Monday 12 March 2018

All's War On The Local And State Fronts Too


1) On our local ‘Nextdoor’ email network site yesterday (March 11).  (On a day, interestingly enough, that some guys were flying a drone on a bluff overlooking the beach where I was minding my own business reading a book, and their ‘toy’ came over and had a good close look at me; and where later, walking along the beach proper on my way back home, I noticed another such flying machine out over the ocean.  Doing nothing in particular.  Just observing the scene…like a harbinger of things to come???......)  

Maya DeNola, Alamitos Beachunknown.png1
unknown_1.png
Anybody familiar with the laws governing use of Drones in residential areas of Long Beach?
New3h ago · 16 neighborhoods in General

unknown_1.png
Roger Abea, Alamitos Beach·3h agoNew


unknown_1.png
Maya DeNola, Alamitos Beach·3h agoNew
So does “Fly within visual line-of-sight” mean you have to keep the drone low or just must be able to see it?
Also,
Can you please tell your fellow drone flyers to not invade other peoples privacy. Flying these abominable machines outside my window is a violation of my rights AND horribly unneighborly.
Thank you for your reply!


unknown_1.png
Scott Thomas, Alamitos Beach-East·3h agoNew
Sometimes it's better not to respond. Poor Roger is now responsible for all drone pilots.


unknown_1.png
Maya DeNola, Alamitos Beach·2h agoNew
No Scott, he’s not. 
However, people who share hobbies often speak with each other. In the event that he does, he could be a Good neighbor, and relay my message. 
It’s a simple request.


unknown_1.png
Roger Abea, Alamitos Beach·Edited 2h agoNew
I'll happily spread drone knowledge for all our pilots and neighbors on next door and Alamitos beach. Within visual line of sight means you can see it. I don't know any other drone pilots but if you guys are out there lets all get together sometime, and don't fly by Maya's window. I'm also a photographer and California law states a 50mm lens on a 35mm equivalent camera shot through a window is the threshold for invading your privacy. Most drones have about a  3.61mm lens which would be a 20mm lens on a full frame 35mm equivalent camera meaning they can technically fly it right at your window, pan around and California law does not consider it a violation of any sort. Just talk to your neighbor and let them know it bothers you. Drone operators have to stay a certain distance away from heli pads and air ports so we are always nervous that we are flying in illegal spaces so I try to be as nice as possible to people around me and the property I'm flying by. If your neighbor doesn't respect your wishes there is a good chance he is operating his or her drone illegally and you can give him a hard time legally if that's the case. Drone rules are still in a grey zone but flying by airport and helipads is a big no no right now. Most drone operators are just trying to stay out of the way. And even the best drone cameras can't see much from the height they usually operate at, everyone just looks like dots.


unknown_1.png
Maya DeNola, Alamitos Beach·2h agoNew
Thank you Roger. I appreciate you have a hobby I ALSO like my privacy and 3.61 or 150,000mm makes no difference to me when I’m in my bedroom.
I have no problem talking to people I juts like to know what the rules are before I go around enforcing them 😉
I Appreciate the education, kindly be considerate of the rest of us when you enjoy your hobby.



Roger Abea, Alamitos Beach·2h agoNew
Just tell them the noise bothers you or makes your pets nervous if you have any and they should stay away from your windows. Even small drones are pretty loud.


unknown_1.png
Roger Abea, Alamitos Beach·2h agoNew
@Scott, thanks for the concern but I'm probably one of the most qualified people in our Next Door Alamitos community to answer that question. I've been a drone nerd for years lol. If she makes it a noise issue instead of a privacy issue she should succeed with her neighbors.  Drone guys hate the privacy issue, we don't acknowledge it exists because of out dated camera laws,  making it a noise issue should be a easy win for Maya.  We all agree drones are annoyingly loud, but we all don't agree that they violate anybody's privacy. And if Maya has a pet that "gets aggravated" by the drone, it's set game and match for Maya, unless her neighbor is a real jerk, which for drone operators, is not a good point of view for them right now, Maya can easily escalate the situation to a position that's unfavorable to the drone operator.


unknown_1.png
Maya DeNola, Alamitos Beach·2h agoNew
Roger, you are a breath of fresh air. Thank you for the advice, the openness and the example of stellar neighborliness ❤️


unknown_1.png
Patricia Benjamin, Alamitos Beach·1h agoNew
Hello Drone Avoiders and Roger in particular,  I read Amazon is going to start deliveries by drone. Will complaining about the noise level be effective against Amazon? Thoughts ? I hope so.


unknown_1.png
Stan Stanfield·Just now (March 11)

Since there are people in this country who are attempting to take it over and bring it under the control of a totalitarian superstate called the New World Order, and are busy at work now censoring those of us who do not buy their 'official story' take on things, like 9/11, and other false flag ops, I would like to put into this Comments thread that it is not just a matter or even primarily of 'noise level,' as our friend the drone meister would have it.  It is very CLEARLY a privacy/surveillance state issue as well.  Invading people's privacy, and keeping an eye on them all over the place, is a constitutional issue.  You have heard of the Constitution?  

Yours for stellar neighborliness.


2) from joeforamerica.com; ‘Kamala Harris Backs Oakland, CA Mayor Who Tipped Off Illegal Aliens “100 Percent”’ - Randall - March 12 
(“Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA), who is eyeing a 2020 potential Democratic presidential bid, stated that she “100 percent” supports Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s (D) decision to help criminal illegal aliens evade deportation ahead of a raid by federal immigration officials. The ICE raids were targeting over 850 illegal aliens and wound up netting just over 200 because they were warned in advance…
“As a result of the advance notice, many criminal illegal aliens with sex crime convictions, drunk driving convictions, gang connections and armed robbery convictions, escaped arrest and deportation. Mayor Schaaf doubled down and defended her actions as defending her community.
Harris defended Schaaf by saying, “I think Mayor Schaaf is doing exactly what she believes is in the best interest of her community, and I support that 100 percent,” according to the San Francisco Chronicle. The Democratic senator said the Trump administration and Jeff Sessions were attempting to “roll back the clock” by enforcing federal immigration laws. “This administration is using our tax dollars to engage in a political game instead of what’s in the best interest of Californians,” Harris said…”)

..
Stan Says
1 min ago (March 12)

‘Her community” and “Californians”, Sen. Harris? Ah – got it. We are to allow illegal aliens into this country, and to vote, because they are – succeeded in becoming – ‘residents’. And because they will vote comfortably for Democrats; who want to take this country down, and make it merely part of a region of a totalitarian New World Order. Run by the liberals, you understand. So, all conservative speech should be banned, because, well, because it’s ‘hate speech’. As in objecting to our country being taken over by you lot, Sen. Harris.

That mayor of Oakland needs to be arrested, on charges of aiding and abetting in the commission of a crime. And you, Sen. Harris? Flirting on the edge of the same charge, you at least need to be voted out of office. Just as soon as the federal government forces the state of California to clean up its voter registration rolls, of all the illegal aliens and other ineligible persons that currently infest said rolls. Says who, you ask, Sen. Harris? Says the law. You know; that inconvenient truth, that still hangs the nation onto the rule of law, if only by a thread, these dark days?? You will have come across that little matter, in your political career, somewhere or other, Sen. Harris? It’s called constitutional law??

A course that you will appear to have flunked, on your way first to the state government, and then, from that jumping-off point, to the federal Congress. To represent the people of your state. As in the legal voters of your state. With the illegal aliens to be rounded up and deported, just as soon as we possibly can. Before they cause any more damage to this country than they already have.

A country being a body politic that has borders. Without which, there is no country. Just a mass of people, living by the law of the jungle…You know what I have to say to you and your vision for the future, Sen. Harris??:

Bollocks.

--

On a day that I extended myself to send what is for me a princely sum to the governmental watchdog organization Judicial Watch to fight for the rule of law in this country on the federal level, I have been confronted with the same battle here at home; on both the local and state levels, actually, but more nefariously on the latter, with one of our state's federal senators, Kamala Harris, making a right ass of herself.

The situation is clear.  Liberals don't believe in laws (because that is on the 'absolute' level), only in feelings (the 'relative' level).  But only in their own feelings.  And that that's what 'government' should go by.  Not something called 'the rule of law,' and its handmaiden, something called constitutions.  But what you 'feel' is right, and in the moment.  Thus, judges that were appointed by the Usurper, Obama, have been ruling from that perspective; only to be blocked by a federal Supreme Court that is still attempting to rule by the rule of law.  But, given time, and the 'right' people in office......

How have things gotten to this point; have the revolutionaries gotten away with this 'relativist' thinking as regards 'the law', and to the extent that they have??

Because they have been allowed to.  By a citizenry largely asleep at the switch of their country's governance.

Well.

No.  More.

But the war that is going on in this country is not just with the 'left'.  It is with the 'right' as well.

Consider an example,  (One of many.)

How would you like to be a parent who has to attempt to teach your child - the great preponderance in the 'class' being males; for scientific reasons - how to open their lips in a certain way, that is called a 'smile,' even though they don''t have any connection with the emotion behind the movement, don't understand what it is all about?  Why?  Because they are brain damaged.  Why??  Because We the People have allowed them to become so.  Why???  Because we have believed trustingly - too trustingly - in our 'authorities,' and especially our medical authorities.  Who are into 'money'.  (And especially via a medical--pharmaceutical-government complex.)  And 'authorities' behind them.  Who are into power.

I will cut to the chase, here, in this blog, already long enough, for the attention spans of the most of the citizenry in this day and age.  The great preponderance of what is called autism is caused by brain damage that is caused by vaccines.  And the consequences of that situation go far beyond just the need for parents to teach their autistic children what it means to 'smile'.  Those consequences go into the likes of school shootings by 'mentally disturbed' kids.  Who have additionally been put on 'medications' that make their 'disturbance' worse.

And it has all been allowed to build to avalanche proportions.  Why?

Because there are people on the 'right' who wish to take over the world as well.  And who, actually, are behind the whole shooting match, you should excuse the expression.  Because the political arena is not a level 'playing field,' with the 'liberals' on the left, shading over to the far left into outright socialism and further over left - to those limits - into communism, on the one hand, and the 'conservatives' on the right, shading over to the far right into authoritarianism imposed by the established order and further over right - to those limits - into a full-blown corporate-government complex, aka fascism, on the other hand.  The geopolitical picture in this world is, rather, like a pyramid, with the same nest of vipers at the top; from their All-Seeing Eye keeping an eye on both sides of the process.  

Who are these vipers?

The big-moneyed people, protecting their 'investment'.  And some Dark-side beings behind even them, who have their own investment in the situation.   

Who all are about to get their comeuppance.  

Because why?

Because The Play is over.  Which has been something of a Game to these creatures.

And the Light wins.

Because why?

Because that is

the Law.

No comments: