Messages to Reince & Jerry

To: Reince Priebua, Chairman, Republican National Commmittee 

Re: CA Voter Exploratory Republican Presidential Preference Polling Ballot

Dear Reince,

I resent you and the RNC continuing to play fast and loose with Truth and the Constitution.

Just like Obama, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio (and perhaps Bobby Jindal as well) are not eligible to run for the presidency, for not being "natural born" citizens.  They were all born dual citizens; and the whole point of the NBC requirement for that office - and that particular office only (since extended logically to the office of the VP) - was to make sure that the candidate, who if elected would become as well the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, did not have any DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  

Stop trying to play the American public for fools.  The RNC is in enough trouble as it is, for letting Obama off the hook on this issue.

(signed)  

--

To: Jerry Moran, Chairman, National Republican Senatorial Committee

Re: Renewal of Sustaining Membership

Dear Jerry,

The NRSC is backing the wrong candidate in the Kansas Republican Senatorial primary.

Residency matters.1  (Just like the circumstances of one's birth matter, especially regarding the citizenry of one's father, and the constitutional requirement for one to run for the presidential office; which the Republican Party is also guilty of overlooking, in the case of Obama, and now in the cases of both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.)2

I will not be renewing my membership in the NRSC.  You have not earned it.

(signed)

[1 The Republican incumbent, a longtime establishment type in the office, has been found to have his primary residence in the town of his special-interest cronies; and who is so far out of touch with the reality that is going on in the nation that he says he doesn't "really know what the Tea Party is all about".  Of course not.  He is one of those bought-and-sold mastodons that the Tea Party is trying to get rid of.]

[2 I have taken Jerry to task before on this issue.  If he reads his 'For the Personal Attn. of' mail.

     One does what one can.] 

--

I put stamps on both return envelopes.  It was the least I could do, for the opportunity to give them both a piece of my mind.  If it ever reaches them.  But at least, 'it' is out there.

---

P.S.  Further on the general subject of 'Republican Chamber of Commerce types':

from teapartyC.C.: 'La Raza CEO: 'USA!  USA!' Chants 'Made Me Angry' - posted by Nat'l   Dir. Dee - July 24

..

 Reply by Stan Stanfield 2 seconds ago (July 24)

It is really very simple:

1a) Close the lid on the honey pot that is attracting many if not most of them here.  That means no more welfare benefits, of any kind - including public/taxpayer-paid education - to anybody who is not either a citizen or legal resident.  As for those who are working 'under the table':

1b) Heavy fines and/or jail time for anyone caught employing illegal immigrants.  And that definitely includes Republican Party Chamber-of-Commerce types enjoying the benefits of hiring illegals for low wages.  

2) Speeding up the immigration process of legal immigrants; who shouldn't be allowed to go immediately onto any welfare benefits, either for them or for their children.  We need to set stricter standards for immigration.  This is a nation.  Not a charity.

 3) Clarifying this 'anchor baby' business, of babies born here to illegal immigrants.  That erroneous attitude is due to a misreading of the 14th Amendment.  If the parents are here illegally, they are still under the jurisdiction of their home country - NOT of the states of the United States.  The children are the citizens of their parents' home country, whether they were born here or not.  

4) This current flood of 'children' (including gang members): It is due to Obama's (unilateral, like a potentate) announcement that no minors in residence/present here will be sent back to their parents' home country.  So 'Come, all ye minors' was the message that went out to Latin America (undoubtedly helped along by Obama's Marxist minions; doing their best, under the Cloward-Piven Strategy workbook, to bankrupt the nation, & thus leave it ripe for plucking). Disgusting stuff, playing with children's lives like that.  In any event, two wrongs don't make a right: Back to their home countries they should go.  Period.  And THAT message sent out, instead.     

As for the La Raza crowd: I wonder how many of them have roots that go back to Spain???... 

---

P.P.S. And further on the general subject of the Republican Party's involvement in all the chicanery going on these days: I forgot to include it in this disparaging comment on Obama's ineligibility for the office.  Consider it included:

from teaparty.org: 'Border Patrol Agents: U.N. Taking Control of America's Southern Border' - July 23 - orig. from infowars.com

..

Judy Alonso

If the government is allowing MS 13 gang members into this country they are traitors. This is one of the most violent gangs of all. This administration will destroy our country and should be impeached.

Reply · Unlike · 31 · 20 hours ago (July 24)

Charlie Shanklin · Top Commenter

Judy Alonso Impeachement is not the answer...that does not remove anyone from office, nor removes or cancels any crap they have done!!!

Reply · Unlike · 13 · Edited · 14 hours ago

Dexter Massolettisr · Top Commenter

Charlie::

Impeachment removes access to power and leaves an empty title. Removal can then find criminal prosecution -- all very tidy and nice, without blood shed. However:

Your reply is not an answer, either impeach or assassinate are the options here now. The damages can be corrected/repaired, but that is another set of questions. A large number of people are going to be upset in a restoration of the Republic in any case. Nothing saves the impoverished.

There is no reset button for this game -- it is a matter of Life or Death.

Reply · Unlike · 22 · 7 hours ago

Rick Ranger Mitchell · Top Commenter · Hurst, Texas

Dexter Massolettisr Impeachment is the same as an indictment in criminal court. It DOESN'T "remove access to power or leave an empty title". ONLY a conviction by the Senate removes them from office, and that has never happened in our history. Twice has a President been impeached but not convicted and removed from office. Also, a conviction wouldn't leave an empty title, just as in the case of the death or resignation of the President, the Vice-president assumes the office and is sworn in as President.

Reply · Like · 6 hours ago

Dexter Massolettisr · Top Commenter

Rick::

Your view only appears somewhat sound as you conflate political power with the office that can actually wield it -- impeached, Obama has no political capital, with more than two years left then in the empty chair. To bring him to the criminal justice system means he must be removed from the office by a guilty verdict from the Senate, kicking and screaming, but with not a single straw to grasp on to. That part is the least of our concerns.

You had best look again at impeachment for what it really is -- not the eye-wash being slavered on the uniformed. Because, some like to say, he cannot be impeached because he is not legally the president -- critical thinking requires common sense too. 

To oppose impeachment actually supports only the alternative: assassination.

As it stands right now, Obama is already very close to being cold meat.

.

Reply · Like · 5 hours ago

Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University (July 24)

Dexter Massolettisr: There is another option. Obama, being an illegally sitting president (for not being a bona fide 'natural born citizen'), can be arrested and removed from the purloined office by Oathkeepers, active and retired (including Constitutional Sheriffs) - with a multitude of Patriots having their backs - and held for trial. And since the Democrat Party is an accessory to the fact of his illegal candidacies, its officials go to trial also; as do both VP Biden and Nancy Pelosi, for being involved in the coverup. And that means that the federal elections of both 2008 and 2012 are null and void. And that means a) that we start over, with a clean slate; or that b) we move on, into a 'better day' for the country. The latter of which options means that we draw an end to the Play, that we have all been actors in - playing [, and exchanging,] parts, to learn from - and graduate from the school of 3D life; moving closer to our real identities, as 'spiritual beings having a human experience'. 

The latter of which options also requires us to grow up. I think we can do it. But then, I'm prejudiced; because I am a firm believer in The Process, and The Purpose.