Truth In Action

1) from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘Why Isn’t Congress Looking Into Epstein’s Intel Connections?’ - Dave Hodges - August 29

..

Stan Stanfield Thu, 08/29/2019 - 23:27

• Let me guess: The patriots are not saying anything about this whole JE business because they figure that Barr & Co. smuggled him out to make sure he wasn't killed by the Deep State, saving him in exchange for his intel. And the NWO crowd are not saying anything about it because they are afraid of what might come out about their own critters that JE had intel on, and are willing to let sleeping dogs lie, at least until they know more about what is going on behind the scenes. 
•    Oh, what a tangled web we weave......

—

2) from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘Comey’s “Walk” Exposes the Deep State Cartel Running America - THE RULE OF LAW IS DEAD!’ - Dave Hodges - August 30

(Hodges is furious, figuring that AG Barr, with his association with the Bushes, is part of the DS and is just going to cover things up, and it’s time for civil disobedience.  Well; it may be.  But…)

..

Stan Stanfield - Fri. August 30

The other good 'Dave' on the Internet on these sorts of matters, of the x22Report, figures that Comey was let off for now because they are going to get him when a larger nail is banged into the coffin of the Deep State, coming up.  However, the proof of the pudding, and all that.  So: We'll see.  Shortly.    

—

3) from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘The Radical Left Conspiracy Against Tulsi Gabbard’ - Dave Hodges - August 30 & on into August 31

(Hodges laments the dropping of Gabbard from the Democrat debates - as the only reasonable candidate there - and the possibility of Kamala Harris continuing on and her being selected, even with her background.  While AG of CA.  Not understanding her even more potent downside…)

Stan Stanfield - August 30/31

Dave, for the record, and your basic info: Kamala Harris is not eligible for the office of the presidency, because she is not a 'natural born' citizen.  The definition of a 'natural born' citizen is a person, quote, "born in the country, of parents who are citizens" thereof.  The definition is from the definitive tome of the day of the constitutional Framers on such nation-building matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations'.  (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212.  Look it up.  It's right here on the Internet.)  It stands to reason: The whole POINT of the exercise on the part of said Framers was to make sure that the occupant of that particular federal office - and that particular federal office ONLY, signifying its special nature in (cont'd)  

their eyes - had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES.  Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the United States (in this case).  (Their main concern was because that occupant would also, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces.)  And that eligibility requirement for that particular federal office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.  

Some have tried to argue that the Naturalization Act of 1790 changed everything.  They fail to note that the Naturalization Act of 1795 repealed the misleading words in the earlier Act - and anyway, No Act or Resolution of Congress will suffice to change an eligibility requirement for the office.  And - guess what: (cont'd)     

That means that BHO was ineligible for the office as well.  (With the 'birther' issue a red herring.)  So, what do we do about that.  I'll tell you: He is arrested and brought to trial on charges of fraud, perjury, and treason; and when he is found guilty, all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.'s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made - including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts - go with him.  Into the dust bin.  For it to be as though he were never there.  For, he was never there legally.  And both political parties need to be taken to court, on RICO statutes, fined, their authorities jailed, and the parties dissolved.  That's how big a scandal that this is.  And Kamala Harris?  Dumped. 

P.S. Both major political parties tried a total of 8 times between them, between 2003 and '08 alone, to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress watering down that eligibility requirement for that office - all their proposals having this issue as their common denominator - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue.  So, what did they do?  It's obvious what they did: They colluded.  And figured that, between them, with their control of the Congress and the MSM, they could get away with it.  But guess what: Truth is truth.  And the truth WILL out.  And will yet bite you critters in the bum.  With the help of truth-tellers - and -warriors - in the country.