On The Law

Dr. Alan Keyes, former Ambassador to the UN under President Ronald Reagan and candidate for the US Senate seat in Illinois that Barack Obama ended up winning, and thus starting out on his illustrious, and fast-moving (well-greased??), political career, is in a high dudgeon these days over a number of socio-political issues; one of which is how the U.S. military, under the administration of said BO, is caving in under pressures to erase all mention of God - at least the Christian God - in their institutions.1

In a recent letter to those on the mailing list of one of the organizations that Dr. Keyes fronts, he says:

"(This particular organization) is focused on a return to our nation's God-ordained foundational principles, which are found in the Declaration of Independence, and are codified as law in the U.S. Constitution.  (his emphasis)

"The fact is, the United States is a nation of laws, and those laws proceed from God.  Yet, Obama -- the man occupying the White House even though he has steadfastly refused to prove his constitutional eligibility to the office -- is doggedly working to make America a nation of men…"

First, a comment on Dr. Keyes' former charge, and then to the latter one.  He would appear here to be referring to the fact that the document that BO authorized to be posted on the official White House website as purportedly a copy of his original, long-form, vault-copy birth certificate from the state of Hawaii has been analyzed by a number of electronic-document experts to be a forgery.2  But the man's ineligibility for that office - for not being a bona fide "natural born" citizen - does not even hinge on that question.  As I have clarified a number of times in these pages, his eligibility fails at the first hurdle, via the fact that his - declared - father was not a U.S. citizen (then, or even later).  And this understanding of the definition of a 'natural born' citizen was even acknowledged by the Usurper during the campaign between these two men for the U.S. Senate seat, when Dr. Keyes even then accused him of not being a NBC, and Barry's reply at the time - and caught on video camera to boot - was, quote: "So what.  I'm not running for the presidency."  

As they say: Ka-ching!

But that issue is not the one I want to to talk about here.  I want to talk about the other point that Dr. Keyes raised in his comment, quoted above, about the difference between 'the rule of law' and 'the rule of men'.

Yes, I know what he means, about times when tyrants begin to take over, and say things like, "I am the law;" as Hitler did.  And as BO is effectively doing, by issuing 'executive orders' far beyond the scope of that administrative prerogative of the U.S. executive, thus straying into the area of legislative action, which is the prerogative - and the prerogative solely - of the legislative arm of government.  But sometimes, 'the rule of law' is just as bad as 'the rule of men'.

Case in point.  I am reminded of a case that I read about while living in Australia for a few years in the '90s, where I got involved in free speech issues, and where a professor, in the late '90s, was hauled before a tribunal because he was posting information that he had researched calling into question 'the Holocaust' - at least major aspects of the 'given story' about the incarceration of Jews by the Nazis.3  I'll paraphrase that case, which I read about via a source that never reached the Aussie public at large (go figure):

'You must understand something, Citizen.  You've presented all this material that you have prepared, in your defense.  But this tribunal is not about Truth.  It is about The Law.  And The Law says that you cannot bring into question The Holocaust.'

'Not even the veracity of it, Madame Chair?  Of details of that story??'

'Not even the "veracity," as you call it.  That word does not appear in the law.  What you have engaged in is against the law, pure and simple.

'Therefore, this Tribunal of The People finds you - '

'Just one more comment on my behalf, if I may, Madame Chair.'

'All right.  Let it not be said that these proceedings have not been fair.  What is it, Citizen.  But make it quick.'     

'Oh, I will, Madame Chair.  And that is just to say, further in my defense - and in the defense of Reason -  that 'the law,' then, is an ass.'

'How dare you insult this Tribunal and The Law like that, Citizen.  The Law is sacrosanct, above either question or ridicule.  After all, if if it were not for The Law, there would be chaos.  And I - speaking for this Tribunal, of The People, of course - will not allow that to occur.  Especially not under My jurisdiction.  You are therefore found guilty as charged, and with no allowance for leniency in the sentencing.  Is that clear, Citizen?'

'Oh, yes, Madame Chair.  Very clear indeed.  That this prison is run by idiots.'

I agree.  And rest my case.  That Justice and 'the law' are often two different things.

P.S.  May I remind one and all: This 'hearing' (in its essence) took place in Australia.  

     Not even in Germany.

     Australia.  

     And not in 1984.                    

---

footnotes:

1  Thus, the Air Force Academy has recently scrubbed from their graduating officers' military oath the phrase (and pledge), 'So help me God'.

2 And therefore the Usurper is toast right there.  No need to go through any more legalistic hoops:  that is a felony.  He needs simply to be arrested if only for that crime alone; and other charges against him can be added to the indictment from there.

3 One question was regarding the '6 million' figure, widely, and incessantly (like a mantra), touted as the number of Jews slaughtered by the Nazis in their 'death camps'.  Even some Jews - yes, there are honest Jews; they don't all subscribe to the script, that nets them millions of dollars in reparations and untold amounts of deference in sympathy - have admitted that that figure is a lie.  

   (It is based on a figure that the Zionists bandied about during the early part of last century, as the number of 'Diaspora'/dispersed - and therefore 'missing' - Jews, in order to make a case for a homeland for them, such as in Madagascar, and which ended up being in 'their old homeland' - a deceit in itself, for most of them (for being descended from a Turkic people, from their kingdom of Khazaria, in the Ukraine area of Europe, converted to Judaism in ancient times) - in Palestine, courtesy of the British government.  Another subject in itself.)    

   Another question was the - so-called - gas chambers.  The professor had come across info that the notorious 'Zyklon B' gas touted as having been used in mass exterminations in 'shower' facilities, was actually for delousing; lice being a major problem amongst concentrated groups of people.  He even took the trouble to go visit one of the fingered 'extermination' camps, and discovered for himself that the shower rooms were just that, weren't the sealed chambers that would have been needed to do the dirty deed. 

   And found out for himself that the camp also had had a symphony orchestra, at the time designated for having been - according to the story - an 'extermination' camp.  And…and……and………   

   Not to say that in our day there aren't members of The New World Order who don't want to exterminate the patriots standing against their takeover of the American Republic, in the FEMA 're-education' camps all ready for them.  Including with railroad tracks leading right into them  And train cars reportedly with shackles, and guillotines…

   Many NWO minions being Zionists.  Who have their fetish of being a - the - Master Race.  'The Chosen People,' as they have been brainwashed into thinking of themselves.

   Another blog in itself.  Except just to say, here: Guess who has been involved in the creation and operation of the Department of Homeland Security in America, from its Day One??   

   And starting under Bush Jr., and the (dual-Israeli-citizen) NeoCons of his administration???… 

   And speaking of the truth of things, and as for the crematoriums in the Nazi concentration camps: Of course there would be crematoriums there.  People die in such conditions.  That doesn't mean that they were put in the ovens alive.  There is simply no credible evidence, that I have come across as yet, for that - political - conclusion.  

   I think it was - has been - part of a projection, of what the 'Chosen People' would do to their enemies if they - and with their proven end-justifies-the-means philosophy (Alinsky: 'By Any Means Necessary') - were in charge.

   I want the truth of that matter   And every matter.  And will settle for nothing less.  (These Games That People Play.  One of which is that 'Truth is conditional'.  Grrrr...)  That particular story has been used to calumniate an entire nation of people, and must not be allowed to stand any longer.  It is an affront to Truth, as well as to those citizens. 

   It is as if the whole of America were to be tarred for the sins of the fascists under Bush/Cheney (et al), or those of the Marxists under Obama.  'We' need to tell these extremists - all under the same nest of vipers at the top of the pyramid of - current - world power: 

   'We' are not amused.  And are not going to take it any longer.