from godfatherpolitics.com: 'Are We Moving Toward a National Police Force?' - Dec. 15 - orig. posted at commonconstitutionalist.com - by Brent, aka The Common Constitutionalist
..
The Sandy Hook Elementary School hoax was a set-up to expedite/continue the taking away of the public's weapons of self-defense ("Never let a good crisis go to waste"). He is letting millions - millions - of illegal aliens into the country, including Islamic terrorists (and released 36,000 convicted criminal illegal aliens into our towns & cities, to foment more 'crisis'). He is facilitating the bringing of Ebola into the country, instead of keeping it isolated in its home base in Africa, for treatment there (where it was spawned by a U.S. bioweapons lab). He is, as this article notes, making local police forces financially and loyally beholden to the federal government. We are being surveilled by police-state tactics worse than the USSR or East Germany ever dreamed of. The indices go on, and on: this is takeover mentality at work.
And our basic mentality in response??:
Which celebrity is doing what to whom…who won the game……what's for dinner…...
It's pathetic.
Come ON, America. I KNOW you can do better than this. In defending the principle of 'essential liberty' that our Founding Fathers bequeathed to us.
A federal constitutional Republic. If we could keep it.
The jury is still out on that one.
But barely.
--
2) from tea party C.C.: '2016: Ted Cruz Will Bank on the Base' - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - Dec. 15
(Another given assumption that Ted Cruz is a candidate for the pres'l office in 2016)
..
Permalink Reply by Lewana Hinton 2 hours ago
It seems like that issue is no longer relevant. Obama's father was documented to be born outside of the U.S. He has now set the precedence. Since obama has gotten away with it, then Cruz father not being born in the U.S. wouldn't matter either. If they rule Cruz isnt eligible, then obama will not have any standing as President, and all decisions, rules, laws, etc that he implimented are all illegal and must be thrown out. Personally I think they should be any way, because they are all stupid & ridiculous.
▶ Reply
Permalink Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (Dec. 15)
Dear Ted (& Various & Sundry Tea Partiers here on this thread, & in general),
You are a good man, and make a good senator. But regardless of what your law professors may have tried to make you think, and what the Republican Party Establishment honchos have tried to make the Party's grassroots supporters think: You are not an eligible candidate for the office of the presidency of the United States.
This is not rocket science. The whole POINT of the exercise, on the part of the constitutional Framers, in putting the "natural born citizen" requirement in the Constitution for that office - and that particular federal office ONLY, may all who read this please note carefully - was to make sure - as least as far as THEY could, in their time - that the person who became elected to that office - who would then perforce become as well the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces - would have no DUAL LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES. Like a naturalized citizen. And like a dual citizen. Like, for example: Obama.
You, Senator Cruz, were not born a "natural born" citizen, meaning one born on the soil (jus soli) of two U.S. citizen parents (jus sanguinis). You are simply not eligible for the top spot. (Or the VP position either, for that matter; occasioned by a constitutional amendment to that - logical - effect.)
Two wrongs do not make a right.
The only people who think otherwise on this issue, among those who have studied it, are those who do not believe that there is any such thing as absolute truth; who believe that everything is relative in life. Republicans must not believe that. Or we are doomed as a republic, and no longer living under the rule of law. Living under then, simply, the rule of men. Another word for which is tyranny.
I won't have it. And neither will a lot of other patriots, who are trying - desperately - to get this country back on track again, to its founding roots. With Republican Party scoffers on this issue, who needs enemies.
The Republican leadership obviously did a quid pro quo deal on this matter with their Democrat Party counterparts: 'We won't say anything about your candidate on this issue if you won't say anything about any of our candidates on this, er, little detail, in the future.' They could have gone the legal route, and moved to pass a constitutional amendment easing up on the "natural born" issue, making just a "citizen" eligible. And actually, both parties tried - a total of 8 times between 2003 and '08 - to get just such an amendment going through Congress. And failed each time even to get it out of committee (such was the sensitivity of the issue). So, what to do. Got it:
Cheat. 'And since, between us, we control the judicial branch of government…' Mission accomplished, with the Usurper in the White House as we speak. Which is a stench to high heaven, and enough to make our Founding Fathers groan and turn over in their graves. All of their sacrifices. In the end, for nothing.
If you doubt this take on the matter, do your homework. You will find that John Jay - who became the nation's first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, such was his stature as a statesman of that day - wrote a letter to G. Washington, in his role as Chair of the C'l Convention, on this very issue, and making this very point, about the desirability of not wanting someone with the taint of possible dual loyalties to be C in C of the nation's military. You will also find that Alexander Hamilton made a proposal to the Convention to have such a candidate need be only a "citizen" - and his proposal was TURNED DOWN. It's on the record of those proceedings. The c'l Framers were also familiar with E. de Vattel's work 'The Law of Nations Or Principles of Natural Law' on this subject. But enough on the history of the matter. A really good, particularly salient point here is what a service you could render to the nation - to the Republic - in 'coming out' on this matter, and thus bringing pressure to bear on having Obama (simply) removed from the office, for the crime - at the very least - of impersonating an officer (Title 18, U.S. Code (Sect. 912]), before he can do any more damage to the country than he has already done.
I look forward to your performing of this inestimable service to the nation, Sen. Cruz. And besides The People of the American Republic, heaven will bless you, if you do.
For standing for Truth. Absolute, unsullied, Truth. For, contrary to the opinion of atheists, it exists. And is for us to stand for.
And definitely not to stand for lies.
--
--
3) from personalliberty.com: 'IMF now ready to slam the door on the U.S. and the dollar' - Brandon Smith - Dec. 16
"As I write this, the news is saturated with stories of a hostage situation possibly involving Islamic militants in Sydney, Australia. Like many, I am concerned about the shockwave such an event will create through our sociopolitical structures. However, while most of the world will be distracted by the outcome of this crisis (for good or bad) for at least the next two weeks, I find I must concern myself with a far more important and dangerous situation.
Up to 40 people may be held by supposed extremists in Sydney, but the entire world is currently being held hostage economically by international banks. This is the crisis no one in the mainstream is talking about, so alternative analysts must.
As I predicted last month in “We have just witnessed the last gasp of the global economy,” severe volatility is now returning to global markets after the pre-game 10 percent drop in equities in October hinted at what was to come.
We expected such destabilization after the wrap-up of the Fed taper, and the markets have not disappointed so far. My position has always been that the taper of QE3 made very little sense in terms of maintaining the illusion of economic health — unless, of course, the Federal Reserve was implementing the taper in preparation for a renewed financial catastrophe. That is to say, the central bankers have established the lie of American fiscal recovery and then separated themselves from blame for the implosion they know is coming. If the markets were to collapse while stimulus is officially active, the tragedy would be forever a millstone on the necks of the banksters. And we can’t have that now, can we?
This is not to say that individual central banks and even currencies are not expendable in the grand scheme of things. In fact, the long-term goal of globalists has been to consolidate all currency systems and central banks under the outward control of the International Monetary Fund and the Bank Of International Settlements, as I outlined in “The economic endgame explained.”
That particular article was only a summary of a dangerous trend I have been warning about for years, namely the strategy by international financiers to create a dollar-collapse scenario that will be blamed on prepositioned scapegoats. I have no idea what form these scapegoats will take: There are simply too many possible triggers for fiscal calamity. What I do know, though, is the goal of the endgame: to remove the dollar’s world reserve status and to pressure the American people into conforming or even begging for centralized administration of our economy by the IMF.
The delusion perpetuated in the mainstream is that the IMF is a U.S.-dominated institution. I have outlined on many occasions why this is false. The IMF like all central banks is dominated by the international corporate banking cartel. Central banks are merely front organizations for globalists, and I am often reminded of the following quote from elitist insider Carroll Quigley when I hear people suggest that central banks are somehow independent from one another or that the Federal Reserve is itself the singular “source” of the world’s economic ills:
It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.
The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.
No one can now argue against this reality after we have witnessed hard evidence of Goldman Sachs dictating Federal Reserve policy, as outlined here.
And, most recently, we now know that international bankers control political legislation as well, as Congress passed with little resistance a bill that negates the Frank-Dodd restrictions on derivatives and places the U.S. taxpayers and account holders on the hook for more than $303 trillion in toxic debt instruments. The bill is, for all intents and purposes, a “bail-in” measure in disguise. And it was pushed through with the direct influence of JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.
The Federal Reserve, the U.S. government and the dollar are as expendable to the elites as any other economic or political appendage. And it can be replaced at will with yet another illusory structure if this furthers their goal of total centralization. This has been done for centuries, and I fail to see why anyone would assume that globalists would change their tactics now to preserve the dollar system. They call it the “New World Order,” but it is really the same old-world monetary order out of chaos that has always been exploited. Enter the IMF’s old/new world vision.
In articles over the past year, I have warned that the plan to dethrone the dollar and replace it with the special drawing rights basket currency system would be accelerated after it became clear that the U.S. Congress would refuse to pass the IMF reforms of 2010 proclaiming “inclusiveness” for developing economies, including the BRICS nations. The latest spending bill removed any mention of IMF reforms. The IMF, under Christine Lagarde, has insisted that if the U.S. did not approve its part of the reforms, the IMF would be forced to pursue a “Plan B” scenario. The details on this “plan B” have not been forthcoming, until now.
The Financial Times reported on the IMF shift away from the U.S. by asserting the authority to remove the veto power America has always enjoyed over the institution. This action is a stark reminder to mainstream talking heads and to those who believe the U.S. is the core economic danger to the world that the IMF is not an extension of American policy. If anything, the IMF and the U.S. are extensions of international banking policy, just as the BRICS are nothing more than puppets for the same self-serving financial oligarchy clamoring for the same IMF-controlled paradigm, as Vladimir Putin openly admitted:
In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this…
The IMF decision to eliminate U.S. veto power and, thus, influence over IMF decisions may come as early as the first quarter of next year. This is the great “economic reset” that Largarde has been promoting ad nauseam in multiple interviews and speeches over the past six months. All of these measures are culminating in what I believe will be a more official announcement of a dump of the U.S. dollar as world reserve currency.
Along with the imminent loss of veto power, I have also written on the concerns of the coming SDR conference in 2015. This conference is held only once every five years. My suspicion has been that the IMF plans to announce the inclusion of the Chinese yuan in the SDR basket and that this will coincide with a steady dollar dump around the globe. Multiple major economies have already dropped the dollar in bilateral trade with China, and engineered tensions between the U.S. and the East have exacerbated the issue.
The timing of the SDR conference has now been announced, and the meeting looks to be set for October of 2015. Interestingly, this linked article notes that China has a “real shot” at SDR inclusion and official “reserve status” next year, but warns that the U.S. “may use its veto power” to stop China’s membership. I have to laugh at the absurdity of it all, because there are many people in the world of economic study who still believe the developments of globalization and fiscal distress are all “random.” I suppose that if it is all random, then it is a rather convenient coincidence that the U.S. just happens to be on the verge of losing veto power in the IMF just before they are about to bring the BRICS into the SDR fold and supplant the dollar.
This is it, folks; this is the endgame right in front of our faces. The year of 2014 is the new 2007, with all the negative potential but 100 times more explosive going into 2015. Our nation has wallowed in slowly degrading financial conditions for years, hidden by fake economic statistics and manipulated stock prices. All of it has been a prelude to a much more frenetic and shocking event. I believe that we will see continued market chaos from now on, with a steep declining trend intermixed with brief but inadequate “dead cat” stock bounces. I expect a hailstorm of geopolitical crises over the next year to provide cover for the shift away from the dollar.
Ultimately, the death of the dollar will be hailed in the mainstream as a “good and necessary thing.” They will call it “karma.” They will call it “progress.” They will even call it “decentralization” and a success for the free market. But it will not feel like a positive development for the American public, who will suffer greatly as the dollar crumbles. Only those educated in the underpinnings of shadow banking will understand the whole thing is a charade designed to hide the complete centralization of sovereign economic governance into the hands of the globalists, using the IMF and BIS as “fiscal heroes,” saving the world from a state of economic destruction the elites themselves secretly created."
–Brandon Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment