Monday, 30 March 2015

A Little Bit Of History

from ‘Obama Was Hand-Picked & NOT A Natural Born Citizen - Congress Knew It & Protected Him’ - Dean Garrison - March 30
(A review of the 10 times in modern times that TPTB - via BOTH political parties - tried to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress to eliminate the NBC requirement for the office of POTUS - and failing to get it out of committee each time.  So, obviously, they did the next best thing: they colluded.)


I stand corrected. There IS an honest man in Washington D.C.

Thank you for the rundown, Dean. It's never too late for the truth to out.

Which it will, ultimately, on all those lies hatched in dark places. And in this case, will send both the Dem and the Repub Parties to (legal, Common Law) court on RICO-Statute charges, of collusion, and on a major bit of constitutional business at that. Enough to dissolve them both, and send their responsible authorities to jail. As part of the cleansing process now needing to take place - and soon. Before the Usurper uses a self-constructed national emergency to declare martial law, and thus eliminates the Constitution in one fell swoop, rather than the death of a thousand cuts that he is administering to it now. Meaning the rule of law in the country. Which will no longer be a country; but the fiefdom of the Overseers running both political parties. To be dealt with, as well, by The People reinstating their lawful authority in the land, from its long-intended takeover by the New World Order mob. As sorry a bunch of s.o.b.'s as there ever has been.

Sunday, 29 March 2015

Time's Up

The Treasurer of the National Republican Congressional Committee has written me a letter on 'Official Business'.  My response, under today's date:

"Dear Keith [Davis],

"You are obviously right that I'm "upset" with the Republican Party.  You are letting an illegal occupant of the Oval Office a) off the hook and b) run riot.

"See, &/or CDR C.F. Kerchner (Ret.)'s blog.  Obama is not a "natural born" citizen - not by any stretch of the imagination.  You people, as the official opposition party, have let an ineligible candidate get into that critical position of power - & do his predictable thing, of destroying the American republic.  You are thus as guilty as the Democrat Party in this matter - & should have to face RICO-Statute charges over it.

"Can I be any more clear about how "upset" I am with you?  Consider it done."



What I didn't add, but could have, and will here, is the further comment on this whole thing:

'You see, I am here to see that Truth is served - in all things.  And that's why there will be in-depth and independent investigations into the likes of 9/11, and Sandy Hook, and the Boston Marathon "drill" exercise, and even back into the OKC Murrah Building bombing.

'No stone will be left unturned, as the light of Truth is brought to shine in all the dark places of our history.  And yes, that includes the assassinations of JFK and RFK and MLK and JFK, Jr. as well.  Because

'It's time.'


On a little lighter note (and to show that I know how to hit them, every once in awhile):

On Having A Nice Day - The Modern Way

‘This is a recording.  I cannot take your call right now because I am busy paying bills.  You really don’t want to know.  In any event, I am not interested in either the goods or services you are selling or the political campaign you are touting.  Please take my number off your list.  Thank you - and try to have a nice day or evening regardless.’

‘This is highly irregular……highly, irregular……..’

‘Why are you holding you hand to the back like that?’

‘So I’m sorry, there is nothing that I can do for you.’

‘Now you’re - oh! I get it.  ‘scuse me.  Just a sec……There.  Does that…help?’

‘But I’l see what I can do for you.  Have a nice day.’

‘You too!’

‘Hello, dear.  Did you have a nice day at the office?’

‘Oh.  It was a bitch.  Don’t ask.  What’s for dinner.  I’m famished.’

‘I have Chef Boy-ar-dee all ready, as usual.’

‘Very funny.  Very funny.  Wait ’till I get out of this silly outfit and I’ll take over.  Hi baby pumpkin.  Did you miss me?’

‘No need.  I’ve got it all ready.  And oh - the mothers want me to tell you that the meeting has been moved to Lucille’s home.  Same time.’

‘Why don’t you go to that for me?  You do everything else in that regard.  Yes, baby pumpkin.  I understand.  I missed you too.’

