* “The [so-called] whistleblower's attorney, Mark Zaid, openly admitted back in 2017 that a "coup" had started against the president from within the administration, and that CNN's coverage would play a "key role" in the effort.
“He also openly solicited intelligence community members to help impeach and "get rid" of Trump, years before Trump's call with Urkaine's leader that triggered the current impeachment proceedings…” (‘Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says - and Paul may force the issue” - Gregg Re, Fox News - January 30)
* The Dems didn’t do their job properly on the Impeachment thing, including making subpoenas legal, and attempted to cover it by saying, in effect, ‘tough’.
* And now, seeing their best-laid plans not working in the Senate, some Dems (and their echo chamber in the MSM and the Comments sections of various news articles) have taken to arguing - get this. Truly get this - that their allegations in the Articles of Impeachment are, quote, “akin” to criminal conduct. And should be accepted on that basis. Because - you know - close is good enough. (Even in a trial in the Senate for impeachment of a president???…the same corrupt attitude echoed in Rep. Schiff’s ‘reading’ for the cameras of the Trump-Zelensky phone call transcript that was purely his spin on it.)
* And as if to clinch the ‘case’ - that the Dems have no shame: A California House Impeachment Manager has come right out and admitted that it has been all about the 2020 election, that they needed to bring the charges before the election was effectively all over and it would all be “moot”.
Case closed.
As Ed Martin, President of the Phyllis Schlafly Eagles, has said:
No New Witnesses, Acquit Now
End this impeachment sham — House managers lack any foundation.
Washington, D.C.: After rushing the ham-fisted impeachment of President Donald Trump through the House, Democrats brought the process to a screeching halt. They delayed turning over articles of impeachment to the Senate and they are stalling during the trial by demanding more witnesses and evidence.
"All of America sees right through this sham," said Ed Martin, president of Phyllis Schlafly Eagles. "House Democrats know they can logjam the Senate even longer if they drag out this trial. They can prevent the Senate from confirming judges and continuing with their work. It's despicable and it must end now.
"Every Senator should vote to restore the dignity of their chambers. Senators should vote against calling new witnesses. They should then immediately vote to acquit President Trump. The President's legal team has proven without a doubt that there has been no violation of law or public trust. The President is and has been working for the citizens of the United States.
"To the Senate: vote no to witnesses and vote to acquit the President. Vote to end this national embarrassment."
|
--
Amen.
P.S. From the Question-and -Answer session in the Senate trial:
P.S. From the Question-and -Answer session in the Senate trial:
‘Q: 'How should the Senate consider more than one motive in assessing Article 1?’ (Question from Repub Sens. Collins, Murkowsky, and Romney - so-called ‘moderates’.)
A: Mixed motives? Bull-oney. Trying to say that Pres. Trump had some underling ‘motive’ to the clear words in the phone conversation is tantamount to putting your own words in his mouth. (As Shifty Schiff did.) Wondering about “the thinking of the man in charge,” as Sen. Feinstein put it?? No way to determine such a subjective, spin-doctored hypothesis. Throw this Impeachment scam of a stinking dog out.
It’s obvious that the Dems are just trying to get Trump out of the way, By Any and All Means Necessary, in order to move their totalitarian New World Order forward. Total perfidy.
Grrrrrrrrrr.
No comments:
Post a Comment