Thursday, 31 December 2015

To Sir, With Recognition

(Lecturer:) People are basically selfish.  That’s why they have to be forced to pay more in taxes on a progressive scale…What is it now, Johnny, my little class nemesis.  (Chuckles emanating from the other students)

(Johnny:) Excuse me, sir, but I have heard that Americans are the most charity-giving people on the planet.  Per capita, they - 

(Lecturer:) If you stole other people’s money, you would be more inclined to give it away, too. 

(Johnny:) How so ’stole,’ sir?

(Lecturer:) By raping other countries of their wealth, in the form of their resources.  By living on a higher standard of living than anybody else.  We owe them.  We should have no higher standard of living than anybody else.  That would be more fair and equitable; wouldn’t you agree, if you had an open mind?  Don’’t you agree, class?  (A unanimous ‘Yes sir’ in response)  Did you hear that, John?  

(Johnny:) …i hear that.  Sir…   

(Lecturer:) But what.  I heard a ‘but’ in your voice.  But what. 

(Johnny:) It’s just that…

(Lecturer:) That you’re so much smarter than all the other students?  Your peers?  You are better educated?  Where were you educated anyway, if you don’t mind my asking.

(Johnny:) I was home-schooled.  Sir. 

(Lecturer:) Aha.  Well, that answers that, then.  We really should have closed that door a long time ago.  

(Johnny:) Excuse me, sir.  Who’s ‘we’?

(Lecturer; snarling his reply, all ‘gloves’ - pretenses - off:) Your masters.  
    (A short stunned silence in the room; then, slipping back into his moderate persona:) 
     Now, where were we.

We were getting to the core of the matter.


Reading the Young America’s Foundation latest donation-request letter this early evening, I was myself stunned into a short silence when reading the following:

“…polls of U.S. students prove that our children and grandchildren aren’t being taught real and unbiased American history.

“** Only one in three fourth-graders can identify the purpose of the Declaration of Independence.

“** Less than half know why George Washington was an important American leader.

“** And most fourth-graders have no idea that the Pilgrims fled England so they could be free to practice their religion…”

The bit about the pilgrims was bad enough - airbrushing inconvenient info out of our history books and education; just like, and no better than, the old Soviet Union, airbrushing the images of ‘fallen’ leaders out of pictures.  But I was particularly struck - saddened, and angered - at the bit about George Washington.

My mind went back to my experience in the second half of my first grade in school, when we colored in some sprigs of cherries, and a hatchet, to ‘land’ and help remind ourselves of the story we had just been told about George Washington as a little boy.

And if you don’t know what i’m talking about, you just made my, and the YAF’s, point.

Anyway.  Back to the full-court press going on, with our erstwhile masters pulling out all the stops now, in trying to keep us from being successful in our anticipated reaction to their machinations, in such actions as 

(1) trying to block their flooding of the country with jihadists and other Muslims - to stir up animosities and turmoil, and try to balkanize the U.S., in order to weaken it, so that it will, like a ripe fruit, fall into the hands of the New World crowd - and 

(2) starting to heat up our securing of weapons of self-defense (as Obama and his merry band of nation hijackers try to block American patriots any way they can from such purchases, via such clever techniques as (a) buying up available ammo, and (b) pricing it out of availability via taxation, plus (c) keeping such weaponry out of the hands of veterans); and 

(3) rebelling against such people-control agents as Smart Meters on the one hand (both for their surveillance nature and their EMF/radiation toxicity), and vaccines on the other (with their intentional toxic ingredients).


And on that note:

I wish you and yours the best New Year that we can muster, against these miserable creatures trying to lock humanity up in their prison planet.  

May we rise to this august occasion.  So that we can see the wondrous view on the other side of this particular mountainous range of challenges.

So be it.


A footnote to the national world we have been living in:

from ‘The Crummy Deal ‘Progressives’ Sell’ - Joseph Farah - December 31
(‘Exclusive: Joseph Farah hears Obama explain realities of 'new economy' under his watch’)

kibitzer3 4 minutes ago (December 31/January 1 on the mark)

Good point, Joseph.

I am reminded of the confession of one of the younger Rockefellers on video once when he admitted that 'they' were behind the feminist movement. Why? They wanted the extra taxation money to flow into D.C., so they could have more dosh for their corporate-welfare shenanigans. Sweet.

And now we suffer the results of their selfish actions.


And another:

from Co-Creating Ou Future on Planet Earth: ‘Guess Which State Is Planning Gun Confiscation Starting January 1, 2016?’ - December 31 (orig, posted at - Wes Walker - December 30)

kibitzer3 says:

Ah. The authorities in California can now confiscate your weapons of self-defense if a “potential for violence” exists. This, at the same time as the Obama DoJ has a body now that is going to go after ‘potential domestic terrorists’. Which list includes – in their minds, and intention – ‘anti-government extremists’.

Just so, the noose tightens…

Wednesday, 30 December 2015

On Calls To Action

1) from Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth: ‘From the Bundy Ranch: **This is a Call to Action** Protest Jan 2nd in Oregon’ - December 30
(The federal govt. using its weight to push around a local family in order to drive them off their land.)

kibitzer3 says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation. 

It does no good to argue the law because there is no law. The nation has been hijacked, and from living under the rule of law, we now live under the rule of men. Aka arbitrary law. Aka tyranny.

This river will now have to take its course.

2) from ‘Pamela Geller Named Woman Of The Year’ - December 30
(‘“If Obama wants to go to war against the American people, I say, bring it on.”  Backing down is not in Pamela Geller’s lexicon…’)

kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (December 30)

She makes an excellent point, about free speech.

For me, Muslims are welcome in this country. They just have to abide by American law, is all. That means the likes of: no polygamy; no genital mutilation of their female children (some Americans must understand: this is NOT like male circumcision [this is, indeed, mutilation]); no beating of their wives [and, it should go without saying, no honor killings]; no facial covers when it is not authorized. I have probably left some obvious points out, but that's enough for a start.

Otherwise, back to their home countries. And the sooner, the better. We need to start sorting the wheat from the chaff. Before American law disappears altogether, in The Great Kumbaya of multiculturalism.

Moslems are not welcome here because they adhere to a book that demands jihad to be performed which can and usually does involve the death of the host country's citizens. Therefore, there is no such person as a "peaceful islamist". That being said, I hope you change your mind because it is the truth, read it for yourself in the koran.


  • kibitzer3
    Kaas a few seconds ago (December 30)

  • If they can live in peace with their neighbors, no problem. If they can't: problem.

  • The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Not in the assumption of what it tastes like.


I don't know which is worse, the war on American homogeneity, or the war on the environment that goes too far.  Multiculturalism is obvious, when, say, Muslims begin taking over whole areas of towns and cities, which are then declared 'no-go' areas - a travesty, that should not be countenanced.  But how many ranchers and other American ruralists have lost their jobs and ways of life in the silent homage to the spotted owl (so to speak) that has been going on in this country for quite some time??  and often not even acknowledged???

On the one hand, I sign petitions sponsored by various 'environmentalists', because they are for worthy causes.  But I get angry when I find that sometimes, the way the petitions are worded is a cover for a major 'green fascist' operation.  

I support wolves, as long as there is protection for ranchers's livestock.  I don't support this arrogant, anti-people, totalitarian business of the ('Wildlands Agenda 21') map of North America which shows huge swaths of human no-go areas.  

Speaking of such things...

We need to learn to live in harmony with our surroundings.  But not kowtow to the ideologues - both the well-meaning watermelons and the hardcore New World Orderites - with their agenda of doing away with private property, and putting everybody under the thumb of Big Brother, in doing so.  

My two cents for today on this general subject.

Which is not going to go away.

Is, in actuality - and not before time - coming to a head.


a late entry under this subject title:

3) To: JB Williams
     Subject: Your NWV Column of December 31
     (Title: ‘Impeachment Resolution Introduced At The RNC’)

Dear JB:

Thank you.  Well put.

Personally, I’ve given up on the GOP.  It needs to go down anyway, for obviously having engaged in a conspiracy with their Democrat Party counterparts to conceal the true, constitutional, original-intent meaning of the ‘natural born citizen’ term; which it is not rocket science either to understand or to discover.

I am sure that the GOP honchos - having been bought off or not - will say, ’Are you serious?  That would tear the country apart’.  

As if having driven a coach and horses through the wall of the Constitution - that is, the rule of law - on this issue hasn't already started that process.  

So, to court on RICO statutes, the both of them.  And we start anew in this country.  Lamenting how the rot set in so terminally.  But needing not to delay the rebuilding process any longer.  Tempus fugit.  

‘Stan’ Stanfield

The Sound That You Are About To Hear...

Ever heard of derivatives obligations?  Or the 'credit swap derivatives market'?  You will, if you haven't.  And very, very soon.

Credit swap derivatives are bets that The Masters of the Universe make on the future value of stocks and other items. (Including weather changes.  Really.)  What you are not being told is that the banksters are gambling with your money - i.e., the 'good faith and credit' of the American taxpayer backing their bets.   You see, the catch is that if they win their bets, they keep it.  If they lose, you wear it.  Including 'your' money in the bank.  It is now no longer your 'money'.  It is, for all intents and purposes, the bank's money.  Your deposit figure goes to the bottom of the payout pile, if the banks go belly up.  Which is about to happen.  And in a big, big way.

It is a sickness.  A gambling addiction writ large, because it's not even their money that they are gambling with.  As I say: it's yours.

They didn't learn from the Savings & Loan disaster of the late '80s, when, after sly 'deregulation,' federally insured (i.e., the taxpayers' money) deposits were used for just such gambling as is going on today.

Did I say that they didn't learn?  I should, perhaps, more properly, have said that YOU didn't learn.  That you can't trust these bastards who have been in charge of the monetary system in this country, and the world.  You see, to them, money is an end in itself.  It's good that it can make money (via the interest-bearing system).  Especially for the money changers.  Who have the inside track on all sorts of speculative deals, and gimmicks.  Like the false commodities market, of such as false mining operations and production reports, that is about to take down a number of mining company-based investment groups for a start.  To the avalanche.

Fortunately, there is a silver lining to this huge dark cloud hanging over the head of humanity.

But only because life has meaning, beyond just in and for itself only.

But you have been warned.

To pay attention.  And for those of you who have to go through it all over again - for not having learned your lessons well enough to graduate from this 3D vale of tears ar this critical junction:

Better luck next time.

P.S. My advice: Don't let the authorities take away your means of self-defense.  You are entitled that protection in this country.  (One of the main reasons why TPTB have been trying to take down the Constitution.)  For one thing, the Obama administration is a rogue entity, for the man being an illegal occupant of that (thus-dishonored) office.  Take advice from the Founding Fathers of this country: You need not obey unjust laws.  But it's enough to know that the New World Order crowd have had their sights set on this country for a very long time, and will do anything, and/or take advantage of anything - including a financial collapse - to take your weapons of self-defense away; which are as much to stand against an out-of-control government as against petty criminals.
        Understand the situation well: You, Average Joe and Jill American, are all, really - with the nation's military having become compromised under the Usurper - that stands in the way now between them and their prize: the scalp of the federal constitutional republic of the United States of America; with the rest of the world to follow suit.  Deny them that ignoble end, and their satanic ends.  And praises will be long sung of your having risen successfully to this august occasion.
     The occasion, of
     Breakthrough.  Into, not only a New Era.  But into
     And the realms thereof.
     As opposed to this realm of Illusion - of seeming separation, from our true Being - that we have been inhabiting, now for long enough.
     This classroom.
     In which to learn lessons.
     And then move on from.
     Having successfully
     Here, at the end of this
     Grand Round.
     For the principle of As Above, So Below to be fulfilled.        

     I personally am a man of peace; and will help pick up the pieces, when The Drama has run its course.  To fruition.

P.P.S. And: Avoid the vaccination shots being planned for your children and you.  They have been known to be laced with toxins, of various kinds.  And ID chips.
     As I say.  Satanism.
     And graduation time.  Out of the Matrix.
     Into The True.


P.P.P.S. 'Bank Bail-Ins About to Begin' - December 30

While the mainstream media focus on ISIS extremists, a threat that has gone virtually unreported is that your life savings could be wiped out in a massive derivatives collapse. Bank bail-ins have begun in Europe, and the infrastructure is in place in the US.  Poverty also kills. 
At the end of November, an Italian pensioner hanged himself after his entire €100,000 savings were confiscated in a bank “rescue” scheme. He left a suicide note blaming the bank, where he had been a customer for 50 years and had invested in bank-issued bonds. But he might better have blamed the EU and the G20’s Financial Stability Board, which have imposed an “Orderly Resolution” regime that keeps insolvent banks afloat by confiscating the savings of investors and depositors. Some 130,000 shareholders and junior bond holders suffered losses in the “rescue”...


You have been warned...

Tuesday, 29 December 2015

Letter To Hillary

An Open Letter To Hillary

Dear Hillary,

I haven’t been following your (unsecured, private) e-mail saga too closely, content to see where it would lead, what all would come out of it, as regards information, proof, and specific outcomes.  But from an article in a recent issue of The New American,1 I see that ’it’ is worse than I thought; speaking to the full extent of the moral degradation of the American federal government, to say, of those who inhabit it.

But first things first.

You have hidden behind the niftily-parsed claim that you ”never sent or received any e-mail that was deemed classified, that was marked classified”.  I will let go for now the inconvenient fact that “at least a dozen e-mails found on her server early in the investigation were classified, and at least two were ‘Top Secret’.”  But that’s not the half of it.  The author of this report goes on:2     

“But did Hillary know [that she was lying]?  The answer to that is found in two documents bearing her signature.”

- And here I’m going to pause and prepare my dinner.  And listen to some Jackie Evancho.  To clean my palate, as it were.3

To continue.

“It is now known that Hillary signed two separate non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) as part of her job as secretary of state [written as original].  The first deals with Selective Compartmental Information (SCI).  The second is a more general NDA dealing with the protection of all classified information…The language of the NDAs removes all doubt that Hillary Clinton was aware of the criminal nature and inherent national security risks associated with her actions.  Disregarding something is not ignorance; it is worse.

“The NDAs signed by Secretary Clinton on her second day on the job spell out in language so clear that the meaning of the word ’is’ is quite unambiguous — her responsibility in handling the sensitive information to which she would have access in her new job.  One part of the first NDA reads: ‘I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.’   The agreement goes on to address how Secretary Clinton could be sure she was abiding by the letter and the spirit of the agreement.  ‘I understand that it is my responsibility to consult with appropriate management authorities in the Department…in order to ensure that I know whether information or material within my knowledge or control…might be SCI,’ the NDA says.  Regardless of whether or not Hillary saw any indication that the e-mails were classified, she was required to keep State Department information secure unless she obtained specific permission to release it.

“And yet, before the ink of her signatures could dry, Hillary made the decision to re-purpose Bill’s old e-mail server into her own private server to be used for official government business.  She has defended the decision, not on the grounds that it was the best choice for the nation she swore and accepted the responsibility to protect, but on the grounds of convenience.”

Convenience to conduct private business with foreign contacts, to enhance your and Bill’s wealth…As for any argument about mere ‘formalities’:

“NDAs are fairly common and many Americans have signed such agreements as a condition of employment.  Failing to abide by those agreements is cause for dismissal, civil action, and possible criminal charges.  As a matter of integrity and simple self-interest, most people would take that seriously and ask themselves what the NDA requires and what it prohibits. 

“But there’s a special type of narcissism,” Shaw fairly goes on, “that seems to have set up permanent residence in the minds of Bill and Hillary Clinton.  The rules that apply to everyone else simply don’t apply to them.  They keep straight faces while telling the biggest lies.  It’s almost as if they believe it when they say, ‘I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinski [sic],’ and ‘I never sent or received any e-mail that was deemed classified, that was marked classified.’  After all, they have dodged everything so far…: why should any recent scandal that is afoot be any different?  After all, ’It depends on what the meaning of the word ’”s” is.’  Words are just tools to be used — and misused — to fit their purposes.”4

And on top of all of the specific legalities there is the implied aspect as well:

"Furthermore, inherent in her job was the understanding that certain intelligence is 'born classified.'  In other words, certain information is considered classified by its very nature and the nature of its inception.  If she then communicated that information to someone who lacked the appropriate clearance, she would be guilty of violating federal law.  Likewise, if she broke the chain of custody for that classified information -- by, for instance, allowing it to be stored on and transmitted over a non-authorized [Note: and unsecured] server -- she would be guilty of violating federal law..."

It goes on.  But the point is made.  And in spades, as they say.5

So, what do we have here, dear Reader.  We have a woman who, with her husband, has spent a good portion of her life sailing ‘close to the wind’ of criminality.6  There was the Whitewater scandal, based on their criminal tenure when Bill was governor of Arkansas.  There was the Chinagate scandal, when he was POTUS, selling American defense secrets to the Red Chinese in exchange for re-election funds, and the likes of their mutual stripping of the People’s House of valuable furnishings when they left it.   (How tawdry can you get.)  And here they were, up to their old tricks again, when Hillary was SoS, getting bribery money - extortion money?? - into their money-laundering front, the Clinton Foundation, from foreign government and business officials, in exchange for decisions and other favors done for them, from her sensitive political position.7  All of which shenanigans were undoubtedly part of her private e-mail account, which she has kept the public knowing about, because of her convenient parsing of words.  

It doesn’t matter if something was “marked classified” or not, Hillary.  What matters is what was in your heart.  And what was in your heart was, obviously, larceny.  

So.  To prison with you.  For some seasoning.  That you really get, that actions have consequences.  Before you can move on.  To say, up.

If you so choose.

Yours very sincerely,

Duane 'Stan' Stanfield

P.S. Oh - and you could possibly have the cell next to Obama.  A fitting tribute.  And you two can share gender-neutral toilet facilities.



1 Yes yes; “a vast right-wing conspiracy” and all that potential rubbishing.  But facts are facts.  And if the mainstream media won’t inform the public as to the full version of the facts of a matter, and the supportive terrain to them, what’s a good citizen to do, but go to ‘alternative’ news sites for their info.      Besides, the John Birch Society (The New American being their house magazine) is a very good source of info, because its material will be attacked relentlessly if they don’t have their facts correct, being a major enemy of the far Left in this country - outright communists, and its fellow travelers - since its inception, in the Cold War era. 
   (Its motto, for you younguns: ’Less Government, More Responsibility, And, With God’s Help, A Better World’.
   Do I agree with their positions on all issues totally?  No.  But at least they are on the right track.)   

2 C. Mitchell Shaw.  The article: ‘Clinton’s Email Evasions,’ in the December 7 2015 issue of TNA.

3 Her ‘Dream With Me’ for tonight’s dinnertime concert.  Highly recommended.  Well; as are her other two.  But this one is particularly pure.
   Just what I need.  To get the other taste out of my mouth.

4 (a) This business about ”the meaning of the word ‘is’“ for you too young to know what that reference is all about has to do with Bill’s shenanigans around the Lewinsky saga.   Look it up, if you’re into tawdriness.  As for the general subject of ‘the meaning of words’:
   (b) I think we’ve had quite enough of Humpty ’Words mean what I say they mean’ Dumpties sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court, and its specifically delegated protection of the wall of the Constitution - i.e., the rule of law in the nation - from being breached, without any more shenanigans along those lines.  And I hope you think so also, dear American reader.  Or this nation is toast. 

5 But just to be spelled out crystal clear, so that no one, not even Hillary, can miss it:
   “To Hillary material was only classified if it was marked classified and if it was marked so when she sent it or received it.  The NDAs she signed do not accept that elastic definition.  If the only information she had to worry about was that which was marked, there would be no need for Secretary Clinton to ’consult with appropriate management authorities in the Department…in order to ensure that [she knew] whether information or material within [her] knowledge or control might be SCI.’”
   Just so.       

6 Possibly learnt from, or at least exemplified by, a political mentor of hers, Saul Alinsky; the Chicago ‘community organizer’ whom she wrote a college thesis about, and stayed in touch with on a personal level.  ‘Whatever It Takes…By Any Means Necessary…’.  Everything is relative; right, Saul?  Right, Hill??  What is right is what advances your ends???
   And the devil take the hindmost.  

7 One of their main nemeses, Larry Klayman, dating back to Bill’s time as POTUS - then of Judicial Watch, now of Freedom Watch, and still on the job, as it were - has called them “the Bonnie and Clyde of American politics”.  Rather fitting, I would echo.

On Good Citizenship

To: Cong. Alan Lowenthal, U.S. Congressman, California 47th District

Issue: Civil Rights 

Subject: The Strong Cities Network

Dear Cong. Lowenthal,

I have very recently come across some disturbing information, that I would like your opinion on.

On Sept. 19th last [actually, the 29th], U.S. AG Loretta Lynch spoke to the UN General Assembly regarding a UN initiative called the Strong Cities Network.  The UN is usually involved with environmental issues; I wondered what the U.S.'s AG was doing talking to that body.  It turns out that the SCN has as part of its brief to 'combat home-grown domestic terrorism'.  

What is this all about, I wondered.  Until I found a more recent quote.  This, from the Asst. AG for National Security, John Carlin, who lumped people with "anti-government views" with groups he considered under the label of 'domestic terrorism' (like the KKK, e.g.).  

So, under the well-known strategy of incrementalism, we are being faced with the very real prospect of UN forces coming into U.S. cities with a mandate to outlaw criticism of the state - the UN to do it, because the Obama administration does not trust U.S. [domestic] forces to do such a job, presumably.

Your comments on this extremely disturbing matter and chain of events, please.

Thank you.

Very sincerely

'Stan' Stanfield

Monday, 28 December 2015

On Teaching Methods

Or: Trained To The Leash

(Teacher:) ‘We can’t have you mentioning that word in class, Diane.  Please refrain from referring to your parents’ primitive - '

(First Student; a bit defensively:) ‘What word.  God?’

(Teacher:) ‘Don’t say that, Diane.  Didn’t you hear me?  We can’t have you kids believing in the Tooth Fairy and the like.’

(First Student; a bit firmer, more rebelliously:) ‘Not even Liberty?  As in the former Statue of - ‘

(Teacher; a bit warningly:) ‘Don’t say - ‘

(Second Student; genuinely curiously:) ’Teacher?  What’s ‘liberty’?’ 

(Teacher; exasperated, to First Student:) ‘Now see what you’ve done?  Now see what you’ve done?’ (glancing at the far corner of the ceiling and then quickly away)

(First Student; calmly, as if more certain of herself, more in charge of the situation:) ‘What, exactly, Teacher?’

(Teacher:) ‘You’ve ruined my record.  My future.  If the word gets out too far that any of my kids were talking insurrection, abominations, in my - ‘

(Third Student; curious about what’s going on:) ‘What are ‘abominations,’ Teacher?’

(Teacher:) ‘Banned words!  Banned words!  There will be no banned words uttered in my classroom!’  (To the whole class:)   DO - YOU - HEAR - ME?’

(A beat.  Then, with some looks back and up at where the Teacher had glanced, and knowing that they are being prepared for jobs, that that is the purpose of their education, and service to the state; the whole class:)  ‘Yes, Teacher.’

(Teacher; calmed down somewhat:) ‘Now back to your textbooks.’  (Dutiful movements from the class. Then, shaking her head, and muttering to herself:)  ‘Parents.  They’ll be the death of us yet.  Fortunately,…’

-  they’re being phased out.  With the likes of Single Mom ‘families’.  Beholden to the state for their sustenance.  And thus, their loyalty having been bought.  And the nation’s legacy of essential liberty thereby sold for a mess of pottage.  So that, e.g., Muslims - having been brought into the country under the contrived pretext of ‘refugee’ status - instead of having to abide by American law, if they want to stay and live in this country, are forcing - with the help of their statist manipulators - American law to give way to Sharia law.  As part of the move by our erstwhile Keepers to demolish the United States of America, and turn it into a mere part of a region of the Dark force’s totalitarian New World Order.  And thus the moves for the likes of multiculturalism, and the airbrushing out of our history books of the inconvenient details.

