The Law Of Rule

In a recent blog where I dealt with the principle of the rule of law, I referred to the fact that their is a misconception amongst many Americans about their ‘constitutional rights,’ wherein they think (and have been led to think) that the federal Constitution is the only law that is ruling over them. and thus that they are ‘protected’’ by its Bill of Rights.  When what the Bill of Rights is, in fact, is a statement, with some examples, of powers that were not being ceded by the States to the federal government, by which to rule over them.  That the new federal government was to be a government of limited and delegated powers - ‘few and defined,” as referred to by the man quite fairly called the Father of the Constitution, James Madison.  And thus was ‘the rule of law’ set in this country.  Whereby we all live under the rule of law.  The rules governing the powers of the federal government, in this instance.  And the rules governing the powers of the several States  Which consist of most of the ‘social’ matters.  Delineated under the terms of their respective constitutions.

States, and cities, are imposing draconian decrees on their residents regarding the current viral ‘pandemic’ (which in truth is proving not to be a pandemic after all, more like a seasonal flu; another subject) which they have no power, under law, to do. 

The bottom line:

A State cannot deal with its citizenry - or as is increasingly the matter as well, with merely its inhabitants; with so many faux 'refugees' on the one hand, having been brought into the country under the auspices of the UN mostly as a 5th Column, and so many illegal aliens on the other hand, having been flooded into the country, and locating especially in ‘sanctuary states’ and ‘sanctuary cities’ for purposes of overthrow/revolution - arbitrarily, i.e., outwith its rule of law - its state constitution.  Additionally, because of the 14th Amendment to the federal Constitution, it cannot abridge the rights of its U.S. citizenry residents in the following manner:

“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State derive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”   

I am here not going to go into the details of the definition or intention of these terms.  Here, I am just going to make my basic point: 

that we in the United States live under the rule of law.  That neither the federal government, nor any state of the Union, can treat its inhabitants ARBITRARILY.  To say: Outwith its rules of relationship with its residents.

If a State, or any city or town within its jurisdiction, treats its residents in a way that they don’t have the power to do under their state’s Constitution, then they are acting ILLEGALLY.  And their ukases and decrees need to be treated with the contempt that they deserve.

Is this showing contempt of the law?

Absolutely not.  It is showing contempt of those wannabe Masters who want to rule over us as though they had the authority to do so.

Oh, they may have the power to do so.  Momentarily.  But ‘the people’ have the right to throw off their illegal power over them, with all due disrespect.  

And since a State that exercises such arrogant, illegal power over its inhabitants - which include American citizens - is demonstrating a ‘state’ of insurrection, the federal government has a right - nay, a duty - to go in there and set things to rights.  According to

the law.  In this case, the Law of the Land.  According to the federal Constitution.  Which, under the understanding of ‘judicial supremacy’ (Art. VI), authorizes the federal government to make sure that the laws of the land are faithfully executed - by it, and by the several States of the Union.  And if either the federal government itself, or a State, engages in an act outwith the terms of its constitution, either the several States, on the one hand, or the federal government, on the other, has the right - and, indeed, responsibility, to keep individuals in positions of authority from making things up as they go along - to

Set.  Things  Right.

All of which is relevant to the educational process that We, the People are under, as ‘spiritual beings having a human experience’.  And learning to live by Law.  With our very being governed by Law.  The Law of Karma.  Whereby we learn that actions have consequences.  Fundamental consequences.  Educational consequences.  That everything we do - and think, for that matter - is recorded.  In this School for apprentice gods.  With ‘the universe’ itself thus operating under perfect Law.  

And the Justice thereof.  As we learn, among other lessons,

the Law - and responsibility - of Rule.