The relative who asked me about the birth status of Kamala Harris has returned with a query about Pres. Trump, knowing that his parents were from other countries, and wondering about that factor. My response:
"Re Trump's parents: First of all, it doesn't matter where one's parents were born for a person to be a 'natural born' citizen of a country, what matters is if they were (in this case) U.S. citizens at the time of one's birth. Trump's mother was from Scotland, but she had gained U.S. citizenship some years before his birth. I just did a quick check to see if I could find any info on the citizenship of his father, who came from Germany, and had lived here for many years before his marriage, but I wasn't able to clarify if he had ever actually taken out U.S. citizenship. If he hadn't, then Trump is not a 'natural born' citizen, just a native born citizen. That would be a close call in this matter, because the whole POINT of the 'natural born' eligibility requirement for that office on the part of the constitutional Framers was to make sure that the occupant of that particular office - who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces; a key factor in the setting of that requirement - had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. I suppose if it turns out that his father never actually took out U.S. citizenship, but had lived here as long as he had, a team of highfaluting lawyers might make a convincing-sounding case that Trump met the spirit of the law, if not precisely its letter, and the argument might possibly prevail in the U.S. Supreme Court, especially given how it has fudged the niceties of the law over the years many times, and this would certainly be a case almost of nitpicking. The law needs to be honored. But it should also be just.
"If you were to ask me what I think should be done if it turns out that his father indeed never actually became a U.S. citizen, I would opt to follow the spirit AND the letter of the law - and ESPECIALLY because I feel so strongly about the ineligibility of Barry Obama for that office, which opened this country up to some terrible moves supporting its downfall at the hands of the NWO crowd behind so much of what is going on these days, and his two terms in that deliberately purloined office need to be cancelled out. That has been pure Dark-side stuff, and IT MUST NOT STAND. So I can hardly talk out of both sides of my mouth. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
"And if you were to ask me further what I think of the whole mess, I would say that it is about to be moot anyway, because we are in for a major Game Changer, whereby we are about to go Up a notch or two on the consciousness scale, and our Past will be left behind. As a reminder, down to its fine details, of how far off The Path we Homo sapiens can get, given our free will to go exploring in the brambles and thickets of Life, especially when we forget that life has a meaning beyond just in and for itself only. As so many have done, in this, our darkest hour. But being saved from ourselves, by the natural 'law' that it is darkest before dawn."
-
The bottom line:
We need to move into a state of governance characterized by Truth. That state of being - along with its counterpart, Love - will inform our consciousness. Or we will be unable to withstand the energy of the frequency of the Light involved, in that transition out of our current state. And as we move on to such technological niceties as to allow a Universal Basic Income, we will understand that the only way that such an idea will work is in such a 'state'. Not the state of consciousness that we are largely in at present. That would only lead to such 'static' as the corruption of the consciousness of people voting themselves money out of other people's pockets. That is part of the Old Order. Welcome to
The New.
And the need for it, now. Or to be left behind. On
The Path. In
The Process.
No comments:
Post a Comment