Student: ‘Teacher, why aren’t we being taught the likes of the national sides in World War Two, and what was it all about, anyway?’1

Teacher: ‘What difference does it make?  It would just stir up old animosities.  We’re all friends now, creating free trade agreements and such.  Let sleeping dogs lie.’ 

And let us get on with creating our wondrous New World Order.  Without borders.  No more borders, no more nation states, possibly to go to war against each other.  Just one big Commune.  Wouldn’t it be wonderful?

Well; in the right conditions - yes, it could be.

But not in your giant concentration camp.  No.  It wouldn’t be wonderful at all.

It would be a disaster, of monumental proportions.2

Creeping closer.

As we speak.


1 from the covering letter of Ben Stein to a fundraising appeal for the programs run by Young America’s Foundation: “I’ve spoken with young people who can’t identify the Second World War or even name our enemies during that conflict.  When I told her we fought Japan in World War II, one young person asked me, ‘Who won?’”

2 Ben Stein again: “But if we can educate our children and teach them about your conservative ideas, we can pass on values that will serve them throughout their lifetime AND preserve America as the country our Founding Fathers intended.”
   Well; yes.  And, that’s precisely the point, Ben.  Precisely why TPTB don’t want our children to be educated to such as the founding principles of this nation.
   Can’t have the individual exalted.  That gets in the way of the New Improved Collective.
   Same as the Old Collective.  Only with sharper teeth.

What People Will Get Up To - 2

from presstv: ‘William Kristol is terrified that Trump could try 9/11 perpetrators’ -  December 27 (carried on Co-creating Our Future on Planet Earth)
(“US neoconservative commentator William (Bill) Kristol is terrified that if Donald Trump becomes president, he might try the perpetrators of the 9/11 coup d'etat for mass murder and high treason, an American scholar and researcher says.

“Dr. Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Scientific Panel for the Investigation of 9/11, made the remarks in an interview with Press TV on Sunday while commenting on a recent interview by Kristol, the founder of the Emergency Committee for Israel, an American neoconservative group associated with the Israel lobby…")

Scerry 12 hours ago (December 27)

It's physically impossible for an aluminum projectile to penetrate a larger piece of structural steel at subsonic speed.


Laika Lammerink> Scerry 9 hours ago

I reckon half New York saw the second (remotely controlled non-commercial) plane, and you say there was no plane? You must be a CIA-disinformation troll. The internet is full of (CIA-) disinformation . . . Of course planes (and kerosene) could never bring down these strong as iron buildings, anyway. And what about the even stronger WTC building 7?


John Vanderford> Laika Lammerink 5 hours ago (December 27)

Screrry is part of a Fetzer/Judy Wood disinfo op launched around 2005 to discredit anyone attempting to do serious scientific research on how the buildings fell. At this point it's wise to ignore these people but unfortunately this op was so successful you'll see people trying to insert 'no planes' in almost every discussion on 9/11.


Stan Stanfield right now (December 28)

Fetzer has uncovered evidence that a plane was parallellng a short distance away the image of the plane going into the second tower. It could well have been just that: an image. Remember that the people behind 9/11 were experts at imagery, leading us to believe what we saw 'with our own eyes'.

Scerry is right: an aluminum projectile could never penetrate that steel-rise building. It sliced into it like a Roadrunner cartoon. That was imagery, friend.

sorgfelt> Stan Stanfield 20 hours ago (December 28)

There is a big difference between penetrating and breaking. Those planes broke the steel and were themselves shredded by the central columns. It could have been done by a big, fat dough boy.


Stan Stanfield 3 minutes ago (December 29)

Doesn't answer the fact that another angle of the 'hit,' on a major TV news feed, showed the nose of the plane's image coming out of the other side of the building before the guy at the TV station controls could Cut To Black and try to cover up the mistake. 

I repeat: That was imagery. The perps have gotten away with their scam long enough. It's time for major independent hearings on the matter, for the whole story of 9/11 - the TRUE story - to come out.
The comment will be published after moderation

John Vanderford> Stan Stanfield12 hours ago (December 28)

No Scerry is not right, and thanks for outing yourself as a disinfo peddler as part of the same very suspicious campaign to distract serious truthers and researchers. I will make note of your username/handle for future avoidance.

What People Will Get Up To...

When They Think That No One Is Looking

and therefore that their actions have no consequences to themselves.  That is, think that they are living in a realm of total free will; but the Creator is Just, and the universe is a Just one; and therefore, the realm is 'just' a relative one.  Relative to having been gifted it, by a Supreme Being, giving them the rope to hang themselves by.  Or not.  Their choice, in this school for aspiring gods.  Who need to get the hell bred out of them, before they can aspire to something more than simply human Power Over Others.

I am talking about all the Darkness in the land.  Whereby, as the old saying has it, it is the darkest before the dawn...

 Last night I was reading about the pedophilia 'scandals' that were going on in this country at the highest levels of its governing sectors - federal and state politicians, judges, Chiefs of Police - in the late '80s, focusing mostly on the state of Nebraska and Washington D.C.,  reaching in the latter all the way into the White House.  Goodness knows how much all of that sort of thing is going on at this time.  However, a clue to its widespread nature, I feel, is how the U.S. Supreme Court - with a couple of its members who should have either recused themselves from the vote or be recused, for having engaged directly in activity demonstrating bias in the issue - voted this year in the Obergefell decision, regarding same-sex 'marriage'.1  Thus engendering such thoughts in, and comments from, the public as no one having the right to tell someone "who they can love".  Ah.  And so the stage is well and truly - and conveniently - set for further 'advancement' down that path.  First, undoubtedly, to Man-Boy 'relationships' being legalized.  And then who knows.  A man marrying a sheep?  A woman marrying her dildo of a dog??

The mind boggles.  But to move on.

To how I sent off a Holiday Season card to a relative today (Sunday) who had asked me in her Year’s End card if I “miss Scotland,” where I had lived for many years before returning to my home country (and town) over three years ago, now.  I told her I had closed that chapter in my life, do not look back (on other, more personal life factors either), only look forward; but of this coming year, I told her - after sharing a little on the political subject in this country - that in my estimation it was shaping up to be “a doozer”.  What did I mean.  Example.

From - December 25.  Dave Hodges reporting:

"According to my sources, Obama will ultimately implement the following gun control regulations, mostly through a series of Executive Orders.

  1. Tax ammunition into oblivion and encourage the prosecution of gun manufacturers and bullet producers for shootings using their products. This is a given and will be rolled out very early in the form of an Executive Order.
  2. The Federal government will purchase as much ammunition as possible in order to create shortages, thus, driving up the price of ammunition.
  3. The prohibition of purchasing a gun in one state and transporting that same gun across state lines.
  4. New Federal regulations which will permit, without a warrant, any civil authority to enter a home of a registered gun owner to check for gun safety when it comes to the “proper” storage of guns. Said gun can be confiscated and the owner will be subject to arrest and fines if a gun does not meet governmental storage regulations. The new regulations will be devised to prevent one from using the gun in a moment’s notice.
  5. There is discussion among DoJ officials about limiting how guns, in the aggregate, that can be stored in one geographic area. This will amount to gun rationing.
  6. Gun owners will eventually be required to attend and pass gun safety courses in the same manner as one renews their drivers license. This will, again, drive up the cost of owning a gun.
  7. At some point, no doubt following a false flag event, an Executive Order will be issued to overturn all conceal and carry laws currently in place in several states.
  8. With regard to Child Protective Services investigations, any gun-owning parent will receive an negative score when it comes to investigation of child abuse and welfare cases.
  9. No veteran will be allowed to own a gun for an unspecified period of time following their discharge from the service. As part of the VA reform there is serious discussion about mandating outplacement counseling for all veterans and gun prohibitions will be a part of this. I was told that this is, in part, why all the Federal attention is being placed on streamlining the VA process for veteran access.
  10. The scope of gun free zones will be expanded. The IRS will be given policing powers on new gun control regulations. Bank accounts and homes can be seized for failure to comply. Further, RICO statutes can be utilized among the non-compliant. It was stressed to me that examples will be made of protesters and non-compliant people.
  11. Obama will wait for the next false flag, but will announce a ban on all assault rifles."

So, let's get right down to it.

The New World Order crowd - the bigwigs at the top of the pyramid of power in the world (the international banksters, industrialists, politicians, educators; it goes on), and, in the lower ranks, ideologues: the ardent communists, the ardent socialists, the ardent environmentalists (some of whom naively believe in the Climate Change myth that they have been programmed with, as a means to the NWO totalitarian end, of total control over the populace), the ardent feminists (their ranks loaded with females with male-patterned brains; deliberately cultivated, so that they don''t want to play the old roles anymore, are more susceptible to the siren call for the end of the family unit, for everybody, including the children, to be simply under the thumb of, wards of - subjects of - the state; and you WILL line up your children for their shots),  and assorted others - are making their move.  Big time.  Having slipped into the country and conveniently placed around it many Muslims - not simply for 'multicultural' purposes, i.e., the breaking down of the majority Christian populace (as is being implemented in Europe as well), but for more active revolutionary purposes.  That is to say: war.  The crowning gambit in their takeover of the American constitutional Republic; which was to a large extent implemented by the illegal placing of the Usurper in the Oval Office, and, with the considerable help of TPTB's mainstream media shills, keeping him there.  And very possibly attempting to keep him on there, via a false flag op giving him the excuse to declare martial law, and take over complete control of the - former - U.S.A.  And thus, no more even pretence of a Constitution.

Who specifically is 'the New World Order crowd'?

