On Legacies

‘Oh, you must be one of those conspiracy theorists.’  And just so did Dave Hodges, of his The Common Sense Show, come up against the success of the CIA, when he tried to alert a fellow citizen to something that was going on, in relation to what is really going on this country.

I say the CIA, because of two facts in particular.  The first is how the Director of the. CIA in the mid-‘70s let it out that they ‘owned’ most major names in the mainstream media of the day.   The second is a quote to his people by a later CIA director, in the ‘80s: “We will know that our disinformation program is complete when everything that the American public believes is false.”

Thus have we been falling for some time under the control of despots.  People who believe that they have a right to control us.  The American people.  Born to be free.  Now, to be subject to, and subjected to, the rule of the modern-day equivalent of the Bolsheviks of the Russian Revolution, turning it into part of the Soviet Union - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.  The USSR for short.

Shit for short.

Which takeover has already led to major degrees of censorship of conservative and Christian and other non-Left points of view on the MSM at first and now including the Independent Media.  Which has taken a number of forms.  

Example.  Last night I had, in my ‘surfing of the net,’ come across a reference with link to a video by Dr. Steve Pieczenik regarding the subject of how some Jews had been responsible for the killing of other Jews in Europe for the purpose of ‘encouraging’/getting more of them to up sticks and go live in the desert in the Middle East, which ‘homeland’ the Zionists had secured via the Balfour Declaration, back during the war that was to become enlarged to WWI.  The Zionist Jews had gone to the British Home Secretary of the time, Lord Balfour, and got him to enter into a deal with them: that he would authorize a ‘homeland’ for the Jews in ‘their’ old homeland,(1) which area was nominally under the control of the British Empire as the time, in exchange for their ‘arranging’ to get the U.S. to come into the war on the side of the Brits.  Deal made; deal done.  

I  clicked on the link to see what the good Doctor Steve had to say on the subject.  I was familiar with him and his perspectives, from various ‘interviews’ that he had done with Alex Jones.  (I put quote marks on the word, because of Jones’s terrible habit of interrupting his interviewees so often.  But at least the gist of what Steve has to share with the public has been able to come across when he has appeared there.)  Instead of the video site, a message came up, headed:

“False History RAW:

‘“The following content has been identified by the YouTube community as inappropriate or offensive to some audiences.”  

So?  Okay.  Duly noted.  Now let me see it.  I’m an adult…Fortunately, it had a link to click on to “proceed”.  Well, at least that’s something, I thought; YouTube must be responding to messages of outrage from the public about its censoring (and ‘demonetizing’) of material that it deems ‘offensive’.  I clicked on it to proceed, having been duly warned.

Nothing.  Zip.  Zilch.   Nada.  A blank screen.   

Hey, YouTube:   

You talk about being ‘offended’.  I am deeply offended when a) someone tries to keep me from reading or hearing or saying something, and when b) someone tries to assault the Truth of things.  Or even just a perspective on things.

You are not just a private company.  You are using the public airwaves to be in business.  You are subject to some responsibilities in that regard; and are subject to anti-trust laws in addition.

Just a word.  And I will say it once:

Get your boot off my neck.

That is all.  

-

P.S. On this general subject, of illegal overreach, and suppression of access to information and other perspectives, and of governmental regulation: I have had an interesting juxtaposition of snail mail recently.  First I received in the mail a letter from a guy who is passionate about rivers, and wants people to support him in fighting back against what he characterized simply as the Trump administration’s attempts to dilute EPA regulations defending the nation’s rivers. Sounds good, and fair enough; right?  But it rang a bit of a bell regarding other mail that I have received over some period of time; and then, lo, in the mail today came a reminder of that ‘note,’ in the form of a letter from an outfit called the Southeastern Legal Foundation, who have been fighting EPA overreach regulations regarding this very subject.  

     It has to do with a bit of legislation called WOTUS, standing for ‘Waters of the United States’.  As their letter clarifies:

“WOTUS is the regulation that allows the federal government and the (EPA) to regulate — in a limited way — the country’s major navigable rivers and lakes. 

“But shortly before he left office, Obama dramatically redefined and expanded WOTUS so that it effectively ABOLISHES private property…”  (emphases in original)     

Basically, what had been going on under the Obama administration had been a snatch-and-grab operation by his apparatchiks, in an attempt, in this case, to undermine all private property rights in the U.S., with the potential of nationalizing virtually all land in the country.  By federal fiat.  Under the guise of ‘regulating’ rivers.  Via Obama’s henchmen arguing in effect that after a rain, the water drains from a puddle on private property into a brook which empties into a creek and then a stream “and eventually a river”.  The federal argument being that that water on that private property - say, if the rancher dams some of it up to use it to water his livestock - is regulatable by the feds.  

Excuse me?  Hey - it affects the river, to some extent; but it is not the river.  The effect of the Obama-affected EPA’s attitude being the eradication thereby of private property rights.  By dictatorial fiat.  Which potential outcome is being fought in the courts by the SLF.       

Yes, Obama is no longer in the office.  But his legacy still stands.  Not only in the form of federal governmental regulations enacted under his (surreptitious) aegis.  But ‘his’ judges - likeminded jurists - are still sitting on benches all over the country.  And you can say, ‘Well, at least Trump and the patriots now have control of the Supreme Court’.  But that argument doesn’t recognize the realistic potential, where the defendants of federal overreach and arrogance will not be able financially to fight their corner all the way to the Supreme Court.

So that is why I have argued in these pages that a) it needs to be recognized that BHO occupied the office of POTUS illegally - for not meeting the eligibility requirements, for not being a ‘natural born’ citizen, i,e., a person “born in the country, of parents who are citizens” thereof(2) - and therefore b) all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P.D.’s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made - including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts - need to go with him.  Into the trash bin.  For it to be as though he had never been there.  For, he was never there legally.

And therefore, his legacy must not be allowed to stand after his being stricken from the record. 

‘Oh, but that would cause turmoil in the country’?’

You ain’t see nothing yet regarding turmoil, if the Dark side makes a major play for control of this planet.  Which is going Up.

With you.

Or without you.

Your choice.

—

footnotes:

(1) quote from the definitive tome of the day of the constitutional Framers on such nation-building matters, E. de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations’.

    (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212.  Look it up.  It’s right here, on the Internet, for all to see for themselves.  That this is not rocket science; arcane legalistic gobbledegook.  It is pure reason.  In this case, to make sure that the occupant of that particular federal office - and that particular federal office ONLY; who also therefore becomes the Commander in Chief of the nation’’s military forces, which was the particular concern of the Framers for including this eligibility requirement for that office - has NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  Has SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.) 

(2) A subject of contention, besides the matter of Jews not having lived there for 2000 years.  Most Western Jews are not bloodline Jews, rather are from converted stock, known as Khazarian Jews, from a former country in the eastern European area roughly around Ukraine of this time, whose king was forced, by its neighbors, to get his subjects to start behaving, instead of engaging in such ‘unsocial’ measures as the robbing of travelers through their area, back and forth between western Europe and Russia.  He apparently was given a choice, of one of the three religions: Judaism, Christianity, or Islam - i,e., the People of The Book - to give his subjects some basis for moral order.  He chose Judaism for his people.  (Hey - a Chosen People.  Why not??)  And the rest is history.  Very bloody history.

   But to continue.

—

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.’

                                                                                                          - Voltaire