The Rule Of Law - Another Example...

…Of Chicanery And Deceit

Things were bad enough in this country, in the way of the trashing of the rule of law, when the American citizenry - of a nation founded on the principle of self-governance - failed to recognize that the definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, as defined by the definitive tome of the day of the Framers of the constitutional contract, is a person, quote: ‘born in the country, of parents who are citizens,” unquote and my emphasis.   And that that eligibility requirement for the office of the presidency of the United States - and that particular federal office only, indicating its special nature in the eyes of the authors of the Constitution - STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.  So, that oversight error on the part of the American citizenry of our day - as I say -  has been bad enough.  Without taking into consideration another such egregious error, just as spiteful the rule of law.        

This is all a terribly sad story, about a free people failing in their duty to look after their own interests.  Which oversight has allowed some very deceitful people, acting like cancer cells, to do their thing, in trying to take this country   over for a very long time.  But their day in the sun is done.

And that includes the deceitful category of U.S. citizens that has been dubbed ‘anchor babies’.  Of which there is no such thing in reality.  Only in the minds of those deceitful creatures amongst us  perpetrating that myth, and other American citizens who have been hoodwinked in the matter.  Presumably from thinking that one or the other of the political parties - doing their thinking for them - would have blown the whistle on the deception, if there were substance to the case, that the category of so-called ‘anchor babies’ is a chimera - a fake, a fraud.  As I say: a myth. 

It is based on a misreading of a passage in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, enacted after the Civil War, which gave U.S. citizenship to the freed slaves.  The passage in question, quote: 

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”   My emphasis.  All reading of the historical literature on the matter shows that the authors of that amendment meant it to apply only to the citizenry of the United States.  Not to citizens of other countries (and thus, subject to their jurisdiction) in this country either illegally, or as tourists or on a work visa, or on a diplomatic mission, say.

It turns out that this has been a long-standing error in application of that term in the 14th Amendment.  One can wonder why.  In any event: It is an error.  

Undoubtedly it is part of the fraud that says that the U.S. Constitution is ‘a living document,’ and is therefore subject to ‘legitimate’ change in interpretation over the years.  It.  Is.  Not.  It is in the nature of a contract.  With a built-in provision for amendment.  

Which has not been applied in this case.  And so, this creative interpretation - falls.  In the re-application of the rule of law in this country.

In order that we can move on. 

In the right way.  To say: In obedience to

Law.

-

A personal word about Law.

In high school, when I was filling out application forms for college, and the question was asked in them as to the major that I was going to engage in, I gave the question thought between Law and Medicine, as equally of possible interest.  In the event, I chose the latter course of instruction, as a bit more in keeping with my sentiments at the time (in either event, wishing to be of service to people), and matriculated on that basis into the university of my choice (and with the aid of a most generous scholarship).  

In the later event, I dropped out of my formal studies prematurely - with the help of a nudge from a spiritual experience - and set out on what has been a lifelong journey researching into, in a word: Truth.

If I had decided otherwise in my choice of major, and, embarking on a study of Law, had found out earlier in life what I have since discovered about the corruption of that field of human endeavor,* things may have been far different.  For me.  And for this country.  

We will never know the answer to that hypothetical question, in its particular.  But we will will know the   

same outcome, in general:

that Truth will prevail on Earth.

As it does in Heaven.

As Earth rises in its essence, up a notch, or two, initially.  In an Ascension process.

With us, individually.

Or without us.  Individually.

Your choice, for You.  Child of God that you are.

That is all.

For now.

Details to follow.

—

* As I have discovered in the field of you-should-excuse-the-expression Medicine.