I have mentioned some of them. A lot of them are Jews; who have spent so many years telling themselves that they are The Chosen People that they really believe it, and are determined to play it out.  (As they have tried to, over the centuries, in many nations; and got kicked out of many of them for their efforts.) 2  But there are others.  Including outright Satanists.  Who are in a major effort now to overthrow any semblance left of the 'old order' of things on the planet, and take over total control.  And who engage in such despicable atrocities as live baby sacrifices.

Everything being relative, doncha know...

I will wrap this blog up here, and on a positive note.  Because all of this is part of The Plan.  You see: It's all a matter of Balance.  Of laws.  Of Action and Reaction, and ultimate stasis. Things have to come to a culminating point. before the process is over.

 'The Process,' in a nutshell:

America was raised up to enhance and defend the individual, over against the power of the state, whether that state be of Royal or Church or Oligarchy or Despot.  What is called, loosely, Western Civilization.  With a strong religious component.  It has been, is, opposed, in The Process, by 'collectivism' - the overriding power of the state (and its controlling elite class); and also, the rise of atheism as a part of that mentality, that expression.  Thus, the stage has been, is now -with the rise of global totalitarianism run by relativists - set, for


The importance of the individual, as an incarnate soul; not to be treated as mere chattel by said state.  But as well, the importance of the collective, in creating a society of sharing individuals. supporting each other in their mutual endeavor.


Harmony of expression.

And the atheists having served to move humanity beyond just its old religious connotations.  Which were part of its history; its 'process'.  But need to make way, now, for


Just as the erstwhile arrogant Masters of the world need to make way, now, for

the real thing.

From Force.  To Love.

The ultimate lesson.

The graduation lesson.

What it has all been all about.

In the end.

To say: On our 'doorstep'.

As we speak.      

Of the Victory of The Light over The Dark.



1 How could the majority of these judicially-minded people have failed to note that the institution of marriage is a religious one - for before it also became a civil one - and therefore, they could not just change the institution off their own bat, as it were?  Call same-sex unions by some other name than the time- and religious-honored institution of marriage.  Call it a civil union.  As it was, that majority acted similar to the edict of the king who demanded that the tide turn; or as Humpty Dumpties, declaring words to mean simply what they say they mean.
   But then, that tendency has been going on for some time.  Hasn't it...

2 More particularly: What are called Rothschild Zionists.  Aka Khazarian Mafia.  Look up the terms.
   Actually: serving a purpose.
   A larger purpose, than what they have apprehended.
   Read on.

Sunday, 27 December 2015

Consider The Caterpillar

Consider The Caterpillar

Consider the caterpillar
Which has to enter
Into the prison-like womb
Of its creepy-crawly nature
         and submit there
To that destructive process
           it can emerge
Into its fuller nature
                       as a

Soar, little butterfly.


Saturday, 26 December 2015

On Constructs, Large & Small

On Constructs, 
Large And Small

  On Universi

Once you have reached
                   the level
     of consciousness
Of incorporating
              a galaxy
            an entire 
  (and not even
   speaking of
 In your awareness
           it’s hard
   to be poured
 into a single
  like these
  deep sea
That we wear
On this level.
           in our
     our very
 like a flower
In its mathematical
           Oh well.
     to get on
     with it.
  ‘It’:   our

      to a new level
      of our


On Homosexuality

Is a possibility
        within the
          But it’s
An anomaly
From the basic
On imbalances
    as it is
    for its

      in the 
     of the
      as it

    and All.

Friday, 25 December 2015

Christmas Day

Christmas Day

Christmas Day
   on the lonely
Downtown streets
Of Long Beach.
     Not a cloud
In the sky.  All
Is calm.  All
Is bright…well,
There are individuals
Talking to themselves,
         and individuals
Passing each other by,
Talking to each other.
Like pieces of newspaper
           drifting by
On the coolish breeze…

        ,,,but I found 
          an FDR
On the sidewalk
     for good luck
     and a plastic 
     water bottle
For my neighborhood
Recyclable trash pickers


            What’s wrong
With this picture?
             for one thing
                the day 
              is built
On a falsehood:
Gods of old
Were celebrated
On this day.
        was built
On their shoulders.
      to keep
      the peasantry
And for another
      It’s all
              You see,
              not only
Is this all
An image; but
         it is a
Reverse image -
          as in
A mirror - 
The real thing
      into being
Out of latency;
      effect, that
              as we
    know it
Is a negative
Of a positive.

       you say?
That life, then,
      is an image
   in reality.  But
    for all

     for calling us out
     of our little

Oops.  Can’t be giving
         too many
      before their
                of unfolding.
Forget I ever
          of this,
Won’t you?
        That’s a good

      a space
Suit.  Whereby
            we are
Santa Clauses
To each other.
Pieces of drifting
         to each other

I will just say
  New Year
And let it go
At that  
          today. we
Transmute matter
      back into
In sacred resonance
            like a
     homing signal  

So that the Creator
             may manifest
Upon the Earth
through every aspect
Of our individual
This will herald
The divine Plan
Into manifestation
And embodiment:
The New Era.

Indeed, a happy
New Year.  One
      and All.