Wednesday, 7 March 2018

The Very Definition of Hypocrisy


The Democrats tried to make a huge issue out of alleged 'Russian influence' for Trump in the 2016 elections.  (Which investigation is biting them in the bum, as it turns out that Clinton was involved in such shady shenanigans up to her double's eyeballs.)  However, research has shown that there were over 100,000 'noncitizens' voting in the elections in Pennsylvania alone - and Virginia and New Jersey and Maryland are under that Election Integrity microscope as well.  And, of course, there is Chicago; where the 'residents' - i.e., anybody with an address - are being given a 'municipal' ID, that will allow them to do all sorts of things, including to, er, vote.

So, it's terrible - terrible - if there was Russian influence in the elections (as long as it was alleged to be for Trump).  But it is another thing when there is widespread voting being done by illegal aliens, and other noncitizen voters (as long as it is obviously going to benefit the Dems).

What we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is the very definition of hypocrisy.  Or to put it another way:

'What is right is whatever advances my agenda; and what is wrong is whatever impedes my agenda.'  To say: There are no absolutes.  Everything is relative.  In the Dems's rulebook.  Which instructs, a la Saul Alinsky: Whatever It Takes.  By Any Means Necessary.  Lie, cheat, steal.  Kill.  Whatever it takes, to accomplish your goal.  The end justifies the means.  Any and all means.....

How can we cure the Dems of this affliction??

I've got an idea.

Nationwide laws, both federal and state - with the federal laws activated in all federal elections at the minimum (but including state elections as well, since we are talking about U.S. citizens, and their rights, in both instances ) - deporting on the spot any noncitizen caught voting in U.S. elections, with ICE agents present at the precincts to activate the law.  And the argument?:

The Democrats say - in very fact, scoff: 'Widespread voting fraud is not happening.'  Okay.   No need to worry about such a law affecting anything to any great degree, then.  So, objection overruled.

Simple.

In fact,

the very definition of simplicity.

To help stop these arrogant assholes, these scurrilous shitheads in their behavior, from having disenfranchised U.S. citizens the way they have.

No other country would allow noncitizens to vote in their elections.  Why should we???...

'Voter suppression'.  My Aunt Fanny.  The only persons that such measures - and others, of an Election Integrity nature - would be 'suppressing' from voting are those that shouldn't be voting in the first place.

Grrrrrr..................................

--

In this same vein, and cleaned up a little for wider public consumption:

from thehollywoodconservative.us: ‘Jeff Sessions is COMING AFTER California for their dangerous ’Sanctuary State’ policy’ - Amanda Head - March 7

..

People here banging on AG Sessions for his seeming lack of action, and I sympathize with the feeling; but we haven't seen the uncovering of those thousands of indictments yet. Personally, I will hold my concerns about Sessions until then.

As for CA's "dangerous 'Sanctuary State' policy": It should have fallen under federal law long ago. A Californian, but U.S. citizen first and foremost, I am angry beyond words at having had my vote, and that of my fellow U.S. citizens in this state, not only canceled out but swamped under by the invasion of illegal aliens that has been allowed to take place here, and the deliberate ease that has been made by the state's liberal governments, state and county, to get them on the voter registration rolls. It is a disgusting state of affairs, and I want to see it stopped. Now. So come on, Sessions. Do your duty.

--

...and a good note to end this 'theme' on:


from 1776 coalition com: ’Sessions to California: ‘There is no secession’ - March 7
(“Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a warning to California the same day he announced a lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) over the state’s immigration policies…”)

..
Stan says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation. 

Now this is what I have been waiting to hear from AG Sessions. As a Californian, but an American citizen first and foremost, I have been damn angry about what has been going on in this state regarding its welcome to IAs, and this business of declaring it a ‘sanctuary state’ was the last straw.  Give’em hell, Jeff.

No comments: