the Obama admin has asked seed & food-storage companies to inventory their food stocks for the government.)

kibitzer3 says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation. 

I don’t know what the problem is for some of the posters here. Perhaps they don’t know about the UN’s Strong Cities Network, which Obama’s AG has signed the U.S. up for. Long story short: It enables the UN to come directly into the U.S. and put down ‘domestic terrorists’. Which in the Obama admin’s lexicon includes the likes of: Patriots, Second Amendment supporters, Constitutionalists, anti-government activists (read more accurately: anti-Obama-regime activists), and – oh yes: Christians. Got it?

And so she is warning her public to get ready for a potential attempt at takeover, by means of such as a possible EMP (false flag) attack, and oh, say, the likes of UN forces appearing in our country. Curious, that last one, in the light of the sinister forces having appeared up in the southeast of Oregon, and putting up roadblocks even against ranchers trying to get to their ranches. And not identifying themselves as either FBI or BLM.

Got it yet???


I feel the need to engage in a little clear truth-telling here.  It comes as well with having read  today an article about how 2,000 Yazidi women, a sect primarily of northern Iraq, who had been sex-slave captives of ISIS, escaped, and have formed an army to 'engage' their former captives.  Who, being Islamic jihadists, want to 'purify' Iraq of all non-Muslims.  Their Holy Book telling them to do terrible things to non-Muslims, especially apostates.  And it is this same spirit that such Muslims are bringing in to this country, under the aegis of their Dear Leader, Barry 'Barack' Soetoro Obama - or whatever his real name is, since we haven't seen a real birth certificate from him.

Another issue.  I'll stay with the original one here, of a militant religion, which is more political system then religion; but a religion, nevertheless.  Totalitarian government under the cover of a religion.

Which needs to be rolled back, like Charles Martel did in Europe, against the invading Muslim hordes of his day.

So, I am anti-Muslim, and anti-Shariah law.  Because I am anti-totalitarianism.  The Usurper's take on that religion to the contrary notwithstanding.

Now.  Am I a Christian?

No.  And it is time to move beyond the duality level - to say, the level of Drama; of stories; of karma, in The Play in the (illusory) Theatre of Life - of such as religions and embrace the unity level of Truth anyway.  But I will defend to the death the right of a person, or people, to be of whatever religious persuasion that they choose to be, if any.  As long as the tenets of their religion stop at the noses of other people.

And this is all, as well, why I am against this business of 'multiculturalism' going on.  Which is a cover, manipulated by culture-wreckers, to try to bring down the current, established  order of things, in a devious and forcible way.  In this country, mostly wielded by Jews; and among them, mostly wielded by Zionist Jews.  Who are trying to bring about a New World Order, governed by them.  Who are mostly not true Jews, either, rather, are Khazarian Jews - a quarrelsome Turkic people converted by their king centuries ago.  (Probably because that religion fit his, and their, grandiose schemes rather well; a Chosen People, and all that jazz.)

All of which is another story, too.  For now, I'll just say, to such people:

It ain't going to happen, you members of such a Tribe.

There are larger things going on, than your best-laid schemes; which we are about to get to.

And just in time, it would appear.

On many fronts.  Of the battle.  Between the Dark.

And the Light.  The



Which you WILL NOT pass.

Until you see it.

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

On Getting Short-fused

A blogger telling it like it is for him.  And after i posted this response last night/early this morning, I came across a report of a particularly reprehensible activity by young male 'refugees' in European countries, with an Arabic name to it, whereby they gang-rape Western women, in an alarmingly organized fashion.  As if this couldn't have been seen coming, by TPTB who orchestrated this invasion of Europe - and this country - not by legitimate refugees (who should simply have been sent to refugee camps in neighboring countries to theirs anyway, until things settled down in their own countries) but by an invading army of military-aged men, to be the shock troops for TPTB's attempted takeover of Western civilization, and our submergence, sans our Western individual rights and 'people power,' into their viciously draconian New World Order.  I am, more and more, sharing this blogger's frustration, with the lead-up, hopefully, to  positive Change; since the Dark side doesn't have much further to go to have gone just far enough, to trigger its equal and opposite reaction......

from ‘Will Someone Please Tell Me Why Barack Hussein Obama Is Still President’ - Richard Anthony - February 8
(A call for “armed insurrection”.)

kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (February 9)

Thank you, Richard, for your cogent take on this pressing matter. I totally sympathize. Unfortunately, the Usurper would just use such a march as an excuse to declare martial law, and that would be the end of the federal constitutional Republic of the U.S.A. right there.

I would support such a march sans the weapons. Leave the weaponry to the Oath keepers, current and retired. They will know when to use them, and where, and how, and if needed, after such a graphic portrayal of the feelings of The People en masse.

The New World Order crowd, on both sides of the aisle, would love nothing better than that patriots give the Usurper the excuse that he dearly wants, to pull the plug on the Republic. Don't give him that excuse. Make him - and them - come up with it. That way, the onus is clearly on therm. But please, keep putting out your dissatisfaction. More will flock to such a clear call, as things heat up this year. And especially with the Jade Helm 16 Exercise coming up. 'Unconventional Warfare' they're calling it. Sounds like preparation for civil war to me...