On Getting Blue In The Face

I have just received in the daily mail a Survey from the (very conservative) Heritage Foundation and covering-letter request to rejoin their ranks.  Those latter are my words.  The actual wording of the letter (I am making a point of this distinction, for a reason that will shortly become apparent) is to a potential member of their ranks, gleaned from some conservative mailing list or another.  Their computer doesn't recognize me as a former member, and it is not the first time that 'they' are - in effect - still trying to entice me back into their fold.

They talk a good talk.  But as I have just said to 'them' (again; if not in these precise words, at least the same sentiment) at the bottom of the Survey, after dutifully filling it out (which was full of talking points to and for a conservative this time, in a sort of bookend to the same sort of thing I filled out yesterday in reply to the SPLC; this one basically in support of the U.S. Constitution, i.e., limited government and more freedom/opportunity, etc.):

"Alas, when the HF failed to call BHO on his ineligibility for the office of POTUS - for not being a 'natural born' citizen* - the country got derailed from its rule of law, and entered Relativist Country.

"'If Not You, Who?'

My footnote reads as follows:

"* is a person 'born in the country, of parents who are citizens' thereof.  The definition of a NBC that the constitutional Framers were aware of - & still an eligibility requirement for that particular office absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary."

Which failure on their part - as a leading conservative organization in the country; and proud of its role in influencing governmental policy - has led us ineluctably into the likes of the current Democrat Party's Impeachment of Pres. Trump: not for any actual, constitutional Impeachment offenses on his part, but for purely partisan purposes.  And they hoped to get away with their chicanery and deceit.  Because they have been led to think that they might be able to.  Because their charges, in their 'relativist' minds, were 'close enough'.  Were, quote, "akin" to criminal conduct.  And that should be enough to do the job.  Right?  Because after all, that is the sort of climate in the country.

All is relative.

Relative, to who has the power.

And over sufficient enough of the Congressional representative, and the brainwashed public - via their 'liberal' education ideologues, and the majority of the MSM - to carry the deceit off.

And just so, have we come down to our day.

Of

Reckoning.


P.S. And as I have also said before: Am I totally a supporter of Pres. Trump?  No.  There are a number of his and his administration's policies that I object to.  His seemingly 'all-in' support for 5G, for example, when there is already available evidence in to show cause for caution in its rollout, on health issues.  And the same for GMOs.  And fracking (against which I have today sent support to Food & Water Watch, in evidencing cause for concern on health issues there, too).  And the U.S. sovereignty-destroying aspects in the recently passed and signed into law of the USMCA Trade Agreement.  But, you see,  we are involved in a Process, of unfoldment of consciousness; whereby there is some 'truth' on both sides of the 'aisle'.  As we get to a state, and stage, of
     Synthesis.
     And not just as a precursor to another round of unfoldment of consciousness.  But as
     The Last Frontier.
     Novus Ordo Spiritus.
     The Best of Both.
     To say as well:
     Not Either/Or.  But
     Both/And.
      And so: Getting both Blue and Red in the face.
     Blue, from arguing.
     And Red.  From, perhaps, not acknowledging sufficiently in these pages
     that I am not 'just' a conservative.
     That both sides of the current standoff have elements of truth -
     and of Truth itself -
     in their positions.
     As we all go Up, now.
     All those who choose to, that is.
     As it ever was.