Wednesday 30 November 2016

...And Don't Get Me Started


from teapartyorg.ning.com: ’Never mind Wisconsin. California’s Presidential vote must be disqualified’ - posted by Natl Dir. Dee - November 28/29 (orig. posted at floppingaces.net - November 28)
(“In California illegal aliens are allowed to obtain driver’s licenses. Last year California passed a “motor voter” law. It stipulates that unless the applicant opts out, the applicant will automatically be added to the voter rolls. The potential for fraud is yuuge…”)

..
Reply by Stan Stanfield 1 second ago (November 30)

This is PRECISELY why I, as a U.S. citizen and CA resident, refuse to vote.  To vote, in this state, is the equivalent of aiding and abetting the commission of a crime.  I phoned the LA County Voter Registrars Office on such questions regarding who is on our voter reg rolls, and was told that they do not vet the rolls, because "people register on penalty of perjury".  But if no one ever checks whether they HAVE committed perjury or not???  Nothing to do with them, I was told: If I want to change the law, I need to contact my Assemblyman or state Senator.  Who are both deep Democrats.  Elected by a fraudulent voting system.  Catch-22.  

I don't know why nobody is suing this state for its corruption in this matter.  (I'm on S.S., or I would.)  But if I were Trump, I would move to bar any votes from CA on federal elections until they CERTIFIABLY CLEAN THEIR VOTER  REG ROLLS, of all illegal aliens and other ineligible voters, dead voters, and duplicate/multiple voters, and REQUIRE PHOTO ID.  PERIOD.  END OF STORY.  And get rid of the hackable electronic voting machines while they are at it.  As it is, voting here is a scam and a sham, a fake and a fraud, a farce, a delusion, an illusion.  It is, simply, a crime, being enacted by this state's political prostitutes. 

Grrrrrrrrr..............................................

--

...but on a more positive note; and looking at the larger picture, that we are entering:

from eaglerising.com (via Godfather Politics News): ’Trump ‘Furious’ Over Kellyanne Conway’s Comments on Mitt Romney?’ - Philip Hodges - November 28/9

..
v steve 6 hours ago (November 29)

I wouldn't appoint or elect a Mormon to any government position, because, this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ.

The Mormon Jesus is one of a bunch of gods who began as men and attained godhood in a “celestial kingdom.” One Mormon doctrine is summarized as follows: “As man is, God once was; as God is, man may become.”

For Romney to say that Jesus is the “Savior of mankind” he is making a huge stretch to look “Christian.” Mormon salvation is essentially by works. Their 3rd article of faith states that salvation is “by obedience of the laws and ordinances of the Gospel,” not by faith in Jesus Christ.


Reply
         kibitzer3 v steve a few seconds ago  (November 30)
  • Not that it matters regarding a political position in someone's administration, but what is wrong with the concept that we, as facets, fractals, aspects, points of view - to say, the children - of our Creator Source, are gods in the making? That life is a school, and the purpose is to graduate?? Into - what, do YOU think???

The Right Stuff


from patriotsandpolitics.com: ‘Trump meeting with Goldman Sachs president’  - November 29/30
(“President-elect Donald Trump is meeting with the president of Goldman Sachs on Tuesday, according to a transition spokesman.
Sean Spicer told reporters that Trump is meeting with Gary Cohn, the president and chief operating officer at the bank, as he continues to vet potential Cabinet contenders and seeks advice on who should be in his administration…”)


NOVEMBER 30, 2016 AT 6:34 AM (November 29 PST)

This is unsettling, Goldman Sachs is the New World Order crowd in spades. Trump needs to lift his game. He’s losing it; presumably to be a president ‘for all Americans’. Which will end up with him being president for none of them, if he isn’t more careful.


And not Elaine Chao for Secretary of Transportation.  Yes, she is Mitch McConnell’s wife, and that can gain Trump some headway with the RINOs, in terms of getting some things through Congress.  But she is in bed with the Red Chinese faction that tried to gain clout in American politics via the Chinagate scandal under Bill Clinton.1  

And not Gen. Petraeus either (for Secretary of State).  Apparently a supporter of the TPP, Climate Change….links with the Bilderbergers…a real globalist???2

Let’s get clear on all this.  Nothing wrong with the idea of ’globalism’ per se.  It all depends on whose hands it would be in.  If it’s in the hands of the current den of thieves in ’charge’ of the planet  - no thanks.  

However, the move into the rightful New Order of Things is another matter entirely.  As we move into the consciousness/awareness that We Are All One.  And thus, start the move out of 3D - the realm of Duality/polarity - and into the higher realms, registers, vibrations.  Frequencies.  Resonances.  Aka dimensions.

And so, I’m not sure that Trump is the man for the job.  He is still thinking on the level of the problem.  There is a turn of the spiral going on.

The spiritual evolutionary spiral.

Further into

the Light.

And it needs those who are attuned to that Process, and Stage, to lead us into it.

Off of the Stage of The Play that we are currently still on, and in.

About to change.

For the better.

For the much, much better.

Into peace prosperity, freedom, joy, and global cooperation.

Of the right kind.


Footnotes:

1) See: wnd.com: ‘Trump Shocker!  Who Is Elaine Chao?’ - November 29


This is not draining the SWAMP!


Reply


        kibitzer3 Robert Nackman a few seconds ago (November 29)
  • It would appear so. Wanting to build paths to the RINOs in Congress is one thing (The Art of The Deal and all that). But betraying your base is another thing entirely.

  • He is walking a fine line. Let's see how this unfolds. Give him the benefit of the doubt. For now.

2) See:  the Alex Jones Channel - YouTube - November 29


Tuesday 29 November 2016

The Golden Rule, Updated...

...For Our Time And Place

  Do unto others
         regardless
       of what you
Would have them
                      do
           unto you.
               Do it
  simply because
        it is right
          to do it.

       This, to be
       in place of
   the maxim of
   our erstwhile
   masters;
               to wit:
  'Do unto others
       before they
 have a chance to
            do it
          to you.'

  And herein lies
          Truth.

Monday 28 November 2016

On Larceny, Treason, And The Corrupt Mind


from rickwells.us: ‘Bill Still - What’s Behind Soros Stein Clinton Election Recount Trickery’ - Rick Wells - November 28/9
(Still thinks that they are trying to get the Electoral votes of the 3 states in ‘play’ thrown out because the recount won’t be concluded in time, and thus deprive Trump of enough votes to be below the 270-vote threshold.  But a Republican-controlled Congress won’t go along with that, at the end of the day.  So - what gives?  My response:)   

Stan // November 29, 2016 at 9:52 am // Reply (November 28 PST)
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

These NWO people are just trying to stir up a patriot backlash so that the Usurper can declare martial law, and the consequent trashing of the Constitution, to say the rule of law. The rule of men results in Chaos. Chaos = Opportunity. Order ab Chaos = their New World Order.

Clever. But no cigar.


from conservativeamerica-online.com/AmericanConservativeNews: ‘5 Potential Trump Administration Supreme Court Picks - Diane S. Skyes [sic; act. Sykes]' - November 26

.Concerned parent 2 days ago (November 26)

I wondered if Ted Cruz may have made it on this list. Maybe Trump has another position for him.

1
Reply


         kibitzer3 Concerned parent a day ago (November 27)
  • Conservatives need to wake up to the fact that Cruz has lied to the American people about being eligible for the office of the POTUS. He is not a 'natural born' citizen. The definition of that term, as understood by the constitutional Framers, is a person "born in the country, of parents who are citizens..." (That's what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake.) And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.

  • Conservatives need to get over their infatuation with Cruz. He is a fake.
  • Reply


    • budabobnu kibitzer3 3 hours ago (November 28)

    • Cruz was Texas's Solicitor General and successfully argued every case in favor of Texas before the US Supreme Court. You are not able to do that well is you are not steeped in Constitutional Law.
    • Reply
  •                     kibitzer3 budabobnu a few seconds ago (November 28)

      • He is "steeped in Constitutional Law" as taught to him by liberal law professors like Alan Dershowitz, who believe - cynically - that the Constitution is 'a living document,' rather than the contract that it is, between the States and the federal government, which can only be amended in substantive matters - like the eligibility requirements for the office of the presidency - the way allowed for IN the contract.

      • He may have been taught that the NBC term was 'modified' by the Naturalization Act of 1790 (which Act he has in fact claimed for his stance on the issue); but if so - to give him the benefit of the doubt - he wasn't taught that that Act of Congress was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795 ON THIS VERY ISSUE, of having been misleading in its use of the NBC term; and which repeal was signed off on by no less highly authoritative sources than J. Madison, as a Congressman at the time, and G. Washington, as President. And in any event, no Act of Congress, or Resolution, or whatever, can trump the Constitution. The only thing that can trump the Constitution is a constitutional amendment (or a treaty).

      • This assault on the Constitution on this issue has been entered into by both major political parties of our day, as a self-serving illegal act; as attested to by the fact that both of them, between 2003 and '08 alone, tried a total of 8 times [between them] to get amendments started through Congress watering down this strict requirement - proposals all of which had this issue as their common denominator - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this NBC issue. So what did they do? It's obvious what they did: They colluded, in an attempt to do an end-around on the Constitution on the matter; obviously figuring that between them, they had enough control over both the judicial branch of government and the MSM that they could get away with their treacherous act. But fortunately, there have been enough true constitutionalists to blow the whistle on this audacious exercise in oneupmanship, and the alternative media to help them reach the public, to alert Americans to the hijack of their country that is in progress, and has been going on ever since the Usurper who is in that awesome position of political power ascended his throne in 2008/9.

      • It is long past time to correct this trashing of the Constitution that has taken place. Not build on the error. Which is an error, not just in "a damn piece of paper" (as the Constitution has been referred to by another corrupt president of our time). But in the very rule of law in the country. Without which, we are being governed by the rule of men. A/k/a arbitrary law. A/k/a tyranny.
--

from thecommonsenseshow.com: ‘Washington Post must retract and apologize for its completely fabricated story naming indy media websites as Russian collaborators’ - Mike Adams/NaturalNews - November 27/8
(Mike Adams & Dave Hodges looking to sue the Washington Post w/ class action lawsuits/c0-litigants.)


Stan November 29, 2016 at 12:39 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation. 

Unfortunately, Mike and Dave, suing them is what they want – they want to break you financially, through appeal after appeal, since that is the only way that they can bring you down. Don’t forget: the New World Order crowd have bottomless pockets. (That’s what the failure to audit the Fed has brought us.) They will spin this out as long as they can.

Just join in laughing THEM out of existence. Ridicule is a powerful weapon. (They know that one, too.)

--

Look to the New World Order crowd to throw everything they have at their enemies.  For otherwise, they know that their days are numbered, under the backlash of the counter-revolution to the revolution that they have engaged in.  And they can't have that.  They have planned, and waited, too long for this Opportunity: to rule the world.

And just so, the machinations to attempt to overturn the election of Trump, that Jill Stein has entered into as well.

Desperate people make desperate decisions. Look out for the lashings of their death throes.

Sunday 27 November 2016

On Getting Things Straight


1) from rickwells.us: ’Sanctuary Cities, States Could Quickly Bankrupt If They Force Trump To Withhold Funds’ - Rick Wells  - November 26/7

..
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Now let me get this straight. American citizen taxpayers are supposed to support all these illegal aliens taking ‘freebies’ on their backs, and that’s okay; but withholding American citizen taxpayers' money from these sanctuary cities is not, because, well, it just isn’t??

Why are we supposed to be slaves to the illegal aliens? Oh, I get it: it’s supposed to be some sort of ‘reparations’. I guess. What other even halfway intelligent reason could there be for it, in the liberals’ minds???

Oh, I get it further: It’s part of the Cloward-Piven Strategy to bankrupt the nation, and thus to let it fall into the hands of the New World Order crowd. Order out of Chaos, I believe it is called, and considered.

Now, THAT makes a lot of sense.

P.S. You don’t reward lawbreakers. Or what you will end up with is a nation of lawbreakers.


2) I think that we need to cut to the chase in all this putzing around, and face some brutal facts. 

Item: California is being faced with being taken out of the Union, by the New World Order forces, to be handed over to the likes of La Raza and Co.  Why?  Because TPTB can't have the U.S.A. Republic standing in their way for a global dictatorship.  They might have been able to accomplish their mission under a Hillary presidency - because that's what she wants as well; and those forces behind her were feeling their oats, of intimidation of the great American public, being controlled by the MSM arm of the takeover.  But something happened to their best-laid plans.  So they are going to their Plan B.  Which involves said breakup of the Union.  And not only with California being split off.  Eight states, mostly in the Southwest, are 'destined' to be taken over by these Dark forces.

Over my dead body.

And I don't plan on sloughing off this mortal coil just yet.


And here I was, thinking that I had returned to my old home town just to retire in the sun...

We ain't seen nothing yet, folks.  The fireworks are just beginning.

And what will win out in the end??

Love.

Not Force.

Because we live in a just universe.

Even if we are now in a false reality.

To learn lessons.

And then move on.

And Up.

Just waiting.

On the other side of the end of our contracts.

Having chosen, to be here, at this time.

To set things right.

Friday 25 November 2016

On Getting Things Right


from conservativebyte.com: 'Here’s Why the Election Results Weren’t Wrong’ - November 25 (orig. posted at Hot Air - John Sexton)
(“Yesterday I noted a story at New York magazine which reported Hillary Clinton’s senior advisers were being urged to demand a recount in three swing states which determined the outcome of the election. The basis of those requests was an analysis by University of Michigan computer scientist J. Alex Halderman who claimed to have found a discrepancy between Clinton’s performance on paper ballots compared to computer ballots. The suggestion was that maybe someone (read: Russia) had tampered with the voting machines in those states…”

..
daves 5 hours ago

The popular vote has Ms. Clinton up by more than 2 million votes now.

Reply
  • Bob G daves 4 hours ago 

  • Minus 3 million illegal alien votes.

  • 8
  • Reply


  • ourzoo10
    daves 4 hours ago 

  • At the same time it has been established that 3 million illegals and 60,000 inelligable ex-cons in Virginia voted...

  • 5
  • Reply

                   kibitzer3 ourzoo10 a few seconds ago (November 25)
    • Not to mention how many estimated millions (one source says ab. 4M) of dead and duplicate/multiple voters. And quite possibly, as another estimate has it, 3M IAs in California ALONE. (And 200,000 in Nevada, where Hillary only 'won' by 40,000 ANYWAY.)

    • As for a recount - Great: let's get it all out in the open. Including ALL the voter and electoral fraud that took place; which includes the G. Soros programmed electronic voting machines in 16 states, and other machines reported as capable of having their electronic tallies that are posted to a central tally location being intercepted, massaged, and THEN sent along their way. And then let's admit that we have allowed the voting in this country to become a scam, a sham, a fake, a fraud, a farce, a delusion, an illusion; and clean the whole thing up, and set up a true system, nationwide, with certifiably cleansed voter reg rolls, mandatory photo ID, mandatory exit polls to check the reported tallies against, receipts for one's vote, and dipping a voter's finger in purple dye if we have to, to GET THE WHOLE THING CLEANED UP. If we are going to act like children, we need to be treated like children.

    • So - thank you, Democrats, and Jill Klein, for bringing the subject up.

--

Further On Getting Things Right regarding the election;

from an article in the November issue of Whistleblower magazine entitled '2016 election rigged?  More so than Watergate' by Joseph Farah:

"...(A) major campaign theme for Hillary Clinton is doing away with all voter identification requirements, which, she suggests, "suppress" the vote.*

"Ironically, there is even a direct tie-in between Watergate and Watergate 2 [the 2016 attempted elections rigging], which I hereby dub 'Hillarygate.'  That historical and ironic link would be Hillary Clinton herself.

"Few remember, or care to remember, that HIilary Clinton played a significant role in the Watergate scandal.  Her role was scandalous itself.

"Hillary Clinton, as it turns out, was one of the staff investigators of the House Committee preparing an impeachment case against Richard Nixon, but she was fired by her boss, lifetime Democrat Jerry Zeifman, general counsel and chief of staff, for being a "liar" and "an unethical, dishonest lawyer."  He said Clinton was collaborating with allies of the Kennedys to block revelations of Kennedy-administration activities that made Watergate look like "a day at the beach."  In addition, he said, a brief Hillary wrote for the committee was so fraudulent and ridiculous, she would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

"Hillary's brief argued that Nixon did not have the right to counsel in an impeachment case because of lack of precedent.

"To make that case, Clinton ignored the then-recent impeachment case of Supreme Court Justice Willian O. Douglas, who was, indeed, allowed to have a lawyer during the impeachment attempt against him in 1970.  Zeifman claims Clinton bolstered her fraudulent brief by removing all of the Douglas case files from public access and hiding them in her office, enabling her to argue as if the case never existed."  [my emphasis]

Flagrant fraud.  And which leads ineluctably to the conclusion that she is not only a compulsive but a pathological liar and cheat.  A staunch acolyte of her mentor, Saul Alinsky, with his attitude of 'Whatever It Takes.'  'By Any Means Necessary.'  To defeat your opponent.  Because the end justifies the means. 

(Ladies: And this is the woman whom you championed for, and wanted to fill the office of, the presidency of the United States??  To represent YOU, as a woman???...)

As Farah concludes his article:

"Not much has changed in the character of Hillary Clinton since then.  In fact, her propensity to lie, cheat and steal set the stage of Hillarygate in 2016."

Indeed, Joseph.  Indeed.

And a close-run thing it was.

And not over yet.

Until

we get things

completely

right.

--

* In another article in the same issue of this magazine, Patrick Buchanan reports:

"...(I)in a private speech that netted her $225,000 from Brazilian bankers, Hillary Clinton confided that she dreams of a "common market, with open trade and open borders" from Nome, Alaska, to Patagonia."

Ah.  So, the better to hide the voting of millions of illegal aliens by a lack of voter identification requirements, eh Hill???...

Buchanan goes on, to state the obvious conclusion to all this sort of crap going on, by the Clintons and their Establishment-elite buddies:

"That would mean the end of the USA as a unique, sovereign and independent nation...."

GO TRUMP!

But to continue.

Thursday 24 November 2016

Let The Cleansing Begin


from wnd.com; ’News Conference Called On Obama’s Birth Certificate’ - Bob Unruh - November 24
(Sheriff Joe and Mike Zullo going to wrap their investigation up on December 15th…)

..
kibitzer3 a few seconds ago (November 24)

Nice, comprehensive rundown of the matter, Bob. But just for the record: this whole kerfuffle about the bc is a moot point, in actuality. He has already 'confessed' that he is not a 'natural born' citizen, by claiming that his father was a Kenyan national. He was toast, right there. The definition of a 'natural born citizen':

"The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens..." It's from the definitive tome of the day of the constitutional Framers on such matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations, Or Principles of Natural Law'. And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.

The Republican honchos have failed to act on this historical fact because they wanted to run their OWN candidates through that breach in the wall of the Constitution on this issue - as subsequently evidenced in the candidacies this time around of Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal: not a nbc among them. And there is proof that both major political parties KNEW the truth in this matter, by the fact that between them, between 2003 and '08 alone, they tried a total of 8 times to get an amendment starting through Congress to water down this strict requirement (proposals all of which had this matter as their common denominator) - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around this issue.

Trump needs to 'drain the swamp' for far more reason than he has alluded to so far. For the sake of the rule of law in this country - its Constitution, to be anything other than a dead letter. Or we are being ruled rather by the rule of men. Aka arbitrary law. Aka tyranny.



I find it impossible to believe that a married U.S citizen couple, on a cruise ship, afloat in the middle of the ocean, and the wife gives birth there. That child is NOT a U.S. citizen, I don't believe that. Is that child then considered to be a citizen of the ocean? How about a U.S. citizen woman, in the military, married to a U.S. citizen, and she is serving over seas when she gives birth. Same questions as above. How about a U.S. citizen couple on vacation abroad, and the woman gives birth??? Of what country are these babies considered a citizen and why? Why would they not be U.S. citizens? Irv.

Reply


          kibitzer3 Irv Cohn a few seconds ago 
  • Being born 'on the soil' has been construed to mean as well if born offshore while the parents were on official government business, as in a diplomatic mission or at a military post. Other such factors, such as being born "in the middle of the ocean," I don't know the specifics of, regarding the difference between being a nbc and simply a citizen. I DO know that Cruz tried to use the Naturalization Act of 1790, which covered some of these points, as a rationale for claiming nbc citizenship - but failed to let the public know that that Act, which was misleading in its use of the nbc term, was repealed OVER THIS VERY ISSUE by the Naturalization Act of 1795 - which both J. Madison, as a Congressman at the time, and G. Washington, as President, signed off on. In any event, the salient point, in being considered to be born 'natural born,' is the citizenship of the parents. Both parents. Which is PARTICULARLY what makes it 'natural,' for heaven's sake. NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Born with SOLE ALLEGIANCE, to the U.S., in this case.

  • Which the Usurper has certainly proven, and in spades, that he does not have.

Also in 1875 the US Supreme ct ruled in Minor V Happersett that the founders meant That a Natural Born Citizen was a child born to ParentS who were US citizens.So Both parents have to be citizens for the child to be a natural born citizen and the supreme ct HAS ruled on this and everyone who says they havent is a liar.


    • Very good point, dazie1. For a fuller rundown on the history of this matter, see:

      puzo1dotblogspotdotcom. Also: unslaveamericadotcom.
    ..
    gman1234a 2 hours ago (November 24)

    Too late...He already fukked us good.

    3
    Reply

    • kibitzer3
      gman1234a a few seconds ago (November 24)

    • But when justice catches up with the Usurper, all the legislation that he signed into law, and all the E.O.'s and P.D.'s that he issued, and all the appointments that he made - including to the SCOTUS, and lesser courts - go with him, into the trash bin. It is to be as if he were never there. For he has never been there legally.

    • All it takes is for the American people - through their oath keepers; with patriots having their backs - to rise to the occasion. Which is quite the occasion. But then, I am of the opinion that it is why we have incarnated at this time. We, who want to see Justice done, in this extremely important regard. To get this nation back on track. As the flagship of the fleet of nation-states to sail this planet's peoples into a New World.

    • Enough of this corrupt crap. It's time for a cleansing. On all levels.
    ---

    As reports continue about foreign troops on our soil, practicing anti-guerilla warfare techniques...

    ...and about California 'looking' to secede from the Union, under the aegis of its governor, who has overseen the invasion of the state by illegal aliens, in furthering the agenda of the New World Order crowd.  Who must still be feeling cocky, even with the outcome of the elections.  Although said outcomes are being challenged, by the pro-Hillary camp.  She of the serial criminal and habitual, even compulsive, if not downright pathological lying mentality......

    This may still be a close-run thing.  No matter what some channelers say.  Who seem to be 'tasting' victory of the Light.

    Let's see how this plays out.  And in the meantime:

    keep putting good vibes out there.  To counter the darkening that is taking place.

    With - or at least: as they say - its being darkest just before

    the dawn.

    Of a New Day.

    For ALL of humanity.

    Who choose to go into it.

    As I say:

    Enough of this corrupt crap.

    It's time for a cleansing.  

    On all levels.