‘They have let me know, not in so many words, that they draw the line there, in my being the householder of this household.  Besides, I can’t stand their gossipy nature.  Typical females as they are.’

‘And you are saying?  Don’t spit up on mommy, kiddo.  Here.’

‘I am saying that I am having a perfectly lovely time being the mother in this family.  And don’t leave your jacket on the back of the chair like that.  You know how I hate that.’

‘I know, darling.  I know.’

…and one on not having a nice day; my concluding post for tonight:

from ‘Articles of Impeachment, Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro’ - Sgt. A - March 29/30 

kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (just gone March 30)

An excellent rundown of the charge sheet, Sgt. A. And if I believed that impeachment was the way to go with this guy, I would be right with you. But that constitutional remedy is only for legally sitting presidents. Obama is not a legally sitting president. He is a Usurper, for not being a "natural born" citizen, and so simply needs to be removed from the purloined office, by Oathkeepers (with Patriots having their backs, in a show of solidarity); and that way, all the legislation that he has signed into law, and all the executive orders that he has issued, and all the appointments that he has made, go with him, into the trash bin.

This whole subject is not rocket science, as some shyster-lawyer types would have us believe. It is very simple; as clarified by a) the (July 25, 1787) letter by John Jay (a statesman of the time; who would then go on to become the first Chief Justice of the new U.S. Supreme Court, such was the respect for his perspective and legal acumen) to G. Washington in his role as Chair of the Constitutional Convention, 'hinting' at the desirability of the president, particularly because of his role as the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, needing to have NO FOREIGN ALLEGIANCES; b) the known familiarity of the constitutional Framers with the work 'The Law of Nations' by E. de Vattel, which goes into all these sorts of matters; c) the proposal by delegate Alexander Hamilton at the Convention that the president need only be a "citizen" - which proposal was specifically TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent 'nbc' category of citizen, i.e., one born on the soil of U.S. citizen parents - PLURAL; and d) the paper, published in 1789, by Founder and historian David Ramsay, entitled 'A Dissertation On the Manners of Acquiring the Character And Privilege of a Citizen,' which confirms the understanding of that term at that time by those statesmen.

We are only in this pickle in OUR time because the Republican Party failed to do its job as the official opposition party in calling the Democrat Party on its ineligible candidate in 2008. For its own purposes, obviously; and for which it needs to be hauled into court along with the Democrat Party on RICO-Statute proceedings, for colluding in a criminal enterprise. What is happening is obvious:

Both political parties are under the control of the same perps, who mean to demolish the American federal constitutional Republic, and make of it a mere part of a region - called the North American Union - of their vaunted New World Order; a totalitarian enterprise that they are well on their way to putting into place as we speak.

Or haven’t YOU noticed all the surveillance stuff going on. And the gun control measures. And. And. And………

Saturday, 28 March 2015

On Getting Short...

...And In More Ways Than One

“Dear Reince [Priebus, Chairman, Republican National Committee],

“I have responded to the RNC a number of times [his covering letter to the request for Membership Renewal alleging that they haven’t heard from me since early in 2014] - with ‘for the Personal Attn.’ to you on the envelope - letting you know that i no longer support the RNC because you are failing in your duty as the official opposition party to call Obama on his blatant ineligibility for that thus-dishonored office. 

“Read John Jay’s 7/25/1787 letter to G. Washington.  Read David Ramsay’s paper of 1789.*  Note the proposal at the Constitutional Convention by A. Hamilton that the president need only be a “citizen” - which was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN.  Obama is NOT a “natural born” citizen - & so he is a Usurper in & of that office.  & must be removed from it.   Before he does any more damage.  & for the rule of law to prevail in the country.  Otherwise, there is tyranny.”


* as carried on, or CDR C.F. Kerchner (Ret.)’s blog

   On Obama

         Yes, he is
A Usurper.  But
We must give him the option
Of seeing the Light
And resigning the office
Of his own accord,
Rather than being removed
                  That is
The higher Way.
               Which is
               the Way
       that humanity -
         the bulk of it
         at least - 
               is about
To take.  
Of the Old
              and into
The very, very 
Where no untruth
Is brooked
         no matter
How large, or
How small.  For
      it is all
      a matter
And we are about 
To experience
An Event
That will prove that
And in spades.

Friday, 27 March 2015

Let Me Count The Ways...

…That The Obama Administration Is Up To No Good, And Needs To Be Removed - NOW

Item.  He is flooding the country not only with illegal aliens - for their ultimate votes, and in the meantime, their change of the prevailing white, middle class, Protestant culture - but with Muslims, from the likes of Somalia and Syria.  
     Syria?  Yes, Syria.  ‘But there are refugee camps there, for those uprooted by the civil war going on.’  ‘But they are Muslims.’  ‘Excuse me?’  ‘We need them here.’  ‘We…need them here.’  ‘Yes.  Besides, some of them are hardcore jihadists in actuality, smuggled in between the others.’  ‘And so…’  ‘And so, we need them here too, to prepare for the coming attack by terrorists.’  ‘The…coming…by ‘terrorists’……’  ‘Yes.  You know.  The reactionary forces.  The so-called patriots, and - ‘ ‘And the constitutionalists, and those who have Ron Paul bumper stickers on their cars, and…’  ‘That’s it.  You got it.’  
     I ‘got it,’ indeed.1     

Item.  The FCC is going to take over regulating the Internet like a public utility, like radio and cable, and thus (as signaled by the people behind the move) will eliminate free speech.  ‘But they can’t do that.’  ‘why not.’  ‘Why, because,,,free speech is…well, you know: free.’  ‘Ah.  But people like Rush Limbaugh can still have their free speech.’  ‘… Just…’  ‘Just not on the public utility conduits.  That’s all.’  ‘Right.  Got it.’2
     Really getting it, now.

Item.  The Republican Party is going along with this whole scenario, because they want a piece of the post-Constitution action left for their Big Bucks Boyos after the socialist takeover by Obama & Co.  Which will last only so long.  Before the reaction to it really sets in.  And then the BBB swoop in, and take over, for the other set of statists, the fascists.  Who are the real perps behind it all, for being in control of the End Game.

Clever.  Except for being dumb enough not to see that Obama and his behind-the-scenes Masters’s best-laid plans for their submerging of the American Republic into a mere region of their totalitarian New World Order are obviously in for a rude awakening, due to the fact that he, and they, are mirrors - to say, reverse images - of the real thing. 

The imagery of which is subject to change
With little notice.
In any event:
I’ll save you
From the fatal mistake
Of trying to make
Two wrongs make a right
On the national,
To say constitutional,
By voting for
An ineligible candidate
To take the Usurper’s place.3

As the curtain starts closing,
                           Obama -
Whatever his legal name is
                   really -
To play his part
In the closing stages
Of the Drama going on
As we speak.
He, needing now
To disappear
As the real thing
Comes along.
                 You see,
If there be anybody
To preside over the demise
Of the American Republic
It will be me
And that will be only
At the superseding of it
         by the greater
Kingdom of Heaven

When this Day is done
And we embark
On a tolally
New Era
On Planet Earth;
       as if
      by magic,
For what it
Is worth.

(I’ll let you in
On a little secret:
It is worth
A king’s ransom.
And a would-be king’s
As well.)


1 On the flood of Middle East/Syrian Muslims, see Tea Party C.C.: ‘Huge Surge Of Unscreened Muslims Flooding U.S.’ - posted by kathyet - March 27 (orig. posted at - by Greg Corombos - March 26)      

2 See ‘Update: Republican Elites Are Plotting To Enshrine Barack Obama’s Dictatorial Takeover Of The Internet Into Law!’  - March 27

3 See, e.g., my note today back to the Chair of the California Republican Party, on the occasion of their hitting me up for a donation to their worthy cause:

‘Dear Jim [Brulte]

“Alas, since the Republican Party has chosen to be part of the problem, I can no longer support you.  A shame, that you people can’t understand plain English, in the (Founding) Fathers’s and the (constitutional) Framers’s description of their clear intent in the “natural born citizen” issue for the (purloined) office of the presidency - & looking now not only to continue to ignore it but to compound it, in possibly putting up such an ineligible candidate for the office of your own.

“So much for a legitimate opposition party in this country.  May you sellouts be consigned to oblivion. 


“P.S. See & CDR C.F. Kerchner (Ret.) for details* you lot have chosen to overlook.  For your own purposes, of course.  Corrupt ones.  
     RICO cannot be far behind.”

* including the paper by Founder and historian David Ramsay, in1789 - a smoking gun if there ever was one 


A P.S. to this posting:

from ‘Scientist Confesses: “Global Warming a $22 Billion Scam”’ - March 26 (orig. posted at - Tom Luongo - March 25)

Stan Stanfield · Top Commenter · Stanford University (March 26)

This was not just about money. It was, and is, about power. Specifically, Power Over us. To make us ornery critters subservient to the power of the state to regulate us. Like cattle, to produce benefit to our erstwhile Masters. And/or be culled to their will. For you are breathing a greenhouse gas into the air; and therefore, are ripe for regulation. Or dispatch. Whatever your erstwhile Masters decide. When Man is God.


The point: TPTB have seized on the idea of Global Warming - changed into 'Climate Change' when the original idea was not cooperating with their best-laid plans - as their excuse for putting us all under their thumb.  Or boot, more precisely.  The idea is to have currency based on energy units, which we will all be limited in our ration of.  And those who won't go along with the scam will be incarcerated.  Or worse.  (What was that word that Al Gore used, to describe 'climate change deniers'??  These our erstwhile Masters are deadly serious about all this.)

It's called The New International Economic Order.  And TPTB (a key unit of which is the Trilateral Commission) are very serious about imposing it on the world.  Because they are deadly serious about controlling us, to within an inch of our ornery lives.  Not taking good enough care of the Earth, and all.  As I say: a mirror image of the real thing.   

(Catch the interview of Patrick Wood by John Wells on YouTube ('Caravan to Midnight').  It's well worth sticking out its 3-hour length.)  


And P.P.S.: This, from Judicial Watch's 'Weekly Update' e-newsletter:

"This administration's Obamacare lawlessness is not just a political fight in DC between Congress and President Obama.  It is about the rule of law.  It is about your private health care information being secure from misuse.  It is about fraud, waste, and abuse of your tax dollars. And it is about the Obama administration's contempt for federal transparency law.  And thankfully, it is also about Judicial Watch, one watchdog group doing the hard work of exposing this corruption to the light of day so, at a minimum, you and other citizens can be warned:  If you share private information on or a related Obamacare site, you should assume that your private information is unsecure, will be used to tag and target you for advertising/government propaganda, is at risk of being used by the Department of Homeland Security, and is at risk of being hacked by criminals outside of government."

The article showed how the DHS has fundamental access to the ObamaCare info.  This is a feature of a government - via doctor requests for private info of their patients - interested in who has guns at home, what meds they might be on so that they can be deprived of their rightful means of self-defense by a dictatorially-minded government, etc. etc. etc.  It's the same as the Common Core curriculum for our schools: getting the children to give the authorities info about their home lives - the attitudes and activities of their parents, to be more precise...*

We are, in other words, suffering under the softly-softly beginnings of a totalitarian takeover of the nation.

But not to worry.  It's all just conspiracy theory.  Innit.

Back to sleep, slave.

* A similar activity of our totalitarian-minded Overlords is how the DHS is involved in the major rollout of wi-fi cell towers going on around the country.  This is not just about Big People making Big Bucks.  This is about major, Total-Control surveillance of the citizenry.  (See 'Cell Tower Problems To Know About' - Catherine J. Frompovich - March 28) 


...and what blog of mine would not be complete without a swipe at the Usurper:

from freedom ‘Ted Cruz & the Qualifications for President of the United States’ - Evelyn Bennett - March 27


Thank you, Evalyn, for this admirable summary of the matter. You could also cite:

* John Jay's letter (July 25, 1787) to G. Washington, as Chair of the Constitutional Convention proceedings, at the time the delegates were considering this matter, in which he strongly "hints" as to the desirability that the potential Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces have NO DUAL/CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES, and therefore must be "a natural born citizen," thus clearly identifying his/the meaning of the term;

* A. Hamilton's proposal at the Convention that the president need only be a "citizen" - and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent nbc type of citizen;

* the paper, published in 1789, by David Ramsay, a Founder and historian, who clarified the intent and definition of the term "natural born citizen".

Nothing trumps original intent except an amendment to the constitutional contract. Any conservative who thinks that Cruz is eligible is simply trying to make two wrongs make a right - instead of standing on his or her two feet for the rule of law, and thus for the removal of the Usurper from the (thus-dishonored) Oval Office. If this issue is allowed to be compromised, by a sense of expediency, that is the end of the rule of law in this country, and the takeover of the rule of men. Another word for which is tyranny.

Wake up, Citizens. It's that serious a matter.


And now, it really is time for bed.  And the hope for 

a better day ahead.

On Looking Back

Congratulations for having completed your course on the 3D level of initiation!  

For the purposes of this particular feedback report, just take your last - and final - lifetime in consideration, in summing up your main conclusions.  And take your time.  You have all the time there is - in your dimension.  That’s a joke, you understand.  We understand that some of your experiences may still be somewhat raw for you on the Emotional level; but we also know that it helps to start taking it all in perspective, at this Report time.  

So - off you go.  See you at the other end, for a wrap-up.

Anything you care to add?

All in all, it was an excellent experience; I wouldn’t have missed it for the world - its grungy parts and all.  I learned a lot.  It was a great summing-up experience.  It took me - well; as you know - a little getting used to the ’your-enemies-are-your-best-teachers’ concept; but in the end, I think I got a fair handle on that lesson.  But I have to say - having said all this - I can hardly wait to move on!  I’m really tired of the 3D level.  I’m more than ready to graduate to the next one.  Bring it on! 

Oh - but P.S.  For the benefit of the next class of pilgrims: Please please have their handlers stop sending them and calling them for so many requests for money.  By the end, I was so sick and - 

Oh.  I think I’ve got it, now.  Was that part of the process?  As in getting so sick of the scarcity shtick that we would CLAMOR, energetically and synchronously, to get out of that stage??  Like a troop of soldiers marching in unison on a bridge???

Clever, you folks in the upper grades.  Clev-er.

Thursday, 26 March 2015



Now Is The Time

Now is the time
For all god men
       and women
To come to the aid
Of their country.

Now is the time
For all god men
       and women
To come to the aid
Of their country.

Now is the time
For all god men
       and women
To come to the aid
Of their country.



I bless my body
That I have a healthy body
In order that my healthy mind
            can be
This incarnation
                   with me

  like a flower
  for the Hour
  of our Destiny.



The Truth will out.

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

A Dead Parrot Revisited

I have just received another missive from one of the conservative legalistic-oriented organizations that I contribute to, which contains a quote from then-candidate Obama; to wit: 

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set.  We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

I remember when I first heard that: living over in Scotland as an expat, and wondering, What is he talking about?  and what “national security objectives” had his administration set??  And then, somewhere in there, I came across his quote about how “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America” to applause, from his mostly young audience at the time of its delivery.  And at the time of my coming across this bit of political theater, I assumed that he was referring to how the Dubya Bush administration had not been open to the American people about all their activities, and this was part of his electioneering promises, to bring more “transparency” into his administration, if elected.  Which he dutifully was, in considerable part because of just such Change-of-direction promises.  But the ‘civilian national security force’ thing still niggled at the back of my mind… 

And I have since discovered - upon returning to my home country, to see what precisely was going on here, and looking into the whole thing in detail; including the Cloward-Piven socialist Strategy to bankrupt the country under a mountain of debt, particularly exacerbated by people organized to clamor for their ‘entitlements’ - that he was and is referring to a socialist takeover revolution, with elements of fascism thrown into the murky pot.  And he and his comrades know it, including a brainwashed lot of college students, indoctrinated, as they have been, by their left-wing professors, who have been operating under the socialist ideological ‘doctrine’ -stroke-strategy of ‘a long march through the institutions,’ particularly that of Education.  And the ‘Big Guys’ know it, because many of them are actually behind the whole shooting match, you should pardon the expression, and are positioned to benefit financially from The Change.  And the only people who don’t seem to know it are the poor (and about to get poorer, under this ‘beneficent’ econo-political philosophy) middle-class men and women who are footing the bill for their own demise, but have been too busy raising their families to notice it for what it truly is: a hijack of the American federal constitutional republic nation-state, and its long-planned-for insertion into a mere region - call it the North American Union - of the New World Order of the totalitarians behind the whole takeover scenario.  

Well, no longer.  The hijack; and the middle-class’s misunderstanding of it, of what precisely is going on.  For, it’s too far out in the open now, to be mistaken about what it is fundamentally: that ‘fundamental transformation’ that Obama talked about, back in the week before his first election.1  This is not just political ‘business as usual’.  Obama and his administration have been caught out in corrupt and outrightly illegal action after corrupt and outrightly illegal action, leading up to now.  And now, we have coming up - ta-da! - the piece de resistance:

the Jade Helm 15 operation.  On the heels of the military officer class having quietly quietly been purged of all officers who couldn’t go along with The New Order of Things because they had made a prior oath to the Constitution, and couldn’t - wouldn’t - go along with swearing an oath rather to our erstwhile Emperor.  

Hell, Caesar.  We who are about to rise up against you and depose you give you the middle-finger salute.2  

But we need to be about this higher business, than the dark business of these traitors amongst us.  Because this takeover Operation is scheduled to begin on July 15.  

It is of course not being billed as that.  It is being billed simply as an exercise.  You know about exercises?  About how they are, over and over, used as covers for the real thing?  9/11?3  The Sandy Hook hoax??4  The Boston Marathon Bombing exercise???5 The Charlie Hebdo affair????6         

I could go on, with background to this whole takeover scenario.  But to conclude.

The fact remains:

* that Texas and Utah, the two states declared in the ‘exercise’ to be ‘hostile territory’ and marked for extra ‘exercise’ attention thereby, have shown particularly deep aversion to the Obama administration’s illegal activity-cum-takeover of the nation;

* that the governor of the state of California - which is scheduled for more benign attention - has stated somewhat recently, in a speech to an Hispanic audience known to have many illegal aliens within it, that “they are welcome here” in this - ‘his’ - state;

* that these 7 southwestern states are precisely the area that La Raza - which has been welcomed in the Obama White House - declares belongs to them, and their desired new-old country of Aztlan.

The picture becomes more clear every day.  Including some nukes that went walkabout, and the firing of the military officials involved who would not go along with the game.

For a game it is, to these characters who would presume to be Masters over us.  Over We, the People; about to be Assembled

to take our country back from these charlatans.

Who don’t realize that they are being used, in a larger Play.

A Play that is about to end. 

On its marks.  Not the marks of those playing dark parts.

And doing a very good job of it.

In some cases, too good.

For believing that they are

their characters.

And thus, will be left behind.  (As the rest of us now move up a spiritual notch.)

Unless they repent.

Which seems to be against their religion.


Their choice.

For, that is the kind of universe we live in.

Not one run by Force.

Rather, by free will.

In alignment with its basic makeup.

Which is a combination of Light and Love.


1 And how come more people don’t understand that he is an illegally sitting president to boot (and literally)?  Even many good, solid conservatives don’t understand how they have been snookered on that one; such is the power of a bought-and-paid-for Mainstream Media - and a bought-off Republican Party.
   As I have just today written back, somewhat tiredly, to another legalistically-oriented organization that I have been supporting financially, in responding to a survey they are conducting about the excesses of Obama and his administration:
   “He is an illegally sitting president in the first place, for not being a “natural born” citizen, as defined by original intent.  See  Fight that corner, and I would donate more to your worthy cause.  You are doing good  But you could do better, in your “commitment to uphold the rule of law”.” (quoting from their covering letter) 

2 Actually, this setting-of-things-to-rights can be accomplished without firing a shot.  But we need to mean business, regardless.  And be seen to mean business. 

3 More coming out about that as we speak; especially about ‘the third tower’ - WTC7, & its having been indubitably a controlled demolition.  Along with the evidence of nano-thermite used in the other two demolitions.  And.  And.  And……

4 Evidence of the hoax aspect of this gun-grabbing operation is all over the Internet; including how the school had been closed and had been opened back up just for this exercise, which itself had a run-through there the day before.  The fingerprints of Satanists are all over this particular operation.
   Satanists.  You know: People who believe that the God of this world is Lucifer; and we should honor him.  With such as child sacrifices.

5 Again, a search on the Internet will bring this scam, gun-grabbing and Constitution-shredding operation into full view - how it was even announced at the site, by police bullhorn,  that “This is a drill…this is a drill…….” etc. ad nauseam.
   (P.S. Hey Steven - nice show!  You Dirty Rotten Scoundrel!)

6 The Internet again gives this scam operation away, for the setup it was: the cop car hitting its marks for where to come to a stop (in the blocked-off side street), the blank cartridge fired at the cop lying on the sidewalk, leaving no blood or cement gouge, and on and on.  Literally: Street Theater.

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

From A Founder's Mouth

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789 - by Atty Mario Apuzzo

Ratings:  (3)|Views: 355|Likes: 
Published by puzo1
02 Apr 2010: An essay written 2 Apr 2010 by Attorney Mario Apuzzo, counsel for the lawsuit of Kerchner v Obama & Congress. Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789.

For more details on the lawsuit see:

More info:

Published by: puzo1 on Jun 28, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhoneiPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See less
Friday, April 2, 2010
In defining anArticle II “natural born Citizen,”it is important to find any authority fromthe Founding period who may inform us how the Founders and Framers themselvesdefined the clause. Who else but a highly respected historian from the Founding perioditself would be highly persuasive in telling us how the Founders and Framers defined a“natural born Citizen. ” Such an important person is David Ramsay, who in 1789 wrote,A Dissertation on the Manners of Acquiring the Character and Privileges of a Citizen(1789), a very important and influential essay on defining a “natural born Citizen.”David Ramsay (April 2, 1749 to May 8, 1815)was an American physician, patriot, andhistorian from South Carolina and a delegate from that state to the Continental Congressin 1782-1783 and 1785-1786. He was the Acting President of the United States inCongress Assembled. He was one of the American Revolution’s first major historians. Acontemporary of Washington, Ramsay writes with the knowledge and insights oneacquires only by being personally involved in the events of the Founding period. In 1785he published History of the Revolution of South Carolina (two volumes), in 1789Historyof the American Revolution (two volumes), in 1807 a Life of Washington, and in 1809 aHistory of South Carolina (two volumes). Ramsay “was a major intellectual figure in theearly republic, known and respected in America and abroad for his medical and historicalwritings, especially for The History of the American Revolution (1789)…” Arthur H.Shaffer, Between Two Worlds: David Ramsay and the Politics of Slavery, J.S.Hist., Vol.L, No. 2 (May 1984). “During the progress of the Revolution, Doctor Ramsay collectedmaterials for its history, and his great impartiality, his fine memory, and his acquaintancewith many of the actors in the contest, eminently qualified him for the task….” .
In 1965 Professor Page Smith of the University of California at Los Angeles publishedan extensive study of Ramsay's History of the American Revolution in which he stressedthe advantage that Ramsay had because of being involved in the events of which he wroteand the wisdom he exercised in taking advantage of this opportunity. “The generosity of mind and spirit which marks his pages, his critical sense, his balanced judgment andcompassion,'' Professor Smith concluded, “are gifts that were uniquely his own and thatclearly entitle him to an honorable position in the front rank of American historians.”In his 1789 article, Ramsay first explained who the “original citizens” were and thendefined the “natural born citizens” as the children born in the country to citizen parents.He said concerning the children born after the declaration of independence, “[c]itizenshipis the inheritance of the children of those who have taken part in the late revolution; butthis is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens….” 6. He added that “citizenship by inheritance belongs to none but the children of thoseAmericans, who, having survived the declaration of independence, acquired thatadventitious character in their own right, and transmitted it to their offspring….” Id. at 7.He continued that citizenship “as a natural right, belongs to none but those who havebeen born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776….” Id. at 6.Here we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential Founder defined a“natural born citizen.” Given his position of influence and especially given that he was ahighly respected historian, Ramsay would have had the contacts with other influentialFounders and Framers and would have known how they too defined “natural bornCitizen.” Ramsay, being of the Founding generation and being intimately involved in theevents of the time would have know how the Founders and Framers defined a “naturalborn Citizen” and he told us that definition was one where the child was born in thecountry of citizen parents. He giving us this definition, it is clear that Ramsay did notfollow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of nations, and Emer deVattel, who also defined a “natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his highlyacclaimed and influential,The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature,Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758French) (1759 English). We can reasonably assume that the other Founders and Framerswould have defined a “natural born Citizen” the same way the Ramsay did, for being ameticulous historian he would have gotten his definition from the general consensus thatexisted at the time.
Ramsay’s article and explication are further evidence of the influence that Vattel had onthe Founders in how they defined the new national citizenship. This article by Ramsay isone of the most important pieces of evidence recently found (provided to us by ananonymous source) which provides direct evidence on how the Founders and Framersdefined a “natural born Citizen” and that there is little doubt that they defined one as achild born in the country to citizen parents. Given this time-honored definition, which hasbeen confirmed by subsequent United States Supreme Court and some lower court casessuch as The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 289 (1814) (Marshall, C.J., concurring anddissenting for other reasons, cites Vattel and provides his definition of natural borncitizens); Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) (Justice Daniels concurring took out of Vattel’s definition the reference to “fathers” and “father” and replaced it with“parents” and “person,” respectively); Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830) (samedefinition without citing Vattel); Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 21 L.Ed. 394, 16Wall. 36 (1872) (in explaining the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment clause,“subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” said that the clause “was intended to exclude from itsoperation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States bornwithin the United States;” Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) (“the children of subjectsof any foreign government born within the domain of that government, or the childrenborn within the United States, of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreignnations” are not citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment because they are not subject tothe jurisdiction of the United States); Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875)(same definition without citing Vattel); Ex parte Reynolds, 1879, 5 Dill., 394, 402 (samedefinition and cites Vattel); United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890) (samedefinition and cites Vattel); U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) (quoted fromthe same definition of “natural born Citizen” as did Minor v. Happersett); Rep. JohnBingham (in the House on March 9, 1866, in commenting on the Civil Rights Act of 1866 which was the precursor to the Fourteenth Amendment: "[I] find no fault with theintroductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution,that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents notowing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself,a natural born citizen. . . . ” John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, March 9, 1866Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866), Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866)).Thetwo-citizen-parent requirementwould have followed from the common law thatprovided that a woman upon marriage took the citizenship of her husband. In otherwords, the Framers required both (1) birth on United States soil (or its equivalent) and (2)birth to two United States citizen parents as necessary conditions of being granted thatspecial status which under our Constitution only the President and Commander in Chief of the Military (and also the Vice President under the Twelfth Amendment) must have atthe time of his or her birth. Given the necessary conditions that must be satisfied to begranted the status, all "natural born Citizens" are "Citizens of the United States" but notall "Citizens of the United States" are "natural born Citizens." It was only through bothparents being citizens that the child was born withunity of citizenship and allegiance

tothe United States which the Framers required the President and Commander in Chief tohave.