And yet another letter from the U.S. Justice Foundation. Now, don't get me wrong; the USJF is a good organization - at least, based on its materials. And especially because it is taking the better position on The Problem With Obama: that Impeachment is NOT the way to go, because he is illegally occupying the office to begin with - for not being a bona fide 'natural born citizen,' as the Constitution requires of the person occupying that office - and with 'simple' removal (or forced resignation), and being held for trial on various charges, "everything that he's signed [both legislation and Executive Orders/Presidential Directives] and every leftist appointment he's made, will be overturned," they have rightfully pointed out in their literature. My position exactly. But there can be too much of a good thing. (I've made three donations to them recently already, and yet the letters keep coming; different themes, but the same hand out.) In any event, let's see what this one is all about…
Ah. A fair-enough 'sore point': the Obama administration's encouragement of UN monitors at U.S. polling places. ("The globalist cult at the United Nations wants to tell YOU who will be allowed to vote in California.") Got me. I am very angry about this sort of thing. Here in California, one has to show their birth certificate in order to get either a driver's license or a state photo ID card. Either of these means of identity is needed to engage in all manner of civic activities - including signing up for welfare benefits. It would be an extremely simple thing to require the person showing up at the polling place to vote, to show their d.l. or their photo ID card, to identify themselves as being who they say they are.1 Right? Too simple for California: What you do here is sign a name against a name on the voter reg roll. You could be Joe Blow for all they know, but if you sign Joe Smith alongside the name of Joe Smith on the roll, that's all that it takes to enter the inner sanctum of the voting booth.2
Sometimes it gets a bit much to live in this world…where there are all manner of people trying to rope America into the totalitarian New World Order planned for all of us on the planet; with America the key stumbling-block to this evil enterprise.3 Which I used to get very upset about. But have 'mellowed' my stance on it a bit. Here's my more considered take on all of this immature nonsense going on:
I think that the best that can be said of people like Obama and Holder, and all those of both main political parties who are advocating the failure to clean up the voter rolls of illegal voters, and not requiring commonsense voter ID, and allowing spurious electronic voting machines to be used, is that they are just digging their own graves, as it were. To say: While the rest of us 'spiritual beings having a human experience' now ascend to a higher level, from the dense vibes of the 3D school that we have been ensconced (incarcerated?) in for so long, they will just have to do another Grand Round turn of the Wheel of Karma. I believe that amounts to another 26,000 years of Earth-like time. 25,920 years, to be more precise. Identified as a full round of the precession of the equinoxes.
Though not on Earth itself. Gaia is ascending as well. They will have to serve their sentence on some other planet, anchored in 3rd density, for just such educational purposes.
'We need to drag you so-called patriots kicking and screaming into the 21st century,' say the so-called progressives. Oh, really? Into the clutches of, like, Big Bro??...I don't think so. You can have your 'equality' somewhere else. I'll keep my essential liberty - that is, the exercise of our free will, vouchsafed us by our Creator - thank you all the same. Got it?
Not here, you won't practice your big-state, big-stick socialism. Not in my country.
And a bit further on this matter of legitimate citizens, and countries, with borders; and then I'll let my little harangue on sovereignty go for now:
I recently heard from a friend from my spiritual-community days in the north of Scotland, who responded with mild rebuke to something I posted on my Facebook page, or wall, or whatever it's called. It was an invitation for my 'Friends' to join me in signing a petition for keeping what is being called 'Net Neutrality,' which used, as an example, a request to 'Stop Amnesty Now!' I'm not sure if this friend, who lives in Scotland proper now, is originally Scot or American; in any event, he chided me about America being in actuality a continent, and so forth and so on. What?! I remarked to myself upon reading his response. What is this nonsense? Has the move to corral the U.S. into a North American Union region of the Cabal's New World Order reached all the way into the depths of Scotland - and a former member of a spiritual community to boot??!
I didn't reply to his post, figuring that he is entitled to his opinion. But I could have said something like:
'(his name), why are you being so obtuse? Illegal aliens - or 'undocumented workers,' as the liberals call them euphemistically - are flooding into the U.S. as unmonitored economic refugees because the U.S. has been so successful in its form of free enterprise and small government; their illegal activity threatening to kill the goose that lays the golden egg. (Actually, that's part of the purpose. It's called the Cloward-Piven Strategy, to bankrupt the U.S. and build a socialist system on its ruins. But that's another subject in itself.)
'A nation has a fundamental right to its boundaries, or it is not a nation. It is but a region of a less citizen-representative entity. Scotland will sink under the weight of a welfare class of state dependents too, if you don't watch out. That's 'redistribution of wealth' under the gun of the state - to say, theft; and it's immoral. I'm surprised at your support of that sort of thing.'4
I rest my case.
Again: For now.
---
footnotes:
1 Alas, no longer with the d.l. itself. The California governor recently signed into law a boon to the illegals present in the state (in droves): They can now get a driver's license.
Go figure.
2 I asked the person in charge at my precinct what good that does. I was told that they have your signature on file when you registered to vote. Do they go through the rolls after every election to see if the signatures match up with the ones they have on file? No comment. Wouldn't it be simpler just to produce either your d.l. or your state photo ID card - which not only has your picture on it, but your signature, and have the person at the desk simply compare your signature with your legitimate ID? No comment.
It's a mad world.
Oh - and I then asked her, that if you have to learn to speak and read English to become a citizen - which fact she concurred with - why are their other languages on the voting ballot and materials??
A shrug.
As I say…
3 "[The U.N. and their American enablers - like Barack Obama's leftist Attorney General, Eric Holder] want to see anyone unable to prove their eligibility to vote allowed in the booth anyhow, because Mr. Obama, Mr.Holder, and their leftist pals at the United Nations know that electoral cheaters are overwhelmingly likely to vote for the party of federal giveaways . . . the Democrats.
"U.N. monitors know that opening up our electoral system to illegal aliens, other non-citizens, and anyone not registered to vote will give the liberal/progressive bloc the winning margin that they need to take the election, and then to force their big government agenda upon you and me.
"And that is a key step toward ultimately cooping our sovereign republic into the U.N.'s New World Order." (emphases in original.)
I wouldn't call it the U.N.'s NWO. It's the Cabal's behind the whole shebang. But close enough.
4 Yes, the gap between the very wealthy and the very poor has widened terribly, and needs to be addressed. But there are ways; and then there are ways, that don't involve throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
---
P.S. And here's another letter from the same source, under its 'The Defense of Family Center' hat, detailing how "(w)ithin months, tens of thousands of government and industry bureaucrats will be able to pore over YOUR personal medical records, and they will discover every secret detail of your life".
'We see you haven't had your annual flu shot yet. Please come in for it immediately. Also, for your anthrax shot. You are our property - I mean, our responsibility. We want to look after you.'
'No thanks.'
"You do not understand. We are not asking you. We are telling you…after all, it's for your own good.'
'I'll look after myself, if it's all the same to you.'
'It is decidedly not 'all the same to' us. Now that's enough dilly-dallying around. Report to your medical officer immediately. At once, do you hear me? At once.'
For a bolus dose of nanoparticles that can take one out at any moment's notice???…
So much for medical care in the hands of the New World Order thugs.
P.P.S. I decidedly do NOT love Big Brother. Nor will I ever.
And you can put that in your syringe and shoot it.
---
P.S. And here's another letter from the same source, under its 'The Defense of Family Center' hat, detailing how "(w)ithin months, tens of thousands of government and industry bureaucrats will be able to pore over YOUR personal medical records, and they will discover every secret detail of your life".
'We see you haven't had your annual flu shot yet. Please come in for it immediately. Also, for your anthrax shot. You are our property - I mean, our responsibility. We want to look after you.'
'No thanks.'
"You do not understand. We are not asking you. We are telling you…after all, it's for your own good.'
'I'll look after myself, if it's all the same to you.'
'It is decidedly not 'all the same to' us. Now that's enough dilly-dallying around. Report to your medical officer immediately. At once, do you hear me? At once.'
For a bolus dose of nanoparticles that can take one out at any moment's notice???…
So much for medical care in the hands of the New World Order thugs.
P.P.S. I decidedly do NOT love Big Brother. Nor will I ever.
And you can put that in your syringe and shoot it.
No comments:
Post a Comment