Further On 'On Synchronicity'

From: 

Subject: Surprise

Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:11:59 +0000

To:

Hi Stan

Thanks for your comments on the John Lash interview.

Not withstanding the accustomed fluffy New Age disinfo I am used to getting from you, I am still genuinely shocked by the gob-smacking naivety of your perspective. Where do I begin..?

Your advocacy of "Non-resistance to evil."!? Unbelievable! What are you thinking? I refer you (in some desperation) to EVERY single epic, mythic fable and legend ever written.

Christianity and your "bathwater" comment!! You clearly have no idea what Christianity is. Christianity is an appalling curse upon humanity. Greek civilisation, under paganism and the Perennial/Hermetic wisdom, was less than a hundred years from an Industrial Revolution when it was overrun by Christianity. Misogynistic, genocidal Christianity set humanity back 1000 years and began the destruction of Nature on our planet!

"How else COULD the British Empire be taken down.."???!! You think the British Empire was taken down? In India? Anywhere? You'll be telling me next that America got its independence from Britain!! Do you really believe that protesting has EVER achieved anything?

Sad to say, and in spite of my best efforts, you are a fully paid-up, dyed-in-the-fluff, New Ager, Stan—lost to the true cause—one of those eternal Cluny-types who, while swooning over the latest Tolkein movie, will only apply the vegetarian parts of the mythology to his life. An insubstantial cheek-turning, Christian apologist, with no knowledge (or desire to learn) of the backstory to any of the outward show. A 'spiritual' consumer.

Sorry, mate. Another good man down. I'm going to go and have a lie-down now and compose a eulogy to the man (I thought) I knew.

Unbelievable.

-

RE: Surprise

Stan Stanfield 10:54 PM  (Dec. 28)

To: 

While you're composing, let me make myself perhaps more clear on my 'non-resistance to evil' comment: 

I meant in the sense of: not to give it any similar energy.  Action-reaction on the same level [as] the problem.  Hate for hate just generates the same thing.  Been there, done that, over and over, and over, again.  I advocate a game changer.  Love - to say, spiritual clarity; awareness; insightfulness; conscious[ness]-raising - is such a game-changer.  

I have a very hard time with the Bible.  I have come [a]cross enough information in my lifetime's Search for Truth to let me know that it is, for the most part, the work merely of humans. (And apparently an Annunaki tribal 'god' or two, or three.)   But every once in awhile, there is a nugget of pure gold in there.  This 'nonviolence' philosophy - returning good for 'evil' (and you could say even 'strategy') - is one of them.  Someone in history knew what they were talking about, in proffering that bit of advice.  It breaks the cycle, introduces a new element in[to] The Process.  The process, of unfolding ourselves, in the 3D illusion.  By learning lessons therein.  Which take us out - break us out - of the matrix.   

But, still: One man's meat…

…at any given time.    

Okay.  Back to your composing.  Thanks for hearing me out.  (There's more, of course.  But diminishing returns, and all that.)

Stan        

--

A large subject encased herein.  The role of The Warrior, and so forth.  But I need to be clear - and for myself - about where I stand, in all this unfolding-process stuff. 

Basically: I'm trying to stand above it.  I could easily enter into The Process - The Play - and 'take sides'.  (Like a Patton.)  But the Truth is on both sides, of the equation; the dialectic.*  'Thesis' and 'antithesis' are working their action-reaction way out to a synthesis.  And because the socio-econo-political 'scene' has now gone global, it is to be a true Synthesis; not just another 'thesis', to set off another reaction to it, another 'round' of The Play, unfolding.

Oh, there will be the 'reaction' of the Dark forces, to it.  But they are, now, to meet their Waterloo. 

Because the Light is stronger than the Dark.   

The Dark - the Shadow - requiring the Light in order even to exist.

But me are, now, to stand, clearly and unequivocally, in the Light.  On this planet.  Undergoing Her own Ascension process.

I get ahead of myself, here, a bit.  But -

you get the idea.

And to end on such an Idea (and then to let 'it' go, for now):

 The Play

     Was

The Thing

          For,

Once you

Have really

Groked

          that we 

          are in

          a play,

          why

    would you

    want to

    continue

    playing

    a part

    simply? -

          to say,

            why

wouldn't you

     want to
         get off
         the
         karmic
         wheel -

         release

         the

 part playing

 and go for

    the real

           thing??

And instead

Of calling for

'Author!  Author!'

         to take

         a bow,

           realize

           that

  the author

           is

               and

          has been

 you
      and you
            and you
              over
      and over
 again.

--

* Yes, I think that Hegel really had his finger on the pulse of 'reality' - on the 'mechanism' of life's unfolding.  He simply thought that the ultimate end of the process was a materialistic one.  Surprise.  (Speaking of, in this thread…)