Saturday 21 July 2012

9/11 And Its Aftermath

I have been reading Dr. Judy Wood's book on 9/11 entitled 'Where Did the Towers Go?'  It is riveting; eyeopening; comprehensive.  She has made her case well. Her case, that a major new technology was involved in bringing down the towers that day.  Well; new to the public.  Which doesn't know, yet, what all was involved in that atrocity, or any other such assaults on humanity that may have been going on since the advent of such technology - whenever that was.

HAARP we know something about. (Although not everything. There is talk of its having been employed in the Fukashima disaster.  All of this needs to come out.)  The technology employed in the takedown of the 9/11 towers appears to be of another, different, order, involving torsion laws of physics, and such.

A brief background to that story, before I get to the 'Aftermath' part of this blog.

I did some careful net surfing in the aftermath of 9/11, trying to find out where the questions were going/leading to.  For I knew, from the evidence of my own eyes, that there was 'something wrong with this picture'.  Those 'collapses' were NOT just due to jet airline fuel fires and gravity/structural collapses.  They were of a different order. Entirely different.   Something never seen before.  Absolute dustification of concrete and office equipment and everything: Who was kidding whom.

When Prof. Steven Jones came out with his evidence of thermite having been present, I followed that argument.  It was in following those links that I came across a video interview with Dr. Wood, and her theory of some sort of Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) having been used.  The interviewer set out to make fun of her - which he shared with his live audience, and us in cyberspace, before she joined him on stage.  He was some sort of expert; I was willing to listen to his case.  But there was something wrong with that picture, too.  When she had made her case for serious anomalies in the official story, and asked a simple question: Where did the towers go?, he wrapped up his attempted demolition of her by showing pictures of the Ground Zero site in the aftermath, with a big pile of rubble.  But wait a minute - these were two towers, over 100 stories tall.  Wouldn't the expected pile of rubble be even higher than that??  And just what was behind all that dust, wafting away and spreading across the whole Eastern seaboard???...

I had to leave the investigation at that, with other things going on in my life; but every once in awhile, in the years following, I would 'check in' on the discussion.  It seemed to be heading in the direction of Prof. Jones's thermite factor, and that would indeed be an important piece of the picture to investigate more deeply.  And I subscribed to the 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' site, and figured they would be my best bet to keep an eye on, for the truth to come out.  After all, these were experts, and they weren't buying the official story; good for them.  For obviously, the public was being bamboozled in this matter.

Part of it would have to do with the Bush/Cheney administration, and the Neocon's desire for U.S. hegemony/imperialism, to protect 'little' Israel from its neighbor enemies, and thus neither of those 'camps' being above creating the circumstances for a War on Terror, and the making of a lot of money for crony buddies if nothing else.*  And there was the curious business of the Bush family having connections with the security agencies of the twin towers, and with at least one of the airports in question; plus, the outlandish business of Mossad agents across the river, dancing in glee and taking pictures of the towers and their demise, and being released and returning to Israel as heroes.  What did they all know, and when did they know it; etc. etc.  But there was also the curious business of the Left being involved: a fellow, calling himself a 'forensic economist' by the name of David Hawkins at a site called hawk's cafe had an interesting take on the caper, too, that involved people like George Soros and Maurice Strong, former CIA chief John Deutsch, Noam Chomsky (with his belief in 'anarchic syndicalism'), Mafia types in Montreal, the Clintons, and even Michelle Robinson and her husband-to-be, Barack Obama.  Clearly, this was a major subject area.

And then just recently I happened across a radio interview on the Internet with Dr. Wood, wherein she outlined her findings from her book, titled, appropriately enough: 'Where Did The Towers Go?'  She had, obviously, stayed with her original hypothesis; and now had fleshed it out.

I listened.  I bought.  I read.  I am convinced.

I won't go into all that evidence here.  Just to point out that it involves a major coverup by powerful players.  Not just those behind the BBC - whose TV network broadcast the 'collapse' of WTC7 20 minutes before it had actually done so (appearing through the studio window behind their on-the-spot news commentator, until somebody caught it and quickly closed down the trans-Atlantic link). But the particularly damning fact that there was a major hurricane off the coast of New York City right at that time,** and no TV station showed it on their weather reports that morning.  We're talking a major factor, here, in that dark business of that day; for, any 'directed energy weapon' capable of all the curious anomalies of that day - some cars in the wider EM field flipped over, some not; some 'burning' but not by hot flames; material being dissociated down to its atomic level; etc. etc. - would have to have had a source of an electromagnetic input, and there it was, right off the coast: a hurricane, that creates some of those very effects, by their torsion physics.

And so much for that day's appalling theatrics having been the result of the work of 19 terrorists with box cutters.

And I say 'theatrics', because it was a play, put on for the public.  To 'ooh' and 'ahh'.  And not notice the man behind the curtain.

A dark, dark day, in mankind's history.

Which - for whatever all karmic reasons - was needed.

For it is the darkest before the dawn.


And of such a new day, I append below a contribution I made today to an article on the Internet.  Carried by Western Journalism, it was titled 'Columnist Goes Ballistic Over Arpaio Investigation'.  (A columnist for the Washington Times finally made some mainstream-media noise over the whole Obama Birth Certificate brouhaha.  The Washington Times may not be major mainstream.  But it's a start.)



kibitzer2 says:                     

Daniel,

Thank you for this video, and article. But be aware that you have jumped to a conclusion: Just because the BC is, as it very well appears to be, a forgery, does not mean that Obama is a “foreigner”. He could very well turn out to BE, after all, a ‘natural born Citizen’; if his real father was the ‘Frank’ of his (or his and Ayers’s) autobio – i.e., Frank Marshall Davis, as a recent book makes a good case for (‘Dreams from My Real Father’, by Joel Gilbert). Or even if he is the son of Malcolm X, as a blogger has made a case for. Either way, the point is that the BC released to the public is, then, without a doubt, a forgery; and under the circumstances, it is a felony. And it is even that alone that strips the man called Obama of any legitimacy for being in that office. So he needs to be impeached right there – as an example, if nothing else, that the American people will still hold faith with the rule of law.
If he were indeed the son of the Kenyan brought into this murky picture – as he claims – he is, of course, ineligible for that particular office right there, and is, then, already an ‘illegal’ – a usurper in the office; and needs to go/be pressured to go from that fact alone. So he is a criminal either way – which he has brought upon himself. With, obviously, the help of shadowy others; who also need to be brought to justice.
As for some less ‘shadowy others’: the Congress is proving itself to be an accessory both to and after the fact of this crime. So Sheriff Arpaio is in error to think to turn this matter over either to them, or to the Department of Justice – itself an accessory to this crime. All three branches of the federal government are involved in this crime, of major, constitutional proportions. So the answer to the conundrum is clear: there needs to be a march on Washington of The People, Assembled – led by Oathkeepers, both retired and current, and right behind them the militias of the several States, and right behind them such citizens as Second Amendmenters and Tenth Amendmenters and Article Twoers and Tea Partiers and yes, those of the Occupy Movement who realize the danger of having a person in the presidential office who is assuming dictatorial powers & don’t want the country turned into an empire; and all others of the citizenry who are mad as hell and aren’t going to take it anymore – to stay there, in organized relays, and in nonviolent civil disobedience, until the Usurper vacates the office; also dissolving the Congress – as its employers – for its complicity in this crime, and appointing an Officer OF The People, who will call for elections within a time certain (say, 90 to 120 days), and in the meantime, clean out the Augean stables of the executive branch of government of all those appointees who don’t pass the smell test (as in corruption); the Supreme Court and lesser courts being bypassed in all this, for not having allowed The People their day in court in this matter. Justice denied being injustice.
Those Congresspersons who can prove, in a cleansed court of law, that they were not guilty of any crime in this matter – either by commission or omission – can, of course, stand for re-election in those elections. If such there need be. For what this is all a signal of, as well as of the depth of corruption that the nation’s politics has sunk to, is the end of ‘business as usual’ – as well in the ‘business’/banking sector itself, with all the information coming out about how corrupt THAT sector of society has become. And therefore, it is time for a systemic change. And now, for the planet as a whole.
For that is where we have come to. The end of the current road. And the beginning of another, higher one.
Some have called it the New Age. Some, The Great Turning. Some, the Golden Age. By whatever name, it will smell as sweet. The end of corruption. And the beginning of an Ascension process; to a higher level of civilization than any heretofore, on lovely old, beleaguered old, planet Earth.
For our having learned our lessons, well.
And the sooner, the better.
This lovely planet – and the people on it – asking of us, now, our best.
No longer our worst.
Been there. Done that. It’s time for a change, all right.
Just REAL change, this time.

--

I think I'll let any further comment go for now.  It's hard enough to stay positive, after being immersed back in the atrocity of 9/11 in the reading of Dr. Wood's book, as it is.

But positive I will remain.

For it is all - all - for a reason.

Which we just don't know all the reasons for, yet.

But we will.

For, that is where we are headed:

the truth.

Of things.

Of it all.


---


footnotes:


* See President Eisenhower's Farewell Address, with its warning about the 'military-industrial complex'.  See also Marine Gen. Smedley Butler's 1930s book 'War Is a Racket'.  See also Prof. Carroll Quigley's monumental tome 'Tragedy And Hope'.  Among other good sources, on the subject of the Powers That Be.  Or, as David Wilcock likes to characterize them these days: the Powers That Were.


** which then, immediately upon making its contribution to the cause of the Dark Forces behind that caper, turned on its heel and started moving briskly out to sea; in an abrupt move that would have drawn attention to it, if its presence had been allowed to be known that day.

No comments: