Monday 14 January 2019

A Matter Of Principle And Disgust


So the New York Times - ‘All The News That’s Print To Fit,’ I think is how their motto goes.  Something like that - is attempting to make something of a nothing burger, re the ’Russian Collusion Delusion’ caper that the fake news - excuse me; the Mainstream Media - has been pushing so relentlessly and assiduously, like a barrow uphill.  

Hey.  Let me tell you the kind of news that we should be hearing about.  The kind that a federal judge has called ’shocking,’ involving “doublespeak” and ‘word games,’ and who even used the word ”loathsome” in describing one part of the matter.  It is contained in an article in the current issue of ‘Verdict,’ the monthly newsletter of Judicial Watch, the pre-eminent watchdog of the federal government, calling out both sides of the political aisle for their chicanery and deceit.  The article is titled ‘Federal Judge ‘Shocked’ Clinton Aide Granted Immunity By [Obama] Justice Department, and subtitled ‘Court criticizes State Department for providing false statements on Clinton emails’ that JW was forced to file a lawsuit to obtain, by the State Department’s intransigence, and then, as the federal District Court judge in the matter came to realize and called them on, lied about.

How lied?  By - well; listen to this exchange.  From a hearing on this matter this past October, when an irate federal judge called the lawyer from the State Department on that department’s chicanery and deceit in the matter at hand in his court:

The Court: The State Department told me that it had produced all records when it moved for summary judgment [i.e., to dismiss JW’s lawsuit] and you filed that motion.  That was not true when that motion was filed.

Mr. Prince: At that time, we had produced all —

The Court: It was not true.

Mr. Prince: Yes, it was — well, Your Honor, it might be that our search could be found to be inadequate, but that declaration was absolutely true.

The Court: It was not true.  It was a lie.

Mr. Prince: It was not a lie, Your Honor.

The Court: What — that’s doublespeak.

                 ***

Mr. Prince: There’s strong precedent saying that items not in the State’s possession do not need to be searched…

The Court: And that’s because the Secretary was doing this on a private server?  So it wasn’t in the State’s possession?…So you’re playing the same word game she played?”


He may be a Prince of a fellow.  But he is a shyster lawyer; especially considering the gravity of the case.  Especially considering that factor, this is more than a case of simply being ‘economical with the truth’.  This is a matter of outright national security.  And the State Department signed off on the coverup. 

And not just the Obama State Department.  This exchange took place this past October.  Thus, we are talking about Obama State Department carryovers.

Don’t just drain the swamp of outright saboteurs, Pres. Trump.  The high-level Deep State actors, in this farce that is going on, regarding the attempted taking-down of this country.

Clean out the simply miserable misfits, too.

Misfits, in a nation conceived as this one was.  In its founding principles.

Which we are just about to get back to.

Just about.

And not soon enough, in my opinion.  And my Verdict.


No comments: