On Committing To Life

One more missive here on my favorite hobby-horse subject and then I'll let it go.  For now.1  This one went (back) to Larry Klayman, an attorney, of his outfit, Freedom Watch.  He does excellent work on calling the federal government big-wigs on their actions, most notably errant presidents.  (But he has also recently won a (lower) court case against the unconstitutional, and police-state, actions of the NSA, which is currently making its way to the Supreme Court, on appeal by the Obamaites.)  He is nonpartisan, having gone after both Clinton and Bush W. in the past, both for exceeding their authority and engaging in corruption whilst in the office.  But he has a particular passion against the current incumbent, for many reasons, including for what he considers to be his illegality in the office.  Alas, he seems to think that that stems from questions about where Obama was born (he thinks that The Usurper was born in Kenya; and that that is why Obama has gone to such lengths to disguise his authentic birth certificate, to the point of posting a proven fraudulent one on the official White House web site.  More to come on that front).  I beg to differ; as the following makes abundantly clear (at least, I think, and hope, it does):2

(12/11)

"Dear Larry,

"Even you, a stalwart defender of the law, still don't get it, do you.  Obama is not just "likely not" a nbc (your WND column accompanying this mailing).3  It doesn't even hinge [principally] on where he was born.  It hinges primarily, and crucially, on how he was born.  

"The clincher is his parents.  He is a dual citizen (at best).  Thus, he is out of there, on the strength of that birth condition & fact alone.

"Not 'impeachment'.  'Simple' removal.

"This is not rocket science.  The whole point of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers, in putting that eligibility requirement in the Constitution for that particular office - & that particular [federal] office alone - was to make sure (at least as far as they could) [in their time & place] that the candidate, if elected - who would as well then become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military  forces - did not have any DUAL LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  Like a naturalized citizen.  And indisputably like a dual [double underlined] citizen.

"Duh.

"This reading of the matter is attested to by the fact that A. Hamilton made a proposal [at the Convention] that the candidate for that office need only be a 'citizen' - & his proposal was specifically turned down (double underlined].  

"This reading of the matter is also attested to - & definitively [so], I believe -  by the letter that John Jay (who later became the new nation's first Chief Justice of its Supreme Court; a not-so-incidental factoid in this matter) sent to G. W. in his role as Chair of the C. Convention proceedings - & I believe as well [specifically] upon hearing of A. H.'s proposal - when he wrote:

"'Dear Sir,

"'Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise & seasonable4 to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government, & to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American Army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born citizen.'*

"Rather prescient, wouldn't you say, given our current circumstances??…

"The bottom line:

"You are simply barking up the wrong tree in this matter.  This terribly important matter.

"& if the Founding Fathers, & specifically the constitutional Framers, were alive today, they would agree, & tell you so."

(signed)


* See puzo1.blogspot.com; articles by JB Williams at capitolhilloutsider.com; 2 videos by Prof. Herb Titus; the [good & solid] references to this issue go on, & on.

--

I rest my case.

As I say: For now.

& ask you to consider how you would feel, if you were one of those Founders of this nation, about this brazen attack on the very letter and spirit of their Constitution, for the ages???  Capable of being amended as time went on, and sentiments on various subjects change.  But not to be amended for "light and transient" reasons, as T. Jefferson put it, in the Declaration of Independence.

And certainly not by arrogant and high-handed human fiat.

So, please; as I say: cut me some slack in this matter.  It is a vital one.  To the rule of law.  And the short-circuiting of the machinations of people who would attempt to ride Mankind with spurs, and whip a'flailing.  And all that is standing in the way between them and that outcome

is "just a damn piece of paper".

In the words of one of those erstwhile tyrants.  Masters, over us

Not with us.    

As we ascend the stairway to the heavens.

Having learned our lessons, in the (dualistic) realm of free will, well.

Hopefully.

So that we can get to that better future for us.  Just as soon as possible.

I don't know about you.

But I can hardly wait.

And we aren't going to get there, on the level and degree of consciousness that we are operating on, right now.

It will take a little more attention to details, than we are demonstrating right now, to accomplish

our

mission.

What we were born for.

What we chose

to incarnate at this time for.

Remember???……...

---

footnotes:

1 Being the 'shade' of the little boy calling the Emperor on his new clothes seems to be part of my commitment to this life.  I ask those of you who have been following my blogs for awhile to cut me some slack in this particular matter in that general regard.  I'm just trying to be a voice for, stand clearly for, Truth.
   Yes, there is a place for Love.  And, there is a place for Light.
   To each his own.  (At any given time.)

2 I have added some comments in brackets along the way from the original, to try to make my points clearer to You, dear (patient) Reader.

3  'Obama: Impeach And Convict Now!' - undated.

4 I would assume that the correct word here was 'reasonable,' but a number of Google search sites had it indeed as 'seasonable'.  I can only presumer that someone early on misread J. Jay's handwriting on this matter.